Matrix Games Forums

Join the Matrix Team at Historicon!Recruiting Privates for Germany at War: Barbarossa 1941!Ageod takes you back to the Civil War Battle Academy iPad and PC 50 per cent off!Close Combat Last Stand Arnhem v5.60.53 update Allied Corps Walkthrough playlist and AARConflict of Heroes: Ghost Divisions Released!Pandora Beta Playthrough VideosGermany at War: Barbarossa 1941 Announced!Great Battles Medieval coming to your tablet with a 50 per cent off launch sale!		 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Pelton vs JV

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: Pelton vs JV Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Pelton vs JV - 9/28/2012 2:26:37 PM   
Klydon

 

Posts: 1878
Joined: 11/28/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Savanniperkele

It not about he's offers but he's lie which he uses to tarnish my reputation. No one should be diverted by Peltons smoke screen in here.

edit: typo


Your drama is fast becoming far more damaging to your reputation than anything else Pelton may or may not have done.

You are the only one raising a stink about a person who has played a ton of AAR's and I have not seen any other person go off the deep end like you are.

The absolute best thing you can do is just let this die before you do more damage to yourself and turn more people off as possible opponents. Personally, IF I ever play another head to head game again, it won't be against you and it is not because of anything Pelton posted, but rather the damage you have done to yourself.

(in reply to Savanniperkele)
Post #: 61
RE: Pelton vs JV - 9/28/2012 3:38:41 PM   
terje439


Posts: 5448
Joined: 3/28/2004
Status: offline 		@Pelton
A quick Q. Since you are one of the more experienced Axis players, how serious is the 0 armaments in the German pool in your oppinion? It always scares the crap out of me.


Terje

_____________________________

Incompetent Allied commander in witp:AE
Trying for Lebensraum in WitE
Emperor in CoG:EE
Sultan in CoG:EE

(in reply to Klydon)
Post #: 62
RE: Pelton vs JV - 9/28/2012 3:58:06 PM   
AFV


Posts: 371
Joined: 12/24/2011
From: Dallas, Texas
Status: offline 		Savanniperkele:
You're an idiot.
First off, I'm not sure where Pelton posted this "lie", I would have never been aware of ANY of this except for YOUR postings.
Second, he has offered a rematch, that was a chance to repair your "damaged rep", you refuse.
Third, you are the one that has done all the damage to your rep, not him. YOU, not Pelton.

Seriously, you're acting like a child, which leads me to really think about how old you really are. As with Klydon, what I have gained out of this is that I am never going to play you. Let this go, accept the challenge (because no one else here is going to play you), and take this chance to prove your an honorable opponent. That's your best option.

(in reply to terje439)
Post #: 63
RE: Pelton vs JV - 9/28/2012 4:56:45 PM   
Aurelian

 

Posts: 1446
Joined: 2/26/2007
Status: offline 		Savanniperkele

You're not doing yourself any favors. It's coming down to one of two choices.

1: Stop on your own and move on. (Best thing.)

2: Erik or someone will do it for you. (Not in your best interest.)

You've made your point.

_____________________________



(in reply to AFV)
Post #: 64
RE: Pelton vs JV - 9/28/2012 5:56:43 PM   
Savanniperkele


Posts: 64
Joined: 7/6/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: AFV

Savanniperkele:
You're an idiot.
First off, I'm not sure where Pelton posted this "lie", I would have never been aware of ANY of this except for YOUR postings.
Second, he has offered a rematch, that was a chance to repair your "damaged rep", you refuse.


AFV,
With your gentle approach to my person you fail equally to read the thread: http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/fb.asp?m=3178263
"I had several reports from other players that you are a possible reloader." he states and has not apologized.

The rematch has nothing to do with my "damaged rep". In contrast he's trying to damage my reputation by telling the lie above. But let me guess you have failed to read the proof for it being a lie too?
He's "rep" might have been damaged when he fled the game and which "rep" I am not engouraged to repair.

(in reply to AFV)
Post #: 65
RE: Pelton vs JV - 9/28/2012 6:01:30 PM   
Savanniperkele


Posts: 64
Joined: 7/6/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aurelian

Savanniperkele

You're not doing yourself any favors. It's coming down to one of two choices.

1: Stop on your own and move on. (Best thing.)

2: Erik or someone will do it for you. (Not in your best interest.)

You've made your point.


Thank you very much Aurelian,

I kind of understand your point. But one thing is that Erik is already privately looking into this issue and asked proof from pelton about he's public claim and he has not responded to Erik either. Pelton has had weeks to do it.

Perhaps the point is indeed proven and he's silence confirms what I have said. And that's why I refused to flee into silence in this.

(in reply to Aurelian)
Post #: 66
RE: Pelton vs JV - 9/28/2012 6:46:07 PM   
Fishbed


Posts: 1622
Joined: 11/21/2005
From: Beijing, China - Paris, France
Status: offline 		Well, please guys, even though it's not done the way it should be done, if it should ever be done at any rate, the guy's got a point. Pelton stops it, calls it a draw and says now it's because SV is a possible reloader. Whatever the reason for quitting, especially if it is due to a gamey move by Savanniperkele, I don't see why Pelton shall be allowed to say such things if it's not true (well, Savanniperkele playing gamey would be quite enough already).

