Matrix Games Forums

To End All Wars: Video, AAR and Interview!Ageod's To End All Wars: Video, AAR and Interview!To End All Wars: Artillery Battle Academy 2: Eastern Front - End of Early Access Space Program Manager unveils its multiplayer modes Another update for Commander: The Great War!Distant Worlds: Universe gets a new updateDeal of the Week: Eagle Day to Bombing the Reich Advanced Tactics Gold is coming to SteamMatrix Games now speaks German!
Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

A neat trick for JFBs

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> A neat trick for JFBs Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
A neat trick for JFBs - 1/24/2013 3:42:26 AM   
Numdydar

 

Posts: 1789
Joined: 2/13/2004
Status: offline
Tired of all those P-47s and P-51s ruining your day with those pesky sweeps before the nasty bombing runs? If so, I have a possible solution.

Set every fighter sq to training Are you nuts, the bombers will kill them all you say. Better the planes die on the ground versus the planes AND the pilots die in the air :) But there is a benefit beside this. So there is more

If a bomber raid happens to fly over to vist WITHOUT any 'little friends' your training flights will wake up and say "Hey we are tired of just flying around shooting at targets, let hit some real planes!" And they will

The training flights will attack unescorted bombers pretty regularly. So this does two things for the JFB. It allows CAP that will only attack bombers AND avoids combat with ANY fighters. A much better out come than trying to survie all the sweeps the Allies can throw at you.
Post #: 1
RE: A neat trick for JFBs - 1/24/2013 5:17:54 AM   
JeffK


Posts: 5152
Joined: 1/26/2005
From: Back in the Office, Can I get my tin hut back!
Status: offline
And you have tried this and discovered that sometimes your trainees will intercept, no guarantees are there?

Might be the best JFB plan since Midway.

_____________________________

Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

(in reply to Numdydar)
Post #: 2
RE: A neat trick for JFBs - 1/24/2013 6:11:38 AM   
koniu

 

Posts: 2157
Joined: 2/28/2011
From: Konin, Poland, European Union
Status: online
Sometimes it will work sometimes it will not.
If You are lucky You will shutdown few bombers. Damn 4E are almost as good with shotting down fighters as P-47. If You are out of luck You will pay high price.

< Message edited by koniu -- 1/24/2013 6:12:04 AM >


_____________________________

"Only the Dead Have Seen the End of War"

(in reply to JeffK)
Post #: 3
RE: A neat trick for JFBs - 1/24/2013 8:57:48 AM   
DivePac88


Posts: 3115
Joined: 10/9/2008
From: Somewhere in the South Pacific.
Status: offline
No sorry, but this tactic is doomed to failure, as your real chance (dice rolls) for intercepting unescorted LB raids are so low, to be just about non-existent.

_____________________________


When you see the Southern Cross, For the first time
You understand now, Why you came this way

(in reply to koniu)
Post #: 4
RE: A neat trick for JFBs - 1/24/2013 9:29:12 AM   
obvert


Posts: 6957
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline
On the other side of the coin, I think your opponent might have some issues with this tactic. Should your fighters be able to avoid the sweeps of planes that fly 40-60 mph faster than they do and can fly better at higher altitudes, thus getting the dive as well?

If this does work it's gaming the engine. How is it going to be when the Allies do this throughout 41-42 and skewer all of the Nells, Betties and Sallys you need to keep forts low, burn supply and hit shipping? I certainly would not be happy about that.

_____________________________


"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to DivePac88)
Post #: 5
RE: A neat trick for JFBs - 1/24/2013 10:48:54 AM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 13933
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: koniu

Sometimes it will work sometimes it will not.
If You are lucky You will shutdown few bombers. Damn 4E are almost as good with shotting down fighters as P-47. If You are out of luck You will pay high price.


I often tell my opponent that (July 42), his B-17s are the best fighter he's got.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to koniu)
Post #: 6
RE: A neat trick for JFBs - 1/24/2013 1:13:47 PM   
Mundy


Posts: 641
Joined: 6/26/2002
From: Neenah
Status: offline
I seem to have more luck with my B-24s.  In one of my PBEMs, I have two B-24 aces.

Ed-

_____________________________


(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 7
RE: A neat trick for JFBs - 1/24/2013 3:35:44 PM   
crsutton


Posts: 7119
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline
You can't be talking about using this tactic with a human opponent. If so, then I would venture that you need to find a better opponent. I personally can think of about 5 different ways that I can hammer this idea into the ground.. But vs the AI, then it may work. But that is like saying that you can beat your six year old nephew at chess four out of five times....

_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to Mundy)
Post #: 8
RE: A neat trick for JFBs - 1/24/2013 3:36:34 PM   
Chickenboy


Posts: 17966
Joined: 6/29/2002
From: Twin Cities, MN
Status: offline
I wouldn't use this trick, even if it worked uniformly. It just seems 'gamey' to me and sidestepping the game mechanics through a glitch. It's not logical, so I won't use it.

