Matrix Games Forums

To End All Wars: Mountain InfantryPandora: Eclipse of Nashira Announced! Deal of the Week: Command Ops goes half price!New Fronts are opening up for Commander: The Great WarCharacters of World War 1Sign of for the Pike and Shot Beta!More Games are Coming to Steam! Return to the Moon on October 31st! Commander: The Great War iPad Wallpapers Generals of the Great War
Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0 Page: <<   < prev  24 25 [26] 27 28   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0 - 2/1/2013 11:31:37 PM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
Alor Star saw a ground attack by the Japs:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 751
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0 - 2/1/2013 11:37:18 PM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
Then San Fernando was hit by a ground attack:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 752
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0 - 2/1/2013 11:37:57 PM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
And of course, here's the combat report:

Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 753
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0 - 2/2/2013 5:26:45 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
I rounded up all the damaged ships and put them into a TF and gave them an escort and set them on the way to Seattle. It's going to
take an extraordinary length of time to get there. I'm going to segregate the TF into slow ones and faster ones as soon as I round up
some more escorts. They will eventually get there I'm hoping.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 754
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0 - 2/2/2013 5:31:10 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
The HML Hermes will soon be pulling into Oosthaven for repairs. After it's fixed I'm thinking of sailing her over to Kendari and maybe
getting into a Naval Search mode prior to letting the stringbags loose on some Jap ships. I don't want to get her involved in some really
involved fight .......I'm more interested in picking off the odd ship here and there.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 755
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0 - 2/2/2013 11:38:32 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
I pulled the trigger and ended the turn again and here's some fresh combat results. This is just one of about a dozen sub attacks.
Sometimes they get a hit sometimes they don't.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 756
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0 - 2/2/2013 11:42:33 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
SS Permit left Manila harbor on 8Dec and arrived at Hong Kong soon thereafter and has been waiting patiently and finally all that waiting
has paid off. She got an xAK.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 757
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0 - 2/2/2013 11:46:17 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
I lost a CL at Rangoon to Jap air attacks:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 758
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0 - 2/2/2013 11:49:32 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
And then Rabaul was hit by an air attack. I've already evacuated all the aircraft at Rabaul because the runway is deteriorating even as
we speak. My engiineers can't keep up with the damage being delt. And the Japs are dandy at dealing damage.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 759
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0 - 2/2/2013 11:51:33 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
And then there's a second Rangoon air strike and some more ships are hit




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 760
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0 - 2/2/2013 11:53:51 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
And then there was an air strike on Bataan:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 761
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0 - 2/2/2013 11:57:02 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
There's nothing at Brunei so I don't know why Elmer is striking there w/ his carrier planes. Not that I'm complaining. Every carrier plane
he loses to a ground target is one less I don't have to deal w/ on the high seas.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 762
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0 - 2/2/2013 11:59:38 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
And then there was an air strike on my shipping at the Singapore harbor.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 763
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0 - 2/2/2013 12:03:42 PM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
And then there was an airstrike on Georgetown:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 764
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0 - 2/2/2013 12:07:57 PM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
And then the Japs capture San Fernando:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 765
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0 - 2/2/2013 12:09:02 PM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
And of course, here's the combat report:

Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 766
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0 - 2/2/2013 2:32:39 PM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
Here are the places that are still failing.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 2/2/2013 2:33:22 PM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 767
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0 - 2/2/2013 2:43:55 PM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
I used to think that places that were listed in red ment that there were too many planes at one airfield or something but here's a situation
where the only planes that are there are those that won't fly and maybe it's red because of all the runway damage. Pretty cool I think.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 768
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0 - 2/2/2013 3:26:11 PM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
The Ops report contained a blurb about flooding being a problem or something aboard the West Virginia and I though to be safe I'd just
bring them all back and repair some of the damage before going out to sea again.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 769
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0 - 2/2/2013 4:53:51 PM   
catwhoorg


Posts: 636
Joined: 9/27/2012
From: Uk expat lving near Atlanta
Status: offline
If it were me, I'd think about keeping St Louis and Honalulu with the DD and moving them onwards.

The BB's for sure can get some pierside time at Pearl without messing anything up, and make the journey safer in a few weeks.

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 770
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0 - 2/2/2013 6:20:31 PM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: catwhoorg
If it were me, I'd think about keeping St Louis and Honalulu with the DD and moving them onwards.
The BB's for sure can get some pierside time at Pearl without messing anything up, and make the journey safer in a few weeks.

