Matrix Games Forums

Command Ops gets a Massive Update!Lost Battles AAR: Smolensk 41War in the East: Lost Battles is here!Conflict of Heroes: Awakening the Bear! Let's Play videoLost Battles Scenario Manual excerpts available!A sneak peek from Allied Corps!Harpoon 3 ANWs Free Ultimate Update!All good Deals always come in threesDistant Worlds: Shadows Approaches!Lost Battles AAR: Moscow 41		 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Informal Poll: Random Weather or Not

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> Informal Poll: Random Weather or Not Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Informal Poll: Random Weather or Not - 6/1/2012 6:38:30 PM   
Rufus T. Firefly


Posts: 38
Joined: 4/28/2012
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline 		Hi everyone,

I'm about to start a new GC and since I haven't played with random weather yet, I'm trying to decide it I should try it out. I recall reading in some previous post that a least a few people think the random weather option introduces too much randomness. I would hope that the random weather would provide an occasional surprise to spice up the game, but not go so far as to dramatically change the outcome of the game through an excessive amount of freak weather changes benifiting one side or the other.

So I'm interested in seeing what the majority opinion of the more experienced players will be.

Thanks for your advice!

_____________________________

Rufus T. Firefly: Do you realize our army is facing disastrous defeat? What do you intend to do about it?
Chicolini: I've done it already. I've changed to the other side.
Firefly: What are you doing over here?
Chicolini: Well, the food is better
Post #: 1
RE: Informal Poll: Random Weather or Not - 6/1/2012 8:02:53 PM   
Schmart

 

Posts: 552
Joined: 9/13/2010
From: Canada
Status: offline 		I play only with random weather. I think playing with non-random weather is far too predictable. Likes seriously, did the Germans and Russians know exactly when there would be mud and clear weather in the spring of 1942 (non-random weather alternates mud/clear from May to mid-June 42) to time their attacks? I don't think so.

Some people say it disadvantages the Axis too much with at least one mud turn in the summer of 1941. Don't forget though, that you'll also get at least one snow turn during the first winter, and that can put a major damper to any Russian blizzard offensive. Also, I once played a game (Russian v AI) where there was snow all through April 1942, allowing the Germans to conduct a spring counter-offensive for a full month longer. Let me tell you, that put a major dent in the Russian lines...

(in reply to Rufus T. Firefly)
Post #: 2
RE: Informal Poll: Random Weather or Not - 6/1/2012 8:30:09 PM   
Tarhunnas


Posts: 2945
Joined: 1/27/2011
From: Hex X37, Y15
Status: offline 		IMHO random weather will be somewhat more to the Germans advantage in 1941. As Schmart says, even thoug a mud turn in summer can put a wrench in the Geman machinery, a couple of snow turns during blizzard more than compensates. Later in teh game, I think random weather is an advantage to the Soviets, as they move second in the turn. Random weather makes the game much more unpredictable and enjoyable. However, I do agree with those that think random weather can be a bit too random. I would like to see some kind of light mud or similar during the summer months.

(in reply to Schmart)
Post #: 3
RE: Informal Poll: Random Weather or Not - 6/1/2012 8:32:26 PM   
Farfarer

 

Posts: 661
Joined: 7/21/2004
Status: offline 		Random makes it more fun. Who stays in Russia during Blizzards anymore? :)

(in reply to Tarhunnas)
Post #: 4
RE: Informal Poll: Random Weather or Not - 6/1/2012 9:11:50 PM   
TulliusDetritus

 

Posts: 3810
Joined: 4/1/2004
From: Back to Reality :(
Status: offline 		Only random weather for me. In fact I am an extremist: death to non-random weather!

< Message edited by TulliusDetritus -- 6/1/2012 9:12:06 PM >

_____________________________



"Block is very important. If you think block is useless now it's ok. If you don't like block, why don't you take it with your face...?" -- Kung Fu master

(in reply to Farfarer)
Post #: 5
RE: Informal Poll: Random Weather or Not - 6/1/2012 10:09:27 PM   
timmyab

 

Posts: 616
Joined: 12/14/2010
From: Bristol, UK
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tarhunnas
However, I do agree with those that think random weather can be a bit too random. I would like to see some kind of light mud or similar during the summer months.

