leehunt27@bloomberg.net
Posts: 321
Joined: 9/6/2004
Status: offline
|
Anyone intermediate to advanced players interested in a Grand Campaign, scenario 1, either side? Similar to a recent post by 39battalion, I am looking for a friendly but challenging game  . I have a decent amount of PBEM experience so I'm somewhere in the intermediate to advanced range. Also I am willing to play a long time in spite of my blunders, though most games I've played have been decided by late 1943 to the satisfaction of both players. Anyone interested please PM me and we'll sort out the best mutual fit.
I feel the same as 39battalion, if he doesn't mind me quoting him:
"I like games played in a friendly and gentlemanly spirit and I am much more interested in enjoying the journey rather than attempting to break the game system to "win". As I enjoy the detail of this game and the numerous small challenges each turn presents... Any interruptions to gameplay caused by RL should be able to be amicably discussed and accepted. The key here is good communication and respect for your opponent. I can manage at least 5 turns per week.
The opponent I seek: I am looking for somebody who understands and identifies with what I am trying to say above ."
Suggested settings :
Turns = 1 day turns
Fog of war = On
Advanced weather = Negotiable
Allied damage control = On
PDU = Negotiable
Historical first turn = On
December 7 surprise = On
Reliable US torps = Off
Realistic R&D = On
No unit withdrawals = Negotiable
Reinforcement rate = Negotiable
Combat reports = On
Auto subs = Off
TF/aircraft move radius = Off (as it can be toggled during the game)
All facilities expand at start = Off
Accept air and ground replacements = On
House rules : My preference would be have very few. In fact I would be happy to have none as I think the latest version of the game is well balanced I would rather play the game in the spirit of sorting out any problematic issues by discussion if they come up. But,of course,I would be very happy to negotiate on house rules.
thanks!
< Message edited by leehunt27@bloomberg.net -- 6/3/2012 8:53:55 PM >
_____________________________
John 21:25
|
Printable Version
Opponent wanted [CLOSED] - 
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread