Matrix Games Forums

Deal of the Week: Command Ops goes half price!New Fronts are opening up for Commander: The Great WarCharacters of World War 1Sign of for the Pike and Shot Beta!More Games are Coming to Steam! Return to the Moon on October 31st! Commander: The Great War iPad Wallpapers Generals of the Great WarDeal of the Week Panzer CorpsNew Strategy Titles Join the Family
Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: New Forum Policy for JTCS-is this approved by Matrix

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion >> RE: New Forum Policy for JTCS-is this approved by Matrix Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: New Forum Policy for JTCS-is this approved by Matrix - 12/10/2011 8:56:14 AM   
undercovergeek

 

Posts: 1476
Joined: 11/21/2006
From: UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Deputy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arctic Blast

Seeing how well this is going, I can't imagine why Jason would possibly not want to deal with this sort of thing in the sub forum...


He did. That is the whole problem. There seems to be a conflict within Matrix rules and regulations. One rule says the thread gets locked down and another rule says posts are deleted. That was the point of the OP. We'd like to know WHICH rule is in effect.


i dont want to rain on your parade, or indeed your arguement that youve managed to carry across 3 different forums now it would seem, but..........

no
one
cares

except the original people embroiled in the arguement. All youre doing is bitching and moaning in public. Imagine three little girls all whirling their hands in each others face and shouting at the same time - thats you that is.

(in reply to Deputy)
Post #: 61
RE: New Forum Policy for JTCS-is this approved by Matrix - 12/10/2011 10:51:42 AM   
Terl


Posts: 584
Joined: 6/1/2005
From: Charleston, WV
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: undercovergeek


quote:

ORIGINAL: Deputy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arctic Blast

Seeing how well this is going, I can't imagine why Jason would possibly not want to deal with this sort of thing in the sub forum...


He did. That is the whole problem. There seems to be a conflict within Matrix rules and regulations. One rule says the thread gets locked down and another rule says posts are deleted. That was the point of the OP. We'd like to know WHICH rule is in effect.


i dont want to rain on your parade, or indeed your arguement that youve managed to carry across 3 different forums now it would seem, but..........

no
one
cares

except the original people embroiled in the arguement. All youre doing is bitching and moaning in public. Imagine three little girls all whirling their hands in each others face and shouting at the same time - thats you that is.



Totally agree. I guess Erik has not seen this yet else he'd shut it down I think...

(in reply to undercovergeek)
Post #: 62
RE: New Forum Policy for JTCS-is this approved by Matrix - 12/10/2011 10:56:09 AM   
JudgeDredd


Posts: 8474
Joined: 11/14/2003
From: Scotland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: undercovergeek
...
thats you that is.
...

LMAO!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ApQejqCqwxU

_____________________________

JudgeDredd
I AM the Law!

(in reply to undercovergeek)
Post #: 63
RE: New Forum Policy for JTCS-is this approved by Matrix - 12/10/2011 11:03:24 AM   
**budd**


Posts: 1357
Joined: 7/4/2009
From: Tacoma
Status: offline
.................

_____________________________

Enjoy when you can, and endure when you must. ~Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

*I'm in the Wargamer middle ground*
I don't buy all the wargames I want, I just buy more than I need.

(in reply to undercovergeek)
Post #: 64
RE: New Forum Policy for JTCS-is this approved by Matrix - 12/10/2011 2:05:41 PM   
MrRoadrunner


Posts: 910
Joined: 10/7/2005
Status: offline
Spot on GoodGuy!

RR

_____________________________

“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.”
― Marcus Aurelius, Meditations

(in reply to GoodGuy)
Post #: 65
RE: New Forum Policy for JTCS-is this approved by Matrix - 12/10/2011 2:30:02 PM   
Deputy


Posts: 446
Joined: 9/24/2005
From: Silver City, NM USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: undercovergeek


quote:

ORIGINAL: Deputy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arctic Blast

Seeing how well this is going, I can't imagine why Jason would possibly not want to deal with this sort of thing in the sub forum...


He did. That is the whole problem. There seems to be a conflict within Matrix rules and regulations. One rule says the thread gets locked down and another rule says posts are deleted. That was the point of the OP. We'd like to know WHICH rule is in effect.


i dont want to rain on your parade, or indeed your arguement that youve managed to carry across 3 different forums now it would seem, but..........

no
one
cares

except the original people embroiled in the arguement. All youre doing is bitching and moaning in public. Imagine three little girls all whirling their hands in each others face and shouting at the same time - thats you that is.



First off I am not the OP. I was simply describing what he wanted to know. Secondly, the OP left the JTCS forum to find out from others who MIGHT KNOW what the policy might be at this location. Thirdly, NOBODY is forcing you to read the thread. If you don't have an answer to the original question put forward, you are just blowing smoke and padding your post count.

