Matrix Games Forums

War in the West gets its first update!Flashpoint Campaigns: Red Storm version 2.08 is now available!Command gets huge update!Order of Battle: Pacific Featured on Weekly Streaming SessionA new fight for Battle Academy!Buzz Aldrin's Space Program Manager is out for Mac!The definitive wargame of the Western Front is out now! War in the West gets teaser trailer and Twitch Stream!New Preview AAR for War in the West!War in the West Manual preview
Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: A new ACW..

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion >> RE: A new ACW.. Page: <<   < prev  13 14 [15] 16 17   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: A new ACW.. - 1/19/2013 3:45:28 AM   
junk2drive


Posts: 12905
Joined: 6/27/2002
From: Arizona West Coast
Status: offline
West Point is training for right wing nut job anti federal govt attacks.

http://www.kfiam640.com/cc-common/news/sections/newsarticle.html?feed=104668&article=10711513

(in reply to Will_L)
Post #: 421
RE: A new ACW.. - 1/19/2013 10:58:52 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 20225
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Will_L

............. More importantly... I like pie. Does anyone else like pie?
warspite1

Depends on the kind of pie on offer. For example, I very much liked the Cherry pie (with custard) that my dear old mum used to make when we were kids, however I'm not so keen on 3.142 (whether with custard or not).



_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty - Horatio Nelson 1805.




(in reply to Will_L)
Post #: 422
RE: A new ACW.. - 1/19/2013 1:12:21 PM   
MrRoadrunner


Posts: 924
Joined: 10/7/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
Guys-keep it on topic. We've already had a moderator tell us 'no' to the whole abortion thing. Knock it off or you'll get the thread locked. Don't be trolls.


Thanks CB.
Fearing to be called a board troll, (and feeling more like Jonah being asked to go to Ninevah), I think that 20 dead/murdered children in Conn., compared to the ONE THOUSAND dead/murdered innocents that same day is valid.
The kids in the school did not ask to be slaughtered any more than those still in the womb?
Trying to justify something because it is "inconvenient" is not a great way to start, or end, an argument.

I think it was Stalin who said, "a handful of dead is a tragedy, a million dead is a statistic"? Have we really come to that?

That said, I believe that the degradation of moral values in the society are at the root cause for the dilution of The Constitution. It helps people to devalue life (Yes the LIFE part of The Constitution) and lessens the LIBERTY part as well.
The rights of the people are divine rights. Not rights allowed to individuals by other men.

Life, liberty, happiness, free speech, self protection are our rights.

The 2nd Amendment should be fiercely defended. We should not even allow it to be parsed down to any point that makes a legal, law abiding, citizen to not reasonably be able to defend themselves. New York is trying to put regulations in place now that, as written, does not allow the police to legally carry their current handguns and Delaware is trying to pass a law that would allow you to keep large magazines, but if you have the guns to use them within twenty feet you will be in violation of the law (all from a knee jerk reaction by a few jerks who are more willing to take away freedom than use common sense).

Maybe putting to death those who use guns in the commission of a crime could be the answer? Justified because we already agree to kill 1,000's of innocents because they are "inconvenient"? How much more so is a murderer inconvenient to a safe society?

Said my piece, now back to the belly of the beast.

RR

_____________________________

“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.”
― Marcus Aurelius, Meditations

(in reply to Chickenboy)
Post #: 423
RE: A new ACW.. - 1/19/2013 10:46:54 PM   
Gary Childress


Posts: 5830
Joined: 7/17/2005
From: United States
Status: offline
Hey guys... Since we have been asked not to comment further on abortion and since there seems to be plenty of wind left in that debate I recommend going to the Maddogdrivethru to continue that debate. I visit the place every now and again and will be happy to continue the debate over there.

