Matrix Games Forums

War in the West gets its first update!Flashpoint Campaigns: Red Storm version 2.08 is now available!Command gets huge update!Order of Battle: Pacific Featured on Weekly Streaming SessionA new fight for Battle Academy!Buzz Aldrin's Space Program Manager is out for Mac!The definitive wargame of the Western Front is out now! War in the West gets teaser trailer and Twitch Stream!New Preview AAR for War in the West!War in the West Manual preview
Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Red Army Support Units

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> Red Army Support Units Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Red Army Support Units - 8/1/2012 2:14:38 AM   
hfarrish


Posts: 767
Joined: 1/3/2011
Status: offline

Does anyone know if there is a comprehensive thread regarding which SUs to build as the Sovs when? I am pretty up to speed on '41 build order but after that (i.e. blizzard and beyond) it starts to get pretty hazy - tank battalions for Corps and...some other stuff? Any advice or a pointer to an existing link would be appreciated.
Post #: 1
RE: Red Army Support Units - 8/1/2012 4:35:43 AM   
A game


Posts: 73
Joined: 5/9/2012
Status: offline
I would like to get some advice on that to! Also what do people find is the optimum amount of SU's for soviet HQs? Art SU's now recieve a bonus to the amount that can be committed to a battle (9 compared to 6 it says in the updated manual) so this means its probably good to go heavy on art?

Im sure there is the information there if we dig around on the forum but could be nice to get some more up to date information from the experts.

(in reply to hfarrish)
Post #: 2
RE: Red Army Support Units - 8/1/2012 4:45:17 AM   
Flaviusx


Posts: 6415
Joined: 9/9/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline
I put 4 in every Army HQ: 2 sappers, 2 arty. I don't build any SUs but sappers nowadays for these HQs. You've got enough arty to start with to cover all army HQs without adding to them. (Indeed, I disband the heavy ones.)

At the Front level I place 2 RR construction brigades. STAVKA gets 10-15 of those. That's mainly to cover rail repair, although they can pull double duty as diggers. Sappers are better for digging overall now.

I build enough sappers and tank battalions to give every corps one of each, regardless of corps type. Arguably, you could bump this to 2 sappers. Late in the war, you can start building heavy tank regiments and/or SUs of various flavors (76 and up) and substitute those for tank battalions. Park these in STAVKA until the corps are ready to receive them and make them ahead of time.

None of the other SUs seem cost effective to me at this point for various reasons.


_____________________________

WitE Alpha Tester

(in reply to A game)
Post #: 3
RE: Red Army Support Units - 8/1/2012 1:18:53 PM   
M60A3TTS

 

Posts: 1113
Joined: 5/13/2011
Status: online
41 mortar battalions aren't bad if you want to supplement the armies with more tubes. 36 122mm mortars. They don't upgrade and have minimal manpower requirements.

On sapper regiments, I build lots. By Summer 1943 I look to have at least 200.

< Message edited by M60A3TTS -- 8/1/2012 1:22:19 PM >

(in reply to Flaviusx)
Post #: 4
RE: Red Army Support Units - 8/1/2012 2:25:08 PM   
Tarhunnas


Posts: 3157
Joined: 1/27/2011
From: Hex X37, Y15
Status: offline
I like mortar battalions too. And mortars are supposedly very effective in dishing out casualties.

I tend to build tank battalions because the Red Army is usually literally swimming in tanks in 1942, so to get them from the pool to the front you need many units with tanks. And since armament points are in short supply, tanks is a good way to provide firepower for low armaments and manpower costs. That is my theory at least, please debunk it if I'm wrong.

(in reply to M60A3TTS)
Post #: 5
RE: Red Army Support Units - 8/1/2012 2:31:06 PM   
hfarrish


Posts: 767
Joined: 1/3/2011
Status: offline

Does anyone build AT SUs? One would hope the game mechanics would make these useful in areas where you are likely to face panzers, but I haven't really seen anyone ever recommend it - is the benefit just far outweighed by the opportunity cost of other SUs (i.e. sappers, arty, tank) that have broader application?

(in reply to Tarhunnas)
Post #: 6
RE: Red Army Support Units - 8/1/2012 2:39:42 PM   
Flaviusx


Posts: 6415
Joined: 9/9/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline
I've built them, and they are marginally ok, but the biggest problem I have with them is that they are kinda pricey in terms of armament points. Mostly I avoid like the plague building anything relating to guns, mortars, artillery, AA, and AT. The riflemen need all this stuff in their divisions and corps, and lots of them, so to the extent you're building any of that, it's kind of counterproductive. In time, the Soviet rifleman has no need for additional firepower in this form, the TOE's keep adding more and more of this stuff organically.

Plain fact of the matter is that by 1943, the Soviet rifle corps chews up tanks just fine on its own. No real need for further AT assistance.

Sappers are cheap. So are tanks, which you eventually get more of than you know what to do with, although I'm a little wary of the vehicle requirements (not big, but vehicles are scarce early on.)