_____________________________

Squad Battles
John Tiller's Campaign Series: Abandonware and no longer supported. Whata shame.

(in reply to undercovergeek)
Post #: 66
RE: New Forum Policy for JTCS-is this approved by Matrix - 12/10/2011 2:48:16 PM   
undercovergeek

 

Posts: 1476
Joined: 11/21/2006
From: UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Deputy


quote:

ORIGINAL: undercovergeek


quote:

ORIGINAL: Deputy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arctic Blast

Seeing how well this is going, I can't imagine why Jason would possibly not want to deal with this sort of thing in the sub forum...


He did. That is the whole problem. There seems to be a conflict within Matrix rules and regulations. One rule says the thread gets locked down and another rule says posts are deleted. That was the point of the OP. We'd like to know WHICH rule is in effect.


i dont want to rain on your parade, or indeed your arguement that youve managed to carry across 3 different forums now it would seem, but..........

no
one
cares

except the original people embroiled in the arguement. All youre doing is bitching and moaning in public. Imagine three little girls all whirling their hands in each others face and shouting at the same time - thats you that is.



First off I am not the OP. I was simply describing what he wanted to know. Secondly, the OP left the JTCS forum to find out from others who MIGHT KNOW what the policy might be at this location. Thirdly, NOBODY is forcing you to read the thread. If you don't have an answer to the original question put forward, you are just blowing smoke and padding your post count.


you, the OP and all the other little girls dont want an answer.

If Erik came on here now and said Yes or No, one of you would find a contrary arguement to blast the others with and THEN it would be locked - so leave it be now.

A google search soon brings up places where you can go argue with each other - netmummys looks like a popular one

JD - they were the best ever when i was at school

(in reply to Deputy)
Post #: 67
RE: New Forum Policy for JTCS-is this approved by Matrix - 12/10/2011 2:51:16 PM   
Deputy


Posts: 446
Joined: 9/24/2005
From: Silver City, NM USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: undercovergeek


quote:

ORIGINAL: Deputy


quote:

ORIGINAL: undercovergeek


quote:

ORIGINAL: Deputy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arctic Blast

Seeing how well this is going, I can't imagine why Jason would possibly not want to deal with this sort of thing in the sub forum...


He did. That is the whole problem. There seems to be a conflict within Matrix rules and regulations. One rule says the thread gets locked down and another rule says posts are deleted. That was the point of the OP. We'd like to know WHICH rule is in effect.


i dont want to rain on your parade, or indeed your arguement that youve managed to carry across 3 different forums now it would seem, but..........

no
one
cares

except the original people embroiled in the arguement. All youre doing is bitching and moaning in public. Imagine three little girls all whirling their hands in each others face and shouting at the same time - thats you that is.



First off I am not the OP. I was simply describing what he wanted to know. Secondly, the OP left the JTCS forum to find out from others who MIGHT KNOW what the policy might be at this location. Thirdly, NOBODY is forcing you to read the thread. If you don't have an answer to the original question put forward, you are just blowing smoke and padding your post count.


you, the OP and all the other little girls dont want an answer.

If Erik came on here now and said Yes or No, one of you would find a contrary arguement to blast the others with and THEN it would be locked - so leave it be now.

A google search soon brings up places where you can go argue with each other - netmummys looks like a popular one

JD - they were the best ever when i was at school


So you ASS U ME that is the case. Why not let Erik post the answer and THEN make your judgement?

_____________________________

Squad Battles
John Tiller's Campaign Series: Abandonware and no longer supported. Whata shame.

(in reply to undercovergeek)
Post #: 68
RE: New Forum Policy for JTCS-is this approved by Matrix - 12/10/2011 4:36:08 PM   
JW

 

Posts: 1025
Joined: 8/12/2000
From: Monroe, LA, USA
Status: offline
This is becoming like a parody of forum flame war posts.    Except the participants have not descended to profanity and crude name-calling.  It is kind of like a flame war at the gentleman's forum club.

(in reply to Deputy)
Post #: 69
RE: New Forum Policy for JTCS-is this approved by Matrix - 12/10/2011 4:56:43 PM   
Scott_WAR

 

Posts: 1023
Joined: 2/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: undercovergeek


quote:

ORIGINAL: Deputy


quote:

ORIGINAL: undercovergeek


quote:

ORIGINAL: Deputy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arctic Blast

Seeing how well this is going, I can't imagine why Jason would possibly not want to deal with this sort of thing in the sub forum...


