Matrix Games Forums

A new update for Piercing Fortress EuropaNew screenshots for War in the West!Pike & Shot is now available!Server Maintenance Battle Academy 2 gets updated!Deal of the Week: Advanced Tactics Gold Ask Buzz Aldrin!Pike & Shot gets Release Date and Twitch Session!Deal of the Week Espana 1936War in the West coming in December!
Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 11/28/2012 3:57:52 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
As you can see from the TF display I've found some escorts for the Houston and the Boise. I'm seeing more ships in the northern Jap
group of ships but the southern group doesn't seem to have any ships that can shoot back and has an AP probably. I'm going after the
southern group first. Then tangle w/ the northern group later.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 181
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 11/28/2012 4:02:49 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
I'm going to move up the four DD's in TF 402 to back up the Houston and Boise group to their north.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 182
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 11/28/2012 4:14:11 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
I'm hoping that the southern Jap group is really moving SE because I intend to try to keep them within range of my aircraft for at least 1
more day before they get closer to some land-based air power, after which I'll back off. I haven't determined where they should go after
that.....I'm thinking the Rabaul area maybe.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 183
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 11/28/2012 4:38:46 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
Last night these guys were baby-sitting Hong Kong and today they are run out of gas in the middle of nowhere and can't reach anywhere
so they are just going to drift along 1 hex at a time until they get sunk I guess. Oh, and thanks for your services you guys. You made the
war just a little bit shorter because of what you guys did. See you after the war.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 184
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 11/28/2012 4:47:58 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
The Commander of S-39 doesn't have any information concerning a minefield at Bubble Drop. He's going to gingerly go in there and find
out one way or another. Whatever it takes to get to those Jap ships. Remind me to buy him a beer next time I see him.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 185
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 11/28/2012 4:55:46 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
All there is at Guam is some engineers.....I took a look and there's like 8 Marine Rifle Squads there but they won't last long. I expect that
Guam is going to fall sometime soon.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 186
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 11/28/2012 5:13:40 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
I told the Montanes to evacuate to Dadjangas but I doubt they will get there.....they took considerable damage. Plus,
there's an enemy TF in the hex. And to top everything off it's still on fire too.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 187
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 11/28/2012 5:18:52 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
On second thought I'll dock that bad boy right there at Davao and see if docking it makes the fire go out. We'll at least get the crew off
the boat before it goes down. May have to scuttle her.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 188
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 11/28/2012 5:42:02 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
Okie dokie......I pulled the trigger again. Here's the new losses figures:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 189
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 11/28/2012 5:46:23 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
A Jap sub gets another of my boats. Too bad I don't have enough escorts to escort everybody. Maybe I should put off shipping anything
for a while to let the subs "go away". Or until I get some more escorts. I know.....I'll use all those otherwise useless AMC boats as
escorts. That'll help out. I wonder if those little local minesweepers have any ASW capability. I'll look that up and get back to you.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 190
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 11/28/2012 5:49:18 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
And then there were several uneventful sub attacks by both sides and then one of my subs got lucky:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 191
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 11/28/2012 5:51:18 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
And then the Snapper started having a bad day:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 192
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 11/28/2012 5:54:45 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
And then these things happened, moments apart:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 193
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 11/28/2012 5:57:12 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
And then the Sailfish has a bad day:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 194
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 11/28/2012 5:59:52 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
And then the Swan and the Moresby have a bad day:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 195
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 11/28/2012 6:04:14 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
And then the Salmon brought us some good news for the Allied side:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 196
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 11/28/2012 6:10:40 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
And then there was a Jap air raid on Wake:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 197
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 11/28/2012 6:21:29 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
This is the Wildcat group on Wake. Morale is good fatigue is low. I boosted the CAP to 90% in an effort to get everybody airborne from
now on.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 198
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 11/28/2012 6:25:15 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
Some of my escaping AK's got a little too close to Saigon.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 199
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 11/28/2012 6:30:16 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
This attack is the first indication I've had so far that leads me to believe that Elmer has one or more carriers in this fight near Rabaul.
Well, that changes the whole dynamic. I'll have to escape and evade that carrier until I can get one or more of my carriers to come into
this fight.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 200
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 11/28/2012 6:39:28 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
Those Claudes have the potential to make this enterprise expensive. I've accomplished about all I could have expected....maybe it's time
to back off and regroup. Bring that third carrier to bear w/ these two. That kind of thing. Plus, our presence could be needed around
the Rabaul area according to recent developments so I'll head that way with the carriers.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 201
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 11/28/2012 6:43:44 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
Yes, it's definately time to quit doing this kind of thing within range of those Oscars. This is getting way to expensive for the ships I have
opportunity to attack.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 202
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 11/28/2012 6:46:02 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
And then the Japs take a dump on my shipping again:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 203
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 11/28/2012 6:50:20 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
And the KB did a passing air strike on the facilities and damaged some things but I don't think they are coming to stay this time. I'm
thinking they are really just passing by on their way to bigger and better things.

EDIT: That reminds me....I need to get some mines to Midway before Elmer tries to invade.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 11/28/2012 6:51:15 AM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 204
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 11/28/2012 6:54:06 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
Those Nates north of Kota Bharu are certainly doing their job........I can't seem to get through the CAP the Japs have put up. How come
when I play the Jap player I can't seem to get this kind of performance from my Nates?




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 205
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 11/28/2012 6:58:25 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
I could have sworn that I put all the B-17's on Naval Search missions.....I guess there was a squadron I missed. I made sure this time.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 206
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 11/28/2012 7:02:01 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
And then that Jap carrier near Rabaul put in another air strike on my ships:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 207
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 11/28/2012 7:04:49 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
And then these attacks happened within moments of each other:

EDIT: I think I'll look into why they are dropping bombs instead of torps.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 11/28/2012 7:05:47 AM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 208
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 11/28/2012 7:08:50 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
It's my own fault Pick got hit.....I keep encouraging them to attack on the surface and save torps.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 209
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 11/28/2012 7:11:36 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
And then the Japs invaded Rabaul:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 210
Page:   <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.117