VadeS fast review of Panthers in the Fog

Close Combat: Panthers in the Fog is the first new release (not a re-make of a previous games) in years in the critically acclaimed Close Combat series. It details the desperate German counter-attack at Mortain, the last chance of the Wehrmacht to stave off defeat in Normandy. Can you match the tenacity of the American defenders of Hill 314? Or can you succeed where the Panzers failed, driving through to the sea and changing history? Improved 32-bit graphics and the ability to control more squads than ever bring the Close Combat engine to a new level.
Post Reply
VadeS
Posts: 25
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2012 7:18 am

VadeS fast review of Panthers in the Fog

Post by VadeS »

Hi everyone !

I play CC from the very beginning, since CC I a bridge to far. Who would though years ago that CC with it's 2D graphic could survive on the market for so long ? It was possible because CC is a unique system simulating squad level - no other games can match it.

First of all PitF is a very dynamic game. Now you can't just send your troops whenever you want, if enemy spots you first you have little chance to survive. Infantry fire is more accurate and losing your team in gun fire could last couple of seconds, not mentioning being spotted in open ground.

In previous versions I could easily send my squad to the certain death i.e. assaulting moderately defended building, now troops will propably surrender or route - so forget about kamikaze or weak attack.

HQ units are finally are fully useful - now broken unit is completly unuseful and without HQ it won't regain it's readiness.

Ground AT/AP artilery is usefull longer than couple of seconds after being spotted and fired on by enemy mortar, so now you can enjoy firing your 88.

AI - what AI ? I lost hope that developing AI in CC is possible. For example in scenarios where AI is an attacking side and has an overwhelming forces it just waits for you on a small area + makes some random movements.

Mount function is a great idea but in practice it is not that useful. Example - PZgenadiere in Kubelwagen could flank enemy but instead vehicle can't move efficiently even on a straight road, so surprise effect is lost.

Mortar fire is more deadlier than previously but it takes time and shells to aim target propertly. Mortar team has about 20 shells, about 4 are needed to aim target so in one game you could fire effectively max 3 targets.

Tanks are still very powerfull but as I mentioned before they can't move even on a straight road - if you plan to support infantry with tanks I bet that you will spend most of time on moving vehicles rather than focusing on infantry attack.


So is it worth buing ? definetly yes !

Hasn't this game out lived it's time? definetly no ! good tactical level simulation will newer get bored for enthusiasts even in 2D graphic.


But please MATRIX GAMES do something with vehicle movement, this part of game is unlogic and just stupid.
User avatar
wodin
Posts: 10709
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 3:13 am
Location: England
Contact:

RE: VadeS fast review of Panthers in the Fog

Post by wodin »

If the AI is as bad as you say I'm not sure how you can recommend it.
User avatar
PipFromSlitherine
Posts: 1468
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:11 pm

RE: VadeS fast review of Panthers in the Fog

Post by PipFromSlitherine »

And yet there is a post in Tech Support complaining that the AI isn't cautious enough. So I'm not sure it's so clear cut.

Cheers

Pip
follow me on Twitter here
User avatar
Redmarkus5
Posts: 4454
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 1:59 pm
Location: 0.00

RE: VadeS fast review of Panthers in the Fog

Post by Redmarkus5 »

Very confusing review. Why would I go ahead and buy, as recommended, after reading your comments about both the AI and vehicle movement?
WitE2 tester, WitW, WitP, CMMO, CM2, GTOS, GTMF, WP & WPP, TOAW4, BA2
VadeS
Posts: 25
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2012 7:18 am

RE: VadeS fast review of Panthers in the Fog

Post by VadeS »

I should write it in my review - AI and vehicle movement is almost the same as in CC V , I just hoped that PitF will finally fix it !.
Despite this PitH is still very interesting game, especially infantry tactics.

[:)]
SapperAstro_MatrixForum
Posts: 216
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 9:05 pm
Location: Penrith, Australia

RE: VadeS fast review of Panthers in the Fog

Post by SapperAstro_MatrixForum »

Fix what exactly?

While the AI in the other CC's can be braindead, it can also pull off something surprisingly good in equal measure. In other words...it is a computer AI in a wargame...[:D]

So what is so terrible about this one?

xe5
Posts: 783
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 5:06 pm

RE: VadeS fast review of Panthers in the Fog

Post by xe5 »

ORIGINAL: VadeS
First of all PitF is a very dynamic game. Now you can't just send your troops whenever you want, if enemy spots you first you have little chance to survive. Infantry fire is more accurate and losing your team in gun fire could last couple of seconds, not mentioning being spotted in open ground.
IMO this makes the biggest difference in solo play balance - the player optimally re-deploys his force and therefor doesnt have to move as much, get spotted and die. The AI doesnt re-deploy, does have to move, gets spotted and dies. No player re-deploy = fairer fight.
In previous versions I could easily send my squad to the certain death i.e. assaulting moderately defended building, now troops will propably surrender or route - so forget about kamikaze or weak attack.

HQ units are finally are fully useful - now broken unit is completly unuseful and without HQ it won't regain it's readiness.
Beat up and weak teams will readily surrender when out of command. Barring a nearby command team, high leadership subordinate teams can stiffen weak teams. A good example in PITF is US rifle squads where sqd leaders in the rifle teams lend command influence to the BAR teams. Set the Team Info Icon option to 'Command' and use the Space Bar to see the proximity (ie. overlapping command circles) of higher leadership Rifle teams (red command circles) improve the command rating of lower leadership BAR teams (black command circles).
Image
Mortar fire is more deadlier than previously but it takes time and shells to aim target propertly. Mortar team has about 20 shells, about 4 are needed to aim target so in one game you could fire effectively max 3 targets.
Fully supplied Mortar teams have 30 rounds and shoot 6 round fire missions. They require 2 spotting rounds to zero in on a new target. The first spotting round takes ~21 seconds to aim and will miss by a wide margin (occasionally causing friendly casualties). The second spotting round takes ~12 seconds to aim and will impact much closer to the target (occasionally causing enemy casualties). The remaining 4 rounds of the fire mission dont require any aiming time and are rapidly fired for effect on the target with some small CEP variation. If a mortar can see its own target the aim time is significantly shorter. The downside to this being that the target can also see the mortar team. There is no accuracy benefit if friendly units can spot the target, or if the firing range is shortened as in previous CC versions.