As for the current argument over "military style weapons", I will concede that current legislation being passed is perhaps an overreaction to recent events. Most people who own military style weapons are law abiding citizens who know how to handle the responsibility of having them. I suppose such legislation will not have much real effect on public safety considering all the alternative weapons available out there available for depraved individuals to use. But I suppose I would be equally distraught if they end up banning wargames. Freedom to choose our hobbies and passtimes is an important freedom so long as those passtimes don't significantly interfere with public safety.

That is my conclusion at this point. End of the debate for me.

_____________________________

Favorite/Awesome games from Matrix

War in the Pacific/AE
Panzer Corps
Commander Europe at War
John Tiller's Campaign Series
The Close Combat Series (all versions)

(in reply to MrRoadrunner)
Post #: 424
RE: A new ACW.. - 1/20/2013 1:17:41 AM   
Darkspire


Posts: 1969
Joined: 6/12/2003
From: My Own Private Hell
Status: offline
Cant see what the fuss is about with guns in the states. The folks over there have always had them so I don't think they should be taken away or whatever they propose to do with them, just make it so that everyone who wants a firearm can own a gun or rifle that only fires a single bullet at a time, take away the automatic weapons and make sure everyone can go training so they can hit a target with a single shot. Home defense is one thing but having weapons like automatic machine guns and assault rifles is way to much overkill, a point that has been proven to many times sadly.

My 50p's worth.

Darkspire

< Message edited by Darkspire -- 1/20/2013 1:19:21 AM >


_____________________________

Darkspires's File Repository

Dual Core E4500 2.20GHz - GeForce 8800GT (1gb) - XP 32bit 4gb with a 3gb twist and a shaking of PAE

(in reply to Gary Childress)
Post #: 425
RE: A new ACW.. - 1/20/2013 2:59:19 AM   
2ndACR


Posts: 5653
Joined: 8/31/2003
From: Irving,Tx
Status: offline
Once again, you have to jump thru some serious hoops to get a Class 3 firearms license to own full auto weapons. They are not pervasive. Semi Auto weapons, yes, those are very common in the US. And we would scream long and loud about trying to limit us to single shot.

Same as if wargames were limited to Risk.

(in reply to Darkspire)
Post #: 426
RE: A new ACW.. - 1/20/2013 4:34:34 AM   
Mundy


Posts: 946
Joined: 6/26/2002
From: Neenah
Status: offline
A grand total of two murders have been committed with legally held class 3 weapons since 1934.  One of them was by a cop.

_____________________________


(in reply to 2ndACR)
Post #: 427
RE: A new ACW.. - 1/20/2013 6:00:57 AM   
danlongman

 

Posts: 461
Joined: 3/27/2012
From: Over the hills and far away
Status: offline
Instead of Godwin's Law just run this "discussion" back to where
the first person said something really stupid like let's ban sharp things
or something similarly asinine and declare that person the winner of the
stupidity sweepstakes. The rest is pointless. I personally would be against
any regulations except that some of the guys with gun boners are such dickweeds
that they bring me nothing but revulsion for their cause. Good Luck.

_____________________________

"Patriotism: Your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." - George Bernard Shaw

(in reply to Mundy)
Post #: 428
RE: A new ACW.. - 1/20/2013 10:45:24 AM   
wodin


Posts: 8106
Joined: 4/20/2003
From: England
Status: online
No need to be insulting..

_____________________________

My Tactical wargame facebook page.

https://www.facebook.com/Tacticalwargame


(in reply to danlongman)
Post #: 429
RE: A new ACW.. - 1/20/2013 12:28:18 PM   
MrRoadrunner


Posts: 924
Joined: 10/7/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Darkspire
Cant see what the fuss is about with guns in the states. The folks over there have always had them so I don't think they should be taken away or whatever they propose to do with them, just make it so that everyone who wants a firearm can own a gun or rifle that only fires a single bullet at a time, take away the automatic weapons and make sure everyone can go training so they can hit a target with a single shot. Home defense is one thing but having weapons like automatic machine guns and assault rifles is way to much overkill, a point that has been proven to many times sadly.