He did. That is the whole problem. There seems to be a conflict within Matrix rules and regulations. One rule says the thread gets locked down and another rule says posts are deleted. That was the point of the OP. We'd like to know WHICH rule is in effect.


i dont want to rain on your parade, or indeed your arguement that youve managed to carry across 3 different forums now it would seem, but..........

no
one
cares

except the original people embroiled in the arguement. All youre doing is bitching and moaning in public. Imagine three little girls all whirling their hands in each others face and shouting at the same time - thats you that is.



First off I am not the OP. I was simply describing what he wanted to know. Secondly, the OP left the JTCS forum to find out from others who MIGHT KNOW what the policy might be at this location. Thirdly, NOBODY is forcing you to read the thread. If you don't have an answer to the original question put forward, you are just blowing smoke and padding your post count.


you, the OP and all the other little girls dont want an answer.

If Erik came on here now and said Yes or No, one of you would find a contrary arguement to blast the others with and THEN it would be locked - so leave it be now.

A google search soon brings up places where you can go argue with each other - netmummys looks like a popular one

JD - they were the best ever when i was at school


So, you arent even involved in the discussion,...and want to throw around insults. Pot meet Kettle.

< Message edited by Scott_WAR -- 12/10/2011 5:02:40 PM >

(in reply to undercovergeek)
Post #: 70
RE: New Forum Policy for JTCS-is this approved by Matrix - 12/10/2011 6:21:40 PM   
barker


Posts: 1210
Joined: 7/6/2008
Status: offline
I just wanted to know what are the exact rules for the forum and does it run accross the whole thing. Not cherry picked into a category or subcategory. That is simple huh?

_____________________________

games:
1. AGEOD Blue and Gray
2. John Tiller's Battleground Series
3. Combat Mission: Beyond Overlord
4. Combat Mission: Barbarossa to Berlin
5. V for Victory Games
6. Silent Hunter III
7. Silent Hunter IV
8. Rise and Fall of the Third Re

(in reply to Scott_WAR)
Post #: 71
RE: New Forum Policy for JTCS-is this approved by Matrix - 12/10/2011 8:44:38 PM   
MrRoadrunner


Posts: 910
Joined: 10/7/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mwest

May wish to review some additional Matrix Forum rules?

"Matrix Games is solely responsible for creating, hosting, and maintaining this message board. This is a private board and shall not be used for anyone personal causes.

Matrix Games.com reserves the right to ban any person from this message board which it has determined to be in violation or simply just for the good of the overall community. Matrix Games also reserves the right to delete or remove any post on our message board."



For the love of Pete, Barker did you miss this?



RR

_____________________________

“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.”
― Marcus Aurelius, Meditations

(in reply to mwest)
Post #: 72
RE: New Forum Policy for JTCS-is this approved by Matrix - 12/10/2011 9:04:12 PM   
barker


Posts: 1210
Joined: 7/6/2008
Status: offline
I was wanting an official response from the forums sponsors not a user, no harm intended. I just want the rules to apply to you as well as me...even footing if you will

_____________________________

games:
1. AGEOD Blue and Gray
2. John Tiller's Battleground Series
3. Combat Mission: Beyond Overlord
4. Combat Mission: Barbarossa to Berlin
5. V for Victory Games
6. Silent Hunter III
7. Silent Hunter IV
8. Rise and Fall of the Third Re

(in reply to MrRoadrunner)
Post #: 73
RE: New Forum Policy for JTCS-is this approved by Matrix - 12/10/2011 10:04:43 PM   
Erik Rutins

 

Posts: 32881
Joined: 3/28/2000
From: Vermont, USA
Status: offline
Hi Barker,

We'll look into this and reply early next week. I want to make sure I know what happened here before giving an official response.

Regards,

- Erik

_____________________________

Erik Rutins
Director of Product Development


For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.

(in reply to barker)
Post #: 74
RE: New Forum Policy for JTCS-is this approved by Matrix - 12/10/2011 10:15:59 PM   
Titanwarrior89


Posts: 3086
Joined: 8/28/2003
From: arkansas
Status: offline
Oops!  Wrong Door(as he quietly closes the door and moves on).........

_____________________________

"Before Guadalcanal the enemy advanced at his pleasure. After Guadalcanal, he retreated at ours".

"Mama, There's Rabbits in the Garden"

(in reply to Erik Rutins)
Post #: 75
RE: New Forum Policy for JTCS-is this approved by Matrix - 12/10/2011 11:15:25 PM   
barker


Posts: 1210
Joined: 7/6/2008
Status: offline
Thank you Erik for the quick response

_____________________________

games:
1. AGEOD Blue and Gray
2. John Tiller's Battleground Series
3. Combat Mission: Beyond Overlord
4. Combat Mission: Barbarossa to Berlin
5. V for Victory Games
6. Silent Hunter III
7. Silent Hunter IV
8. Rise and Fall of the Third Re

(in reply to Titanwarrior89)
Post #: 76
RE: New Forum Policy for JTCS-is this approved by Matrix - 12/11/2011 12:19:31 AM   
Deputy


Posts: 446
Joined: 9/24/2005
From: Silver City, NM USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Erik Rutins

Hi Barker,

We'll look into this and reply early next week. I want to make sure I know what happened here before giving an official response.