An orange Target Marker appears on the tactical and mini-maps after the second spotting round when the mortar team is selected. Target Markers are centered on the 8x8 meter map 'tile' that the fire dot is placed in, not on the exact 5x5 centimeter map pixel the fire dot is centered on (Map scale is now 8 pixels = 1 meter). Target Markers for the last 3 fire missions are saved and displayed when the mortar unit is selected. New fire missions at existing Target Markers (or within those map tiles) require no aim time. Oddly, the CEP of fire missions at existing Target Markers seems to be slightly greater than the first 4 rounds of fire for effect.

Its very useful to create a group for mortars (select->CTRL+number) so you can select them quickly in the heat of battle using that hotkey. Dont know why Target Markers arent displayed on the zoomed out Overview map but it would be helpful if they were.
Attachments
CmdBoost.jpg
CmdBoost.jpg (185.75 KiB) Viewed 381 times
Tejszd
Posts: 3466
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2007 4:32 pm

RE: VadeS fast review of Panthers in the Fog

Post by Tejszd »

The mortar changes make the process and time for troops to get support more realistic.
PDiFolco
Posts: 1195
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:14 am

RE: VadeS fast review of Panthers in the Fog

Post by PDiFolco »

Mortars still have "magical spotting" - I mean you can aim somewhere that no officer/spotter has any LOS too ?
This has broken all CC games since the start - which incidentally wasn't "a bridge too far", that's CC2, but just "Close combat" and was in Normandy.
PDF
xe5
Posts: 783
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 5:06 pm

RE: VadeS fast review of Panthers in the Fog

Post by xe5 »

ORIGINAL: PDiFolco
Mortars still have "magical spotting" - I mean you can aim somewhere that no officer/spotter has any LOS too ?
This has broken all CC games since the start - which incidentally wasn't "a bridge too far", that's CC2, but just "Close combat" and was in Normandy.
An 11Charlie can fire towards random map coordinates w/o a spotter or LOS. Mortars in CC tend to be more efficient when firing at known targets which are, by definition, visible to at least one friendly unit.
VadeS
Posts: 25
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2012 7:18 am

RE: VadeS fast review of Panthers in the Fog

Post by VadeS »

Maybe mortars should work like in Squad Leader ?
xe5
Posts: 783
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 5:06 pm

RE: VadeS fast review of Panthers in the Fog

Post by xe5 »

ORIGINAL: VadeS
Maybe mortars should work like in Squad Leader ?
CC is a notorious cheat when rolling dice.
PDiFolco
Posts: 1195
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:14 am

RE: VadeS fast review of Panthers in the Fog

Post by PDiFolco »

ORIGINAL: xe5
ORIGINAL: PDiFolco
Mortars still have "magical spotting" - I mean you can aim somewhere that no officer/spotter has any LOS too ?
This has broken all CC games since the start - which incidentally wasn't "a bridge too far", that's CC2, but just "Close combat" and was in Normandy.
An 11Charlie can fire towards random map coordinates w/o a spotter or LOS. Mortars in CC tend to be more efficient when firing at known targets which are, by definition, visible to at least one friendly unit.

How can some mortar team fire at "random coordinates" that just happens to be populated by enemies - that are seen by another team which can't communicate with the mortar ?
Seriously, CC needs arty spotting rules..
PDF
Tejszd
Posts: 3466
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2007 4:32 pm

RE: VadeS fast review of Panthers in the Fog

Post by Tejszd »

It is bit of a whole in CC as we do not know if a team can or can't communicate with the mortar team. Having said that all teams can be given orders so there must be some form of communication happening....
xe5
Posts: 783
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 5:06 pm

RE: VadeS fast review of Panthers in the Fog

Post by xe5 »

You asked how mortars can aim somewhere that no friendly has LOS to. IRL it can be done by pre-registration on target, by adjustment from pre-registered targets, by adjustment from explosion plumes, by adjustment from spotting rounds that are within LOS, or, in extremis, simply by good old-fashioned Kentucky windage. The H&I missions 11Chucks fired in Nam are a prime example of hoping the target "just happens to be populated by enemies".

Since mortars in CC are invariaby fired at spotted targets, your "magical spotting" issue involves the assumption that the spotting unit cant communicate with the mortar. I'd argue that it can communicate (radio/relayed mssgs/runner/carrier pigeon/jungle drums etc) but the game design abstracts and time compresses the call for fire process. The last USMC training version of CC simulated the complete call for fire process where an instructor played both FDC & battery and one Marine acted as FO. The other nine Marines got to play team and squad leaders. If you want an accurate simulation of indirect fire youre gonna spend an hour playing 'FO in the Mist' futzing with a game UI representation of an SCR-300 radio. Otherwise the 'magical spotting' issue devolves to what degree of abstraction is appropriate.

The omniscient FO aspect is insignificant considering CC is a game with magical C3 where you the CO, communicate with, and share your subordinates situational awareness instantly.
Post Reply

Return to “Close Combat: Panthers in the Fog”