Matrix Games Forums

Battle Academy 2 is out now on iPad!A closer look at rockets in Space Program ManagerDeal of the Week - Pride of NationsA new update for Piercing Fortress EuropaNew screenshots for War in the West!Pike & Shot is now available!Server Maintenance Battle Academy 2 gets updated!Deal of the Week: Advanced Tactics Gold Ask Buzz Aldrin!
Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 08Mar42

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 08Mar42 Page: <<   < prev  23 24 [25] 26 27   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 08Mar42 - 12/7/2012 9:33:47 AM   
Empire101


Posts: 1957
Joined: 5/20/2008
From: Coruscant
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: larryfulkerson

Here's how it went on the ground at Manila:






You'll have to use Artillery and Aerial Bombardment quite a few more times to reduce their assault value to get at least to 2-1 odds.
Keep at them and your results will go up exponentially as their supply dwindles to zero ( if its not there already!!)

Don't assault them before then!!

_____________________________

Our lives may be more boring than those who lived in apocalyptic times,
but being bored is greatly preferable to being prematurely dead because of some ideological fantasy.
- Michael Burleigh


(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 721
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 08Mar42 - 12/7/2012 9:49:14 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Empire101
You'll have to use Artillery and Aerial Bombardment quite a few more times to reduce their assault value to get at least to 2-1 odds.
Keep at them and your results will go up exponentially as their supply dwindles to zero ( if its not there already!!)

Don't assault them before then!!

Thanks for posting your advice. I can use all the advice I can get. Um.....by "quite a few more times" I'm guessing maybe a couple of
weeks more? Maybe a month more? 2 : 1 odds is the cutoff then. Alrighty then........I'll do it. And your advice: don't assault them before
then.......I DID assault them too early and lost about 6K troops. I don't think I'll do that again real soon.

(in reply to Empire101)
Post #: 722
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 08Mar42 - 12/7/2012 9:51:19 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
I have assigned my last remaining undamaged DMS ship to clear the minefield at Bataan. It should be clear in about a week I figure and
then I can start bombarding Manila with my BB's, or at least one BB, and then the Manila nightmare will be over with and I can concentrate
on Singapore and Java.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 723
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 08Mar42 - 12/7/2012 9:54:29 AM   
Empire101


Posts: 1957
Joined: 5/20/2008
From: Coruscant
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: larryfulkerson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Empire101
You'll have to use Artillery and Aerial Bombardment quite a few more times to reduce their assault value to get at least to 2-1 odds.
Keep at them and your results will go up exponentially as their supply dwindles to zero ( if its not there already!!)

Don't assault them before then!!

Thanks for posting your advice. I can use all the advice I can get. Um.....by "quite a few more times" I'm guessing maybe a couple of
weeks more? Maybe a month more? 2 : 1 odds is the cutoff then. Alrighty then........I'll do it. And your advice: don't assault them before
then.......I DID assault them too early and lost about 6K troops. I don't think I'll do that again real soon.


2-1 is the bare minimum....3-1 is better, but you probably can't afford the luxury of sitting too long, as those troops are needed elsewhere causing mischief.

_____________________________

Our lives may be more boring than those who lived in apocalyptic times,
but being bored is greatly preferable to being prematurely dead because of some ideological fantasy.
- Michael Burleigh


(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 724
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 08Mar42 - 12/7/2012 10:00:43 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
There are quite a few more resources in Nauru and Ocean Island. I'll be making trips to these two sources for a long time and the best
part is both sources will keep producing them the rest of the game. All the naval bombardment of Cebu killed the resources center there
and it's now 0(20) and I'll have to repair it to get it up and flowing again but I think that's doable. I'm hoping I can capture the goodies
centers on Java w/o too much fuss and without all the damage incurred elsewhere.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Empire101)
Post #: 725
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 08Mar42 - 12/7/2012 10:02:53 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Empire101
2-1 is the bare minimum....3-1 is better, but you probably can't afford the luxury of sitting too long, as those troops are needed elsewhere causing mischief.

Yeah, you're correct. I'm already dreading the situation in Singapore. I'm outnumbered there and if Jim really wanted to he could
probably take back Malaya but so far no actions like that have occured......maybe he's not interested in owning Malaya again.

