Matrix Games Forums

Come and see us during the Spieltagen in Essen!New Screenshots for Pike & ShotDeal of the Week Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations WOTYCommand: Modern Air/Naval Operations WOTY is now available!Frontline : The Longest Day Announced and in Beta!Command gets Wargame of the Year EditionDeal of the Week: Pandora SeriesPandora: Eclipse of Nashira is now availableDistant Worlds Gets another updateHell is Approaching
Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Tactical advice - l'audace!

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Classic (Free) Games] >> Pacific War: The Matrix Edition >> Tactical advice - l'audace! Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Tactical advice - l'audace! - 3/11/2012 7:25:36 AM   
Koniev

 

Posts: 222
Joined: 7/9/2002
From: Shawnee, Kansas
Status: offline
Just for kicks I began a game using the "Nimitz strategy". Admiral Nimitz wanted to bypass the Solomons and the Phillipines, take the north coast of New Guinea to keep Rabaul and Truk subdued, take the Marsalls and the Marianas and move directly on Okinawa.

Well, except for Okinawa, I've done that. I'm currently faced with the problem of moving on Iwo Jima, BUT, according to Sigint, Formosa doesn't have any troops.

What would you think of attacking Formosa from Saipan without taking Iwo or any bases in the P.I. I have plenty of Marines and Inf. Divisions, 5 CV TF's with 3 CV's and 2 CVL's each plus two groups of 21 knot BB's and a fast BB TF which includes the Iowas.

Is this TOO audacious?

"l'audace, l'audace, toujours l'audace!! ? Or am I looking at a General Custer situation?

_____________________________

"Those who don't remember History are condemned to relive it" George Santayana
Post #: 1
RE: Tactical advice - l'audace! - 3/11/2012 4:38:59 PM   
Ian R

 

Posts: 1300
Joined: 8/1/2000
From: Sydney
Status: offline
No. But there are usually 2-3 division equivalents in each Formosa base. [So move your fast carriers up a week before D-day with replenishent TFs, and set one TF to bomb the island and you will see what's there during combat resolution anyway.



_____________________________

"You may find that having is not so nearly pleasing a thing as wanting. It is not logical, but it is often true."
- Cdr Spock


Ian R

(in reply to Koniev)
Post #: 2
RE: Tactical advice - l'audace! - 3/11/2012 7:13:24 PM   
Capt. Harlock


Posts: 4258
Joined: 9/15/2001
From: Los Angeles
Status: offline
quote:

What would you think of attacking Formosa from Saipan without taking Iwo or any bases in the P.I. I have plenty of Marines and Inf. Divisions, 5 CV TF's with 3 CV's and 2 CVL's each plus two groups of 21 knot BB's and a fast BB TF which includes the Iowas.


That's a fair amount of open water to cover without LBA support. I also find the absence of troops on Formosa highly suspect. I would check the enemy air zones and find out how much you have to sail though. Also, do you have sufficient transports with higher speed than the Henderson class to carry your invading LCU's?

_____________________________

Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo

(in reply to Koniev)
Post #: 3
RE: Tactical advice - l'audace! - 3/14/2012 6:09:48 AM   
Koniev

 

Posts: 222
Joined: 7/9/2002
From: Shawnee, Kansas
Status: offline
I couldn't bring myself to do it. As you said, Captain, I didn't really trust SIGINT about Formosa and the supply columns would have to pass through an area covered by LBA from both the Home Islands, Okinawa and the PI.

One consequence of the Nimitz strategy is that, although there are several thousand troops cut off from Guadalcanal to Truk and the New Britain peninsula, all the LBA was evacuated to the P.I. and the home islands. The air defenses are as thick as I've ever seen.

I've attacked and taken Iwo Jima and Bonin Is. and moved in COE units. The SW pacific has just taken Kendari while 6th and 8th Armies are preparing for an assualt on the P.I.

_____________________________

"Those who don't remember History are condemned to relive it" George Santayana

(in reply to Capt. Harlock)
Post #: 4
RE: Tactical advice - l'audace! - 3/14/2012 8:42:01 PM   
Capt. Harlock


Posts: 4258
Joined: 9/15/2001
From: Los Angeles
Status: offline
quote:

One consequence of the Nimitz strategy is that, although there are several thousand troops cut off from Guadalcanal to Truk and the New Britain peninsula, all the LBA was evacuated to the P.I. and the home islands. The air defenses are as thick as I've ever seen.


One other point I forgot to raise: do the Japanese have kamikaze units yet? I can testify from unpleasant experience that it makes a difference.

_____________________________

Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo

(in reply to Koniev)
Post #: 5
RE: Tactical advice - l'audace! - 3/15/2012 6:11:19 AM   
Koniev

 

Posts: 222
Joined: 7/9/2002
From: Shawnee, Kansas
Status: offline
Yes, they do, and yes, they hurt.

_____________________________

"Those who don't remember History are condemned to relive it" George Santayana

(in reply to Capt. Harlock)
Post #: 6
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Classic (Free) Games] >> Pacific War: The Matrix Edition >> Tactical advice - l'audace! Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.070