Here's the rub.

1) The government is not supposed to "make" anyone do anything here. They should stay out of a persons personal life when it comes to rights given by The Constitution.
2) Automatic weapons are banned to general use. Only those who get specific permits are allowed to own them. In my State Automatic weapons are not allowed to be kept in the home. IIRC they are to be stored at State police facilities.
3) Assault rifle is a term used to blur the argument. Most of the politicians believe that assault rifles are those painted black and have a hand grip and military style magazine.
4) Reducing the magazine capacity will only bring about a miss match against someone who illegally has a large capacity magazine.
5) Give me one shot and I will choose a shotgun. But, that will not be restricted by "assault weapons" bans. Even if you can be assaulted by a shotgun.

Sorry I'd rather be able to protect myself and obey the law than be put into a position where I have to disobey a law to protect myself. The criminal does not care for the law so they have the edge.
Same with areas that are "gun free zones". It is restricted to law abiding citizens and a shooting range for those who want to murder.

As with most laws and regulations passed in the last 100 years, the US government has really gone contrary to Constitutional principles. Seems that when the checks and balances all agree it is the people who are on the short end of the scale?

For those who want to ban guns, don't own them. But, don't take them away from law abiding citizens. You don't like them? That is fine with me. Just stay out of my life.

RR

_____________________________

“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.”
― Marcus Aurelius, Meditations

(in reply to Darkspire)
Post #: 430
RE: A new ACW.. - 1/20/2013 12:30:51 PM   
MrRoadrunner


Posts: 924
Joined: 10/7/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: wodin
No need to be insulting..


+1

Insulting someone is a far cry from having a cogent argument and to civilly discuss issues?

RR

< Message edited by MrRoadrunner -- 1/20/2013 12:31:20 PM >


_____________________________

“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.”
― Marcus Aurelius, Meditations

(in reply to wodin)
Post #: 431
RE: A new ACW.. - 1/20/2013 1:28:51 PM   
Darkspire


Posts: 1969
Joined: 6/12/2003
From: My Own Private Hell
Status: offline
I wasn't insulted, put up with far worse from my ex missus but thanks Wodin.
I realize that it is somewhat of an ongoing topic and never meant to provoke anyone. Its just I watched the TV slot with Piers Morgan and as a Brit thought Morgan was well over the line but wasn't to sure who the chap having the heart attack was, no wonder therapy is in such widespread use over the pond. I don't condone the use of weapons, I know that the country grew with them as an integral part of the culture and something so deep rooted could, and never should, be taken away. Just as a Brit (and blonde) I just wished that the amount of innocent folks that get hurt because of them could be reduced in some way. I'm sorry of being a little in the dark over the subject and If I caused any offense It was not meant intentionally.

Darkspire

_____________________________

Darkspires's File Repository

Dual Core E4500 2.20GHz - GeForce 8800GT (1gb) - XP 32bit 4gb with a 3gb twist and a shaking of PAE

(in reply to MrRoadrunner)
Post #: 432
RE: A new ACW.. - 1/20/2013 1:37:44 PM   
junk2drive


Posts: 12905
Joined: 6/27/2002
From: Arizona West Coast
Status: offline
Probably Piers and Alex Jones. Go to infowars.com to see more about him.

(in reply to Darkspire)
Post #: 433
RE: A new ACW.. - 1/20/2013 2:08:58 PM   
vonRocko

 

Posts: 1230
Joined: 11/4/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: danlongman

Instead of Godwin's Law just run this "discussion" back to where
the first person said something really stupid like let's ban sharp things
or something similarly asinine and declare that person the winner of the
stupidity sweepstakes. The rest is pointless. I personally would be against
any regulations except that some of the guys with gun boners are such dickweeds
that they bring me nothing but revulsion for their cause. Good Luck.

