Elmer's bombardments in first round

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Elmer's bombardments in first round

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Norm Koger's The Operational Art Of War III >> Elmer's bombardments in first round

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Elmer's bombardments in first round - 4/16/2013 12:13:23 AM

HPT KUNZ

Posts: 676
Joined: 7/4/2002
From: near Philadelphia
Status: offline

I notice that on the first round of combat Elmer attacks almost exclusively with bombardments. Has anyone else noted the same? I seems to me that this depletes the artillery supply/capability with not much return. But Elmer must know what he is doing. Right?
Any comments?
cheers

Post #: 1

RE: Elmer's bombardments in first round - 4/16/2013 1:57:39 AM

sPzAbt653

Posts: 5797
Joined: 5/3/2007
From: east coast, usa
Status: offline

Maybe 'softening up' ? Or trying to knock the defender out of entrenched status before attacking ?

(in reply to HPT KUNZ)

Post #: 2

RE: Elmer's bombardments in first round - 4/17/2013 1:10:38 AM

HPT KUNZ

Posts: 676
Joined: 7/4/2002
From: near Philadelphia
Status: offline

That is the theory, but it seems to me it is more cost-effective in TOAW to use artillery to support ground attacks. I get the impression Elmer disagrees...

(in reply to sPzAbt653)

Post #: 3

RE: Elmer's bombardments in first round - 4/17/2013 7:20:29 PM

shunwick

Posts: 2152
Joined: 10/15/2006
Status: offline

Difficult to get Elmer to play it correctly I suspect. Sometimes it is worth it and sometimes it isn't. It's not easy for the player to make that decision so poor old Elmer stands no chance unless he can see the results prior to making the initial bombardment.

Actually, would not be a bad idea to let Elmer cheat in this way. Generally speaking, I am not against Elmer cheating if it makes him a tougher opponent.

Best wishes,
Steve

_____________________________

I love the smell of TOAW in the morning...

(in reply to HPT KUNZ)

Post #: 4

RE: Elmer's bombardments in first round - 4/22/2013 11:47:01 PM

golden delicious

Posts: 4745
Joined: 9/5/2000
From: London, Surrey, United Kingdom
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: shunwick

Actually, would not be a bad idea to let Elmer cheat in this way. Generally speaking, I am not against Elmer cheating if it makes him a tougher opponent.

So, the PO's biggest weakness is his inability to shift troops effectively between fronts. This means in any scenario above a certain size, the correct approach is to massively overbalance one flank while refusing the other, destroy the forces there, and then roll up the rest of the line.

As it stands, one can exercise self restraint in abstaining from the above approach, and thereby get a broadly plausible match. But if the PO is given artificial advantages which make it more potent in direct combat, then the player will be obliged to exploit this unrealistic approach to win.

_____________________________

"Event 902: Bob Cross slays dragons!"

http://www.savemstateathletics.com/tdg/

(in reply to shunwick)

Post #: 5

RE: Elmer's bombardments in first round - 4/23/2013 12:08:14 AM

shunwick

Posts: 2152
Joined: 10/15/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: golden delicious

quote:

ORIGINAL: shunwick

Actually, would not be a bad idea to let Elmer cheat in this way. Generally speaking, I am not against Elmer cheating if it makes him a tougher opponent.

So, the PO's biggest weakness is his inability to shift troops effectively between fronts. This means in any scenario above a certain size, the correct approach is to massively overbalance one flank while refusing the other, destroy the forces there, and then roll up the rest of the line.

As it stands, one can exercise self restraint in abstaining from the above approach, and thereby get a broadly plausible match. But if the PO is given artificial advantages which make it more potent in direct combat, then the player will be obliged to exploit this unrealistic approach to win.

Ben,

What on Earth are you talking about?

Best wishes,
Steve

_____________________________

I love the smell of TOAW in the morning...

(in reply to golden delicious)

Post #: 6

RE: Elmer's bombardments in first round - 4/23/2013 12:14:50 PM

shunwick

Posts: 2152
Joined: 10/15/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: shunwick

quote:

ORIGINAL: golden delicious

quote:

ORIGINAL: shunwick

Actually, would not be a bad idea to let Elmer cheat in this way. Generally speaking, I am not against Elmer cheating if it makes him a tougher opponent.

So, the PO's biggest weakness is his inability to shift troops effectively between fronts. This means in any scenario above a certain size, the correct approach is to massively overbalance one flank while refusing the other, destroy the forces there, and then roll up the rest of the line.

As it stands, one can exercise self restraint in abstaining from the above approach, and thereby get a broadly plausible match. But if the PO is given artificial advantages which make it more potent in direct combat, then the player will be obliged to exploit this unrealistic approach to win.

Ben,

What on Earth are you talking about?

Best wishes,
Steve

Ben,

My apologies, it was way past my bed time and I did not read your post correctly.

It is possible, if you allow the PO unrestricted cheating rights, to create a monster for the solo game that effectively forces the player into specific anti-PO strategies.

But the PO already has some cheats programmed into it and I am not sure that allowing it to judge pre-attack bombardments (Is it worth it? Is it not?) would damage the solo game that badly. Maybe it would, maybe it wouldn't.

Best wishes,
Steve

_____________________________

I love the smell of TOAW in the morning...

(in reply to shunwick)

Post #: 7

RE: Elmer's bombardments in first round - 4/23/2013 7:41:02 PM

golden delicious

Posts: 4745
Joined: 9/5/2000
From: London, Surrey, United Kingdom
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: shunwick

But the PO already has some cheats programmed into it and I am not sure that allowing it to judge pre-attack bombardments (Is it worth it? Is it not?) would damage the solo game that badly. Maybe it would, maybe it wouldn't.

I recently read (well, skimmed) a paper which described a process for a computer to play arcade games by testing multiple outcomes at every frame. It was effective but a real CPU hog.

Of course it's all pretty academic unless and until development actually starts again. Until then, play PBEM.

_____________________________

"Event 902: Bob Cross slays dragons!"

http://www.savemstateathletics.com/tdg/

(in reply to shunwick)

Post #: 8

Page: [1]

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Norm Koger's The Operational Art Of War III >> Elmer's bombardments in first round

Page: [1]