Matrix Games Forums

To End All Wars: Mountain InfantryPandora: Eclipse of Nashira Announced! Deal of the Week: Command Ops goes half price!New Fronts are opening up for Commander: The Great WarCharacters of World War 1Sign of for the Pike and Shot Beta!More Games are Coming to Steam! Return to the Moon on October 31st! Commander: The Great War iPad Wallpapers Generals of the Great War
Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Amph Assaults

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> The War Room >> Amph Assaults Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Amph Assaults - 11/2/2012 2:02:55 PM   
visigoth

 

Posts: 14
Joined: 10/8/2012
Status: offline
Is it better to have a massive fleet for these type of assaults or alot of smaller tfs .
2- do you include Hq units like II Amph assault hq unit or not ??

thinking of invading marshall islands



visigoth- thanks again
Post #: 1
RE: Amph Assaults - 11/2/2012 2:25:50 PM   
Gridley380


Posts: 245
Joined: 12/20/2011
Status: offline
Fewer task forces make command & control easier, but larger TFs increase the odds of collisions.

I like to have a few BB as shell magnets in each amphib TF. They seem to work just fine regardless of TF size, so the more TFs the more you're taking off the covering force gun line. Can't prove this one, but that's how it seems to work for me.

So its a tradeoff.

HQs do help (assuming they're prepped for the objective). A corp and amphib HQ will each provide a different bonus.

(in reply to visigoth)
Post #: 2
RE: Amph Assaults - 11/2/2012 3:39:53 PM   
bigred


Posts: 2862
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Gridley380

Fewer task forces make command & control easier, but larger TFs increase the odds of collisions.

I like to have a few BB as shell magnets in each amphib TF. They seem to work just fine regardless of TF size, so the more TFs the more you're taking off the covering force gun line. Can't prove this one, but that's how it seems to work for me.

So its a tradeoff.

HQs do help (assuming they're prepped for the objective). A corp and amphib HQ will each provide a different bonus.

Has the HQ amphib bug been fixed? (if a HQ landed w/ an amphib the Hq would become fragmented, usually losing the original commander)

_____________________________

---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2597400

(in reply to Gridley380)
Post #: 3
RE: Amph Assaults - 11/3/2012 1:46:50 AM   
n01487477


Posts: 4717
Joined: 2/21/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bigred


quote:

ORIGINAL: Gridley380

Fewer task forces make command & control easier, but larger TFs increase the odds of collisions.

I like to have a few BB as shell magnets in each amphib TF. They seem to work just fine regardless of TF size, so the more TFs the more you're taking off the covering force gun line. Can't prove this one, but that's how it seems to work for me.

So its a tradeoff.

HQs do help (assuming they're prepped for the objective). A corp and amphib HQ will each provide a different bonus.

Has the HQ amphib bug been fixed? (if a HQ landed w/ an amphib the Hq would become fragmented, usually losing the original commander)

Only in the beta ...

_____________________________

-Damian-
EconDoc
TrackerAE
Tutes&Java

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 4
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> The War Room >> Amph Assaults Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.059