_____________________________


(in reply to Mundy)
Post #: 9
RE: A neat trick for JFBs - 1/25/2013 6:03:46 AM   
jejo68

 

Posts: 17
Joined: 3/13/2002
Status: offline
only 2 :)

8 out of my top 10 pilots are bombers. we are now mid 43

(in reply to Mundy)
Post #: 10
RE: A neat trick for JFBs - 1/25/2013 7:00:38 PM   
AW1Steve


Posts: 12864
Joined: 3/10/2007
From: ME-FL-DC-GM-WA-NE-IL ?
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

I wouldn't use this trick, even if it worked uniformly. It just seems 'gamey' to me and sidestepping the game mechanics through a glitch. It's not logical, so I won't use it.



Oh, go ahead and let him use it. And thereby throw every other house rule in the cocked hat. I had it happen once by accident. Now that I know the effect, I'll never use it again. But the one thing about this "trick" is that it's not just for JFB's, it works great for AFB's. Especially for the 1st 18 months of the war.

_____________________________

"Geezerhood is a state of mind, attained by being largely out of yours". AW1Steve

"Quit whining and play the game. Or go home". My 7th grade baseball coach. It applies well to WITP AE players.

(in reply to Chickenboy)
Post #: 11
RE: A neat trick for JFBs - 1/25/2013 7:09:31 PM   
Jorge_Stanbury


Posts: 731
Joined: 2/29/2012
From: Lima and Toronto
Status: offline
I think the AI uses it too (not necessarily willing); I just lost 14 Lillys in one bombing raid .

(in reply to AW1Steve)
Post #: 12
RE: A neat trick for JFBs - 1/26/2013 12:14:42 AM   
Captain Cruft


Posts: 3648
Joined: 3/17/2004
From: England
Status: offline
This does work quite well, I discovered it inadvertently playing Downfall. I think if you playing any other scen than that one (where you have a huge airforce squeezed into a small area) then yes it definitely is gamey.

(in reply to Jorge_Stanbury)
Post #: 13
RE: A neat trick for JFBs - 1/26/2013 1:48:30 AM   
Icedawg


Posts: 1576
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: Upstate New York
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

I wouldn't use this trick, even if it worked uniformly. It just seems 'gamey' to me and sidestepping the game mechanics through a glitch. It's not logical, so I won't use it.


+1

Definitely gamey.

(in reply to Chickenboy)
Post #: 14
RE: A neat trick for JFBs - 1/26/2013 2:58:31 AM   
Numdydar

 

Posts: 1789
Joined: 2/13/2004
Status: offline
So educate me on this please as to why gamey.

Training fligths are flying around the airfield in RL. A sweep comes in, they either a)fly away and loiter until the sweep is gone or b) land
Sweep goes away, training begins again, bombing run comes in escorted, again same as above.
Training begins again. Unescorted bombing run come in, AF commander, radios the flights in the air to try and engage the bombers. May catch the bombers, may not, but it is attempted.

Seems like this is a logical sequence of events to me and not gamey at all. Especially since I am a pilot and this is how I trained in RL. Of course no one was flying in to try and kill me in the process either lol.

(in reply to Icedawg)
Post #: 15
RE: A neat trick for JFBs - 1/26/2013 4:05:24 AM   
Alfred

 

Posts: 3643
Joined: 9/28/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Numdydar

So educate me on this please as to why gamey.

Training fligths are flying around the airfield in RL. A sweep comes in, they either a)fly away and loiter until the sweep is gone or b) land
Sweep goes away, training begins again, bombing run comes in escorted, again same as above.
Training begins again. Unescorted bombing run come in, AF commander, radios the flights in the air to try and engage the bombers. May catch the bombers, may not, but it is attempted.

Seems like this is a logical sequence of events to me and not gamey at all. Especially since I am a pilot and this is how I trained in RL. Of course no one was flying in to try and kill me in the process either lol.


Not really gamey, just a dumb and not effective means to achieve on the cheap the CAP desired by the OP.

Read this recent thread and my posts in particular.

http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3244889

There are far too many ways to take advantage of such a tactic.

Alfred

(in reply to Numdydar)
Post #: 16
RE: A neat trick for JFBs - 1/26/2013 7:52:43 AM   
bradfordkay

 

Posts: 8251
Joined: 3/24/2002
From: Olympia, WA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Numdydar

So educate me on this please as to why gamey.

Training fligths are flying around the airfield in RL. A sweep comes in, they either a)fly away and loiter until the sweep is gone or b) land
Sweep goes away, training begins again, bombing run comes in escorted, again same as above.
Training begins again. Unescorted bombing run come in, AF commander, radios the flights in the air to try and engage the bombers. May catch the bombers, may not, but it is attempted.

Seems like this is a logical sequence of events to me and not gamey at all. Especially since I am a pilot and this is how I trained in RL. Of course no one was flying in to try and kill me in the process either lol.



Would the commander of a base within range of enemy bombers be likely to set all his fighter squadrons to "training" rather than CAP? There is also the question of how in WW2 they know that the incoming aircraft are a fighter sweep, an escorted bombing raid or an unescorted bombing raid unless they approach within visual range. This is where your scenario seems a stretch to me...