(in reply to Empire101)
Post #: 726
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 08Mar42 - 12/7/2012 10:14:17 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
Here's all the Tanker TF's that I have re-routed to Palembang. One is already there loading up on oil. The Computer label on the
bottom of the display isn't green because I'm turning off the computer controlled TF's so that they are skipped when I diagnose what
action I need to take on the TF's. I'm going through the list of TF's inspecting them one at a time and most of the time there's no change
indicated but sometimes the TF needs to be docked or re-directed somewhere else. It's a slow process but I don't want to skip anybody.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 727
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 08Mar42 - 12/7/2012 10:45:05 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
There were 2 AR ships at Wake and I thought it prudent to move one of them to Truk. That way they won't both be destroyed in one
attack and besides there are broken ships calling at Truk all the time and the AR might save a trip to a ship repair yard sometime.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 728
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 08Mar42 - 12/7/2012 10:50:22 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
TF 285 is the one I'm going to use to bombard Manila. The minefield at Bataan is already slated to be cleared and TF 285 is still three
days away from Manila so everything is going according to schedule. So far.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 729
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 08Mar42 - 12/7/2012 11:10:12 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
TF 327 is a group of AKE's that I'm going to park at Subic Bay to re-arm the Manila bombardment group when they finally arrive. And
so all the bombardment group will have to do is go around the corner to Bataan and bombard and they can be back in Subic Bay before
the sun comes up. And be ready again to do it again quickly. That's how I reduced Koepang in my game w/ Rob. It's working in
rehersal and I expect it to work here.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 730
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 08Mar42 - 12/7/2012 11:15:50 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
TF 335 is a group of carriers that weren't doing anything important so I thought I'd fuel them up with an AO ( check ) and push them
within air strike range of the commotion down near Espiritu Santo just to see if they can lend a hand.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 12/7/2012 11:16:03 AM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 731
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 08Mar42 - 12/7/2012 11:41:14 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
Most of the oil coming out of Palembang is being shipped to Cam Ranh Bay as the first stop in the chain and it's starting to pile up there.
I may have to dedicate a trip of the long-distance TK's to start shipping from CRB to the home islands.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 732
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 08Mar42 - 12/8/2012 4:37:53 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
Okay......it's late on Friday and Jim and I have exchanged emails and I did the movie and here's some fresh combat results:

RO-66 gets a hit on an AK and sends it to Davey Jones' locker.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 733
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 08Mar42 - 12/8/2012 4:40:48 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
And then the carrier-borne Zero's do a sweep of Townsville:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 734
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 08Mar42 - 12/8/2012 4:44:05 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
And then, it looks like the Allies did a sweep:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 735
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 08Mar42 - 12/8/2012 4:45:53 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
And then some Nells did a strike on Singapore:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 736
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 08Mar42 - 12/8/2012 4:47:47 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
And then some Bettys did a strike on Port Moresby:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 737
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 08Mar42 - 12/8/2012 4:50:21 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
And then there was a second air strike on Singapore:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 738
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 08Mar42 - 12/8/2012 4:52:49 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
And then it looks like the Allies attacked me at Port Moresby and didn't fare so well:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 739
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 08Mar42 - 12/8/2012 4:55:24 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
And then this happened at Port Moresby:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 740
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 08Mar42 - 12/8/2012 4:58:59 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
And then there is an Allied invasion close to home:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 741
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 08Mar42 - 12/8/2012 5:01:18 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
And then the Japs did a ground bombardment at Manila and hey, there were no Jap losses this time:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 742
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 08Mar42 - 12/8/2012 5:08:19 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
I don't remember ordering this attack so I'm guessing it's a stacking limits kind of thing or something. Anyway there was a ground
bombardment happen:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 743
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 09Mar42 - 12/8/2012 5:11:18 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
And then this attack happened:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 744
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 09Mar42 - 12/8/2012 5:16:03 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
And then the Allied forces bombard me at Batavia:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 745
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 09Mar42 - 12/8/2012 5:17:50 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
And then there was a bombardment attack at Port Moresby:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 746
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 09Mar42 - 12/8/2012 5:18:32 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
And here's the combat report for those of you who want to look something up:

Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 747
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 09Mar42 - 12/8/2012 6:03:35 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
TF 34 is taking close to 50K of fuel to Truk which is a good thing because I somehow let Truk get down to it's last 9K of fuel. I gotta
lighten up on the Black Label or something. But they will be there within a week easy. Maybe I should check to see if there's anybody
else going to Truk that's closer, while I'm thinking about it.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 748
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 09Mar42 - 12/8/2012 6:26:06 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
TF 35 is bringing about 45K of supplies to Cam Ranh Bay which needs supplies more than Truk needs fuel. These deliveries will help
keep the war going a couple of days longer. I can't just park the AK's somewhere out of the way and ignore them.......they are the life
blood of my war machine. I gotta keep 'em on the job, moving goodies back and forth.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 749
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 09Mar42 - 12/8/2012 6:48:07 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 21110
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
I was horsing around in the industry display screen(s) and discovered to my dismay that Hankow doesn't have any
resource center but does have a light industry, one of whose inputs is resources. And Hankow is almost out of resources so I have
to put together a TF just to carry some resources to Hankow periodically for the rest of the game. D'oh. I wish I had known this earlier.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 750
Page:   <<   < prev  23 24 [25] 26 27   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 08Mar42 Page: <<   < prev  23 24 [25] 26 27   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.117