Matrix Games Forums

War in the West gets its first update!Flashpoint Campaigns: Red Storm version 2.08 is now available!Command gets huge update!Order of Battle: Pacific Featured on Weekly Streaming SessionA new fight for Battle Academy!Buzz Aldrin's Space Program Manager is out for Mac!The definitive wargame of the Western Front is out now! War in the West gets teaser trailer and Twitch Stream!New Preview AAR for War in the West!War in the West Manual preview
Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Fire fighting the Red Hordes - Uranus vs Olivier

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Decisive Campaigns: Case Blue >> After Action Reports >> RE: Fire fighting the Red Hordes - Uranus vs Olivier Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Fire fighting the Red Hordes - Uranus vs Olivier - 12/15/2012 12:41:18 PM   
Bonners


Posts: 470
Joined: 8/24/2012
From: Stockport, UK
Status: offline
Febraury 12th - one to go

Again Olivier rips into my troops at every turn. Anybody that cannot get out quickly enough is left behind to be submerged in the Soviet flood. Olivier admits that even his troops are now beginning to suffer. So I may end the game with at least the beginnings of a respectable line in place.

Soviet troops in the north do take Kursk though which was the last major objective for the offensive. Most of second army are still struglgingto get back. With the troops released from duties in the Crimea I am able to get full corps from 17th army into the Kharkov area and the situation stabilizes somewhat. Although the defenders wait forlornly for any parts of the panzer divisions to make it back to the lines.

Where I can I conduct minor counter-attacks, but these are just on exposed Soviet tank units trying to make sure that at least some of my troops make it back.

One turn to go and SS Das Reich will be appearing on the line, so time for some fun before my demise




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Bonners)
Post #: 91
RE: Fire fighting the Red Hordes - Uranus vs Olivier - 12/15/2012 2:42:49 PM   
Bonners


Posts: 470
Joined: 8/24/2012
From: Stockport, UK
Status: offline
February 14th - the St Valentine's Day Massacre means the end

....and so to the last turn. The message I get at the start of the turn is dismissal imminent in one turn (including this one) I'm presuming that means that OKH are pretty damn serious about it this time.

Obviously I have been telling Olivier about this as well, so he knows the end of the game is nigh. Therefore in the true spirit of the game, rather than getting to the end of his offensive he goes into a frenzy of attack in the air and on the ground. The only place he doesnt really attack is against the remnants of 2nd Army. He could easily have surrounded them against the north edge of the board, yet although we did not set a house rule for this Olivier leaves them a narrow route of retreat rather than surround them (which he could have done easily) which sums up the spirit in which he has played this game. I of course reciprocate by immediately attacking his spearheads with them

I do have a few surprises for him though. 5 (yes 5) BF109s defend against about 40 red army fighters and bring about 20 to the ground. Battered and defeated though it is, the Luftwaffe still has a few surprises left. Elsewhere every Red Army fighter and bomber takes to the air driving into the retreating columns of Germans. Caught out in the open the Red Army planes really begin to take their toll on my units.

I get Das Reich this turn and they immediately join Hube's corps and launch an assault on the exposed Russian units around Kharkov. More remarkably they actually make some ground and chew up a few Soviets.

The final tally is that I am hanging onto Stalino by my fingernails, but will probably have to evacuate next turn. The Soviets have successfully taken Kursk and their lines are too strong to try anything there. The remnant of 2nd Army should already be surrounded if Olivier had been evil as already mentioned. I have reinforcements coming in so I am actually confident I would've held onto Kharkov until the next Soviet offensive, unless I was lucky enough to get the mud very soon. All in all though I still have huge holes in the lines and it would take me the same amount of time to reinforce the lines as it would for Olivier to launch his next even more powerful offensive.

So well done to Olivier on a game very well done, I was particularly impressed with how he organised his offensives post Stalingrad. I've got some thoughts on what we both did right and what I thought of the scenario as a whole which I'll post up soon along with a detailed breakdown of the stats for the game. I'm hoping that once it is finished I'll be able to get accurate stats on the Soviet OOB.

Final map update just to show the finishing positions:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Bonners)
Post #: 92
RE: Fire fighting the Red Hordes - Uranus vs Olivier - 12/15/2012 3:32:06 PM   
Bonners


Posts: 470
Joined: 8/24/2012
From: Stockport, UK
Status: offline
Bit harsh from OKH I thought






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Bonners)
Post #: 93
RE: Fire fighting the Red Hordes - Uranus vs Olivier - 12/15/2012 3:55:43 PM   
Bonners


Posts: 470
Joined: 8/24/2012
From: Stockport, UK
Status: offline
Right, some statistics now that I can see the genuine losses for Olivier's troops. Full run down of the main troop types, showing total troops and casualties sustained. it would have been nice to have also been able to show the replacements and reinforcements received each turn for each unit type in a similar graph. If I can do it can somebody point me in the right direction?

At the end of the stats I've also included prestige and victory point totals.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Bonners)
Post #: 94
RE: Fire fighting the Red Hordes - Uranus vs Olivier - 12/15/2012 4:44:54 PM   
Bonners


Posts: 470
Joined: 8/24/2012
From: Stockport, UK
Status: offline
Some final thoughts on the game in no particular order.

