Matrix Games Forums

Pandora: Eclipse of Nashira Announced! Deal of the Week: Command Ops goes half price!New Fronts are opening up for Commander: The Great WarCharacters of World War 1Sign of for the Pike and Shot Beta!More Games are Coming to Steam! Return to the Moon on October 31st! Commander: The Great War iPad Wallpapers Generals of the Great WarDeal of the Week Panzer Corps
Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 18Mar42

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 18Mar42 Page: <<   < prev  32 33 [34] 35 36   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 18Mar42 - 1/2/2013 1:17:45 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
There was a lot of vigorous negotiation in the meeting the Zero's took with the KittyHawks in Brisbane.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 991
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 18Mar42 - 1/2/2013 1:20:20 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
There were several air attacks by the Japs on Manila with similar results each time




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 992
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 18Mar42 - 1/2/2013 1:24:05 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
And then my Claudes at Buna decided to do some straffing and I'm not sure if raids like this are doing any good.......no damage was
listed so I'm not sure whether or not to keep going with these raids. On the other hand, raids like this probably buck up the average
Jap soldier so maybe it's a good thing to do. For them.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 993
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 18Mar42 - 1/2/2013 1:28:25 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
And then the carrier-borne bombers his Brisbane's port and got a ship in their sights:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 994
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 18Mar42 - 1/2/2013 1:43:06 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
And then, the same afternoon, south of Tarawa the Jap carrier-borne bombers found some Allied ships racing to get away and put the
hurt on them.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 995
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 19Mar42 - 1/2/2013 1:47:21 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
Here's how it went on the ground at Manila:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 996
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 19Mar42 - 1/2/2013 1:54:47 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
I've got about 2054 PP's saved up. I'm just about to find out if that's enough to buy the services of another division from somewhere.
I haven't even touched the Mongolian Garrison yet so there's some gold in them thar hills. Just have to have the PP's for 'em.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 997
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 19Mar42 - 1/2/2013 1:58:59 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
Oh, yeah, I almost forgot to tell you about the Allied daily ground bombardment at Port Moresby. I guess my out-of-supply-ness is
really effecting the adjustment of the AV. Maybe I should try another supply convoy.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 1/2/2013 1:59:47 AM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 998
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 19Mar42 - 1/2/2013 2:00:43 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
And of course, here's the combat report:

Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 999
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 19Mar42 - 1/2/2013 2:08:33 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
I was checking after the status of all my naval planes just now when I discovered, quite to my amazement, that I have about 5 subs that
don't have their search planes aboard. Or something. Anyway, I need to look into that and fix it, if it's indeed broke.

EDIT: Okay, here's the skinny........the units are aboard the sub alright, it's just that the unit doesn't have any planes. So the next time
that sub is in port I guess I need to transfer the unit to the base or something to get that unit a plane or two. Anybody know how this
works? How to get a sub's search plane some aircraft?




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 1/2/2013 2:12:02 AM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1000
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 19Mar42 - 1/2/2013 2:40:27 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
I-19 is one of the subs on the list of problem subs and it just happened to be parked at Wake. I transfered the original Glen unit to Wake
so that it can receive it's plane from the pipeline and just to see what would happen I transfered a cruiser's 2 Jakes to the sub and they
went onboard alright but now both of them are shown as "maint./damaged". So I don't know if they are in crates or are just down for
maint. or what. I'll check into this situation tomorrow and see what's changed if anything.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1001
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 19Mar42 - 1/2/2013 2:59:58 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
And another surprise just now. I found out that Batangas is a good source of resources. It's not a source per se' but it's got resources
laying by the side of the road and all I gotta do is go get 'em. I've already dispatched at least one TF to getting some Batangas res.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1002
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 19Mar42 - 1/2/2013 7:29:19 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
I completely forgot to post the losses of the 19th:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1003
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 18Mar42 - 1/2/2013 7:42:43 AM   
Puhis

 

Posts: 1688
Joined: 11/30/2008
From: Finland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: larryfulkerson

And then my Claudes at Buna decided to do some straffing and I'm not sure if raids like this are doing any good.......no damage was
listed so I'm not sure whether or not to keep going with these raids.


