Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Air / Naval Operations >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues Page: <<   < prev  25 26 [27] 28 29   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/21/2014 2:03:21 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11531
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline
Weird I updated the Chin Yang last night with that although dated much earlier.

Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to e2204588)
Post #: 781
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/21/2014 3:06:32 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11531
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pergite!


quote:

ORIGINAL:

Would need to make a change to our database architecture or would cost of us probably 40+ hours in copying and pasting for what is more or less a cosmetic change of text line. Sorry this is probably not in the cards at this point. Time->value thing.

Trucks and None bit logged.

Thanks!

Mike



I totally agree!
I will however then make a list of suggestions for generic ground units that would be suitable to add to beef up the custom options. It's also in that department that I have encountered the nation specific unit class names.
Any inputs on my previous request to give small arms the possibility to target and destroy aircraft?




Yeah that would be great. FWIW I've added some of Mark's tanks to that list in an upcoming updated.

Guys we've got to really balance our time for now until we hit some goals after that we can attack some of these other projects. I do have a short list of db specific things I want too but have to wait. We'll get there though so please be patient with us.

Mike


_____________________________


(in reply to Pergite!)
Post #: 782
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/22/2014 6:54:57 PM   
Lnestig

 

Posts: 36
Joined: 12/20/2012
Status: offline
I belive you have to redo the THAAD Battery.

A THAAD Battery consists of six truck-mounted M1075 launchers, 48 interceptors (8 per launcher), a THAAD Fire Control and Communications (TFCC) unit aka Tactical Station Group (TSG), and one AN/TPY-2 radar.

http://www.bga-aeroweb.com/Defense/THAAD.html
http://defense-update.com/20120817_thaad-3.html#.U6cmVPl_t8E

(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 783
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/22/2014 11:31:20 PM   
MR_BURNS2


Posts: 974
Joined: 7/18/2013
From: Austria
Status: offline
#2871 - F-104G Starfighter [CF-104C] -- Norway (Royal Air Force), 1978-1982, 19x, 334 Sqn, Anti-Ship & Strike, Refitted with Gun and other RNoAF AC

Small Typo, add "Norwegian" between "Royal" and "Air Force", or maybe just Air Force as in other RNoAF AC?

< Message edited by MR_BURNS2 -- 6/23/2014 12:35:13 AM >


_____________________________

Windows 7 64; Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz (8 CPUs), ~2.7GHz; 6144MB RAM; NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970;



(in reply to Lnestig)
Post #: 784
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/23/2014 12:32:31 AM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11531
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline
All issues logged.

Thanks!

Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to MR_BURNS2)
Post #: 785
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/24/2014 2:57:27 AM   
Mgellis


Posts: 1832
Joined: 8/18/2007
Status: offline

The addition of a truly generic infantry platoon makes the following a low priority request, as these can easily be simulated with the generic platoon, but I wonder if some of the nations more likely to be involved in military actions or peacekeeping missions (e.g., France, Japan, India, Greece, etc.) should have their own Inf Plt units added? Just a thought.


(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 786
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/24/2014 3:06:06 AM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11531
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline
Yeah I've got a small project lined up for that. Want to increase ammo, evaluate fc systems a do a few other things.
Right now though getting 1.04 out is priority.

Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to Mgellis)
Post #: 787
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/24/2014 3:20:32 PM   
Coiler12

 

Posts: 884
Joined: 10/13/2013
Status: offline
When you have the time:

Under-development Russian air-to-ground missiles: Wiki page, Manufacturer page.


(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 788
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/24/2014 7:36:04 PM   
mats0916@rogers.com


Posts: 67
Joined: 6/17/2014
From: Sweden
Status: offline
Hello!

I would like to request the change of swedish airforce turn-around times. The SwAF ground crews have a turn-around time for refueling and rearming of 10 minutes for empty/ferry and AAW loads, 15 minutes for reconnaissance and 30 minutes for attack load-outs. Be it on regular bases or dispersed war time bases. Is this something that can be reflected in the databases? This was ordered 1958 and was introduced in the years coming. Still valid for the maintenance today.