Yes me too.Also a stage between snow and blizzard.
Ideally the weather would be completely random within historical possibilities, including the first winter.Some sort of VP compensation would be needed for the worst affected player.You'd probably need a next turn weather forecast as well.
The predictability of the weather, even when using the random weather option is a big negative for me.


< Message edited by timmyab -- 6/1/2012 10:18:22 PM >

(in reply to Tarhunnas)
Post #: 6
RE: Informal Poll: Random Weather or Not - 6/1/2012 10:18:03 PM   
Flaviusx


Posts: 5745
Joined: 9/9/2009
Status: offline 		Tarhunnas, respectfully, I don't see how you can say random weather is in the German advantage in 1941. Mud turns in summer 1941 are like gold for the Soviets. I don't care how many snow turns turn up later. Surviving the summer is the most important thing.

Last game I played I had mud in south and central Soviet on turn 5, and in the north zone on turn 11. This was huge.







< Message edited by Flaviusx -- 6/1/2012 10:24:40 PM >

_____________________________

WitE Alpha Tester

(in reply to timmyab)
Post #: 7
RE: Informal Poll: Random Weather or Not - 6/1/2012 10:33:15 PM   
Tarhunnas


Posts: 2945
Joined: 1/27/2011
From: Hex X37, Y15
Status: offline 		@Flaviusx Of course there is some luck to it, but with average luck there will only be one or two muds in summer, it evens out, you might get a shorter autumn mud period or a mild winter. I think I was lucky as the German with random weather in my game against gids.

_____________________________

Read my AAR:s ye mighty, and despair!
41Ger
41Sov
41Ger
42Ger
42Sov

(in reply to Flaviusx)
Post #: 8
RE: Informal Poll: Random Weather or Not - 6/1/2012 11:02:32 PM   
Michael T


Posts: 1539
Joined: 10/22/2006
From: Queensland, Australia.
Status: offline 		Non Random only.

In my board games I like the weather tables and rolls. But the WITE version doesn't do it for me.

_____________________________

'Deus le Volt!'
------------------

(in reply to Tarhunnas)
Post #: 9
RE: Informal Poll: Random Weather or Not - 6/2/2012 12:19:21 AM   
carlkay58

 

Posts: 527
Joined: 7/25/2010
Status: offline 		I prefer and mostly play with Random weather. That said, it can truly bite either player in the rear at times. I did my first game of Barbarossa (as the Axis) with random weather (I did not realize it at the time) and had mud straight from the start of September until the end of October and then had snow and blizzard for the rest of it. It really put a stop on the Axis advance and I got totally creamed by the AI in the game!

On the other hand, I was one of the players who discovered the "Axis Spring" problem (where the Axis become supermen instantly in the first non-blizzard turn in 42) when my carefully planned final push of my Soviet winter offensive was totally ruined when I had a snow turn in February and had my three reserve armies that had just come up to the front totally crushed in two turns - over 1 million casualties while the Axis lost less than 25,000!

But I prefer not knowing when the weather will change and be forced to modify my plans accordingly.

I think that the random weather is great for the Soviets in the summer of 1941 - as anything that can slow down the Axis is a great thing. But after that, I think it tilts towards the Axis player. The Axis player is the first player under the turn's weather so it gives them a slight edge on taking advantage of it.

(in reply to Michael T)
Post #: 10
RE: Informal Poll: Random Weather or Not - 6/2/2012 2:27:22 AM   
delatbabel


Posts: 1140
Joined: 7/30/2006
From: Sydney, Australia
Status: offline 		I prefer only to play with random weather but most of the server game challenges are set for non-random weather.

In fact in a game of this type I can't understand why non-random weather exists. It means that at the start of the game you know what the weather in every turn in April 1944 is going to be. That doesn't make sense.

