Matrix Games Forums

Come and see us during the Spieltagen in Essen!New Screenshots for Pike & ShotDeal of the Week Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations WOTYCommand: Modern Air/Naval Operations WOTY is now available!Frontline : The Longest Day Announced and in Beta!Command gets Wargame of the Year EditionDeal of the Week: Pandora SeriesPandora: Eclipse of Nashira is now availableDistant Worlds Gets another updateHell is Approaching
Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Naval air attack decisions

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Naval air attack decisions Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Naval air attack decisions - 1/23/2013 11:35:38 AM   
fulcrum28

 

Posts: 188
Joined: 2/28/2010
Status: offline
I was playing the coral sea battle scenario with Japanese side for tsting the game and getting familiar with it. My first game was smooth but the second was a bit chaotic because of the "commander decisions" of Japanese carriers. The Japanese commander was keeping lanching valuable attacks against American TFs coposed by CL,and DD. This does not only loose planes but also reveals the position of the kidoubutai.

I wonder if it would ot be possible to have full control of when and when not to launch an air strike to minimize risks and maximize profits.

Post #: 1
RE: Naval air attack decisions - 1/23/2013 12:19:46 PM   
henhute6

 

Posts: 100
Joined: 1/8/2002
From: Tehran
Status: offline
We are dreaming of that, but I guess it needs different game. Try old Carrier Strike. Maybe some day we have them all together.

(in reply to fulcrum28)
Post #: 2
RE: Naval air attack decisions - 1/23/2013 1:28:00 PM   
fulcrum28

 

Posts: 188
Joined: 2/28/2010
Status: offline
I hope there could be a solution for this. the game without this problem seems perferct.

(in reply to henhute6)
Post #: 3
RE: Naval air attack decisions - 1/23/2013 3:12:44 PM   
Puhis

 

Posts: 1696
Joined: 11/30/2008
From: Finland
Status: offline
It's not a problem. That's the way it should be. IRL planes attacked "wrong" targets, like battle of Coral Sea when japanese launch big strike vs. one oiler and destroyer.

Using adequate naval search will help finding best targets.

(in reply to fulcrum28)
Post #: 4
RE: Naval air attack decisions - 1/24/2013 10:10:07 AM   
Empire101


Posts: 1957
Joined: 5/20/2008
From: Coruscant
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Puhis

It's not a problem. That's the way it should be. IRL planes attacked "wrong" targets, like battle of Coral Sea when japanese launch big strike vs. one oiler and destroyer.

Using adequate naval search will help finding best targets.


+1



_____________________________

Our lives may be more boring than those who lived in apocalyptic times,
but being bored is greatly preferable to being prematurely dead because of some ideological fantasy.
- Michael Burleigh


(in reply to Puhis)
Post #: 5
RE: Naval air attack decisions - 1/24/2013 10:40:23 AM   
koniu

 

Posts: 2210
Joined: 2/28/2011
From: Konin, Poland, European Union
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Empire101


quote:

ORIGINAL: Puhis

It's not a problem. That's the way it should be. IRL planes attacked "wrong" targets, like battle of Coral Sea when japanese launch big strike vs. one oiler and destroyer.

Using adequate naval search will help finding best targets.


+1



Having good DL on enemy TFs is critical. If Your bombers/serch planes detect all enemy forces at high DL they will almost always chose big fat critical targets like CV or BB.
Many players forget about that.
Especially in PBEM games where training CV pilots is important. Not training naval search skill will end with major defeat in battle.



_____________________________

"Only the Dead Have Seen the End of War"

(in reply to Empire101)
Post #: 6
RE: Naval air attack decisions - 1/24/2013 3:43:57 PM   
crsutton


Posts: 7184
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline
No, it will never change. Many have asked but this was not the purpose of the designers.

There are those who hate the randomness and unpredictability of the game and want to micro manage every event and wish that every order that they make is executed to perfection.

However, it is my belief and contention that once this becomes possible the game will grow tedious and predictable-and as a result not very interesting.