_____________________________

Cheers,
Mats

(in reply to Coiler12)
Post #: 789
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/25/2014 6:54:01 AM   
MR_BURNS2


Posts: 974
Joined: 7/18/2013
From: Austria
Status: offline
#1565 - AV-8B Harrier II [Day-Only] -- United States (Marine Corps), 1986 and all other AV-8B variants as well:

Mk83 LDGP, Short-Range Loadout has 4 Bombs + droptanks, i suppose the droptank stations are needed for the extra bombs for short range loadout, i.e. remove droptanks from Mk83 short range loadouts.

_____________________________

Windows 7 64; Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz (8 CPUs), ~2.7GHz; 6144MB RAM; NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970;



(in reply to mats0916@rogers.com)
Post #: 790
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/26/2014 3:41:06 AM   
Gunner98

 

Posts: 3385
Joined: 4/29/2005
From: The Great White North!
Status: offline
DB# 948 - F450 Elli[Kortenaer] Greece 92- Should be able to carry AB212 ASW or EW Helo but cannot as the pad and hanger are for small AC only. I think the solution is to change the pad and hanger to med size AC.

Source: Jane's 91-92 & http://www.hellas.org/military/navy/#kortenaer

thanks

B



< Message edited by Gunner98 -- 6/26/2014 4:41:51 AM >

(in reply to MR_BURNS2)
Post #: 791
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/27/2014 5:10:37 AM   
MR_BURNS2


Posts: 974
Joined: 7/18/2013
From: Austria
Status: offline
#1058 - AT-16 Scallion [9K121 Vikhr] DB states speed of 500 knots, websites say 600-610 meters per second!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9K121_Vikhr

http://www.airwar.ru/weapon/aat/vichr.html





_____________________________

Windows 7 64; Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz (8 CPUs), ~2.7GHz; 6144MB RAM; NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970;



(in reply to Gunner98)
Post #: 792
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/27/2014 7:07:50 AM   
Barny23


Posts: 123
Joined: 11/1/2012
From: Denmark
Status: offline
This one is sadly missing in DB3000
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knud_Rasmussen-class_patrol_vessel
Best data in Danish
http://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knud_Rasmussen-klassen
2 twin MU90 Impact ASW-torpedo launchers
12× RIM-162 Evolved Sea Sparrow
Barny




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Barny -- 6/27/2014 8:49:49 AM >

(in reply to MR_BURNS2)
Post #: 793
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/27/2014 8:22:52 AM   
Dide


Posts: 128
Joined: 5/10/2009
From: Italy
Status: offline
Already asked, but very important to scenarios of the Black Sea, the SIGINT ship Elettra (Italian Navy).
Thanks.

(in reply to Barny23)
Post #: 794
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/27/2014 3:17:35 PM   
Coiler12

 

Posts: 884
Joined: 10/13/2013
Status: offline
Some North Korean issues (albeit always highly speculative):

The update says the Najin with Kh-35s was added, but I don't see it in the database.

For something carrying an ASW helicopter, the new Nampo (#2626) doesn't have any ASW capability of its own. No sonar and no ASW weapons. The article showing it indicates positions for four RBU-1200 launchers.

< Message edited by Coiler12 -- 6/27/2014 4:18:09 PM >

(in reply to Dide)
Post #: 795
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/27/2014 4:50:51 PM   
AlmightyTallest

 

Posts: 279
Joined: 2/25/2014
Status: offline
Would it be possible to make the 5"/45 guns on the US Aegis ships more capable vs. missile threats by adding more ammunition types?

http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/logistics_material_readiness/acq_bud_fin/SARs/2012-sars/13-F-0884_SARs_as_of_Dec_2012/Navy/DDG_51_December_2012_SAR.pdf

This unclassified Congressional report dated 2013 claims the following on page 4:

quote:

Flight IIA ships have introduced new capabilities, Cooperative Engagement Capability (CEC) and a MK-45
Gun that will provide improved air and anti-missile defense
and improved land attack.



And this .pdf BAE brochure showcasing the gun system: http://www.baesystems.com/download/BAES_100639/mk-45-naval

Mentions proximity (VTF and IR) and electronically settable
(ESF) fuzes fuses for the 5" rounds.

