Matrix Games Forums

Armageddon invasion starts in 2014Command Rommels Panzers in Battle Academy!Servers UpdateThe Deal goes Fourth!Command Ops gets a Massive Update!Lost Battles AAR: Smolensk 41War in the East: Lost Battles is here!Conflict of Heroes: Awakening the Bear! Let's Play videoLost Battles Scenario Manual excerpts available!A sneak peek from Allied Corps!
Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Rookie To PBEM Looking For DaBigBabes C Allied Opponent (CLOSED)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Opponents Wanted >> Rookie To PBEM Looking For DaBigBabes C Allied Opponent (CLOSED) Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Rookie To PBEM Looking For DaBigBabes C Allied Opponent... - 6/18/2012 10:56:28 PM   
Icedawg


Posts: 1319
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: Upstate New York
Status: offline
I'm a slightly-to-moderately experienced AI player who has decided to take the PBEM leap. I'm looking for an Allied player for a DaBigBabes C Grand Campaign. I'd prefer an opponent who is also new to PBEM, but am willing to give it a go against a person who has a game or two under their belt. Above all, I would like to play a game that is heavy on "having fun" and light on the "win-at-all-costs" mentality.

I'm a high school teacher, so with summer vacation getting ready to start in another week or so, I should be able to do about 1 or 2 (maybe even 3) turns per day until late August. Once the school year starts, I can probably do 3 or 4 per week.

Game Settings Desired: FOW - on, Advanced Weather Effects - on, Allied Damage Control - on, PDU - on, Historical First Turn - off, Dec 7th Surprise - on, Reliable USN Torpedoes - off, Realistic R&D - on, No Unit Withdrawals - off, Reinforcements - variable +/- 15 days, single day turns.

After getting a good amount of feedback regarding HRs over on the main forum, I have compiled a list (based on HRs currently being used in other games on the AAR forum) that I'd like to use. These are negotiable to a degree, but I would prefer a game that is relatively free of gamey tactics. Since the main rationale for HRs is to eliminate "gameyness", I would be hesitant to change them significantly.

1) No single-ship TFs except in cases where the player wishes to disperse ships fleeing from a perceived enemy threat (allied ships fleeing Philippines and SRA early in the game is perfectly fine, but using single-ship picketts and naval-attack magnets is not). Basically, don't form TFs just to be bait to suck up SCTFs' ammo and/or absorb enemy airstrikes.

2) Sweeps and CAP no higher than second best maneuver rating.

3) No 4E naval attacks below 10000' (exception - naval aircraft (PBYs, Emilys etc) may do so).

4) No strategic bombing of light industry.

5) Resticted command units may not cross borders unless bought out with PPs.

6) No buying out HQs to free up wholesale blocks of resticted units on the cheap.

7) No misuse of squadron resizing on CVs to create insanely large (> 30) units.

8) One CV port attack on Dec 7th (unless all attacks are located in the same general area). No hunting of Allied CVs on turns 1 or 2.

9) Japanese amphibious landings on Dec 7th are restricted to Kuantan, Kota Bharu and N. Luzon (Vigan, Laoag, Aparri and islands between Formosa and Luzon). All locations along the North coast of New Guinea and those in the North, Central and South Pacific that can be reached on Dec 7th are also allowed.

10) Japanese TFs may not end their Dec 7th turn: a) S of the hex line between Kota Bharu and Singkawang, b) W of the hex line between Davao and Galeia c) S of the hex line between Morotai and Sansapor, d) anywhere in the interior seas of the Philippines.

11) No new Allied TFs may be created on the Dec 7th turn. Existing Allied TFs may be given orders on Dec 7th, but those orders may only be transit orders to other friendly bases (react = 0, no patrol, cruise speed). The condition of Allied air and ground units may not be altered in any way on Dec 7th. Chinese units are exempt from these restrictions.

12) Parachute units may not paradrop if the drop results in more than 2 fragments being located on the map (allows no more than two targets per unit until the unit forms back up). This is a happy medium between the restrictive rule of one unit = one target and the free-for-all mentality of no restirctions.

13) When dropping on an enemy-occupied base in conjunction with a conventional ground attack, the overall strength of the paradrop must be an honest attempt to bring sufficient force to justify the disruption caused to enemy ground units. In other words, no paradropping of a handful of troops just for the sake of causing disruption to the enemy.

14) Allied nations must operate in geographically appropriate areas (Dutch units not allowed in Philippines or India, Chinese units not allowed in India, Australian units not allowed in N Pacific . . . ) and Japanese Commands must remain in quasi-historical areas.

15) No non-Soviet allied units allowed in Soviet bases and visa versa.

16) Night bombing restricted to max of one squadron per target base, max of one squadron launched from a given base on a given night, and no attacks from the same base on back-to-back nights. Also, no night attacks at < 50% moonlight.

17) No more than 6 PTs in a TF and no more than 2 PT TFs in a hex.



< Message edited by Icedawg -- 6/20/2012 8:11:16 AM >
Post #: 1
RE: Rookie To PBEM Looking For DaBigBabes C Allied Oppo... - 6/19/2012 9:47:35 AM   
adsoul64


Posts: 179
Joined: 1/23/2012
From: Milan Italy
Status: offline
Why you haven't post this one just a couple of weeks ago?

(in reply to Icedawg)
Post #: 2
RE: Rookie To PBEM Looking For DaBigBabes C Allied Oppo... - 6/19/2012 9:01:16 PM   
sanch

 

Posts: 197
Joined: 10/30/2004
Status: offline
PM Sent

(in reply to adsoul64)
Post #: 3
RE: Rookie To PBEM Looking For DaBigBabes C Allied Oppo... - 6/21/2012 3:56:23 AM   
Commander Stormwolf

 

Posts: 1531
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline

you have no chance against my art adsoul.. my art is superior

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwawoAH9h2Y

_____________________________

"No Enemy Survives Contact with the Plan" - Commander Stormwolf

(in reply to sanch)
Post #: 4
RE: Rookie To PBEM Looking For DaBigBabes C Allied Oppo... - 6/21/2012 3:59:40 AM   
Commander Stormwolf

 

Posts: 1531
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline

my Betties are a wall of death

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7TJNXtQ-4SU

_____________________________

"No Enemy Survives Contact with the Plan" - Commander Stormwolf

(in reply to Commander Stormwolf)
Post #: 5
RE: Rookie To PBEM Looking For DaBigBabes C Allied Oppo... - 6/21/2012 8:27:51 AM   
adsoul64


Posts: 179
Joined: 1/23/2012
From: Milan Italy
Status: offline
That's sure

(in reply to Commander Stormwolf)
Post #: 6
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Opponents Wanted >> Rookie To PBEM Looking For DaBigBabes C Allied Opponent (CLOSED) Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.213