Matrix Games

quote:

ORIGINAL: Karri

I don't really get your thinking on the disabled casualties.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pelton


Basicly 1/2 of Russian disabled are discarded every turn-never to return.

All German disabled return.

1% of the pool total returns per turn so basicly all disabled Germans from turns 1-170( not totally sure) return by the end of the game.

So 100% of 1% of the German disabled pool return every turn.

50% of (1%) SHC pool are discarded and 50% of (1%) return.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wuffer

It's only a minor problem, I'm afraid. The main issues are based on GHC's inability of counterattacking the sowjet spearhead(s), so the front becomes longer and longer... A true elastic defence isn't possible with the engine yet.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wuffer

na, wouldn't call it 'ugly' - just a demonstration of the immense complexity around designing a reasonable and playable game which allows some strategic (or better said: operational!) latitude without becoming a total boring simulation AND without ending in complete absurd constellations (e.g. Panzers in Vladivostok).

Let's agree there is some room for further improvements...

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marquo

Pelton,

I disagree with Wuffer: the Axis player can inflict grievous losses on the Soviet spearheads; in the IGO-UGO system the "victorious" Soviet armored stacks are depleted and hurt; with a defensive CV of ~ 15 the Axis can attack at 4-5:1 and put a hurt on. In my game with TD I inflict 3 - 5,000 losses for ~ 1,000; the added benefit is that the units rout or are so hurt they can't attack several turns and it restores the morale balance.

Marquo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marquo

My game wirth TD is now at turn 112/August 1943 - whether you beleive it or not, after he attacks and exposes a juicy, stack of armor I smack it back; I make maybe 2 or 3 such attacks/turn with great effect. I routinely inflict 3 - 5,000 losses per attack at a cost of 1 - 1,500; and his units rout more often than not.

It is what it is.

Marquo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marquo

Pelton,

I disagree with Wuffer: the Axis player can inflict grievous losses on the Soviet (armoured) spearheads;
Marquo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pelton

Lets hope MT is not cheating some how I would not put it past him.

quote:

ORIGINAL: AFV

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pelton

Lets hope MT is not cheating some how I would not put it past him.

I'm gonna call bull **** on that comment.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Joel Billings

They are both using 1.06.22. I think this is because Pelton can't upgrade to .23 since we don't have an installer posted yet.

As for cheating, it's way too early to be talking about anyone cheating. I would be shocked and amazed if the only thing that I saw that looked a little odd was anything that someone could find a way to cheat on.

quote:

ORIGINAL: AFV

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pelton

Lets hope MT is not cheating some how I would not put it past him.

I'm gonna call bull **** on that comment.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aurelian


It's just another in a long list of excuses.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Walloc

Could the difference be that with ur "new" defensive scheme. Putting alot in front lines. Since those units as i understand it, will recieve lot less replacements. Its simply a question of u altering methodes and that therefore it has an effect, that to u, is unseen before?

Kind regards,

Rasmus

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pelton

Turn 78--- GHC armaments: 74,400 --------Only 134 turns to go----------


Russian Men OOB: 8,726,000---------Total Loses:4,879,700
Net of: -30,000 ---------------------- Loses last turn: 57,781
Russian Gun OOB:122,650
Net of: 200
Ready Rifle Squads: 44,314 Net change: 14

GHC OOB: 3,465,000 ----------Total Loses:2,146,846
Net of: +23,000---------------Loses last turn: 28,925
GHC Gun OOB: 37,300
Net of: +400
Men in GHC manpower Pool: 161,500---- 134k in active pool still same as last turn.

———–Won——–—Lost———Ratio
SHC——4—————10—–——–28 %
GHC——4—————0——–—---00%


Air War

Ratio: 20 : 1

GHC loses: 10
SHC loses: 198

Its magic.

This turn OOB went up 23,000 and manpower pool only went down 4k.

Last turn pool increased 10k and OOB dropped 30k.

Losses were about same.

I am going by the turn by turn total loses for now.

This is more in line with what should be going on, unlike the last 18 turns. Things seem to be working magically right now, OOB should increase every turn as it should have been from turns 58 to 76.

I would like and explaination from 2by3 why OOB tanked 104k on turn 58. When loses were no wheres near that high. 40k ish then add in replacements and there is no way OOB should have dropped that much.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pelton

I hear as bad BS is being said about me on other forums so go over there and post how "shocked" you are, unless your another fanboy baby sitting MT like Flaviusx and the rest.

I am not going any wheres or looking for an out as I have told MT in more then one PM.

You think MT was a 12 yr old getting baby sat from the big bad wolf.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marquo

"2.4 to 1 loss ratio seems to be good as far as dropping SHC OOB and GHC staying static."

Which is why you should smack his exposed wasted post -attack stacks and inflict pain at even higher cost to him as I ma doing with TD.