We made it pretty far before someone had to refer to someone as a "dickweed".(offensive comment removed, sorry)

< Message edited by vonRocko -- 1/20/2013 9:10:22 PM >

(in reply to danlongman)
Post #: 434
RE: A new ACW.. - 1/20/2013 3:30:17 PM   
Chickenboy


Posts: 18476
Joined: 6/29/2002
From: Twin Cities, MN
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: danlongman
declare that person the winner of the stupidity sweepstakes.

Yes, congratulations danlongman. You win! Well done. Your prize? A green button! Again, good job.

_____________________________


(in reply to danlongman)
Post #: 435
RE: A new ACW.. - 1/20/2013 3:31:48 PM   
Chickenboy


Posts: 18476
Joined: 6/29/2002
From: Twin Cities, MN
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vonRocko



Take it offline, dude. PM him your displeasure or green button him, but these posts will get the thread locked if they continue.

_____________________________


(in reply to vonRocko)
Post #: 436
RE: A new ACW.. - 1/20/2013 3:38:08 PM   
Chickenboy


Posts: 18476
Joined: 6/29/2002
From: Twin Cities, MN
Status: offline
Applications for permits to purchase firearms in Minnesota reflect a huge demand nationally in the last month. EVERYTHING is selling at breakneck pace. Applications for permits in this state have trebled year over year, with the greatest increase since the Sandy Hook tragedy. Most of the applicants are first time gun buyers.

It seems most of the American public isn't buying the government's argument and is acting on their constitutional rights while they still have them. The NRA is *not* fomenting fear and discord-I've not seen anything from them screaming "go buy a gun now!". Its that the average American who was sitting on the fence about gun ownership is deciding that-rather than letting the government dictate their rights in what will probably be an unconstitutional manner-they'll go ahead and get it now while they still can. No amount of hand-wringing, anti-NRA bandwagon nonsense can explain this otherwise.

John Q. Public doesn't trust the Federal government to do the right thing here. Full stop. That's the message. They're acting on their own accord while they are still capable of independent thought-good on them.

_____________________________


(in reply to Chickenboy)
Post #: 437
RE: A new ACW.. - 1/20/2013 3:46:59 PM   
MrRoadrunner


Posts: 924
Joined: 10/7/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
Applications for permits to purchase firearms in Minnesota reflect a huge demand nationally in the last month. EVERYTHING is selling at breakneck pace. Applications for permits in this state have trebled year over year, with the greatest increase since the Sandy Hook tragedy. Most of the applicants are first time gun buyers.

It seems most of the American public isn't buying the government's argument and is acting on their constitutional rights while they still have them. The NRA is *not* fomenting fear and discord-I've not seen anything from them screaming "go buy a gun now!". Its that the average American who was sitting on the fence about gun ownership is deciding that-rather than letting the government dictate their rights in what will probably be an unconstitutional manner-they'll go ahead and get it now while they still can. No amount of hand-wringing, anti-NRA bandwagon nonsense can explain this otherwise.

John Q. Public doesn't trust the Federal government to do the right thing here. Full stop. That's the message. They're acting on their own accord while they are still capable of independent thought-good on them.


I hope all of them will get training on gun safety and how to use them properly. Along with a course or two of gun laws in their own States and local communities.

RR


_____________________________

“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.”
― Marcus Aurelius, Meditations

(in reply to Chickenboy)
Post #: 438
RE: A new ACW.. - 1/20/2013 4:31:46 PM   
Chickenboy


Posts: 18476
Joined: 6/29/2002
From: Twin Cities, MN
Status: offline
Yes. That would be appropriate, wouldn't it? I'm all for firearms training (and safety).

It's fair to state the obvious here too: that the polemics and knee-jerk reactionary punditry of the current administration is driving gun sales. I guess the proportion of the population still 'clinging to their guns and religion' is telling. Maybe it's even growing due to this bombastic imperial bent of the current administration?

