HITMAN202
Posts: 456
Joined: 11/10/2011 Status: offline
|
I brought up this issue because it hasn't been talked about much. I have started to test some specific situations (with command, reserve and air support removed to factor out those important variables) and one such is that in attacking a single fortified stack (level 2 fort) with 2 units that will win 90 % of the time with a "retreat" result, an preliminary hasty attack does not 1) cause routs, 2) does not increase Soviet casualties, and 3) increases Axis losses. That does not include the likelihood drop of Axis morale and increase in Soviet. The best explanation of the above is that Soviet morale increase benefits their combat value far more than the negative impact of increased fatigue. Michael T.'s point is great. But goodness gracious Dis. Vet., 10-12 hasties to soften up a big target ??? The issue of depleting reserve support is important, but 10-12 hasties ??? Just the MP cost of making them across the Neva seem prohibitive and in attacking the forts behind the Neva the Axis usually have no units to waste. Can the benefit of reserve support truly be eliminated ??? Dis. Vet., do you see my point ???
_____________________________
WITE is a good addiction with no cure.
|