The IR fuse is interesting, and other info here: http://defensetech.org/2012/12/06/more-precision-for-navy-guns/

quote:

U.S. Navy combat ships equipped with 5-inch guns are about to get more lethal. Next fall, ATK will begin delivering the new Multi-Option Fuze, Navy, or MOFN, for ammunition fired from MK 45 weapon systems.
Army Contracting Command just awarded ATK a five-year contract worth $84 million to produce the MK 437 MOFN for the Navy. The Army’s Joint Products Office manages the program for the Navy.
These specialized fuzes provide proximity, precision time, delay and point detonating impact options in a single fuze, ATK officials maintain. The inductive fuze setting feature also optimizes MOFN for use with automated ammunition handling equipment. MOFN will be used on projectiles fired in the MK 45 Single Lightweight Gun Mount on Navy cruisers and destroyers.


Read more: http://defensetech.org/2012/12/06/more-precision-for-navy-guns/#ixzz35rA629z9
Defense.org



http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNUS_5-62_mk45.htm


quote:

Mark 116 HE-VT - 69.7 lbs. (31.6 kg)
Mark 127 HE-CVT - 68.6 lbs. (31.1 kg)
Mark 156 HE-IR - 69.0 lbs. (31.3 kg)


These proximity type or IR guided fuses might be used in anti-missile defense as a hard kill system.

There's also an anti-ship anti-ground cargo DPICM type 5" round mentioned in the link above.

More info on the MFF or Multi Function 5" fuse here:

http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2011fuze/SessionIVAChapman.pdf

http://lem.nioa.com.au/products/view/279/42/munitions/atk/atk-multi-fuction-fuse-mk419

quote:

The U.S. Navy uses ATK's MK419 Multi-Function Fuze for 5″/54, 5″62 and 76 mm ammunition. The fuze provides point-detonation, electronic (variable) time, and height-of-burst, air (proximity) and autonomous modes. The MK419 operates in autonomous mode for gun systems without a fuze setter in development.
Key Features

Ability to engage Fast Attack Craft (FAC) which provide a serious threat to Navy ships
Engagement of very small Radar Cross Section (RCS) targets
“Use-As-Is” existing MFF AIR Mode fuzing capabilities
Engagement range from 1400ft to 9500 yards
Ability to engage targets in various sea states


More info on the 5" gun for self defense as well as other range info here:

http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2005garm/thursday/steelman.pdf




There's not just hard kill options for defense of the ship.

New Mk-59 decoy system







http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=78320

quote:

The system itself consists of a deck-mounted launch tube similar to the SLQ-49 "Rubber Duck" system phased out in the 1990s. Upon firing, the decoy automatically inflates on the surface beside the ship and floats freely past the stern to effectively counteract inbound threats. The advanced system offers increased defense capability against modern anti-ship missile threats, providing additional protection for the U.S. and its allies.

Ramage is the first ship to receive the Mk 59 installation, with additional surface combatants scheduled for the next five years.






< Message edited by AlmightyTallest -- 6/27/2014 7:34:10 PM >

(in reply to Dide)
Post #: 796
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/27/2014 8:28:39 PM   
Mgellis


Posts: 1832
Joined: 8/18/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mikmyk


quote:

ORIGINAL: navyrecognition

quote:

ORIGINAL: mikmyk

mikmyk
Hi All

Need some help digging up info to complete some of your requests. Combat Fleets 2013 and googling isn't coming up with much:

Indonesian missile boat KRI Clurit (KRC-40 Class)

Anybody know the sensors these vessels carry?

Australia- Stonefish Mk. III fine. Lots of Mk.II out there but not so much on Mk.III any details would help.

Myanmar- Aung Zeya Frigates- Need sensor info. Vast differences between internet sources and paper sources on what SSM's are carried.

Thanks!

Mike

I attended a defense trade show in Indonesia a couple years ago and I know for a fact that several sensors onboard are Chinese and not "integrated". I have a few pictures of the vessel, would that help you? If yes, PM or email me.
Edit: I may even have the manufacturer's datasheet, but not much info on it IIRC


Yeah anything you could share would be great. Thanks!

Mike


Another addition for Myanmar, perhaps...it is unclear if this is a separate class or not (maybe it is just the "flight II" ships in this class?)

Kyan Sittha-class frigate
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyan_Sittha-class_frigate


(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 797
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/27/2014 8:47:50 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11531
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline
Mark forgot to pm you but we added a ton our your requests.

Myanmar I've kind started on but tons of gaps in published data so sorry to say it will take some time for us as we've got to look at pictures and try and piece lots of different things together.

Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to Mgellis)
Post #: 798
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/27/2014 10:18:49 PM   
Mgellis


Posts: 1832
Joined: 8/18/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mikmyk

Mark forgot to pm you but we added a ton our your requests.