Would it have been different if the administration hadn't ramrodded through some "Executive Orders", but rather taken a slow and measured tone? Would it have been different if the administration had genuinely listened to gun owners, prospective gun owners and conservatives? Perhaps. Of course, we'll never know now.

Another lesson learned: If your words are divisive and people don't trust your motives, they will revert to conservative principles of independent living. If the people don't trust you to govern their lives, they will react to ensure their own private governance of their ideals.

_____________________________


(in reply to MrRoadrunner)
Post #: 439
RE: A new ACW.. - 1/20/2013 4:40:08 PM   
chijohnaok


Posts: 565
Joined: 7/29/2002
From: Florida, USA (formerly Chicago)
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Darkspire

I wasn't insulted, put up with far worse from my ex missus but thanks Wodin.
I realize that it is somewhat of an ongoing topic and never meant to provoke anyone. Its just I watched the TV slot with Piers Morgan and as a Brit thought Morgan was well over the line but wasn't to sure who the chap having the heart attack was, no wonder therapy is in such widespread use over the pond. I don't condone the use of weapons, I know that the country grew with them as an integral part of the culture and something so deep rooted could, and never should, be taken away. Just as a Brit (and blonde) I just wished that the amount of innocent folks that get hurt because of them could be reduced in some way. I'm sorry of being a little in the dark over the subject and If I caused any offense It was not meant intentionally.

Darkspire


The " chap having the heart attack was" is a conspiracy theorist (I think that is the word for it) who sees little green men around every corner.

IMHO, Piers Morgan intentionally went out and found the wackiest guy available to "represent" the pro-gun viewpoint. He wanted to paint them all as being crazy.

It would be the like having (the late) Sir Jimmy Savile on a BBC TV program as a child safety advocate.

_____________________________


(in reply to Darkspire)
Post #: 440
RE: A new ACW.. - 1/20/2013 7:26:00 PM   
danlongman

 

Posts: 461
Joined: 3/27/2012
From: Over the hills and far away
Status: offline
You would have to take what I said personally to find it insulting.
Unless you have been acting in such a manner it would simply not apply.
And I can see that to at least one it did.

_____________________________

"Patriotism: Your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." - George Bernard Shaw

(in reply to chijohnaok)
Post #: 441
RE: A new ACW.. - 1/21/2013 9:57:38 AM   
MrRoadrunner


Posts: 924
Joined: 10/7/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
Another lesson learned: If your words are divisive and people don't trust your motives, they will revert to conservative principles of independent living. If the people don't trust you to govern their lives, they will react to ensure their own private governance of their ideals.


The only one I trust to govern my life is me (and of course my wife ).
Governors "govern" their states. The President is to preside over the states. Our government should be of, by, and for The People.

The problem to me is that we have too many who think it is the government over the people. Too many who want the government to do things for them or give things to them.
Therefore, and not a problem, The People take to defending themselves from the government.

RR

_____________________________

“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.”
― Marcus Aurelius, Meditations

(in reply to Chickenboy)
Post #: 442
RE: A new ACW.. - 1/21/2013 10:09:20 AM   
MrRoadrunner


Posts: 924
Joined: 10/7/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: danlongman

You would have to take what I said personally to find it insulting.
Unless you have been acting in such a manner it would simply not apply.
And I can see that to at least one it did.


1/13 You will find that your opinion and a couple of bucks will get
you a nice big cup of coffee.

1/16 Rather like the Americans are
a primitive tribe who produce and worship their own legends for their own purposes.

1/17 If they ever do you can say goodbye to your hokey old gun religion. I am not pro regulation, I am anti idiot.
And that is how I FEEL.

I have found most of your "contributions" to the discussion to be weak at best and mostly condescending.
And, I will never bow to your anti gun and anti freedom religion.

George Bernard Shaw? Of course. The Fabian Socialist who thought so highly of America and American values?
I am sure he was for individual rights and gun ownership.



