Matrix Games Forums

Hannibal: Terror of Rome goes into BetaBattle Academy Mega Pack releases on SteamDeal of the Week Da Vinci's Art of WarCivil War II Patch 1.4 public BetaHappy Easter!Battle Academy is now available on SteamPlayers compare Ageods Civil War to Civil War IIDeal of the week - An updated War in the East goes half Price!Sign up for the Qvadriga beta for iPad and Android!Come and say hi at Pax and Salute
Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Pagan -- problem with ownership?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Tech Support >> Pagan -- problem with ownership? Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Pagan -- problem with ownership? - 3/14/2012 11:39:53 AM   
viberpol


Posts: 827
Joined: 10/20/2005
From: Gizycko, Poland, EU
Status: offline
Hi Michael,

Take a look at the attached file, please.
There's a problem that to me seems to have sth to do with Pagan ownership.

I can't transfer airgroups there, it cannot be a home base for TFs.
Try to send an airgroup manually you get "absence of airfield" info.
(But you can pick the base from list of airfields and transfer it this way, though).
Try set a home port you've got "must be friendly base" info.
Sometimes clicking the base brings no info just as if there was no base or the base was enemy's.

Please notice the 86th Nav Gd problem at the same base. It says it has two fragments in the same base, but one is not visible.



Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Przy lackim orle, przy koniu Kiejstuta Archanioł Rusi na proporcach błysł
Post #: 1
RE: Pagan -- problem with ownership? - 3/15/2012 10:38:14 AM   
michaelm


Posts: 8860
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Sydney, Australia
Status: offline
Yes the 86th is acting like a base. It is hiding what the actual base as only one base 'item' is expected in a hex.
[Note the 'Secondary airfield' as the unit type when looking at it.]
I'll try a few thing to see if it can be overcome.

Can't trick it to disband or such

< Message edited by michaelm -- 3/15/2012 11:08:47 AM >


_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to viberpol)
Post #: 2
RE: Pagan -- problem with ownership? - 3/15/2012 11:19:23 AM   
michaelm


Posts: 8860
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Sydney, Australia
Status: offline
I have updated the save to reset the type.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to michaelm)
Post #: 3
RE: Pagan -- problem with ownership? - 3/15/2012 2:47:10 PM   
witpqs

 

Posts: 14151
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: online
Michael, a long time ago we had two brigades turn into divisions, but since they kept their brigade TOE it didn't affect the game. There does seem to be a gremlin hiding in the code.

PS: IIRC this was still under 1106i.

(in reply to michaelm)
Post #: 4
RE: Pagan -- problem with ownership? - 3/15/2012 4:26:51 PM   
crsutton


Posts: 6845
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline
Message removed. We have decided to soldier on and just ignore Pagan...

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by crsutton -- 3/15/2012 7:53:23 PM >


_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to michaelm)
Post #: 5
RE: Pagan -- problem with ownership? - 3/16/2012 1:09:41 AM   
crsutton


Posts: 6845
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline
Michaelm

OK, Im....back. Can you make that same change in this file? I know it is asking you to do it twice but Ark sent you and old file and we are having trouble backing up due to "events" that have occurred in the last turn or two. Attached in my most recent Allied turn that is to go back to Viperpol.

Sorry, we don't mean to be a pain in the neck for you and know you have plenty on your plate.

CRSutton



Attachment (1)

_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to crsutton)
Post #: 6
RE: Pagan -- problem with ownership? - 3/16/2012 3:53:14 AM   
michaelm


Posts: 8860
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Sydney, Australia
Status: offline
Updated

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to crsutton)
Post #: 7
RE: Pagan -- problem with ownership? - 3/16/2012 4:34:15 AM   
crsutton


Posts: 6845
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline
Thanks so much. My wife and I have decided to name our first son after you. However, it will come as a shock to him, his wife, kids and co workers....

_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to michaelm)
Post #: 8
RE: Pagan -- problem with ownership? - 3/17/2012 11:40:34 AM   
viberpol


Posts: 827
Joined: 10/20/2005
From: Gizycko, Poland, EU
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelm

Updated



Thanks a lot for your help & assistance Michael!

_____________________________

Przy lackim orle, przy koniu Kiejstuta Archanioł Rusi na proporcach błysł

(in reply to michaelm)
Post #: 9
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Tech Support >> Pagan -- problem with ownership? Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.074