Myanmar I've kind started on but tons of gaps in published data so sorry to say it will take some time for us as we've got to look at pictures and try and piece lots of different things together.

Mike


No problem. When I looked for information on the frigate, I saw how little was available, although perhaps various reference works have more data, so I figured it might be a while. Thanks.


(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 799
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/27/2014 10:19:30 PM   
Mgellis


Posts: 1832
Joined: 8/18/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mikmyk

Mark forgot to pm you but we added a ton our your requests.



Yes, I saw. Thank you!



(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 800
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/27/2014 10:34:36 PM   
Mgellis


Posts: 1832
Joined: 8/18/2007
Status: offline
Minor corrections, when you have time...

A few aircraft are listed as only having training loadouts. However, some of them are armed, and some are unarmed but can carry light weapons. Please add appropriate loadouts when it is possible to do so. (I figure these might come into play as COIN aircraft with small countries, or possibly even a couple of unarmed ones purchased by a private citizen who turns out to be drug lord with the money to retrofit them with guns, etc.) Thanks.

T-50 Golden Eagle
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KAI_T-50_Golden_Eagle <-- 20 mm. cannon, can carry sidewinders, rockets, GP bombs, etc.

Lockheed T-33 <-- hardpoints for two bombs up to 1,000-lbs. or two rocket pods, AT-33 armed with 2 machine guns, too.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_T-33

Embraer EMB 312 Tucano/T-27 <-- four hardpoints, up to 1,000-kg. of bombs, rockets, or gun pods (not sure if this is the T-27 or the AT-27, though)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embraer_EMB_312_Tucano

No rush on these, but definitely something I could use in some scenarios I'm thinking about. Thanks!


(in reply to Mgellis)
Post #: 801
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/27/2014 10:57:52 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11531
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline
All requests logged. Thanks guys!

Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to Mgellis)
Post #: 802
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/28/2014 5:05:48 AM   
Mgellis


Posts: 1832
Joined: 8/18/2007
Status: offline

A low priority request...

Inf Platoon (France)

Technically, in any scenario this can be handled with the Inf Platoon (Generic) and the Rename function, so there is really no rush on this one. This is a purely cosmetic addition to the DB. But it just seemed odd that of all the nations that have infantry platoons included, the DB3000 does not have one for the French. (There is a forward observer section and a mech infantry platoon, but not a plain old infantry platoon.)

Of course, one could make a case for adding various other nations, too, based on global importance and/or historical combat experience: India, Japan, Italy, Egypt, etc. But I would start with France.

Thanks.






(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 803
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/28/2014 5:31:42 AM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5690
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Coiler12

Some North Korean issues (albeit always highly speculative):

The update says the Najin with Kh-35s was added, but I don't see it in the database.

For something carrying an ASW helicopter, the new Nampo (#2626) doesn't have any ASW capability of its own. No sonar and no ASW weapons. The article showing it indicates positions for four RBU-1200 launchers.


The Najin info cannot possibly be correct, those ships don't sail anymore. Seems the RBU-1200 on the Nampo were indeed SS-N-25.

Thanks!

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to Coiler12)
Post #: 804
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/28/2014 10:13:38 PM   
Rudd

 

Posts: 1501
Joined: 7/10/2013
Status: offline
AN/ASQ-236 radar pod

Nothing in works that needs this pod, take your time

Classified...very little searchable info

quote:

The ASQ-236 is a tactical Ku-band AESA radar pod.

It offers all-weather multi-target detection, track, & engagement and complements other sensor fields of regard.

from http://www.northropgrumman.com/Capabilities/ASQ236AESARadarPod/Pages/default.aspx

quote:

General Characteristics
Primary function: Precision geo-location and non-traditional intelligence, reconnaissance and surveillance
Prime Contractor: Northrop Grumman Corporation
Length: 130 inches (3.302 meters)
Diameter: 20 inches (0.508 meters)
Weight: 1, 000 pounds (454 kilograms)
Aircraft: F-15E
Date Deployed: June 2009
Inventory: Classified

from http://www.af.mil/AboutUs/FactSheets/Display/tabid/224/Article/104604/anasq-236-radar-pod.aspx

