Matrix Games Forums

Space Program Manager Launch Contest Announced!Battle Academy 2 is out now on iPad!A closer look at rockets in Space Program ManagerDeal of the Week - Pride of NationsA new update for Piercing Fortress EuropaNew screenshots for War in the West!Pike & Shot is now available!Server Maintenance Battle Academy 2 gets updated!Deal of the Week: Advanced Tactics Gold
Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) Page: <<   < prev  14 15 [16] 17 18   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/19/2012 11:58:02 PM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1890
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: online
T58 center (German)


Stable situation here.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 451
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/19/2012 11:59:09 PM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1890
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: online
T58 south (German)


I think Saper will not push towards Stalingrad. Readjustments will be necessary.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 452
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/20/2012 12:04:04 AM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1890
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: online
T58 far south (German)


Another prove of my stupidity.


Losing Novorossiysk cut off sea contact with Sevastopol (I forgot about port rules) and doomed my troops in Crimea - 9 infantry division plus 1 tank brigade - 84k soldiers.

Bad, bad, bad ...




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 453
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/20/2012 12:27:28 AM   
bigbaba


Posts: 1169
Joined: 11/3/2006
From: Koblenz, Germany
Status: offline
arg, it's realy time for mud. i realy hope you can hold moscow. i would say that's the difference between a lost game and a russian offensive in the next year. after all there are around 160 manpower centers around moscow.

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 454
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/20/2012 12:29:30 AM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1890
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: online
T58 far north (Soviet)


I reinforced area a bit, but I fear it might not be enough.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to bigbaba)
Post #: 455
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/20/2012 12:30:28 AM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1890
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: online
T58 center (Soviet)


Battle for Moscow continues. This turn was very very good.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 456
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/20/2012 12:35:11 AM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1890
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: online
T58 south (Soviet)


I abandoned upper Don bulge plus stretched front in Tambov area to reinforced my lines further south.


Near Rostov I managed to reestablish contact with encircled units. Crucial factor was air-base providing air-head supply to my encircled divisions.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 457
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/20/2012 12:36:51 AM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1890
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: online
T58 far south (Soviet)


I am waiting.

Amphibious assault on Novorossiysk was obviously unsuccessful.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 458
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/21/2012 1:30:37 AM   
Pelton

 

Posts: 6044
Joined: 4/9/2006
Status: offline
The Finnish attack is just what you want. They be worthless after 4 to 6 turns of combat.

You Moscow defences look good. GHC can take it IF they set up 1 infantry army the right way, but if they don't I beleive you can hold it for now.

The south is the key, I like how you have stuff set-up and are sucking him into the deep south. GHC just plain cant hold a front that long.

Game is still up for grabs.



_____________________________

GHC
22 - 4 - 8

15 games ended in 41 (15-0-0)
7 games ended in 42 (5-0-2)
8 games ended in 43 (2-3-3)
4 games ended in 44 (0-1-3)


General Cheesefinder of WitW

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DiSQ36zfWk

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 459
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/27/2012 8:42:30 AM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1890
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: online
T59 far north (German)


Fins are getting more and more active.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Pelton)
Post #: 460
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/27/2012 8:44:45 AM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1890
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: online
T59 center (German)


I have impression that Germans are running out of steam here.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 461
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/27/2012 8:47:13 AM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1890
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: online
T59 center/south (German)


Abandoned divisions were surrounded, surrounded where destroyed (4 div, 32k). Lots of ground have been lost.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 462
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/27/2012 8:49:21 AM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1890
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: online
T59 south (German)


Saper keeps pouring troops into Caucasus area.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 463
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/27/2012 9:07:56 AM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1890
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: online
T59 far north (Soviet)


I slightly reinforced my troops here.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 464
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/27/2012 9:08:42 AM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1890
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: online
T59 center (Soviet)


Both encircled stacks have been saved.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 465
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/27/2012 9:10:11 AM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1890
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: online
T59 south (Soviet)


My defensive positions look very strong.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 466
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/27/2012 9:11:42 AM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1890
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: online
T59 far south (Soviet)


I will have to send more units here soon, otherwise whole area will be overrun.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 467
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/28/2012 5:56:33 PM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1890
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: online
T60 far north (German)


Finnish offensive continues.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 468
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/28/2012 5:58:03 PM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1890
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: online
T60 center (German)


Situation of my isolate stack south-west from Moscow becomes critical.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 469
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/28/2012 6:00:03 PM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1890
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: online
T60 center/south (German)


3 previously encircled divisions were destroyed, yet no other actions here, hmmm ... Now I need to guess where Saper will move his panzers.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 470
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/28/2012 6:01:05 PM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1890
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: online
T60 far south (German)


Axis offensive towards Caucasus gathers more and more momentum.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 471
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/28/2012 6:27:12 PM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1890
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: online
T60 far north (Soviet)


I have already sent few units here, more (4 or so) are on the way.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 472
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/28/2012 6:30:29 PM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1890
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: online
T60 center (Soviet)


One of counter-attacks (SE from Moscow) failed, not good because he will be able to establish strong position there.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 473
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/28/2012 6:32:14 PM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1890
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: online
T60 far south (Soviet)


I retreated to next half-secure position. I will try to delay him until more troops will arrive.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 474
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/28/2012 8:16:28 PM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1890
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: online
T61 far north (German)


More pressure.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 475
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/28/2012 8:18:19 PM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1890
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: online
T61 center (German)


Contrary to my expectation my units didn't retreat towards safety. They are doomed now, I do no chance of breaking through German lines now.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 476
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/28/2012 8:20:02 PM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1890
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: online
T61 far south (German)


First skirmishes in battle for Caucasus.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 477
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/28/2012 10:50:15 PM   
M60A3TTS

 

Posts: 1059
Joined: 5/13/2011
Status: online
I have to ask. You handled Pelton quite well but here you've struggled to hold Saper back. What's been the main difference?

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 478
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/28/2012 11:14:13 PM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1890
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: online
quote:

M60A3TTS

I have to ask. You handled Pelton quite well but here you've struggled to hold Saper back. What's been the main difference?



Simplifying things - difference was muling. My army was almost destroyed by the end of 7th turn and I didn't recover since (my mistakes didn't help).


Other thing I noticed was Saper's quality CC. During initial summer and winter I won under 10% defensive battles many times despite good initial odds and commanders.

(in reply to M60A3TTS)
Post #: 479
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/29/2012 3:51:18 PM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1890
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: online
T61 far north (Soviet)


Few more troops arrived. It should be enough for turn or two.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 480
Page:   <<   < prev  14 15 [16] 17 18   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) Page: <<   < prev  14 15 [16] 17 18   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.094