No need to have more new guys calling new names out there, and no reason to side like that calling the man an idiot. I can understand someone's honour is at stake, and even though it's really not done quite brightly on his side of the fence, calling the guy a reloader or criticizing his English ain't gonna speak on behalf of Pelton either. The guy doesn't want a rematch, by now he wants his name cleared, and that's most legitimate, whatever sneaky comments he's still throwing at our famous OKH baron.

< Message edited by Fishbed -- 9/28/2012 6:47:28 PM >

_____________________________


(in reply to Savanniperkele)
Post #: 67
RE: Pelton vs JV - 9/28/2012 7:11:32 PM   
Pelton


Posts: 4379
Joined: 4/9/2006
Status: offline 		Alt 41CG scenario
Server game
Locked HQ Support
Non Random Weather
Full FOW

House Rules:
No Para drops to break pockets or cut rail lines past 8 hexs from front( before moves).

No bombing of air bases more than 3 times a turn (after turn 1).

No bombing of HQ's when not stacked with combat units.

No landing west of S-Pool before 43.

I forgot to add the:

If you don't send a turn in for 30 day rule.

If one side is AFK for 30 days without a reason(no emails informing the other person) that will be considered a defeat for the AFK person.


_____________________________

GHC
15 - 3 - 7

10 games ended in 41 (10-0-0)
4 games ended in 42 (4-0-2)
3 games ended in 43 (1-2-3)
1 game ended in 44 (0-1-2)

On leave until 9/13

(in reply to Fishbed)
Post #: 68
RE: Pelton vs JV - 9/28/2012 7:18:20 PM   
Pelton


Posts: 4379
Joined: 4/9/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: terje439

@Pelton
A quick Q. Since you are one of the more experienced Axis players, how serious is the 0 armaments in the German pool in your oppinion? It always scares the crap out of me.


Terje


No issue in 41.

Arm points will pile up during 41/42 winter and increase over time until 1944(if you have setting right). 50% on support units.

When it starts to bottom out or before just lower panzer divisions toe% to 66%

_____________________________

GHC
15 - 3 - 7

10 games ended in 41 (10-0-0)
4 games ended in 42 (4-0-2)
3 games ended in 43 (1-2-3)
1 game ended in 44 (0-1-2)

On leave until 9/13

(in reply to terje439)
Post #: 69
RE: Pelton vs JV - 9/28/2012 9:23:25 PM   
Aurelian

 

Posts: 1446
Joined: 2/26/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Savanniperkele

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aurelian

Savanniperkele

You're not doing yourself any favors. It's coming down to one of two choices.

1: Stop on your own and move on. (Best thing.)

2: Erik or someone will do it for you. (Not in your best interest.)

You've made your point.


Thank you very much Aurelian,

I kind of understand your point. But one thing is that Erik is already privately looking into this issue and asked proof from pelton about he's public claim and he has not responded to Erik either. Pelton has had weeks to do it.

Perhaps the point is indeed proven and he's silence confirms what I have said. And that's why I refused to flee into silence in this.




Well, there are those iI wouldn't play due to the constant pro Soviet nonsense, or how they want to use exploits but don't want you to. That avoids alot of problems.

I understand where you're coming from. But if Erik is looking into it, he is. Nothing you can do will either speed it up or even get a result. If what you say is true, trust him to deal with it in the manner he feels appropiate. Think of it as binding arbitration.



< Message edited by Aurelian -- 9/28/2012 9:31:38 PM >

_____________________________



(in reply to Savanniperkele)
Post #: 70
RE: Pelton vs JV - 9/29/2012 2:27:42 PM   
Savanniperkele


Posts: 64
Joined: 7/6/2005
Status: offline 		Pelton has insulted me outside of the game here in this forum by trying to smear my reputation with false argument by conjuring up fake story of people claiming to him that I was suspected of reloading turns. It's proven a lie.

He's now continuously trying a smoke screen in form of an offer of ingame satisfaction which cannot make this right as stated earlier when apologies are only solution.

(in reply to Pelton)
Post #: 71
RE: Pelton vs JV - 9/29/2012 2:34:37 PM   
Savanniperkele


Posts: 64
Joined: 7/6/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aurelian
I understand where you're coming from. But if Erik is looking into it, he is. Nothing you can do will either speed it up or even get a result. If what you say is true, trust him to deal with it in the manner he feels appropiate. Think of it as binding arbitration.


You are right in that we both are waiting for Erik to intervene but I am not trying to speed it up. Brought this up to notify Pelton publicly as he rudely refuses to respond any private messages at all, even adminstrators messages (sic). Maybe this reminds him that perhaps it's not the wisest thing to do when he has been messaged by Erik about he's proven false claim and perhaps he could admit being wrong and we could continue as if nothing had happened.

(in reply to Aurelian)
Post #: 72
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: Pelton vs JV Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.376