Not too many pics with a quick search, but here are a few, I think




B-52H testing/integration 2014, for possible Pacific maritime role

http://www.afrc.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123415848 (w/ photos)
https://medium.com/war-is-boring/transforming-a-b-52-into-a-maritime-patrol-plane-1003488b345a





(in reply to ComDev)
Post #: 805
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/30/2014 5:16:47 AM   
MR_BURNS2


Posts: 974
Joined: 7/18/2013
From: Austria
Status: offline
#3210 - Su-30MKI Mk2 Flanker G -- India (Air Force), 2016
Loadout: KAB-500Kr TV/EO, No Wingtip Pods(Strike, Land/Naval) and the Long-Range version have the exact same loadout.
I don't know what you had in mind for the LR, maybe only 2 bombs? Or more bombs for the short range loadout?

_____________________________

Windows 7 64; Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz (8 CPUs), ~2.7GHz; 6144MB RAM; NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970;



(in reply to Rudd)
Post #: 806
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/30/2014 8:09:49 AM   
MR_BURNS2


Posts: 974
Joined: 7/18/2013
From: Austria
Status: offline
#1185 - MiG-29 Fulcrum A [UPG MLU] -- India (Air Force), 2013, 62x and other Mig-29M/SMT/K variants

Probe/Drogue Refueling capable

4x AA-10 Alamo A [R-27R, MR SARH] 2x AA-11 Archer [R-73] 1x 1500 liter Drop Tank <-- Are you sure she can carry 4 Alamos? I never saw more then 2 on the inner wing stations, could it be a typo?

Please add 4x AA-11/2x AA-10RE/1500 liter Droptank Loadout, they have the capability to use it and would probably do so, depending on what stores are available.

How about this loadout for Mig-29SMT as short range version of the
KAB-500Kr TV/EO(Strike,Land/Naval) loadout ?

_____________________________

Windows 7 64; Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz (8 CPUs), ~2.7GHz; 6144MB RAM; NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970;



(in reply to MR_BURNS2)
Post #: 807
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/30/2014 8:20:27 AM   
Dimitris


Posts: 9686
Joined: 7/31/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MR_BURNS2

#1185 - MiG-29 Fulcrum A [UPG MLU] -- India (Air Force), 2013, 62x and other Mig-29M/SMT/K variants

Probe/Drogue Refueling capable

4x AA-10 Alamo A [R-27R, MR SARH] 2x AA-11 Archer [R-73] 1x 1500 liter Drop Tank <-- Are you sure she can carry 4 Alamos? I never saw more then 2 on the inner wing stations, could it be a typo?


Apparently it can, but not by "default": http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?128553-R-27-AA-10-Alamo-question&p=2108209#post2108209

quote:


In theory, yes. There is no structural limitation, you can put APU-470 (which is the pylon/adapter for R-27) on mid pylons. There is no software limitation either, however standard MiG-29 does NOT have wiring to utilize the R-27 missile from mid pylon. MiG offered this modification for export models (as in the image), but for most airforces, there is no reason for it: Back in 80s, its counterpart F-16 did not have any BVR capability in anyway, and today its simply better to integrate and carry lighter R-77 missiles.








Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to MR_BURNS2)
Post #: 808
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/30/2014 1:25:08 PM   
chesmart


Posts: 908
Joined: 1/14/2007
From: Malta
Status: offline
Could you add the various iskander missiles pls esp the submuntion one as am creating a scenario where i need mrbm with sub munitions.It already exists in the DBase. And Arrow 3 ASBM and MEADS.BTW The Mk71 203mm gun as well pls

http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNUS_8-55_mk71.htm

http://www.army-technology.com/projects/iksander-system/

(in reply to Dimitris)
Post #: 809
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 7/1/2014 5:06:33 AM   
poaw

 

Posts: 105
Joined: 12/17/2001
From: Houston, Texas
Status: offline
The Malaysian "SU-30MKM Flanker G" (Aircraft #1699) is missing it's "SAP-518 OECM" Pods (Weapon #2839) for it's "AS-17 Krypton C [Kh-31P, ARM], SAP-518 OECM Wingtip Pods, Long-Range" load out.

Also, was the ability to see database #s in-game removed? Because I can't seem to find wherever I found the load out # previously.

(in reply to chesmart)
Post #: 810
Page:   <<   < prev  25 26 [27] 28 29   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Air / Naval Operations >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues Page: <<   < prev  25 26 [27] 28 29   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.156