Matrix Games Forums

Battle Academy is now available on SteamPlayers compare Ageods Civil War to Civil War IIDeal of the week - An updated War in the East goes half Price!Sign up for the Qvadriga beta for iPad and Android!Come and say hi at Pax and SaluteLegends of War goes on sale!Piercing Fortress Europa Gets UpdatedBattle Academy Mega Pack is now availableClose Combat: Gateway to Caen Teaser TrailerDeal of the Week Alea Jacta Est
Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Proposal for Patch - Land Unit Disband Change

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Commander - The Great War >> Proposal for Patch - Land Unit Disband Change Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Proposal for Patch - Land Unit Disband Change - 1/4/2013 6:55:07 AM   
Forwarn45

 

Posts: 718
Joined: 4/26/2005
Status: offline
First off, apologies if someone has already suggested something similar.
But I propose the unit disband feature for land units be modified as follows:
(1) No change if the unit being disbanded is within the player's home country and in full supply.
In the case of the British Commonwealth, only units actually in the UK are considered in the home country to discourage gamey disbanding of Canadian or Mideast armies.
(2) Reduced PP recovery the further the unit is away from the player's home country or not in full supply (all the way down to 0 for faraway units).
(3) Perhaps slightly reduced manpower recovery as well per (2) but not as significant reduction as for PP's.

I think this would solve the gaminess problem with the feature while still allowing players to change the character of an army if they want to take advantage of new unit types (training of tank units, etc. or getting rid of garrisons to make way for better units). It would also still allow players who have overbuilt to configure a leaner, meaner army. And players could still take the hit for disbanding faraway units if they absolutely need to for maintenance cost reasons. They just would get little other benefit from it.

< Message edited by Forwarn45 -- 1/4/2013 7:00:09 AM >
Post #: 1
RE: Proposal for Patch - Land Unit Disband Change - 1/4/2013 9:18:45 AM   
Myrddraal

 

Posts: 293
Joined: 11/13/2012
Status: offline
I don't think a distinction between home and conquered territory has been suggested for disband before. It's an interesting idea... I'd like to hear more players thoughts!

(in reply to Forwarn45)
Post #: 2
RE: Proposal for Patch - Land Unit Disband Change - 1/4/2013 10:00:12 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 16007
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Myrddraal

I don't think a distinction between home and conquered territory has been suggested for disband before. It's an interesting idea... I'd like to hear more players thoughts!
warspite1

I think this is a great idea.

Should players be allowed to disband units to change the make-up of their armies? Yes, absolutely. But for that to be realistic, those units should be in the home country and not hundreds/thousands of miles away where they would (in the real world) still need transporting back home.

_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty - Horatio Nelson 1805.




(in reply to Myrddraal)
Post #: 3
RE: Proposal for Patch - Land Unit Disband Change - 1/4/2013 10:20:35 AM   
Myrddraal

 

Posts: 293
Joined: 11/13/2012
Status: offline
Should the PP refund from disbanding (in your home country) stay as is, or could a further disincentive to disbanding be created by reducing the PP refund (not the MP refund)?

(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 4
RE: Proposal for Patch - Land Unit Disband Change - 1/4/2013 2:05:34 PM   
fodder


Posts: 1720
Joined: 4/11/2010
From: Daytona Beach
Status: offline
I think the PP refund from disbanding in a units home country should stay the same. Decreasing it the further away from it's home country it is , doesn't sound like a bad idea.

_____________________________


(in reply to Myrddraal)
Post #: 5
RE: Proposal for Patch - Land Unit Disband Change - 1/4/2013 3:07:43 PM   
Mike Parker

 

Posts: 581
Joined: 12/30/2008
From: Houston TX
Status: offline
First off some of the biggest abuses are with the UK.. not all of them but alot of them. Disbanding the Canadian Corps, the Gibralter and Malta Garrisons would not be effected at all as those units start in home territory already. I suppose you could create another country called the commonwealth and make all that extra British Isle territory CW and UK conquored but that seems somewhat complex

I honestly think the way to go about this might be simply to allow ONE and only one disbandment per side per turn. This would stop wholesale changes and make them gradual. This combined with reducing the armoured train issue would go along way towards remving gamey tactics, and there would be alot less disbandment with the removal of armoured trains being so beneficial.

(in reply to fodder)
Post #: 6
RE: Proposal for Patch - Land Unit Disband Change - 1/4/2013 5:28:22 PM   
Forwarn45

 

Posts: 718
Joined: 4/26/2005
Status: offline
My proposal would consider only the British units in the UK (home isles) to be within the home territory for purposes of the unit disband feature and not any units elsewhere, including Canada, Gibraltar, Malta, Mideast, etc. (See above.) Armoured train issue should be separately addressed (maybe with increased maintenance cost).