Claudes are armed with 7.7 mm MGs and 30 kg bombs. They are not doing any good, I suggest you stop wasting good pilots.

Later you get fighters that are suitable for ground attack, for example Oscar IIa have decent bomb load (2 x 250 kg).

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1004
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 19Mar42 - 1/2/2013 7:49:07 AM   
Puhis

 

Posts: 1688
Joined: 11/30/2008
From: Finland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: larryfulkerson

I-19 is one of the subs on the list of problem subs and it just happened to be parked at Wake. I transfered the original Glen unit to Wake
so that it can receive it's plane from the pipeline and just to see what would happen I transfered a cruiser's 2 Jakes to the sub and they
went onboard alright but now both of them are shown as "maint./damaged". So I don't know if they are in crates or are just down for
maint. or what. I'll check into this situation tomorrow and see what's changed if anything.





Subs can only operate 1 plane.

Historically only Glen was submarine capable float plane. In this game subs can operate any type of float planes, but I think it's a bit gamey to use other models than Glen.

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1005
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 19Mar42 - 1/2/2013 3:44:15 PM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Puhis
quote:

ORIGINAL: larryfulkerson
And then my Claudes at Buna decided to do some straffing and I'm not sure if raids like this are doing any good.......no damage was
listed so I'm not sure whether or not to keep going with these raids.

Claudes are armed with 7.7 mm MGs and 30 kg bombs. They are not doing any good, I suggest you stop wasting good pilots.

Later you get fighters that are suitable for ground attack, for example Oscar IIa have decent bomb load (2 x 250 kg).

Thank you for your information. The straffing runs will indeed stop.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Puhis
quote:

ORIGINAL: larryfulkerson
I-19 is one of the subs on the list of problem subs and it just happened to be parked at Wake. I transfered the original Glen unit to Wake so that it can receive it's plane from the pipeline and just to see what would happen I transfered a cruiser's 2 Jakes to the sub and they went onboard alright but now both of them are shown as "maint./damaged". So I don't know if they are in crates or are just down for maint. or what. I'll check into this situation tomorrow and see what's changed if anything.

Subs can only operate 1 plane.

Historically only Glen was submarine capable float plane. In this game subs can operate any type of float planes, but I think it's a bit gamey to use other models than Glen.

Okay........you've convinced me to use just Glen's on the subs. I want to play an accurate game you see. I'll get back to you about
what happened to the Jakes on I-19.

