So how does the campaign stack up?

Matrix Games Forums

Join the Matrix Team at Historicon!

Recruiting Privates for Germany at War: Barbarossa 1941!

Ageod takes you back to the Civil War

Battle Academy iPad and PC 50 per cent off!

Close Combat Last Stand Arnhem v5.60.53 update

Allied Corps Walkthrough playlist and AAR

Conflict of Heroes: Ghost Divisions Released!

Pandora Beta Playthrough Videos

Germany at War: Barbarossa 1941 Announced!

Great Battles Medieval coming to your tablet with a 50 per cent off launch sale!

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

So how does the campaign stack up?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Close Combat Series >> Close Combat: Panthers in the Fog >> So how does the campaign stack up?

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

So how does the campaign stack up? - 11/21/2012 5:47:59 PM

SapperAstro

Posts: 121
Joined: 10/28/2002
From: Penrith, Australia
Status: offline

And the overall gameplay next to the last Close Combat games released?

Might be a bit early for this question, but by all means, take your time in answering it if you haven't yet formulated an answer...

Not looking for any of the old chestnuts in this thread (AI is terrible, blah blah), just what other CC lovers think about this game compared to the last few releases regarding the battles, operations, campaigns and content.

Post #: 1

RE: So how does the campaign stack up? - 11/22/2012 12:50:08 AM

The Hunter

Posts: 845
Joined: 4/30/2006
Status: offline

I'm playing through the historical campaign as German right now, about 2 days in. Plenty of challenges and setbacks keeping me interested.

One thing I note is that you can assign support assets, and if you don't use them, they carry over. This means I always allocate them fully in each turn, and then just don't use them if I don't need to. Why leave them unallocated when they can instead be "on-call"?

(in reply to SapperAstro)

Post #: 2