_____________________________

fair winds,
Brad

(in reply to Numdydar)
Post #: 17
RE: A neat trick for JFBs - 1/26/2013 8:33:35 AM   
LoBaron


Posts: 4534
Joined: 1/26/2003
From: Vienna, Austria
Status: offline
Easy counter: LRCAP that base, and escort your strikes, and you got a lot of dead Japanese pilots which would have been much better off flying
layered CAP or not flying at all.

IMHO not really gamey, since against a human opponent it is easy to counter and requires far too many squadrons with training setting to show
a reliable effect.

_____________________________

S**t happens in war.

All hail the superior ones!

(in reply to Numdydar)
Post #: 18
RE: A neat trick for JFBs - 1/26/2013 8:48:37 AM   
gradenko_2000

 

Posts: 765
Joined: 12/27/2010
Status: offline
It's gamey in the sense that while the response of the training pilots is arguably realistic, it's NOT realistic for pilots to be set to train in an airbase that's being constantly bombed, just for the sake of being able to side-step the sweeps/escorts in the first place.

If you want to fly CAP over a base, you're expected to set fighters to CAP. Settings fighters to Training because it happens to be a sometimes-better-CAP is "gamey" because you're not using Training for its intended purpose.

(in reply to bradfordkay)
Post #: 19
RE: A neat trick for JFBs - 1/26/2013 11:13:10 AM   
Icedawg


Posts: 1576
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: Upstate New York
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Numdydar

So educate me on this please as to why gamey.

Training fligths are flying around the airfield in RL. A sweep comes in, they either a)fly away and loiter until the sweep is gone or b) land
Sweep goes away, training begins again, bombing run comes in escorted, again same as above.
Training begins again. Unescorted bombing run come in, AF commander, radios the flights in the air to try and engage the bombers. May catch the bombers, may not, but it is attempted.

Seems like this is a logical sequence of events to me and not gamey at all. Especially since I am a pilot and this is how I trained in RL. Of course no one was flying in to try and kill me in the process either lol.


"The training flights will attack unescorted bombers pretty regularly. So this does two things for the JFB. It allows CAP that will only attack bombers AND avoids combat with ANY fighters. A much better out come than trying to survie all the sweeps the Allies can throw at you."

The part in bold taken from your original post shows the gamey nature of your tactic. It allows you use a poorly designed part of the game engine to selectively engage unescorted bombers. In real life, you wouldn't have been able to tell that the incoming raid had no escorts until your fighters got a line of sight, and then it would have been too late - they'd be engaged by any escorts. However, as you indicated in the quote above, your tactic allows your training flights to have some sort of ESP - "That incoming raid we just heard about on the radio has no escorts. Let's go get them." and "This incoming raid we just heard about on the radio has escorts. Let's bug out.".

Now from my personal experience, training flights in the game do engage sweeps as well, so your technique for avoiding enemy fighters isn't foolproof. Maybe you're playing a different version of the game. I'm playing DaBigBabes C. Perhaps it works in your version, but not in DBB.

(in reply to Numdydar)
Post #: 20
RE: A neat trick for JFBs - 1/26/2013 12:52:04 PM   
LoBaron


Posts: 4534
Joined: 1/26/2003
From: Vienna, Austria
Status: offline
quote:

It allows CAP that will only attack bombers AND avoids combat with ANY fighters.


This is wrong. It avoids combat with fighter sweeps, but it gets completely trashed by LRCAP as compared to CAP, and loses much of the usual advantage
when battling strike escorts. In addition it sufferes from very low efficiency (successful intercepts vs. # of fighters available).

Attempting to hurt raids with training flights instead of CAP is an ineffective tactic.
And not to escort bomber types which rely on escorts for defense is a calculated risk of the attacker.

TBH it is more or less irrelevant if anyone personally thinks it to be gamey or not, it can be easily rendered useless.

I am very much with Alfred here.

_____________________________

S**t happens in war.

All hail the superior ones!

(in reply to Icedawg)
Post #: 21
RE: A neat trick for JFBs - 1/26/2013 5:43:49 PM   
Numdydar

 

Posts: 1789
Joined: 2/13/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: gradenko_2000

It's gamey in the sense that while the response of the training pilots is arguably realistic, it's NOT realistic for pilots to be set to train in an airbase that's being constantly bombed, just for the sake of being able to side-step the sweeps/escorts in the first place.

If you want to fly CAP over a base, you're expected to set fighters to CAP. Settings fighters to Training because it happens to be a sometimes-better-CAP is "gamey" because you're not using Training for its intended purpose.


I agree with this point as I just cannot see an AF commander saying, "Ignore the bombing everyone. Just concentrate on your touch and gos."

quote:

ORIGINAL: LoBaron

This is wrong. It avoids combat with fighter sweeps, but it gets completely trashed by LRCAP as compared to CAP, and loses much of the usual advantage
when battling strike escorts. In addition it sufferes from very low efficiency (successful intercepts vs. # of fighters available).



I should point out that I am not using this in front line bases since you are correct it is too dangerous. I am using this in rear areas where long ranger LBAs and P-38s are anoying me

(in reply to gradenko_2000)
Post #: 22
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> A neat trick for JFBs Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.094