A neat trick for JFBs

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Numdydar
Posts: 3271
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 9:56 pm

A neat trick for JFBs

Post by Numdydar »

Tired of all those P-47s and P-51s ruining your day with those pesky sweeps before the nasty bombing runs? If so, I have a possible solution.

Set every fighter sq to training [X(] Are you nuts, the bombers will kill them all you say. Better the planes die on the ground versus the planes AND the pilots die in the air :) But there is a benefit beside this. So there is more [:)]

If a bomber raid happens to fly over to vist WITHOUT any 'little friends' your training flights will wake up and say "Hey we are tired of just flying around shooting at targets, let hit some real planes!" And they will [:)]

The training flights will attack unescorted bombers pretty regularly. So this does two things for the JFB. It allows CAP that will only attack bombers AND avoids combat with ANY fighters. A much better out come than trying to survie all the sweeps the Allies can throw at you.
User avatar
JeffroK
Posts: 6395
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:05 am

RE: A neat trick for JFBs

Post by JeffroK »

And you have tried this and discovered that sometimes your trainees will intercept, no guarantees are there?

Might be the best JFB plan since Midway.
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
User avatar
koniu
Posts: 2763
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 4:19 pm
Location: Konin, Poland, European Union

RE: A neat trick for JFBs

Post by koniu »

Sometimes it will work sometimes it will not.
If You are lucky You will shutdown few bombers. Damn 4E are almost as good with shotting down fighters as P-47. If You are out of luck You will pay high price.
"Only the Dead Have Seen the End of War"
User avatar
DivePac88
Posts: 3119
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 9:50 pm
Location: Somewhere in the South Pacific.

RE: A neat trick for JFBs

Post by DivePac88 »

No sorry, but this tactic is doomed to failure, as your real chance (dice rolls) for intercepting unescorted LB raids are so low, to be just about non-existent.
Image
When you see the Southern Cross, For the first time
You understand now, Why you came this way
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: A neat trick for JFBs

Post by obvert »

On the other side of the coin, I think your opponent might have some issues with this tactic. Should your fighters be able to avoid the sweeps of planes that fly 40-60 mph faster than they do and can fly better at higher altitudes, thus getting the dive as well?

If this does work it's gaming the engine. How is it going to be when the Allies do this throughout 41-42 and skewer all of the Nells, Betties and Sallys you need to keep forts low, burn supply and hit shipping? I certainly would not be happy about that.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 15874
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: A neat trick for JFBs

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: koniu

Sometimes it will work sometimes it will not.
If You are lucky You will shutdown few bombers. Damn 4E are almost as good with shotting down fighters as P-47. If You are out of luck You will pay high price.

I often tell my opponent that (July 42), his B-17s are the best fighter he's got.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Mundy
Posts: 2867
Joined: Wed Jun 26, 2002 6:12 am
Location: Neenah

RE: A neat trick for JFBs

Post by Mundy »

I seem to have more luck with my B-24s.  In one of my PBEMs, I have two B-24 aces.
 
Ed-
Image
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: A neat trick for JFBs

Post by crsutton »

You can't be talking about using this tactic with a human opponent. If so, then I would venture that you need to find a better opponent. I personally can think of about 5 different ways that I can hammer this idea into the ground..[;)] But vs the AI, then it may work. But that is like saying that you can beat your six year old nephew at chess four out of five times....[:D]
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24520
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: A neat trick for JFBs

Post by Chickenboy »

I wouldn't use this trick, even if it worked uniformly. It just seems 'gamey' to me and sidestepping the game mechanics through a glitch. It's not logical, so I won't use it.
Image
jejo68
Posts: 17
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2002 10:21 pm

RE: A neat trick for JFBs

Post by jejo68 »

only 2 :)

8 out of my top 10 pilots are bombers. we are now mid 43
User avatar
AW1Steve
Posts: 14518
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 6:32 am
Location: Mordor Illlinois

RE: A neat trick for JFBs

Post by AW1Steve »

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

I wouldn't use this trick, even if it worked uniformly. It just seems 'gamey' to me and sidestepping the game mechanics through a glitch. It's not logical, so I won't use it.


Oh, go ahead and let him use it. And thereby throw every other house rule in the cocked hat. I had it happen once by accident. Now that I know the effect, I'll never use it again. But the one thing about this "trick" is that it's not just for JFB's, it works great for AFB's. Especially for the 1st 18 months of the war. [:D]
User avatar
Jorge_Stanbury
Posts: 4345
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:57 pm
Location: Montreal

RE: A neat trick for JFBs

Post by Jorge_Stanbury »

I think the AI uses it too (not necessarily willing); I just lost 14 Lillys in one bombing raid [:(] .
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3636
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

RE: A neat trick for JFBs

Post by Captain Cruft »

This does work quite well, I discovered it inadvertently playing Downfall. I think if you playing any other scen than that one (where you have a huge airforce squeezed into a small area) then yes it definitely is gamey.
User avatar
Icedawg
Posts: 1613
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 8:55 pm
Location: Upstate New York

RE: A neat trick for JFBs

Post by Icedawg »

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

I wouldn't use this trick, even if it worked uniformly. It just seems 'gamey' to me and sidestepping the game mechanics through a glitch. It's not logical, so I won't use it.