I just think of all the computer game that I have bought over the years, quickly mastered and then got rid of. Has yet to happen with this one.

_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to koniu)
Post #: 7
RE: Naval air attack decisions - 1/24/2013 9:03:12 PM   
Dili

 

Posts: 2917
Joined: 9/10/2004
Status: offline
Precisely. It is historical to waste forces.
And the recon from patrols was often wrong. Mistaking between cruisers and battleships, destroyers and cruisers were abound, some even saw carriers when none was around.

(in reply to crsutton)
Post #: 8
RE: Naval air attack decisions - 1/24/2013 9:43:42 PM   
Cpt Sherwood

 

Posts: 837
Joined: 12/1/2005
From: A Very Nice Place in the USA
Status: offline
And don't forget coding/decoding errors.

(in reply to Dili)
Post #: 9
RE: Naval air attack decisions - 1/24/2013 10:32:17 PM   
jcjordan

 

Posts: 1758
Joined: 6/27/2001
Status: offline
What I hate is that numerous times when units are set to naval attack they'll attack a worthless target due to cap over main target (all other things being equal) ie sdrn cdr to his commander sorry sir we can't attack that IJN CV that's launching a/c to attack us as there's a fighter on cap so let's attack this useless target at extreme range that's less dangerous to us. That is ahistroical as we know they'd go after the CV not the worthless/less dangerous target. To me there are way too many die rolls involved in a unit trying to do something that it ends up doing nothing

(in reply to Cpt Sherwood)
Post #: 10
RE: Naval air attack decisions - 1/25/2013 8:21:56 PM   
DivePac88


Posts: 3115
Joined: 10/9/2008
From: Somewhere in the South Pacific.
Status: offline
Your gripe is easily solved, as you are obviously playing the wrong game type. AE is an operational level wargame, and what you need is a tactical level game such as 'Carriers At War'.


_____________________________


When you see the Southern Cross, For the first time
You understand now, Why you came this way

(in reply to fulcrum28)
Post #: 11
RE: Naval air attack decisions - 1/26/2013 2:54:59 AM   
Zigurat666


Posts: 250
Joined: 9/26/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Empire101


quote:

ORIGINAL: Puhis

It's not a problem. That's the way it should be. IRL planes attacked "wrong" targets, like battle of Coral Sea when japanese launch big strike vs. one oiler and destroyer.

Using adequate naval search will help finding best targets.


+1





-1

Have had too many instances where valid valuble targets are spotted and closer than those attacked. I recently had a series of Nells and Betties attack PT's no less at a greater distance when AK TF's were much closer and spotted and out of range of CAP.
Had this happened in real life I dont believe the group commanders would have been around long...


_____________________________

***Schulzstaffen SS***

(in reply to Empire101)
Post #: 12
RE: Naval air attack decisions - 1/26/2013 8:27:17 AM   
Puhis

 

Posts: 1696
Joined: 11/30/2008
From: Finland
Status: offline
While I admit that sometimes Netties have almost pervert desire to attack PT-boats, I believe it's still a detection level problem. Usually PT are at base hex, and therefore get better detection than ships at sea (because of both naval search and recon, and the fact that detection level of bases decrease slower than DL of TFs). One solution would be reduce the range so that Netties do not reach the base hex.

And I've never seen carrier planes attacking PT-boats.

(in reply to Zigurat666)
Post #: 13
RE: Naval air attack decisions - 1/26/2013 8:40:56 AM   
gradenko_2000

 

Posts: 808
Joined: 12/27/2010
Status: offline
Another way to look at this issue is that even if you had total control of the air strikes, that still doesn't necessarily guarantee that you as the player will select the correct target, if the game will only report information based on your Detection Level.

That is, suppose WITP, during the combat resolution, throws up a pop-up with a list of all targets in range of your carrier TF, and asks the player to select which target to hit. If your DL is low, you might have two TFs reported as both containing carriers in them. You select the first one, and off go your Vals and Kates. Later, the combat animation shows you planes hitting the Neosho ...

(in reply to Puhis)
Post #: 14
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Naval air attack decisions Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.098