You caught me being lazy again. Of course you're correct. See, this is why you win games and I don't. Attention to detail makes the
difference. I'll make the change you suggested and thanks for the idea.

(in reply to catwhoorg)
Post #: 771
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0 - 2/3/2013 4:25:40 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
I found some low-range transports trying to make their way to Pearl. They can make it about half way I figure so if I have some fuel there
to refuel them they should be able to make it all the way to Pearl. They can help carry stuff and I figure that instead of using them in and
around Sydney I might ought to see if they can be part of the pipeline between hubs. It's working so far. So far so good. I'm putting an
AO in the minor hubs along the way, Palmyra, Canton, etc. so the low-range dudes can fuel up even if they can't dock.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 772
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0 - 2/3/2013 5:54:28 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
Here's the early part of the supply chain running from Pearl to Canton Island. I've got an AO at Palmyra and there's an AO pulling into
Canton and both islands have the necessary rudimentary supply of fuel to allow passage of the low-range dudes. I'm going to get some
engineers into the islands to expand the airfield(s) so that B-17's can pass from Pearl to Oz. easily. Or more easily.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 773
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0 - 2/3/2013 6:23:35 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
Here's the situation around the lower PI. Finally Jap ships are starting to show up around Tarakan and they look to be the invading kind.
So I'm guessing that Tarakan's minefield will slow them down a bit but they will sacrafice some ships to get Tarakan I predict. There's a
CV type in the upper right area that I'm going to have to watch. Elmer could use that against my shipping w/ great effect so it bears
watching.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 774
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0 - 2/3/2013 7:05:25 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
Of all the TF's headed to Midway most of them can be seen on the screen. Midway is out of fuel so I've got an AO headed that way. A
TK will follow shortly. Subs are starting to draw near to Midway so TF 384 I think it is, is an AS and A DD to make a proper sub base. I've
got adequate ground support there. The airfield is good to go, the port is ready. I think maybe Midway is combat ready. Or will be after
the fuel is delivered.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 775
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0 - 2/3/2013 7:16:58 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
I'm in the process of setting up a sub base at Dutch Harbor and it's slow going. I don't even have an AS picked out yet. It needs one of
course so I'll find one and get it there somehow. Also, I'm sending an AVD to Dutch Harbor so as to service a Catalina or two. I'm
sending most of the subs to the Tokyo area to pick off the AK's and AKL's as they leave the harbor so to speak. I'm hoping there will be
a lot of traffic coming out of Tokyo so as to make the Allied job easier, more efficient. There's about 8 or so short-range subs pulling
into Pearl that I'm eventually going to send out to Canton Island and make that a sub base too. If there's enough AS's to go around.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 776
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0 - 2/3/2013 7:34:53 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
I'm going through the TF's one at a time deciding whether or not to allow the vessel to continue on to it's original path or change some
detail about it's condition or something. A minute ago I was wondering if I'd have enough AS's to go around to the various sub bases I
want to install and here a couple of TF's later I find 3 of them in one TF. I'll find an escort for them and see if I can't distribute them to
the places that need them. Midway, Dutch Harbor, Canton, and of course Pearl. I think I've got enough for that.

EDIT: The forum software screwed something up and this post didn't work all that well. See the next one for the image.

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 2/3/2013 7:36:58 AM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 777
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0 - 2/3/2013 7:35:43 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
I'm going through the TF's one at a time deciding whether or not to allow the vessel to continue on to it's original path or change some
detail about it's condition or something. A minute ago I was wondering if I'd have enough AS's to go around to the various sub bases I
want to install and here a couple of TF's later I find 3 of them in one TF. I'll find an escort for them and see if I can't distribute them to
the places that need them. Midway, Dutch Harbor, Canton, and of course Pearl. I think I've got enough for that.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 778
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0 - 2/5/2013 12:10:34 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
I split off the two more seaworthy CL's and made them into a TF that is continuing on to Seattle and the rest of them, the flooding BB and
all the more damaged ships are going back to Pearl to repair a bit more.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 779
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0 - 2/5/2013 5:59:29 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
I pulled the trigger again and ended the turn. So this is fresh combat results: One of my subs gets a DMS and the sunk ships display
shows it as sunk.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 780
Page:   <<   < prev  24 25 [26] 27 28   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0 Page: <<   < prev  24 25 [26] 27 28   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.117