I am still convinced that this game is ideal for the novice player to play as the Germans. Let's face it, there is virtually no way you can win so it is a good game to try things out on. I think the dismissal rule works better in this game than in any other. It was actually a close run thing me getting dismissed as I had another minor objective that I was going to get the points for on the next turn. In a future game I would also try out the ambition card as that can lend a bit more prestige, but is a bit of a gamble. As the Germans you have to read the manual and thoroughly understand the no step back rule to manage your retreats. especially from the Caucasus. I tried to go in leaps on certain turns to give me a turn of not losing any points and allowing the minor objectives to come to fruition.

In a future game it would be interesting to play without a house rule for Stalingrad although I think for sheer bloody mindedness it is great fun to try a game with a house rule.

I would also consider playing with a house rule for the Crimea in future games. Although I think the minor allies rules are excellent and did a good job of replicating the sheer collapse of the front line units, this also led to the Romanian units in the Crimea disappearing, whereas in reality Romanians were still there in 1944. I suppose it is up to your opponent as well. if you went all out as Soviets and invaded the Crimea the German lines would rapidly become untenable and would probably lead to an early finish. I would say that the Soviets need to clear the Taman before launching their assault on the Crimea.

As German it is really interesting working out how to defend. I think I got it about right until the last Soviet offensive. Admittedly it was very strong and I did not have much leeway to retreat. But in a future game I may keep some of my panzers further back and try and attack the breakthrough units head on rather than defending the shoulders. Difficult to tell though as I didnt have much scope for tactical retreats with the no step back rule...but that was what made it so interesting and so much fun. I will definitely try something different in a future game though.

A note on Soviet tactics, I felt that Olivier got them pretty much spot on throughout the game. He was very brave with his spearhead units and they repeatedly got beaten back by my panzers. yet because of that I was always made to give up territory. I also think he did the right thing by building up for each offensive rather than continuously attacking across the line. Especially in the later offensives it meant he had cards to play and strong guards infantry units to hold against German counter-attacks. You can see how well he did by my dismissal date. Although he had not taken Kharkov he was certainly ahead of the game with his other objectives. If German units are still in Stalingrad (whether by choice or through a house rule) then Olivier played it right by concentrating heavy forces from the start for their eradication.

A note on the reinforcement rules. I know some people dont like the way they can appear on the frontlines, but it is the same for both players. if you look at the historic dates that some of the reinforcement units were actually fighting it means that with the new rules they are not ready until a lot further along than they were in reality. With the new reduced readiness and APs it will make the German's job that bit harder. Anyway, that is just my personal preference, I think it adds a nice random element to the game which will now be much reduced - I realise I'm in the minority with that view though.

The issue of the northern border of the map does come into play in the latter stages as the Soviet player could use it to trap elements of the German 2nd army.

Apart from Stalingrad the Germans never got a major objective, they were all minor ones. I'm not too sure if this is a good or bad thing. On the one hand if they were too tough it would've meant being dismissed sooner. On the other hand once I lost Stalingrad I had minimal prestige for the rest of the game. I think I'm sitting on the fence on that one, but I was surprised to never get a major objective to hold.

Going back to the Soviet player, I dont think it suits novices. Olivier had to spend a lot of time organising his forces and showed a lot of patience in when and how he launched his assaults. A novice player like me may have panicked and tried to rush things along to gain his objectives. As mentioned above, you really have to be brave and harden yourself to high losses if you want to break through the German lines. Olivier did that very well and always seemed to make the right decision to stop his offensives to build up for the next ones.

What I like about this scenario is that both players have plenty to do. The German does not just run away, he constantly snipes at the Soviet spearheads; and the Soviet player does not really have all powerful forces until the balance of power has really shifted as the German losses mount towards the end of the game.

If you like nice straight fronts and carefully managed forces then Uranus is not really the scenario to provide it. However, if you like a crazy game where each player spends much of it scratching his head, then it is definitely the scenario to play, some of the turns were just utter madness.

(in reply to Bonners)
Post #: 95
RE: Fire fighting the Red Hordes - Uranus vs Olivier - 12/15/2012 7:10:08 PM   
Keunert


Posts: 880
Joined: 9/9/2010
Status: offline
thank you both for another interesting aar. and btw Bonners i think you did really well!
you fought an agressive game and i think your gameplay improved already.

(in reply to Bonners)
Post #: 96
RE: Fire fighting the Red Hordes - Uranus vs Olivier - 12/15/2012 9:39:06 PM   
LiquidSky


Posts: 895
Joined: 6/24/2008
Status: offline


When you play the ambition card you gain 1 point of Prestige. Which is enough (as long as you don't lose any more during the turn) to prevent dismissal.

_____________________________

What's the sense of sending $2 million missiles to hit a $10 tent that's empty?

— President George W. Bush, Oval Office meeting, 13 September 2001.

(in reply to Keunert)
Post #: 97
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Decisive Campaigns: Case Blue >> After Action Reports >> RE: Fire fighting the Red Hordes - Uranus vs Olivier Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.082