LSiA is still smashing mate :P
And yes, in some cases the scenarios *75% of them* have to be revised; especially the Attrition Divider.
Still, most of the ' updated' ones, even those for PBEM only, favour the defender big time. I am awaiting some feedback from Robert 'Der Schwede'; because we slugged it out - RTM, LSiA, Ardennes '44 ... in most cases it is like me, Joao, etc. mentioned - 'ignore losses' spoils the PBEM.
I am not saying it's a 'bug', and YES, there are lots of examples and one SHOULD have the option to switch his units to this stance, but with some penalties. E.g. If I attack with I-L settings, I get a turn burn, aye? So, if a poxy defender, no supply, no readiness whatsoever does I-L too often, the boys should evaporate or change into reorg, no?
This is really pivotal that we address the implications here -> 3.5
I also recommend that a sticky thread should be set up about the different settings, e.g. MRPB, CAD etc. By doing so it is easier to adjust an old scenario to the 3.4 combat mechanisms etc.
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam
(Marcus Porcius Cato Censorius)