(in reply to Puhis)
Post #: 1006
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 19Mar42 - 1/2/2013 7:40:24 PM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
Here's the strategic picture. I'm having new feelings about Burma. I'm thinking it would be a might good thing to cut off China from all the
supply etc. it might get from India by invading and capturing Burma. The problem is that there's a nasty lack of people right now. I just
bought the 14th Div out of the Mongolian Garrison and it's moving to Kiejo for further transport. I haven't decided where to ship it. It
probably wouldn't influence things all that much in Manila. I'm guessing Singapore needs it the most. I'm still unsettled about my forces
holding the line near Singapore. He's got more people there than I do and I expect him to start attacking there pretty soon. He can do
mouseovers just as well as I can and he'll figure out that he's got more people in one spot than I do and he'll start taking advantage of it
I'm thinking.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 1/2/2013 7:41:18 PM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1007
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 19Mar42 - 1/2/2013 7:56:00 PM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
This is TF 150. It's one of the bigger TF's w/ about 21 ships and even though some of them aren't completely empty I'm sending the TF
to Sapparo to pick up about 50K of the 67K of resources that are there. There's at least 1 Allied sub operating in the area I'm sailing in
but I'm sending a PB as escort for the TF......I hope that's enough. Sapparo has a 900(0) Resource center but there's not much fuel
there so I'm telling the TF commander, Lt. Larry Hori, that he's not supposed to re-fuel when he gets there.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1008
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 19Mar42 - 1/2/2013 8:06:57 PM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
Here's TF 161's situation. I'm unloading the 7th JNAF dudes even though the 33rd JNAF dudes are already there because I plan to
move the 7th to Lunga as soon as the engineers arrive and start expanding the port and airfield there. I expect those engineers in the
next two weeks or so. There's some at Bataan Island that I have plans for here and it's going to take that long to get them here. I guess.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1009
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 19Mar42 - 1/2/2013 8:17:41 PM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
I've had a better look at those engineers on Bataan Island and found out that they are the wrong kind of engineers and I'll have to look
around some more for the right kind of engineers. On the other hand I've found some more AF dudes that I can send somewhere else.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1010
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 19Mar42 - 1/2/2013 8:23:17 PM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
I found the right kind of engineers at Balabac and B. doesn't need them as much as Lunga does so that's the next thing I need to do is
move these guys to Lunga.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1011
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 19Mar42 - 1/2/2013 9:01:53 PM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
TF 183 is the one that delivered some resources to Hankow yesterday and the TF name field gives the Hankow resource level as of
yesterday, which if we subtract what we have for a resource level in Hankow now then we get about 300 resources per day being
consumed by Hankow. At that rate Hankow will need a delivery of resources in about 21 days. So I'm thinking I can just set up a small
transport whose sole job is to keep Hankow serviced in resources. TF 183 isn't doing anything important so I'll just use it....I'll sail down
to Shanghi and siphon off some resources and take them back to Hankow, etc.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1012
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 19Mar42 - 1/2/2013 10:24:52 PM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
There's only about 600 miles between Keijo and Nagasaki so even though the loads are small there are a lot of trips made over time and
I'm thinking that adding those big-mothers transports a lot of res can be moved. Japan needs it and is going to need it for a long time
yet.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1013
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 19Mar42 - 1/2/2013 10:33:50 PM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
I just now discovered that I need to move some engineers to Cebu to repair the industry there. The LI I don't care as much about as I do
the resource centers. It's 0(20) now and that not exactly chicken feed. Once it's up and pumping out resources there will be more to
truck to Tokyo. Or somewhere.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1014
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 19Mar42 - 1/3/2013 3:12:59 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
Here's another one for you experts: in the pop-up there's a line that displays the value of the hex to Japan and it's 21(3) and I'm
wondering if the (3) means it's got 3 units of damage to repair or what. How do I repair the 3 points of damage?




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 1/3/2013 3:13:02 AM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1015
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 19Mar42 - 1/3/2013 3:34:21 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
TF 321 is my heavy guns south of Tarawa and we're chasing some Allied surface assets and I'm thinking the Allied boats might be low on
fuel by now but I have two AO's in tow and I'm doubting that the Allies planned ahead on an exit strategy for this situation so they might
just go dead in the water any day now. Besides these Jap ships ( TF 321 ) I have a carrier within range of the Allied boats so there may
be another carrier a strike or two occur tomorrow. A couple more strikes like the one that happened today will just about finish off the
Allied group I think.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1016
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 19Mar42 - 1/3/2013 4:42:28 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
I was checking out the various opportunities available to this TF when I discovered to my amazement that Bobo is a source of oil. I'm
posting about this because I'd like to share this rare find w/ you and you can applaud too. Or at least celebrate somehow.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1017
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 19Mar42 - 1/3/2013 5:00:33 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
TF 634 is the one I've been using to do naval bombardments of Manila with. It looks like the naval bombardments might have to be
temporarily put on hold. Unless and until I can dig up another BB to put in w/ the escorts. Plus I think while I'm looking around for a BB
that I'll send that DMS dude in to the Bataan hex to clean up the minefield all the way. No idea how long that will take. That DMS boat
has been clearing that field for about 2 days already. But I've still traversed it w/ mine casualties each time. That's what we in the
computer programming business call a "clue".




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1018
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 20Mar42 - 1/4/2013 2:37:07 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
Jim sent me his moves and I did the movie and here's some fresh combat results: There was a descent naval bombardment of Port
Moresby last night.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1019
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 20Mar42 - 1/4/2013 2:43:10 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20962
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
Having an escort didn't help my AV all that much:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1020
Page:   <<   < prev  32 33 [34] 35 36   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 18Mar42 Page: <<   < prev  32 33 [34] 35 36   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.117