Matrix Games Forums

To End All Wars: Mountain InfantryPandora: Eclipse of Nashira Announced! Deal of the Week: Command Ops goes half price!New Fronts are opening up for Commander: The Great WarCharacters of World War 1Sign of for the Pike and Shot Beta!More Games are Coming to Steam! Return to the Moon on October 31st! Commander: The Great War iPad Wallpapers Generals of the Great War
Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: 1.06.03 Axis AI vs fulkerson T26

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: 1.06.03 Axis AI vs fulkerson T26 Page: <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: 1.06.03 Axis AI vs fulkerson T26 - 2/24/2012 6:02:01 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20965
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
This is the losses, etc. from the Axis half of T26:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 271
RE: 1.06.03 Axis AI vs fulkerson T26 - 2/24/2012 6:30:15 AM   
Farfarer

 

Posts: 669
Joined: 7/21/2004
Status: offline
Hey! - do your turn before an AAR :)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 272
RE: 1.06.03 Axis AI vs fulkerson T26 - 2/24/2012 7:32:51 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20965
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
It would be really cool if there were some way I could transfer just the RR Engineers to the next higher HQ and leave all the other SU's
right where they are. Higher HQ's are usually the ones we park on rail junctions just to get the railroad fixed faster. But I can't think of
an easy way to do it. Maybe if we could get some of those " [ X ] " symbols on the far right side of the window that we could click on to
get the SU reassigned to the next higher HQ or maybe go all the way back to the pool(s). Just a thought.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 273
RE: 1.06.03 Axis AI vs fulkerson T26 - 2/24/2012 8:21:00 PM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20965
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
This is the moves and attacks from the Soviet half of T26..............I did a boat-load of attacks this turn.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 274
RE: 1.06.03 Axis AI vs fulkerson T26 - 2/24/2012 8:23:00 PM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20965
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
Here's the losses from the Soviet attacks:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 275
RE: 1.06.03 Axis AI vs fulkerson T27 - 2/24/2012 8:36:36 PM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20965
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
Here's the losses, etc. from the Axis half of T27:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 276
RE: 1.06.03 Axis AI vs fulkerson T27 - 2/25/2012 2:56:59 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20965
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
This is the moves and attacks of the Soviet side of T27:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 277
RE: 1.06.03 Axis AI vs fulkerson T27 - 2/25/2012 3:01:38 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20965
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
Here's the losses from the Soviet attacks in T27:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 278
RE: 1.06.03 Axis AI vs fulkerson T28 - 2/25/2012 3:12:45 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20965
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
This is the losses from the Axis half of T28. There were no Axis attacks this turn.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 279
RE: 1.06.03 Axis AI vs fulkerson T28 - 2/25/2012 4:10:25 AM   
randallw

 

Posts: 1972
Joined: 9/2/2010
Status: offline
Well into the blizzard now, I believe?

Construction and engineer/sapper units are handled a bit funny in the automated process. You can try moving any in Stavka to a front HQ, if that's where you want them to end up.

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 280
RE: 1.06.03 Axis AI vs fulkerson T28 - 2/25/2012 5:10:00 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20965
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
This is the Soviet moves / attacks in T28:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 281
RE: 1.06.03 Axis AI vs fulkerson T28 - 2/25/2012 5:12:04 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20965
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: randallw
Well into the blizzard now, I believe?

Yes, and it's delicious.

quote:

ORIGINAL: randallw
Construction and engineer/sapper units are handled a bit funny in the automated process. You can try moving any in Stavka to a front HQ, if that's where you want them to end up.

But if they are in an Army HQ and I need to move them to a Front HQ I guess the only way to do that is disband them in the Army HQ and move them from STAVKA after buying them or just buy them in the Front HQ. Thanks for your input though.

(in reply to randallw)
Post #: 282
RE: 1.06.03 Axis AI vs fulkerson T28 - 2/25/2012 5:14:49 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20965
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
Here's the losses from the Soviet attacks in T28:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 283
RE: 1.06.03 Axis AI vs fulkerson T29 - 2/25/2012 5:33:11 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20965
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
This is the losses, etc. from the Axis half of T29:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 284
RE: 1.06.03 Axis AI vs fulkerson T23 - 2/25/2012 7:14:02 AM   
Apollo11


Posts: 22566
Joined: 6/7/2001
From: Zagreb, Croatia
Status: offline
Hi all,

quote:

ORIGINAL: larryfulkerson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Apollo11

This is not good... darn...


If you need the saved game here it is for the Axis side in T23:


Larry, we are now treating this as two possible issues....

