Matrix Games Forums

Armageddon invasion starts in 2014Command Rommels Panzers in Battle Academy!Servers UpdateThe Deal goes Fourth!Command Ops gets a Massive Update!Lost Battles AAR: Smolensk 41War in the East: Lost Battles is here!Conflict of Heroes: Awakening the Bear! Let's Play videoLost Battles Scenario Manual excerpts available!A sneak peek from Allied Corps!		 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 12/1/2012 3:32:10 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 16884
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: online 		I'm using the PT boats as bait to get the Jap planes to fly so I can shoot them down:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 301
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 12/1/2012 3:35:35 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 16884
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: online 		And the air threat from the Saigon area is still very real. I've still got to hug the coast and better yet would be to evacuate those ships.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 302
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 12/1/2012 3:37:50 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 16884
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: online 		And then my B-17's got some excellent training:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 303
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 12/1/2012 3:40:37 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 16884
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: online 		And then there was an attack on Clark Field:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 304
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 12/1/2012 3:42:27 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 16884
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: online 		And then there was a raid on Rabaul:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 305
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 12/1/2012 3:50:35 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 16884
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: online 		And then the Japs captured Kuching:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 306
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 12/1/2012 3:51:24 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 16884
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: online 		And here's the combat report to help you find that result you're looking for in China:

Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 307
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 12/1/2012 4:28:45 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 16884
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: online 		I've got a crippled ship that I would like very much to dock at Wake but there's trouble headed toward Wake in the form of at least one TF
and maybe more. I've got backup at Wake in the form of surface ships and there's still two carriers I can call on so maybe I should only
temp. divert my course slightly and still make a landing at Wake.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 308
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 12/1/2012 4:43:04 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 16884
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: online 		I'm installing an AVP at Sorong and just to my north is lots of Jap traffic and I'm wondering how much longer it'll be safe to park an AVP
at Sorong. Maybe not long. For now I'll let her park at Sorong.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 309
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 12/2/2012 1:02:27 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 16884
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: online 		It's looking like tomorrow Pearl will receive a 73K slug of fuel from SFO. This is the first TF to reach Pearl from SFO if I'm not mistaken.
So it took something like 11 days to put a TF together, load it up, and get it to Pearl.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 310
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 12/2/2012 1:48:24 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 16884
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: online 		TF 340 is a tanker I want to send to Java to harvest some of that fuel that the refinery has been churning out. Move it to Darwin and
down the east coast of Oz if possible. I can see how important it was to the Jap to isolate Oz from any supplies from SEI as soon as
possible because Oz depends on outside supplies and fuel to function. It's helpless w/o outside supplies and fuel. I can also see the
attraction Oz is as a target. Starve it for a year and then just walk in and take over, almost. I'll try that in my game w/ Jim. See what
happens.

Also, how much longer can I make the transit from SEI to Darwin? I've got Jap traffic ( upper right ) and it's headed this way and might I
add, it's possible that one of those ships is a CVE. Looking for juicy targets. So I gotta keep my traffic away from all that as long as I can.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 311
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 12/3/2012 5:52:28 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 16884
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: online 		A few of my subs have gotten beat up a bit over these last few days. I have most of the broken ones headed for Singapore to get fixed.
I'm using Manila less and less because I don't expect operations there to proceed w/o disruption or air strikes or something. Singapore
is almost as good as a base as Manila. It's a little off the beaten path as most of the action is happening in the PI. Although more and
more action is happening on the coast of Borneo at Miri.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 312
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 12/3/2012 2:03:58 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 16884
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: online 		Okay.....I ended the turn again and these are fresh combat results:

Here's the first sub attack in which something gets hit. There's been a lot of inconsequential attacks where everybody misses and here's
the first one where a ship actually really catches a hit.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 313
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 12/3/2012 2:05:48 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 16884
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: online 		And then there was this night raid on Alor Star:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 314
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 12/3/2012 2:07:36 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 16884
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: online 		And then there was a night raid on Georgetown:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 315
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 12/3/2012 2:10:35 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 16884
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: online 		And then a bunch of other stuff happened and then there was this sub attack near Pearl:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 316
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 12/3/2012 2:13:51 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 16884
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: online 		And the Japs invaded Wake again, this time with a force that was way way too small.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 317
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 12/3/2012 2:15:51 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 16884
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: online 		And then my boys find two Jap ships and sink them:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 318
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 12/3/2012 2:20:51 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 16884
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: online 		And here's evidence that the Japs are sliding southward toward Tulagi with their big guns. Time to retreat and live to fight another day.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 319
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 12/3/2012 2:23:03 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 16884
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: online 		And then this happens at Wake:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 320
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 12/3/2012 2:27:46 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 16884
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: online 		And then there was this daylight raid on Alor Star:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 321
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 12/3/2012 2:30:04 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 16884
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: online 		And then my B-17's do their voodoo on Bubble Drop:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 322
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 12/3/2012 2:31:57 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 16884
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: online 		And then there was this air raid on Rabaul:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 323
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 12/3/2012 2:34:02 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 16884
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: online 		And then there was this air raid on Nauru island:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 324
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 12/3/2012 2:36:31 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 16884
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: online 		And then there was this ground attack at Alor Star. I'm holding my own so far. So far so good.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 325
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 12/3/2012 2:39:09 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 16884
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: online 		And then a ground attack at Rabaul happens:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 326
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 12/3/2012 2:41:14 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 16884
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: online 		And then the Japs do a sucicide attack at Wake:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 327
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 12/3/2012 5:39:01 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 16884
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: online 		The Catalina unit at Sorong is down to one working Cat and needed some aviation support so I parked an AVD there to service them.
The unit is keeping an eye on Bubble Drop for me. Lots of invasions will come out of there I predict. I'm thinking that the actions I'm
taking are keeping the Japs having to really work for their invasions. I've sunk a lot of ships already and I'm guessing I'll sink a lot more.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 328
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 12/3/2012 6:16:08 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 16884
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: online 		TF 110's original course was right across the top of a Jap sub to get to Pearl but I've given it a waypoint so as to try to thread the TF
through the gap between TWO Jap subs. What are the odds that one or more of them will react? Should I loiter somewhere until the
subs go away? Should I ignore the subs just because TF 110 has an escort? Enquiring minds want to know.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 329
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 - 12/3/2012 6:33:31 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 16884
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: online 		A lot of the fuel and supplies that are getting shipped to Oz is coming from Bombay. I'm shipping it from Bombay to Colombo and thence
to Perth. So there's two separate routes to service, one for the short-legged ships from Bombay to Colombo, and one for the world-class
ships: Colombo to Perth. The ships that I sent to Cape Town haven't landed there yet, it's only been 10 days at best for some of those
ships and those that started at Cape Town and are headed for Diego Garcia haven't landed there yet either so it's in the pipeline but
hasn't been born yet.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 330
Page:   <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0 Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.377