Matrix Games Forums

Deal of the Week - Pride of NationsA new update for Piercing Fortress EuropaNew screenshots for War in the West!Pike & Shot is now available!Server Maintenance Battle Academy 2 gets updated!Deal of the Week: Advanced Tactics Gold Ask Buzz Aldrin!Pike & Shot gets Release Date and Twitch Session!Deal of the Week Espana 1936
Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

The Wargamer has reviewed Team Assault: Baptism of Fire!!!

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Team Assault: Baptism of Fire >> The Wargamer has reviewed Team Assault: Baptism of Fire!!! Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
The Wargamer has reviewed Team Assault: Baptism of Fire!!! - 5/2/2012 7:03:07 AM   
pditty8811

 

Posts: 13
Joined: 1/9/2012
Status: offline
The Wargamer has reviewed Team Assault: Baptism of Fire!!!

What's your impression?

http://www.wargamer.com/article/3182/pc-game-review-team-assault-baptism-of-fire
Post #: 1
RE: The Wargamer has reviewed Team Assault: Baptism of ... - 5/2/2012 12:01:35 PM   
Xerkis


Posts: 115
Joined: 9/6/2008
Status: offline
A bit confusing. Throughout the article he seems to completely enjoy the game, but then in the conclusion not so much. or at least that is how I took it.

I understand and certainly accept the points made on the graphics and things like that; but his statement “They can only deploy them inside a “deployment box”, which is a bit difficult to find—wish it was more pronounced.” That is a bit hard to take. . . . um . . . . . it’s the giant blue box that take up about 10% of the map. How much more “pronounced” does it need to be?


 Other than that one statement, I think the article was excellent.

. . . . . . That and what the rest of us have already been saying (or known) now. . . . . . . . Need a campaign and need better AI forces to fight against being the top two.

Thanks for posting this.

(in reply to pditty8811)
Post #: 2
RE: The Wargamer has reviewed Team Assault: Baptism of ... - 5/2/2012 12:24:52 PM   
tgb

 

Posts: 712
Joined: 7/8/2005
Status: offline
I would like to know what victory condition he was playing when he complained about the A.I. not being aggressive enough. I suck at the game,but even I know that rushing forward leads to disaster.

(in reply to Xerkis)
Post #: 3
RE: The Wargamer has reviewed Team Assault: Baptism of ... - 5/2/2012 12:31:27 PM   
Xerkis


Posts: 115
Joined: 9/6/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tgb

I would like to know what victory condition he was playing when he complained about the A.I. not being aggressive enough. I suck at the game,but even I know that rushing forward leads to disaster.

Not that I looked real hard, but I couldn’t find an email for the writer of the article. If I did I would like to send him a challenge to try the game again playing against one of my forces I made for the AI and see what he thought then.

(in reply to tgb)
Post #: 4
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Team Assault: Baptism of Fire >> The Wargamer has reviewed Team Assault: Baptism of Fire!!! Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.061