_____________________________

--
Del

(in reply to carlkay58)
Post #: 11
RE: Informal Poll: Random Weather or Not - 6/2/2012 3:49:23 AM   
kg_1007

 

Posts: 229
Joined: 4/19/2008
Status: offline 		I like random just because I think knowing exactly when the blizzard will hit, when the mud will hit, etc, is a bit too much. The first game I played, I did use the "non random" because the scale of the game, etc, was so huge, the last thing I wanted to do was also keep track of possible weather issues while I learned it..but now, I prefer random always.

(in reply to delatbabel)
Post #: 12
RE: Informal Poll: Random Weather or Not - 6/2/2012 5:52:30 AM   
76mm


Posts: 1703
Joined: 5/2/2004
Status: offline 		In theory I would like to play with random weather, but currently it is just too random. If they can't introduce something between clear and mud, I would like for them to introduce a "random-lite" option in which mud/blizzard can vary by +/- two or three turns, just to keep things interesting...

(in reply to kg_1007)
Post #: 13
RE: Informal Poll: Random Weather or Not - 6/2/2012 7:03:26 AM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 991
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline 		Random all the way. Nothing better to see mud stop an advance cold - whether in 41 or 44-45!

(in reply to 76mm)
Post #: 14
RE: Informal Poll: Random Weather or Not - 6/2/2012 7:14:05 AM   
Tarhunnas


Posts: 2945
Joined: 1/27/2011
From: Hex X37, Y15
Status: offline 		I think the preference for random or not depends on if you see WITE primarily as a game to be won or a simulation to be enjoyed.

The impact of weather is different for Axis and Soviet, as the Axis always moves first. I have found that late war, random weather can disadvantage the Axis in that you usually can break pockets and get encircled units out, but if a sudden spell of mud hits, suddenly your encircled units are goners. And late war, you usually have a couple of divisions encircled almost every turn.

(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 15
RE: Informal Poll: Random Weather or Not - 6/2/2012 7:38:42 AM   
cpt flam


Posts: 1104
Joined: 1/16/2011
From: caen - France
Status: offline 		Random too for me.
A bit more fun (except for summer 41 german).

(in reply to Tarhunnas)
Post #: 16
RE: Informal Poll: Random Weather or Not - 6/2/2012 11:02:13 AM   
janh

 

Posts: 1139
Joined: 6/12/2007
Status: offline 		Random only. No one ever planned 3 months ahead because they new on week XX mud was coming. The non-random game is a totally different thing, and it is pure fiction.
A few more grades of weather would be nice though (light mud, heavy mud, etc.).

(in reply to cpt flam)
Post #: 17
RE: Informal Poll: Random Weather or Not - 6/2/2012 1:36:20 PM   
Commanderski

 

Posts: 284
Joined: 12/12/2010
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline 		Random weather only for me. It's more fun and just like real weather, unpredictable. Has no advantage to either side.

(in reply to janh)
Post #: 18
RE: Informal Poll: Random Weather or Not - 6/2/2012 8:45:06 PM   
heliodorus04


Posts: 1369
Joined: 11/1/2008
From: Denver Colorado
Status: offline 		Random. It can definitely do more good for the German than harm.
Plus, it's one of the only things that gives the game better replayability.

Obviously the weather zones could be improved a LOT, and as 76mm said, something in between full-on Rasputitsa and full-on dry would be very welcome in this game.

_____________________________

For the longest time I thought I'd buy WitW to ensure my legitimate voice of criticism could be heard. But as WitE continues down the path of Soviet Army fantasy-land, I've given up all hope of enjoying either game again.

(in reply to Commanderski)
Post #: 19
RE: Informal Poll: Random Weather or Not - 6/2/2012 8:54:31 PM   
hfarrish

 

Posts: 522
Joined: 1/3/2011
Status: online 		Back a year ago random was a death sentence for a German attacker; now I think the game would be almost impossible for the Soviet without it (and it helps to mitigate the blizzard somewhat on the other end)...I'd also note it can hurt the Soviet in '41 as well, particularly in terms of breaking pockets.

