Matrix Games Forums

Command Rommels Panzers in Battle Academy!Servers UpdateThe Deal goes Fourth!Command Ops gets a Massive Update!Lost Battles AAR: Smolensk 41War in the East: Lost Battles is here!Conflict of Heroes: Awakening the Bear! Let's Play videoLost Battles Scenario Manual excerpts available!A sneak peek from Allied Corps!Harpoon 3 ANWs Free Ultimate Update!		 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: 3.5m vs 9.5m Jan 1944

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: 3.5m vs 9.5m Jan 1944 Page: <<   < prev  4 5 6 7 [8]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: 3.5m vs 9.5m Jan 1944 - 5/14/2013 1:21:50 PM   
Pelton


Posts: 4355
Joined: 4/9/2006
Status: offline 		AGS: With drawing and counter attacking as needed. Allot of space to trade for time in this area.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

GHC
15 - 3 - 7

10 games ended in 41 (10-0-0)
4 games ended in 42 (4-0-2)
3 games ended in 43 (1-2-3)
1 game ended in 44 (0-1-2)

(in reply to Pelton)
Post #: 211
RE: 3.5m vs 9.5m Jan 1944 - 5/14/2013 1:22:21 PM   
Pelton


Posts: 4355
Joined: 4/9/2006
Status: offline 		Losses chart




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

GHC
15 - 3 - 7

10 games ended in 41 (10-0-0)
4 games ended in 42 (4-0-2)
3 games ended in 43 (1-2-3)
1 game ended in 44 (0-1-2)

(in reply to Pelton)
Post #: 212
RE: 3.5m vs 9.5m Jan 1944 Draw - 5/14/2013 1:23:00 PM   
Pelton


Posts: 4355
Joined: 4/9/2006
Status: offline 		OOB




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

GHC
15 - 3 - 7

10 games ended in 41 (10-0-0)
4 games ended in 42 (4-0-2)
3 games ended in 43 (1-2-3)
1 game ended in 44 (0-1-2)

(in reply to Pelton)
Post #: 213
RE: 3.5m vs 9.5m Jan 1944 Draw - 5/14/2013 1:27:31 PM   
Pelton


Posts: 4355
Joined: 4/9/2006
Status: offline 		I believe from turn 1 on that if GHC player goes into the game with a draw as his goal, that a draw is very highly likely going to be the out come of the game.

I think the hardest part for the German player is the fact that your going to be the punching bag for 66% of the game.

Push until October 42.
Keep lines basicly static until you have a time and distance trade off of 1 hex per turn left.
Then trade space for time as needed.

< Message edited by Pelton -- 5/14/2013 1:32:39 PM >

_____________________________

GHC
15 - 3 - 7

10 games ended in 41 (10-0-0)
4 games ended in 42 (4-0-2)
3 games ended in 43 (1-2-3)
1 game ended in 44 (0-1-2)

(in reply to Pelton)
Post #: 214
RE: 3.5m vs 9.5m Jan 1944 Draw - 5/14/2013 2:04:33 PM   
terje439


Posts: 5318
Joined: 3/28/2004
Status: online 		I noticed that you kept you minors in the frontline with PzA Red in reserve, how did they hold out? Were they pushed back easily?

_____________________________

Incompetent Allied commander in witp:AE
Trying for Lebensraum in WitE
Emperor in CoG:EE
Sultan in CoG:EE

(in reply to Pelton)
Post #: 215
RE: 3.5m vs 9.5m Jan 1944 Draw - 5/15/2013 2:03:07 AM   
rrbill


Posts: 249
Joined: 10/5/2009
Status: offline 		Sounds like desired Axis strategy of top generals from '43 on, with hopes for promised gamechanger wunderwaffen that never appeared. Even so, SOVs shouldn't draw IMO.

(in reply to terje439)
Post #: 216
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 6 7 [8]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: 3.5m vs 9.5m Jan 1944 Page: <<   < prev  4 5 6 7 [8]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.134