Another WitE expansion?

Matrix Games Forums

Command Ops gets a Massive Update!

Lost Battles AAR: Smolensk 41

War in the East: Lost Battles is here!

Conflict of Heroes: Awakening the Bear! Let's Play video

Lost Battles Scenario Manual excerpts available!

A sneak peek from Allied Corps!

Harpoon 3 ANWs Free Ultimate Update!

All good Deals always come in threes

Distant Worlds: Shadows Approaches!

Lost Battles AAR: Moscow 41

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Another WitE expansion?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> Another WitE expansion?

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Another WitE expansion? - 11/22/2012 9:16:57 AM

jamesm

Posts: 726
Joined: 8/28/2000
From: Cairns, Australia
Status: offline

I seem to remember a couple of months a they were looking for beta test testers for another possible WitE expansion. If this is the case any details?

< Message edited by jamesm -- 11/22/2012 9:23:19 AM >

Post #: 1

RE: Another WitE expansion? - 11/22/2012 3:30:13 PM

Pelton

Posts: 4355
Joined: 4/9/2006
Status: offline

Wite is not close to balanced as can be seen in AAR's, but they need cash so they working on witw.

So expect Leningrad/Moscow/Rostov to be held and Berlin to fall in 44.

I am back to the 2by3 is uber bias for SHC.

SHC units are way way way way over powered and blizzard is a complete joke. The only large formations to get pocketed during blizzard were russians.

_____________________________

GHC
15 - 3 - 7

10 games ended in 41 (10-0-0)
4 games ended in 42 (4-0-2)
3 games ended in 43 (1-2-3)
1 game ended in 44 (0-1-2)

(in reply to jamesm)

Post #: 2

RE: Another WitE expansion? - 11/22/2012 3:40:06 PM

morvael

Posts: 1129
Joined: 9/8/2006
From: Poland
Status: offline

I don't like the "uber" moments each army has as well. I have already proposed that reducing the gap between armies in those moments would result in better game experience, even if someone could deem it a-historical.

(in reply to Pelton)

Post #: 3

RE: Another WitE expansion? - 11/22/2012 7:47:18 PM

Aurelian

Posts: 1428
Joined: 2/26/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pelton

Wite is not close to balanced as can be seen in AAR's, .

SHC units are way way way way over powered and blizzard is a complete joke.

SHC
0-0-0 with 1 on going.
GHC
15 - 3 - 3 with 4 on going.

Sure looks that way doesn't it.

_____________________________

(in reply to Pelton)

Post #: 4

RE: Another WitE expansion? - 11/23/2012 7:51:15 AM

Apollo11

Posts: 21608
Joined: 6/7/2001
From: Zagreb, Croatia
Status: offline

Hi all,

As it was announced earlier - the expansion scenarios are in development!

Same thing, as usual, Joel will provide all necessary info when proper time comes!

Leo "Apollo11"

_____________________________

Prior Preparation & Planning Prevents Pathetically Poor Performance!

A & B: WitW, WitE, WbtS, GGWaW, GGWaW2-AWD, HttR, CotA, BftB, CF
P: UV, WitP, WitP-AE

(in reply to jamesm)

Post #: 5

RE: Another WitE expansion? - 11/23/2012 12:49:24 PM

jamesm

Posts: 726
Joined: 8/28/2000
From: Cairns, Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Apollo11

Hi all,

As it was announced earlier - the expansion scenarios are in development!

Same thing, as usual, Joel will provide all necessary info when proper time comes!

Leo "Apollo11"