So yes, I think random and I agree with prior comments that gradations of weather impact would be nice in the future, so you would likely have more "rain" turns in the summer but many of these wouldn't completely shut down the offensive.

< Message edited by hfarrish -- 6/2/2012 8:55:04 PM >

(in reply to heliodorus04)
Post #: 20
RE: Informal Poll: Random Weather or Not - 6/2/2012 10:38:51 PM   
Manstein63

 

Posts: 345
Joined: 6/30/2010
Status: offline 		I also prefer to play Random weather as I think that the uncertaincy makes the game more fun. Saying that I also think that there should be more weather types so as you don't have clear on one turn then mud the next & then back to clear the turn following. I also think that smaller weather zones would be helpful perhaps dividing the existing zones by 3 so as you have a north center & south weather subzone maybe it will feature in WitE 2.0
Manstein63

(in reply to hfarrish)
Post #: 21
RE: Informal Poll: Random Weather or Not - 6/3/2012 3:24:51 AM   
Rufus T. Firefly


Posts: 38
Joined: 4/28/2012
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline 		The forces of Randomness have dealt a severe blow to the forces of order and predictabilty who were routed after the forces of Randomness achieved an 8:1 superiority (16 votes to 2).

Fortunately, the forces of predictabilty appeared in full divisional strength with 2 command points. Had they appeared with only a single brigade, rather than routing with heavy casualties they would have retreated 10 miles and I would have to run the same poll tomorrow!.

It looks like I'm going with random weather. Thanks for giving your opinions! I'll also make a post in in the suggetions thread about providing intermediate forms of weather, as that seems to be a popular (and very good) idea here, just in case the mods aren't paying attention.

Firefly

_____________________________

Rufus T. Firefly: Do you realize our army is facing disastrous defeat? What do you intend to do about it?
Chicolini: I've done it already. I've changed to the other side.
Firefly: What are you doing over here?
Chicolini: Well, the food is better

(in reply to Manstein63)
Post #: 22
RE: Informal Poll: Random Weather or Not - 6/3/2012 1:08:26 PM   
Shupov


Posts: 183
Joined: 2/7/2004
Status: offline 		Are you playing against the AI or human opponents? Random gives the Axis the advantage of knowing what the Soviet player's weather will be, but not the other way around. IMO this is a considerable advantage.

_____________________________

Two broken Tigers on fire in the night,
Flicker their souls to the wind...

Al Stewart, "Roads to Moscow"

(in reply to Rufus T. Firefly)
Post #: 23
RE: Informal Poll: Random Weather or Not - 6/3/2012 2:55:05 PM   
timmyab

 

Posts: 616
Joined: 12/14/2010
From: Bristol, UK
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Shupov

Are you playing against the AI or human opponents? Random gives the Axis the advantage of knowing what the Soviet player's weather will be, but not the other way around. IMO this is a considerable advantage.

This is why I think there should be a next turn 'weather forecast' when using random weather.An uncannily accurate one.

(in reply to Shupov)
Post #: 24
RE: Informal Poll: Random Weather or Not - 6/7/2012 8:23:19 AM   
invernomuto


Posts: 914
Joined: 10/8/2004
From: Turin, Italy
Status: offline
quote:

So I'm interested in seeing what the majority opinion of the more experienced players will be.


Generally I like to play with historical weather.

_____________________________

Small Ship, Big War - the Voyages of the Hibiki
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=1363103

Best AAR I've ever seen!!!

(in reply to Rufus T. Firefly)
Post #: 25
RE: Informal Poll: Random Weather or Not - 6/7/2012 9:34:24 AM   
juret

 

Posts: 175
Joined: 10/17/2011
Status: offline 		non random only.

