Matrix Games Forums

Battle Academy is now available on SteamPlayers compare Ageods Civil War to Civil War IIDeal of the week - An updated War in the East goes half Price!Sign up for the Qvadriga beta for iPad and Android!Come and say hi at Pax and SaluteLegends of War goes on sale!Piercing Fortress Europa Gets UpdatedBattle Academy Mega Pack is now availableClose Combat: Gateway to Caen Teaser TrailerDeal of the Week Alea Jacta Est		 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Elmer's bombardments in first round

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Norm Koger's The Operational Art Of War III >> Elmer's bombardments in first round Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Elmer's bombardments in first round - 4/16/2013 12:13:23 AM   
HPT KUNZ

 

Posts: 165
Joined: 7/4/2002
From: near Philadelphia
Status: offline 		I notice that on the first round of combat Elmer attacks almost exclusively with bombardments. Has anyone else noted the same? I seems to me that this depletes the artillery supply/capability with not much return. But Elmer must know what he is doing. Right?
Any comments?
cheers
Post #: 1
RE: Elmer's bombardments in first round - 4/16/2013 1:57:39 AM   
sPzAbt653


Posts: 2709
Joined: 5/3/2007
From: east coast, usa
Status: online 		Maybe 'softening up' ? Or trying to knock the defender out of entrenched status before attacking ?

(in reply to HPT KUNZ)
Post #: 2
RE: Elmer's bombardments in first round - 4/17/2013 1:10:38 AM   
HPT KUNZ

 

Posts: 165
Joined: 7/4/2002
From: near Philadelphia
Status: offline 		That is the theory, but it seems to me it is more cost-effective in TOAW to use artillery to support ground attacks. I get the impression Elmer disagrees...

(in reply to sPzAbt653)
Post #: 3
RE: Elmer's bombardments in first round - 4/17/2013 7:20:29 PM   
shunwick


Posts: 1574
Joined: 10/15/2006
Status: offline 		Difficult to get Elmer to play it correctly I suspect. Sometimes it is worth it and sometimes it isn't. It's not easy for the player to make that decision so poor old Elmer stands no chance unless he can see the results prior to making the initial bombardment.

Actually, would not be a bad idea to let Elmer cheat in this way. Generally speaking, I am not against Elmer cheating if it makes him a tougher opponent.

Best wishes,
Steve

_____________________________

I love the smell of TOAW in the morning...

(in reply to HPT KUNZ)
Post #: 4
RE: Elmer's bombardments in first round - 4/22/2013 11:47:01 PM   
golden delicious


Posts: 4632
Joined: 9/5/2000
From: London, Surrey, United Kingdom
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: shunwick

Actually, would not be a bad idea to let Elmer cheat in this way. Generally speaking, I am not against Elmer cheating if it makes him a tougher opponent.


So, the PO's biggest weakness is his inability to shift troops effectively between fronts. This means in any scenario above a certain size, the correct approach is to massively overbalance one flank while refusing the other, destroy the forces there, and then roll up the rest of the line.

As it stands, one can exercise self restraint in abstaining from the above approach, and thereby get a broadly plausible match. But if the PO is given artificial advantages which make it more potent in direct combat, then the player will be obliged to exploit this unrealistic approach to win.

_____________________________

"Event 902: Bob Cross slays dragons!"

http://www.savemstateathletics.com/tdg/

(in reply to shunwick)
Post #: 5
RE: Elmer's bombardments in first round - 4/23/2013 12:08:14 AM   
shunwick


Posts: 1574
Joined: 10/15/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: golden delicious


quote:

ORIGINAL: shunwick

Actually, would not be a bad idea to let Elmer cheat in this way. Generally speaking, I am not against Elmer cheating if it makes him a tougher opponent.


So, the PO's biggest weakness is his inability to shift troops effectively between fronts. This means in any scenario above a certain size, the correct approach is to massively overbalance one flank while refusing the other, destroy the forces there, and then roll up the rest of the line.

As it stands, one can exercise self restraint in abstaining from the above approach, and thereby get a broadly plausible match. But if the PO is given artificial advantages which make it more potent in direct combat, then the player will be obliged to exploit this unrealistic approach to win.


Ben,

What on Earth are you talking about?

Best wishes,
Steve

_____________________________

I love the smell of TOAW in the morning...

(in reply to golden delicious)
Post #: 6
RE: Elmer's bombardments in first round - 4/23/2013 12:14:50 PM   
shunwick


Posts: 1574
Joined: 10/15/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: shunwick


quote:

ORIGINAL: golden delicious


quote:

ORIGINAL: shunwick

Actually, would not be a bad idea to let Elmer cheat in this way. Generally speaking, I am not against Elmer cheating if it makes him a tougher opponent.


So, the PO's biggest weakness is his inability to shift troops effectively between fronts. This means in any scenario above a certain size, the correct approach is to massively overbalance one flank while refusing the other, destroy the forces there, and then roll up the rest of the line.

As it stands, one can exercise self restraint in abstaining from the above approach, and thereby get a broadly plausible match. But if the PO is given artificial advantages which make it more potent in direct combat, then the player will be obliged to exploit this unrealistic approach to win.


Ben,

What on Earth are you talking about?

Best wishes,
Steve


Ben,

My apologies, it was way past my bed time and I did not read your post correctly.

It is possible, if you allow the PO unrestricted cheating rights, to create a monster for the solo game that effectively forces the player into specific anti-PO strategies.

But the PO already has some cheats programmed into it and I am not sure that allowing it to judge pre-attack bombardments (Is it worth it? Is it not?) would damage the solo game that badly. Maybe it would, maybe it wouldn't.

Best wishes,
Steve

_____________________________

I love the smell of TOAW in the morning...

(in reply to shunwick)
Post #: 7
RE: Elmer's bombardments in first round - 4/23/2013 7:41:02 PM   
golden delicious


Posts: 4632
Joined: 9/5/2000
From: London, Surrey, United Kingdom
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: shunwick

But the PO already has some cheats programmed into it and I am not sure that allowing it to judge pre-attack bombardments (Is it worth it? Is it not?) would damage the solo game that badly. Maybe it would, maybe it wouldn't.


I recently read (well, skimmed) a paper which described a process for a computer to play arcade games by testing multiple outcomes at every frame. It was effective but a real CPU hog.

Of course it's all pretty academic unless and until development actually starts again. Until then, play PBEM.

_____________________________

"Event 902: Bob Cross slays dragons!"

http://www.savemstateathletics.com/tdg/

(in reply to shunwick)
Post #: 8
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Norm Koger's The Operational Art Of War III >> Elmer's bombardments in first round Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.070