Matrix Games Forums

Space Program Manager Launch Contest Announced!Battle Academy 2 is out now on iPad!A closer look at rockets in Space Program ManagerDeal of the Week - Pride of NationsA new update for Piercing Fortress EuropaNew screenshots for War in the West!Pike & Shot is now available!Server Maintenance Battle Academy 2 gets updated!Deal of the Week: Advanced Tactics Gold
Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Is there a valid reason to glide bomb?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> The War Room >> Is there a valid reason to glide bomb? Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Is there a valid reason to glide bomb? - 3/12/2013 5:51:47 PM   
Jorge_Stanbury


Posts: 933
Joined: 2/29/2012
From: Lima and Toronto
Status: offline

dive bombers assumed... meaning a plane that can either glide or dive bomb

is there an in-game reason to use it?

for what I have read, glide bombing was a not highly regarded, and it was used only used by novice dive bomber pilots (who didn't master yet the dive bombing technique)

cheers

_____________________________

"Ik val aan, volg mij"
"I attack, follow me"
Karel Doorman
Post #: 1
RE: Is there a valid reason to glide bomb? - 3/12/2013 6:00:21 PM   
Sardaukar


Posts: 6023
Joined: 11/28/2001
From: Finland/now in Israel
Status: offline
Historically, strain to airframe was less.

Finnish Ju-88 pilots used glide bombing after it was discovered that airframes were getting damaged in dives and replacements hard to come by.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Junkers_Ju_88#Finnish_Air_Force

In the summer of 1943, the Finns noted stress damage on the wings. This had occurred when the aircraft were used in dive bombing. Restrictions followed: the dive brakes were removed and it was only allowed to dive at a 45-degree angle (compared to 60-80 degrees previously). In this way, they tried to spare the aircraft from unnecessary wear.

< Message edited by Sardaukar -- 3/12/2013 6:06:10 PM >


_____________________________

"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-


(in reply to Jorge_Stanbury)
Post #: 2
RE: Is there a valid reason to glide bomb? - 3/12/2013 6:05:16 PM   
Sardaukar


Posts: 6023
Joined: 11/28/2001
From: Finland/now in Israel
Status: offline
But in game terms...it depends.

Have to remember that you cannot dive bomb at low altitude...unless kamikaze. It's mainly for low-level attacks, which are decently accurate.

< Message edited by Sardaukar -- 3/12/2013 6:08:44 PM >


_____________________________

"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-


(in reply to Sardaukar)
Post #: 3
RE: Is there a valid reason to glide bomb? - 3/12/2013 8:13:16 PM   
dr.hal


Posts: 2092
Joined: 6/3/2006
Status: offline
Speaking of which, what is the altitude for Glide Bombing? I've done a search in the forum and came up with a guess at below 10K for a dive bomber (not 10K but BELOW?)... is a Dive Bomber the only a/c that can glide bomb? If there are others, what type??? What is the LOWER limit in terms of altitude? In relation to dive bombing, I know it is 10K to 15K but does this mean that at 15K the a/c will use dive bombing OR that AT 15K and on up it will be level (thus in effect from 10K to 14,999)? I would hate to loose out on the accuracy of dive bombing on a technicality! Thanks in advance. Hal

(in reply to Sardaukar)
Post #: 4
RE: Is there a valid reason to glide bomb? - 3/12/2013 8:27:47 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 3038
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: online
15K is still divebombing. I used to set my SBDs to 15k all the time, until I found out that strike escorts fly 2K over the strike (right?), so now I set them to 13k to avoid the maneuverability penalty for the Wildcats at 17k...

I think the glide bombing altitude (and perhaps answers to your other questions) might be in Skyros's reference sheet:
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3010162
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2576157

(in reply to dr.hal)
Post #: 5
RE: Is there a valid reason to glide bomb? - 3/12/2013 9:24:09 PM   
LoBaron


Posts: 4592
Joined: 1/26/2003
From: Vienna, Austria
Status: offline
There is no mvr penalty for the Wildcat above 15k, thats a very old urban legend.

Zero performance drops a slight bit though (low 30something to 27 IIRC)

_____________________________

S**t happens in war.

All hail the superior ones!

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 6
RE: Is there a valid reason to glide bomb? - 3/12/2013 9:45:49 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 3038
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: online

quote:

ORIGINAL: LoBaron

There is no mvr penalty for the Wildcat above 15k, thats a very old urban legend.

Zero performance drops a slight bit though (low 30something to 27 IIRC)


Herp, yes - that's what I actually meant ;). I play both sides way too often. I set my Vals to 13k so that my Zeroes can operate at 15k, while as the USN I set my Dauntlesses to 15k - and they still divebomb.

(in reply to LoBaron)
Post #: 7
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> The War Room >> Is there a valid reason to glide bomb? Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.094