RR

_____________________________

“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.”
― Marcus Aurelius, Meditations

(in reply to danlongman)
Post #: 443
RE: A new ACW.. - 1/23/2013 1:26:49 AM   
Neilster


Posts: 2298
Joined: 10/27/2003
From: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
Status: offline
Sorry if this sort of thing has been posted before but I can't be arsed going through this tedious thread to check. Here's some hot chicks in bikini "uniforms" firing various weapons...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=6e6n1ODDth4

Some of these now contain a lot of plastic components...as do the guns

Cheers, Neilster

(in reply to MrRoadrunner)
Post #: 444
RE: A new ACW.. - 1/23/2013 2:00:41 AM   
danlongman

 

Posts: 461
Joined: 3/27/2012
From: Over the hills and far away
Status: offline
^^More than a little plastic that's for sure.
I apologise if you don't like my tone. I do not oppose your religious freedoms.
I just wish the hysterical and paranoid tone would go away. You have a case to present
and the hyperbole expressed by some adds little to it.

_____________________________

"Patriotism: Your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." - George Bernard Shaw

(in reply to Neilster)
Post #: 445
RE: A new ACW.. - 1/23/2013 4:16:27 AM   
Chickenboy


Posts: 18476
Joined: 6/29/2002
From: Twin Cities, MN
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Neilster

Sorry if this sort of thing has been posted before but I can't be arsed going through this tedious thread to check. Here's some hot chicks in bikini "uniforms" firing various weapons...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=6e6n1ODDth4

Some of these now contain a lot of plastic components...as do the guns

Cheers, Neilster



Best post yet on this thread, Neilster! Many thanks!

Some of those women are terrible shots. I could hardly watch their bad marksmanship, but yet found the strength to carry on and watch it all. 27 times.

_____________________________


(in reply to Neilster)
Post #: 446
RE: A new ACW.. - 1/23/2013 11:12:04 AM   
BASB


Posts: 1715
Joined: 2/14/2005
Status: offline
So bloody typical, it takes a Tasmanian to bring a highly entertaining, educational and informing thread to the pits. Your post will probably get the thread locked.
signed disappointed mainlander

_____________________________

Formerly Goodwood


(in reply to Chickenboy)
Post #: 447
RE: A new ACW.. - 1/25/2013 2:00:49 AM   
parusski


Posts: 4847
Joined: 5/8/2000
From: Wyoming, Even Liberals Welcome
Status: offline
And great news from this nations Sheriffs:

Number Of Nation's Sheriffs Refusing To Enforce Unconstitutional Gun Laws Snowballs



_____________________________

"I hate newspapermen. They come into camp and pick up their camp rumors and print them as facts. I regard them as spies, which, in truth, they are. If I killed them all there would be news from Hell before breakfast."- W.T. Sherman

(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 448
RE: A new ACW.. - 1/25/2013 5:00:09 AM   
Neilster


Posts: 2298
Joined: 10/27/2003
From: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BASB

So bloody typical, it takes a Tasmanian to bring a highly entertaining, educational and informing thread to the pits. Your post will probably get the thread locked.
signed disappointed mainlander

I beg your pardon? Are you attempting to discriminate against me on the basis of where I live? I hope not. Given the content of the Australian Beauties thread, the sight of women in bikinis shouldn't get the thread locked. Have you ever been to a beach?

If you have a problem with women in bikinis, Saudi Arabia will be more than happy to take you. BTW, I'm actually from New South Wales, which kind of deflates your nasty little insult anyway.

Neilster

(in reply to BASB)
Post #: 449
RE: A new ACW.. - 1/25/2013 5:52:42 AM   
BASB


Posts: 1715
Joined: 2/14/2005
Status: offline
Oh sorry a mainland refugee.

_____________________________

Formerly Goodwood


(in reply to Neilster)
Post #: 450
Page:   <<   < prev  13 14 [15] 16 17   next >   >>
All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion >> RE: A new ACW.. Page: <<   < prev  13 14 [15] 16 17   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.115