Matrix Games Forums

Happy Easter!Battle Academy is now available on SteamPlayers compare Ageods Civil War to Civil War IIDeal of the week - An updated War in the East goes half Price!Sign up for the Qvadriga beta for iPad and Android!Come and say hi at Pax and SaluteLegends of War goes on sale!Piercing Fortress Europa Gets UpdatedBattle Academy Mega Pack is now availableClose Combat: Gateway to Caen Teaser Trailer
Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) Page: <<   < prev  14 15 [16] 17 18   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/19/2012 11:58:02 PM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1853
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T58 center (German)


Stable situation here.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 451
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/19/2012 11:59:09 PM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1853
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T58 south (German)


I think Saper will not push towards Stalingrad. Readjustments will be necessary.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 452
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/20/2012 12:04:04 AM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1853
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T58 far south (German)


Another prove of my stupidity.


Losing Novorossiysk cut off sea contact with Sevastopol (I forgot about port rules) and doomed my troops in Crimea - 9 infantry division plus 1 tank brigade - 84k soldiers.

Bad, bad, bad ...




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 453
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/20/2012 12:27:28 AM   
bigbaba


Posts: 1143
Joined: 11/3/2006
From: Koblenz, Germany
Status: offline
arg, it's realy time for mud. i realy hope you can hold moscow. i would say that's the difference between a lost game and a russian offensive in the next year. after all there are around 160 manpower centers around moscow.

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 454
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/20/2012 12:29:30 AM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1853
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T58 far north (Soviet)


I reinforced area a bit, but I fear it might not be enough.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to bigbaba)
Post #: 455
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/20/2012 12:30:28 AM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1853
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T58 center (Soviet)


Battle for Moscow continues. This turn was very very good.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 456
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/20/2012 12:35:11 AM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1853
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T58 south (Soviet)


I abandoned upper Don bulge plus stretched front in Tambov area to reinforced my lines further south.


Near Rostov I managed to reestablish contact with encircled units. Crucial factor was air-base providing air-head supply to my encircled divisions.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 457
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/20/2012 12:36:51 AM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1853
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T58 far south (Soviet)


I am waiting.

Amphibious assault on Novorossiysk was obviously unsuccessful.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 458
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/21/2012 1:30:37 AM   
Pelton

 

Posts: 5720
Joined: 4/9/2006
Status: offline
The Finnish attack is just what you want. They be worthless after 4 to 6 turns of combat.

You Moscow defences look good. GHC can take it IF they set up 1 infantry army the right way, but if they don't I beleive you can hold it for now.

The south is the key, I like how you have stuff set-up and are sucking him into the deep south. GHC just plain cant hold a front that long.

Game is still up for grabs.



_____________________________

GHC
22 - 4 - 8

15 games ended in 41 (15-0-0)
7 games ended in 42 (5-0-2)
8 games ended in 43 (2-3-3)
4 games ended in 44 (0-1-3)


General Cheesefinder of WitW

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afmyypGyfng&list=PLrY4H4gWWBircAjo

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 459
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/27/2012 8:42:30 AM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1853
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T59 far north (German)


Fins are getting more and more active.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Pelton)
Post #: 460
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/27/2012 8:44:45 AM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1853
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T59 center (German)


I have impression that Germans are running out of steam here.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 461
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/27/2012 8:47:13 AM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1853
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T59 center/south (German)


Abandoned divisions were surrounded, surrounded where destroyed (4 div, 32k). Lots of ground have been lost.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 462
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/27/2012 8:49:21 AM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1853
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T59 south (German)


Saper keeps pouring troops into Caucasus area.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 463
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/27/2012 9:07:56 AM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1853
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T59 far north (Soviet)


I slightly reinforced my troops here.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 464
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/27/2012 9:08:42 AM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1853
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T59 center (Soviet)


Both encircled stacks have been saved.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 465
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/27/2012 9:10:11 AM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1853
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T59 south (Soviet)


My defensive positions look very strong.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 466
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/27/2012 9:11:42 AM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1853
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T59 far south (Soviet)


I will have to send more units here soon, otherwise whole area will be overrun.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 467
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/28/2012 5:56:33 PM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1853
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T60 far north (German)


Finnish offensive continues.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 468
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/28/2012 5:58:03 PM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1853
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T60 center (German)


Situation of my isolate stack south-west from Moscow becomes critical.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 469
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/28/2012 6:00:03 PM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1853
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T60 center/south (German)


3 previously encircled divisions were destroyed, yet no other actions here, hmmm ... Now I need to guess where Saper will move his panzers.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 470
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/28/2012 6:01:05 PM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1853
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T60 far south (German)


Axis offensive towards Caucasus gathers more and more momentum.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 471
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/28/2012 6:27:12 PM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1853
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T60 far north (Soviet)


I have already sent few units here, more (4 or so) are on the way.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 472
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/28/2012 6:30:29 PM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1853
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T60 center (Soviet)


One of counter-attacks (SE from Moscow) failed, not good because he will be able to establish strong position there.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 473
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/28/2012 6:32:14 PM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1853
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T60 far south (Soviet)


I retreated to next half-secure position. I will try to delay him until more troops will arrive.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 474
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/28/2012 8:16:28 PM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1853
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T61 far north (German)


More pressure.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 475
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/28/2012 8:18:19 PM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1853
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T61 center (German)


Contrary to my expectation my units didn't retreat towards safety. They are doomed now, I do no chance of breaking through German lines now.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 476
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/28/2012 8:20:02 PM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1853
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T61 far south (German)


First skirmishes in battle for Caucasus.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 477
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/28/2012 10:50:15 PM   
M60A3TTS

 

Posts: 996
Joined: 5/13/2011
Status: offline
I have to ask. You handled Pelton quite well but here you've struggled to hold Saper back. What's been the main difference?

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 478
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/28/2012 11:14:13 PM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1853
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
quote:

M60A3TTS

I have to ask. You handled Pelton quite well but here you've struggled to hold Saper back. What's been the main difference?



Simplifying things - difference was muling. My army was almost destroyed by the end of 7th turn and I didn't recover since (my mistakes didn't help).


Other thing I noticed was Saper's quality CC. During initial summer and winter I won under 10% defensive battles many times despite good initial odds and commanders.

(in reply to M60A3TTS)
Post #: 479
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/29/2012 3:51:18 PM   
Kamil

 

Posts: 1853
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T61 far north (Soviet)


Few more troops arrived. It should be enough for turn or two.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kamil)
Post #: 480
Page:   <<   < prev  14 15 [16] 17 18   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) Page: <<   < prev  14 15 [16] 17 18   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.127