< Message edited by Flaviusx -- 8/1/2012 2:44:59 PM >


_____________________________

WitE Alpha Tester

(in reply to hfarrish)
Post #: 7
RE: Red Army Support Units - 8/1/2012 2:47:20 PM   
Walloc

 

Posts: 3071
Joined: 10/30/2006
From: Denmark
Status: offline
I do, while i have been continusouly been making fewer and fewer SUs and im not sure im finnished in that process. i still like to have 2 AT SUs 76mm+ only at Army HQs. So few things that cause armored losses after mid 42. Inf divs 45mm doesnt really cut it. I dont really have an opinion on whether this is worth it or not tho. It might just be better to make tank SUs cuz it giving CV, less arm, pools and so on.
I would have liked to be able to make some AT bdes too for Reserve both offense and defence. I havent found that there is much AP room for using this in numbers making it a meaningfull tactic.

Kind regards,

Rasmus

Edit: I mean more tank SUs i have been making em before.

< Message edited by Walloc -- 8/1/2012 2:59:24 PM >

(in reply to hfarrish)
Post #: 8
RE: Red Army Support Units - 8/1/2012 5:29:25 PM   
Schmart

 

Posts: 657
Joined: 9/13/2010
From: Canada
Status: offline
You can download my guide for building the Russian Army here:

http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3126849

It's based on the historical Army, so makes no judgement as to what is best for gameplay benifits.

(in reply to Walloc)
Post #: 9
RE: Red Army Support Units - 8/3/2012 2:27:36 AM   
turtlefang

 

Posts: 334
Joined: 7/18/2012
Status: offline
I don't have the experience that most of the folks responding do so take this with a last grain of salt.

Trucks have been a big limitation factor - more for getting supplies forward - so I try to keep usage down. But I like firepower, so I tend to build 3 Art SU per army (2 Art and 1 Mrt), and 2 sappers. I usually build 2 RR construction per front - I haven't really built the 10-15 refered to at STAVKA.

The tank SUs aren't added until 43 - I usually have an AP shortage in 42 trying to built Tank Corp and Infantry Corp - so don't have much to spare for Tank SU. Plus covering the losses to the Germans in 42. Just hard to build anything except the Corps.

(in reply to Schmart)
Post #: 10
RE: Red Army Support Units - 8/3/2012 3:16:56 AM   
Don77

 

Posts: 85
Joined: 5/29/2011
Status: offline
Suggestion:

'Frontal' armies
41
SU – RR Bde x3, Corps Arty x2, BM How Regt, How Regt, Sapper Regt, PVO Regt Arty - largely achievable by allocation (not building from scratch)
42
SU - add AA Regt
43
SU - Add Sapper regt, transfer out 1/2 RR bdes to Front HQ/Stavka

Corps:
Cav - Sapper Regt, Indep Tk Bn (become Regt), later add SU Regt (Lt, Mdm, Hvy?)
Rifle - Sapper Regt, 41 b AT Gun Regt or 41b AT Rifle Regt, ? - possibly Mor Regt/Bn ?
Tank - Sapper Regt, 41 b AT Gun Regt, Hvy tank regt
Mech - Sapper Regt, 41 b AT Gun Regt, Hvy tank regt

Air HQ
PVO regt x 2, AA Regt x 2

Front HQ
PVO regt x 1, AA regt x 1
Transfer in RR Bdes in 43



(in reply to turtlefang)
Post #: 11
RE: Red Army Support Units - 8/3/2012 3:18:41 AM   
hfarrish


Posts: 767
Joined: 1/3/2011
Status: offline
If by Frontal armies you mean armies at the front, I would think 3 RR bdes in 41 is too high in 41...given the fort nerf their digging is just not that valuable anymore and they are huge manpower sinkholes. I prefer 1 RR bde and 2 sappers plus 3 arty in 41, and I think that is even aggressive on the RR front...

(in reply to Don77)
Post #: 12
RE: Red Army Support Units - 8/3/2012 3:33:51 AM   
Don77

 

Posts: 85
Joined: 5/29/2011
Status: offline
Good point,

I differentiate 'Frontal' with the C Atk/C Pen armies under Stavka

Shock
SU - 3 x sapper, 6 x arty (How, Gun etc), 6 x AA (PVO and AA), plus Mor and Hvy Mor (existing and re-allocated)
Tank
SU as raised, plus 3 x Indep tank, 3 x Hvy Tank, 3 x Hvy SU
'Raised', ie additional raised armies (not reinforcements)
SU as raised

(in reply to hfarrish)
Post #: 13
RE: Red Army Support Units - 8/3/2012 11:17:42 PM   
Offworlder

 

Posts: 869
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline
Interesting thread...

BTW is there an AA formation which could be attached to corps (of any kind)? And do they double as AT similar to the Axis?

(in reply to Don77)
Post #: 14
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> Red Army Support Units Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.086