Please save the savegame files from those turns (i.e. turns where German AI abandoned the Leningrad and left whole area south of Leningrad undefended) - I will let you know when / if we need them - thanks in advance!


Leo "Apollo11"

_____________________________



Prior Preparation & Planning Prevents Pathetically Poor Performance!

A & B: WitW, WitE, WbtS, GGWaW, GGWaW2-AWD, HttR, CotA, BftB, CF
P: UV, WitP, WitP-AE

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 285
RE: 1.06.03 Axis AI vs fulkerson T23 - 2/25/2012 8:30:42 AM   
Apollo11


Posts: 22566
Joined: 6/7/2001
From: Zagreb, Croatia
Status: offline
Hi all,

Larry we would need the Axis auto savegame in turn where Axis AI abandons the Leningrad and removes the German units from the south of Leningrad and leaving gap in line...

Do you, hopefully, have those?


Leo "Apollo11"

_____________________________



Prior Preparation & Planning Prevents Pathetically Poor Performance!

A & B: WitW, WitE, WbtS, GGWaW, GGWaW2-AWD, HttR, CotA, BftB, CF
P: UV, WitP, WitP-AE

(in reply to Apollo11)
Post #: 286
RE: 1.06.03 Axis AI vs fulkerson T23 - 2/25/2012 8:34:18 AM   
randallw

 

Posts: 1972
Joined: 9/2/2010
Status: offline
You might want to bomb those hexes with German rail repair units in them.

(in reply to Apollo11)
Post #: 287
RE: 1.06.03 Axis AI vs fulkerson T23 - 2/25/2012 8:38:11 AM   
Apollo11


Posts: 22566
Joined: 6/7/2001
From: Zagreb, Croatia
Status: offline
Hi all,

I think that that should be AI auto savegame Turn #021...


Leo "Apollo11"

_____________________________



Prior Preparation & Planning Prevents Pathetically Poor Performance!

A & B: WitW, WitE, WbtS, GGWaW, GGWaW2-AWD, HttR, CotA, BftB, CF
P: UV, WitP, WitP-AE

(in reply to Apollo11)
Post #: 288
RE: 1.06.03 Axis AI vs fulkerson T23 - 2/25/2012 8:54:37 AM   
randallw

 

Posts: 1972
Joined: 9/2/2010
Status: offline
Armaments pool dried up the last few turns.  Building too many support units?

(in reply to Apollo11)
Post #: 289
RE: 1.06.03 Axis AI vs fulkerson T26 - 2/25/2012 1:40:29 PM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20965
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Apollo11

Hi all,

Larry we would need the Axis auto savegame in turn where Axis AI abandons the Leningrad and removes the German units from the south of Leningrad and leaving gap in line...

Do you, hopefully, have those?
Leo "Apollo11"

Yeah, I've been saving all the saved game turns.


Here's the Axis saved game from T21:

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 2/25/2012 1:44:36 PM >

(in reply to randallw)
Post #: 290
RE: 1.06.03 Axis AI vs fulkerson T23 - 2/25/2012 1:41:56 PM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20965
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: randallw
You might want to bomb those hexes with German rail repair units in them.

Good idea. I'll get right on it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: randallw
Armaments pool dried up the last few turns.  Building too many support units?

I've been building support units like they are going out of style. Now my divisions will be formidable. I hope.

Here's a picture showing the number of SU's per HQ. Admittedly there's no need for 3 SU's per HQ, so I changed the support level
to 2 per HQ. Maybe that'll flush the extra SU's back up to STAVKA where I can disband about 1/3 of them.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 2/25/2012 2:13:40 PM >

(in reply to randallw)
Post #: 291
RE: 1.06.03 Axis AI vs fulkerson T26 - 2/25/2012 1:54:17 PM   
Apollo11


Posts: 22566
Joined: 6/7/2001
From: Zagreb, Croatia
Status: offline
Hi all,

quote:

ORIGINAL: larryfulkerson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Apollo11

Larry we would need the Axis auto savegame in turn where Axis AI abandons the Leningrad and removes the German units from the south of Leningrad and leaving gap in line...

Do you, hopefully, have those?


Yeah, I've been saving all the saved game turns.

Here's the Axis saved game from T21:


Got it - thanks!


Leo "Apollo11"

_____________________________



Prior Preparation & Planning Prevents Pathetically Poor Performance!