< Message edited by Forwarn45 -- 1/4/2013 5:31:12 PM >

(in reply to Mike Parker)
Post #: 7
RE: Proposal for Patch - Land Unit Disband Change - 1/4/2013 10:10:07 PM   
Mike Parker

 

Posts: 581
Joined: 12/30/2008
From: Houston TX
Status: offline
I understand. And I certainly do not know the coding behind this game, but currently all those place are UK home territory. Nobody else really has that problem, I mean Libya is Italian but its not an abuse if Italian units in Libya disband because well.. it never happens.. same with Tunisia/Morocco with French units. So one would likely have to create a new country and make Canada Egypt Gibralter and Malta part of that new country in order to make things work right. Maybe that is easy, but likely it isn't. Its possible one could just code up the disband function so it knows to only allow disbands in certain hexs.

What I was saying was that if you fix the armoured train issue, and limited disbands to one per side per turn you would likely find that the disband is not such a horrible problem as it admittedly is currently!

(in reply to Forwarn45)
Post #: 8
RE: Proposal for Patch - Land Unit Disband Change - 1/4/2013 11:22:32 PM   
Myrddraal

 

Posts: 293
Joined: 11/13/2012
Status: offline
quote:

So one would likely have to create a new country and make Canada Egypt Gibralter and Malta part of that new country in order to make things work right. Maybe that is easy, but likely it isn't. Its possible one could just code up the disband function so it knows to only allow disbands in certain hexs.


Both are possible, however, with the game rules as they stand, creating a new country for British colonies would prevent the UK deploying troops in those cities, which is obviously not what we want.

We could code the disband function to only work in certain hexes, but that seems like a rather arbitrary rule...

(in reply to Mike Parker)
Post #: 9
RE: Proposal for Patch - Land Unit Disband Change - 1/5/2013 12:03:57 AM   
Forwarn45

 

Posts: 718
Joined: 4/26/2005
Status: offline
Perhaps the best way to make this work would be to calculate the distance (for purposes of the PP reduction) between the unit being disbanded and a country's capital cities. Say - the PP production begins to kick in if the unit is more than 5 hexes from a capital city. Anyway, it's just a thought.

BTW - I don't mind the other proposal of 1 per turn limitation. But I think it would still be a little too easy to abuse given the number of turns in this game. This applies to Britain but can potentially apply to others, including minors like Portugal, and even the central powers in some situations (Turkey, Germans deep in Russia). And I don't see there being anything gamey or objectionable about disbanding multiple units close to home in a single turn. For example, a country that no longer needs garrisons - like France - could disband a couple of units in the home country in order to save on maintenance and produce better units.

(in reply to Myrddraal)
Post #: 10
RE: Proposal for Patch - Land Unit Disband Change - 1/5/2013 2:30:06 AM   
fodder


Posts: 1720
Joined: 4/11/2010
From: Daytona Beach
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Myrddraal
with the game rules as they stand, creating a new country for British colonies would prevent the UK deploying troops in those cities, which is obviously not what we want.



Why is this not what we want? Why not give the UK an extra transport or two and make it ship it's units over seas. Makes more sense then units just popping up half way around the world.


_____________________________


(in reply to Myrddraal)
Post #: 11
RE: Proposal for Patch - Land Unit Disband Change - 1/5/2013 4:28:52 AM   
Naskra

 

Posts: 303
Joined: 3/12/2005
Status: offline
If I want the Canadian Corps in Egypt, I can disband it at birth in Canada and rebuild it in Cairo for a net gain in PPs, shipping, efficiency, and time. That ain't right.

(in reply to fodder)
Post #: 12
RE: Proposal for Patch - Land Unit Disband Change - 1/5/2013 8:55:11 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 16007
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Naskra

If I want the Canadian Corps in Egypt, I can disband it at birth in Canada and rebuild it in Cairo for a net gain in PPs, shipping, efficiency, and time. That ain't right.
warspite1

100% Agreed

If a player can be allowed to do that under the rules, then you could argue that there is no point having units coming from Canada. No one would ever bother sailing the troops to Europe because of the gains in not so doing.

At a time when the majority of posters are asking for more realism (less armoured trains, no/greatly reduced strategic bombing, more (and appropriately balanced) naval units, hits taken by fleets operating in confined coastal waters etc) it seems counter-intuitive to dumb down one of the key aspects of British Commonwealth participation in the two World Wars.

_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty - Horatio Nelson 1805.




(in reply to Naskra)
Post #: 13
RE: Proposal for Patch - Land Unit Disband Change - 1/6/2013 12:34:02 PM   
Myrddraal

 

Posts: 293
Joined: 11/13/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: fodder
Why is this not what we want?