(in reply to invernomuto)
Post #: 26
RE: Informal Poll: Random Weather or Not - 6/7/2012 1:11:38 PM   
jaw

 

Posts: 862
Joined: 7/24/2009
Status: offline 		This is one area where I disagree with just about everyone else on the development team: at a scale of one week turns and 10 mile hexes random weather is neither historicaliy nor meteorologically accurate. The amount of rain you need to produce mud conditions over hundreds of square miles of terrain cannot be produced by any fast moving summer shower. It requires sustained rain, day in and day out for days on end. At minimum, the probability of mud between July and September should be ZERO at this scale. Once the weather does deteriorate it should be very difficult, if not impossible, for it to improve before the season changes. So in the Fall, Clear can turn to Mud but Mud can't turn back to Clear, Mud can turn to Snow and Snow to Mud (if still in the Fall) but Blizzard can only be more Blizzard or Snow.

If the Random weather table had this structured variability I'd be all for it; as currently designed I'll stick with non-random weather.

(in reply to Rufus T. Firefly)
Post #: 27
RE: Informal Poll: Random Weather or Not - 6/7/2012 2:11:58 PM   
hfarrish

 

Posts: 522
Joined: 1/3/2011
Status: online
As one who uses random weather I don't disagree with any of the above; that said I think its almost an essential balancing mechanism for 41 at this point (especially for the summer but also for the blizzard). As others have noted it is a substitute slowing mechanism for a true logistics model.

(in reply to jaw)
Post #: 28
RE: Informal Poll: Random Weather or Not - 6/7/2012 2:33:42 PM   
glvaca

 

Posts: 1109
Joined: 6/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: jaw

This is one area where I disagree with just about everyone else on the development team: at a scale of one week turns and 10 mile hexes random weather is neither historicaliy nor meteorologically accurate. The amount of rain you need to produce mud conditions over hundreds of square miles of terrain cannot be produced by any fast moving summer shower. It requires sustained rain, day in and day out for days on end. At minimum, the probability of mud between July and September should be ZERO at this scale. Once the weather does deteriorate it should be very difficult, if not impossible, for it to improve before the season changes. So in the Fall, Clear can turn to Mud but Mud can't turn back to Clear, Mud can turn to Snow and Snow to Mud (if still in the Fall) but Blizzard can only be more Blizzard or Snow.

If the Random weather table had this structured variability I'd be all for it; as currently designed I'll stick with non-random weather.


amen!

(in reply to jaw)
Post #: 29
RE: Informal Poll: Random Weather or Not - 6/7/2012 3:30:15 PM   
danlongman

 

Posts: 300
Joined: 3/27/2012
From: Over the hills and far away
Status: offline 		I worked around weather and forecasting in aviation for the last 30 years or so. The idea of weather forcasting beyond a few days is ludicrous as far as specific
conditions are concerned. Some gross overall trends in the macro scale might be anticipated but given 1940's technology only a couple of days worth could be
predicted with any accuracy. Those damn butterflies would sabotage any long range prediction. In an overall sense the Germans were "upstream" of Russia
and could monitor weather across the atlantic and europe since things tend to flow from west to east in the northern hemisphere but not always. The famous
D-Day forcast was for the next morning and it could have been wrong. Weather is so capricious the idea of having weeks notice of the changes is like giving
the players a weather necromancer or a division of Panzer Dragons and comissars with magic swords. The old adage is climate is what you expect weather is what you get.
I think Twain or somebody said that. These last two weeks in Alberta in the year 2012 with satellite observation and a world wide forecast network undreamed of
in 1941 the daily forecasts have been wrong as often as right on a daily basis. If you want weather in a game the only way to put it in simply is to look at the climate trend
assign values and roll the dice. Warm and maybe rainy in summer, cold and maybe snowy in winter....spring and fall as before but with mud especially with autumn rains
and spring break up. The year 1941 could have had a long, hot dry summer, a late fall and a dry mild winter it happens some years. Other years summer is rainy and cool
winter comes early and she is a bitch.
cheers


_____________________________

"Patriotism: Your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." - George Bernard Shaw

(in reply to glvaca)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> Informal Poll: Random Weather or Not Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.211