A & B: WitW, WitE, WbtS, GGWaW, GGWaW2-AWD, HttR, CotA, BftB, CF
P: UV, WitP, WitP-AE

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 292
RE: 1.06.03 Axis AI vs fulkerson T30 - 2/25/2012 2:03:41 PM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20965
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
Here's the losses, etc. from the Axis half of T30:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 293
RE: 1.06.00 Axis AI vs fulkerson T14 - 2/25/2012 2:27:27 PM   
Apollo11


Posts: 22566
Joined: 6/7/2001
From: Zagreb, Croatia
Status: offline
Hi all,

quote:

ORIGINAL: larryfulkerson

Turn #14:






Larry, did Axis AI ever try to attack northern Leningrad HEX and take it (after it took the southern Leningrad HEX in turn #14)?

Without that Finns are not released...


BTW, can you post Axis savegame from turn #15 (i.e. the first turn after AI took southern Leningrad HEX)?



Leo "Apollo11"

_____________________________



Prior Preparation & Planning Prevents Pathetically Poor Performance!

A & B: WitW, WitE, WbtS, GGWaW, GGWaW2-AWD, HttR, CotA, BftB, CF
P: UV, WitP, WitP-AE

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 294
RE: 1.06.00 Axis AI vs fulkerson T14 - 2/25/2012 8:48:27 PM   
randallw

 

Posts: 1972
Joined: 9/2/2010
Status: offline
No, you don't want to disband the SU's just yet, because if you create them again you lose out on whatever experience they gained early on.

What you can do is set some to 50% TOE, the ones you don't expect to see fighting soon. As time passes and the German AI attacks less you'll have lower losses and the armaments factories will catch up.

(in reply to Apollo11)
Post #: 295
RE: 1.06.00 Axis AI vs fulkerson T14 - 2/25/2012 11:13:41 PM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20965
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Apollo11
Hi all,

Larry, did Axis AI ever try to attack northern Leningrad HEX and take it (after it took the southern Leningrad HEX in turn #14)?

Without that Finns are not released...

BTW, can you post Axis savegame from turn #15 (i.e. the first turn after AI took southern Leningrad HEX)?

Nope, they only took the Leningrad hex and no more. In fact, after a turn or two they evacuated Leningrad so I could reoccupy it.

Here's the T15 axis save game:

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 2/25/2012 11:15:57 PM >

(in reply to Apollo11)
Post #: 296
RE: 1.06.00 Axis AI vs fulkerson T14 - 2/26/2012 4:23:56 AM   
AFV


Posts: 371
Joined: 12/24/2011
From: Dallas, Texas
Status: offline
Larry, this is a basic question coming from an inexperienced Soviet player. I have been following this from the start and should have asked 25 turns ago but- early on, few turns, do you start assigning divisions from the Corps HQ to an Army HQ?
Really, this is also open to any player who has an opinion on this.

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 297
RE: 1.06.00 Axis AI vs fulkerson T14 - 2/26/2012 4:49:24 AM   
randallw

 

Posts: 1972
Joined: 9/2/2010
Status: offline
I generally don't; there's never enough APs early on, and the corp HQs will disappear on their own.

(in reply to AFV)
Post #: 298
RE: 1.06.00 Axis AI vs fulkerson T30 - 2/26/2012 6:14:29 AM   
larryfulkerson

 

Posts: 20965
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth, Solar System
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: AFV
Larry, this is a basic question coming from an inexperienced Soviet player. I have been following this from the start and should have asked 25 turns ago but- early on, few turns, do you start assigning divisions from the Corps HQ to an Army HQ?
Really, this is also open to any player who has an opinion on this.

Keep asking these salent questions. That's the only way to get an answer. I seldom have enough AP's in the early turns to get some divisions assigned from the Corps HQ to an Army HQ. Plus as RandallW says below, they usually dissappear on turn 5 or 6 or so.

quote:

ORIGINAL: randallw
I generally don't; there's never enough APs early on, and the corp HQs will disappear on their own.

I quite agree. I even hesitate to assign any SU's to them unless I know the Army HQ it's assigned to can use the SU's. Otherwise I've been known to disband them early. Those in the Pripet marshes are on their own. I don't even use any rail cap. to rail them out of
danger. I suppose one of two of them might have a superior leader and disbanding them frees up the leader for re-assignment to a
more deserving Army HQ.

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 2/26/2012 6:18:20 AM >

(in reply to randallw)
Post #: 299
RE: 1.06.00 Axis AI vs fulkerson T30 - 2/26/2012 9:11:48 AM   
AFV


Posts: 371
Joined: 12/24/2011
From: Dallas, Texas
Status: offline
I assume you have been spending all of your APs for support units (building like they are going out of style). I also assume not for any infantry divisions?
So what have you been building? (in general, not asking for a specific count)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 300
Page:   <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: 1.06.03 Axis AI vs fulkerson T26 Page: <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.125