With the rules as they currently stand, Britain would then not be able to deploy units in Canada (you can only deploy in your home territory).

(in reply to fodder)
Post #: 14
RE: Proposal for Patch - Land Unit Disband Change - 1/6/2013 4:41:15 PM   
pat.casey

 

Posts: 392
Joined: 9/10/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Naskra

If I want the Canadian Corps in Egypt, I can disband it at birth in Canada and rebuild it in Cairo for a net gain in PPs, shipping, efficiency, and time. That ain't right.


Doesnt' everybody disband the canadian corps as soon as it shows up? (not a trick question).

If you do the math you get hte troops in the field faster, and roughly the same PP cost, by just disbanding and rebuilding in England (or the med if you prefer).

I agree its a bad rule that drives players to do so, but its also almost bonkers to no do so in a competative game.

(in reply to Naskra)
Post #: 15
RE: Proposal for Patch - Land Unit Disband Change - 1/6/2013 4:48:07 PM   
warspite1


Posts: 16007
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: pat.casey


quote:

ORIGINAL: Naskra

If I want the Canadian Corps in Egypt, I can disband it at birth in Canada and rebuild it in Cairo for a net gain in PPs, shipping, efficiency, and time. That ain't right.


Doesnt' everybody disband the canadian corps as soon as it shows up? (not a trick question).

If you do the math you get hte troops in the field faster, and roughly the same PP cost, by just disbanding and rebuilding in England (or the med if you prefer).

I agree its a bad rule that drives players to do so, but its also almost bonkers to no do so in a competative game.
warspite1

No - never done it - guess I'm bonkers

_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty - Horatio Nelson 1805.




(in reply to pat.casey)
Post #: 16
RE: Proposal for Patch - Land Unit Disband Change - 1/7/2013 2:31:40 PM   
fodder


Posts: 1720
Joined: 4/11/2010
From: Daytona Beach
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Myrddraal


quote:

ORIGINAL: fodder
Why is this not what we want?


With the rules as they currently stand, Britain would then not be able to deploy units in Canada (you can only deploy in your home territory).


Yes, I understand that. I have no problem with Britain not being able to do that.

_____________________________


(in reply to Myrddraal)
Post #: 17
RE: Proposal for Patch - Land Unit Disband Change - 1/7/2013 3:06:16 PM   
catwhoorg


Posts: 619
Joined: 9/27/2012
From: Uk expat lving near Atlanta
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: pat.casey


quote:

ORIGINAL: Naskra

If I want the Canadian Corps in Egypt, I can disband it at birth in Canada and rebuild it in Cairo for a net gain in PPs, shipping, efficiency, and time. That ain't right.


Doesnt' everybody disband the canadian corps as soon as it shows up? (not a trick question).

If you do the math you get hte troops in the field faster, and roughly the same PP cost, by just disbanding and rebuilding in England (or the med if you prefer).

I agree its a bad rule that drives players to do so, but its also almost bonkers to no do so in a competative game.
warspite1

No - never done it - guess I'm bonkers


Me neither.

Its simply to gamey for me to consider doing so.


(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 18
RE: Proposal for Patch - Land Unit Disband Change - 1/8/2013 5:38:03 PM   
Mike Parker

 

Posts: 581
Joined: 12/30/2008
From: Houston TX
Status: offline
I admit I do it every time (I take the back every time after the first time I drove it by transport and had it arrive like 5 turns later and land in the UK red!) I do the same with the Malta and Gibralter Garrisons!

(in reply to catwhoorg)
Post #: 19
RE: Proposal for Patch - Land Unit Disband Change - 1/9/2013 2:17:32 PM   
colberki

 

Posts: 153
Joined: 6/16/2007
Status: offline
What is the ETA for the next patch so that the unit disbanding rule changes are implemented and we can play PBEM with any related house rules?

(in reply to Mike Parker)
Post #: 20
RE: Proposal for Patch - Land Unit Disband Change - 1/10/2013 12:16:36 PM   
FOARP

 

Posts: 38
Joined: 12/24/2012
Status: offline
An independent Canada would solve this problem.

(in reply to colberki)
Post #: 21
RE: Proposal for Patch - Land Unit Disband Change - 1/23/2013 10:30:17 PM   
Andriko


Posts: 42
Joined: 12/27/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: FOARP

An independent Canada would solve this problem.


I would suggest this also.

(in reply to FOARP)
Post #: 22
RE: Proposal for Patch - Land Unit Disband Change - 1/28/2013 2:55:21 PM   
billgber

 

Posts: 13
Joined: 1/12/2013
Status: offline
I really don't think it's useful to change the rules.

(in reply to Andriko)
Post #: 23
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Commander - The Great War >> Proposal for Patch - Land Unit Disband Change Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.121