+1

Definitely gamey.
Numdydar
Posts: 3271
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 9:56 pm

RE: A neat trick for JFBs

Post by Numdydar »

So educate me on this please as to why gamey.

Training fligths are flying around the airfield in RL. A sweep comes in, they either a)fly away and loiter until the sweep is gone or b) land
Sweep goes away, training begins again, bombing run comes in escorted, again same as above.
Training begins again. Unescorted bombing run come in, AF commander, radios the flights in the air to try and engage the bombers. May catch the bombers, may not, but it is attempted.

Seems like this is a logical sequence of events to me and not gamey at all. Especially since I am a pilot and this is how I trained in RL. Of course no one was flying in to try and kill me in the process either lol.
Alfred
Posts: 6683
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 7:56 am

RE: A neat trick for JFBs

Post by Alfred »

ORIGINAL: Numdydar

So educate me on this please as to why gamey.

Training fligths are flying around the airfield in RL. A sweep comes in, they either a)fly away and loiter until the sweep is gone or b) land
Sweep goes away, training begins again, bombing run comes in escorted, again same as above.
Training begins again. Unescorted bombing run come in, AF commander, radios the flights in the air to try and engage the bombers. May catch the bombers, may not, but it is attempted.

Seems like this is a logical sequence of events to me and not gamey at all. Especially since I am a pilot and this is how I trained in RL. Of course no one was flying in to try and kill me in the process either lol.

Not really gamey, just a dumb and not effective means to achieve on the cheap the CAP desired by the OP.

Read this recent thread and my posts in particular.

tm.asp?m=3244889

There are far too many ways to take advantage of such a tactic.

Alfred
bradfordkay
Posts: 8500
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 8:39 am
Location: Olympia, WA

RE: A neat trick for JFBs

Post by bradfordkay »

ORIGINAL: Numdydar

So educate me on this please as to why gamey.

Training fligths are flying around the airfield in RL. A sweep comes in, they either a)fly away and loiter until the sweep is gone or b) land
Sweep goes away, training begins again, bombing run comes in escorted, again same as above.
Training begins again. Unescorted bombing run come in, AF commander, radios the flights in the air to try and engage the bombers. May catch the bombers, may not, but it is attempted.

Seems like this is a logical sequence of events to me and not gamey at all. Especially since I am a pilot and this is how I trained in RL. Of course no one was flying in to try and kill me in the process either lol.


Would the commander of a base within range of enemy bombers be likely to set all his fighter squadrons to "training" rather than CAP? There is also the question of how in WW2 they know that the incoming aircraft are a fighter sweep, an escorted bombing raid or an unescorted bombing raid unless they approach within visual range. This is where your scenario seems a stretch to me...
fair winds,
Brad
User avatar
LoBaron
Posts: 4775
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2003 8:23 pm
Location: Vienna, Austria

RE: A neat trick for JFBs

Post by LoBaron »

Easy counter: LRCAP that base, and escort your strikes, and you got a lot of dead Japanese pilots which would have been much better off flying
layered CAP or not flying at all.

IMHO not really gamey, since against a human opponent it is easy to counter and requires far too many squadrons with training setting to show
a reliable effect.
Image
gradenko2k
Posts: 930
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 6:08 am

RE: A neat trick for JFBs

Post by gradenko2k »

It's gamey in the sense that while the response of the training pilots is arguably realistic, it's NOT realistic for pilots to be set to train in an airbase that's being constantly bombed, just for the sake of being able to side-step the sweeps/escorts in the first place.

If you want to fly CAP over a base, you're expected to set fighters to CAP. Settings fighters to Training because it happens to be a sometimes-better-CAP is "gamey" because you're not using Training for its intended purpose.
User avatar
Icedawg
Posts: 1613
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 8:55 pm
Location: Upstate New York

RE: A neat trick for JFBs

Post by Icedawg »

ORIGINAL: Numdydar

So educate me on this please as to why gamey.

Training fligths are flying around the airfield in RL. A sweep comes in, they either a)fly away and loiter until the sweep is gone or b) land
Sweep goes away, training begins again, bombing run comes in escorted, again same as above.
Training begins again. Unescorted bombing run come in, AF commander, radios the flights in the air to try and engage the bombers. May catch the bombers, may not, but it is attempted.

Seems like this is a logical sequence of events to me and not gamey at all. Especially since I am a pilot and this is how I trained in RL. Of course no one was flying in to try and kill me in the process either lol.

"The training flights will attack unescorted bombers pretty regularly. So this does two things for the JFB. It allows CAP that will only attack bombers AND avoids combat with ANY fighters. A much better out come than trying to survie all the sweeps the Allies can throw at you."

The part in bold taken from your original post shows the gamey nature of your tactic. It allows you use a poorly designed part of the game engine to selectively engage unescorted bombers. In real life, you wouldn't have been able to tell that the incoming raid had no escorts until your fighters got a line of sight, and then it would have been too late - they'd be engaged by any escorts. However, as you indicated in the quote above, your tactic allows your training flights to have some sort of ESP - "That incoming raid we just heard about on the radio has no escorts. Let's go get them." and "This incoming raid we just heard about on the radio has escorts. Let's bug out.".

Now from my personal experience, training flights in the game do engage sweeps as well, so your technique for avoiding enemy fighters isn't foolproof. Maybe you're playing a different version of the game. I'm playing DaBigBabes C. Perhaps it works in your version, but not in DBB.
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”