Regards,

- Erik


Thank you Erik. Much appreciated.

< Message edited by Deputy -- 12/11/2011 3:03:47 PM >


_____________________________

Squad Battles
John Tiller's Campaign Series: Abandonware and no longer supported. Whata shame.

(in reply to Erik Rutins)
Post #: 77
RE: New Forum Policy for JTCS-is this approved by Matrix - 12/11/2011 12:21:31 AM   
barker


Posts: 1210
Joined: 7/6/2008
Status: offline
Well we are going to get an up or down decision...I would rather have a decision good or bad then none at all

_____________________________

games:
1. AGEOD Blue and Gray
2. John Tiller's Battleground Series
3. Combat Mission: Beyond Overlord
4. Combat Mission: Barbarossa to Berlin
5. V for Victory Games
6. Silent Hunter III
7. Silent Hunter IV
8. Rise and Fall of the Third Re

(in reply to Deputy)
Post #: 78
RE: New Forum Policy for JTCS-is this approved by Matrix - 12/13/2011 2:17:53 PM   
barker


Posts: 1210
Joined: 7/6/2008
Status: offline
Erik any word yet?

_____________________________

games:
1. AGEOD Blue and Gray
2. John Tiller's Battleground Series
3. Combat Mission: Beyond Overlord
4. Combat Mission: Barbarossa to Berlin
5. V for Victory Games
6. Silent Hunter III
7. Silent Hunter IV
8. Rise and Fall of the Third Re

(in reply to barker)
Post #: 79
RE: New Forum Policy for JTCS-is this approved by Matrix - 12/13/2011 2:39:00 PM   
vonRocko

 

Posts: 1159
Joined: 11/4/2008
Status: offline
Geez, give it a rest. Like Eric has nothing better to do than referee a girlie catfight.

(in reply to barker)
Post #: 80
RE: New Forum Policy for JTCS-is this approved by Matrix - 12/13/2011 2:45:04 PM   
sterckxe


Posts: 4601
Joined: 3/30/2004
From: Flanders
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: vonRocko
Geez, give it a rest. Like Eric has nothing better to do than referee a girlie catfight.


"No fighting in the war room" :)

Greetz,

Eddy Sterckx

(in reply to vonRocko)
Post #: 81
RE: New Forum Policy for JTCS-is this approved by Matrix - 12/13/2011 2:52:14 PM   
Treale


Posts: 1254
Joined: 8/10/2003
From: Central Florida
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: sterckxe

quote:

ORIGINAL: vonRocko
Geez, give it a rest. Like Eric has nothing better to do than referee a girlie catfight.


"No fighting in the war room" :)

Greetz,

Eddy Sterckx



A great line from a great movie !!!

_____________________________

Tony

(in reply to sterckxe)
Post #: 82
RE: New Forum Policy for JTCS-is this approved by Matrix - 12/13/2011 3:52:19 PM   
barker


Posts: 1210
Joined: 7/6/2008
Status: offline
What does it matter asking for an update. I have to give status meeting on where we are at and what our expectations going to be. What standards have changed etc. Life in engineering. It is no big deal

_____________________________

games:
1. AGEOD Blue and Gray
2. John Tiller's Battleground Series
3. Combat Mission: Beyond Overlord
4. Combat Mission: Barbarossa to Berlin
5. V for Victory Games
6. Silent Hunter III
7. Silent Hunter IV
8. Rise and Fall of the Third Re

(in reply to Treale)
Post #: 83
RE: New Forum Policy for JTCS-is this approved by Matrix - 12/13/2011 6:58:12 PM   
Erik Rutins

 

Posts: 32881
Joined: 3/28/2000
From: Vermont, USA
Status: offline
Hi everyone,

I had a chat with Jason and went over some of the forum history.

First, Jason is the moderator for the Campaign Series sub-forum and we support his actions and appreciate the time he puts in to moderate the forum.

There were some threads and discussions that were going far off-topic and also in some cases into completely non-constructive discussions that devolved into arguments between posters. Off-topic posts should go to the General Discussion forum and on-topic posts should remain constructive. The goal of any of these forums is to promote our interest in gaming and in a specific game, including healthy debate, but not to promote arguments.

There is a difference between our general forum policy and the sub-forum policy though and this resulted from a miscommunication on our part. Off-topic threads and general bashing/argument threads will either be locked or moved to the General Discussion forum as appropriate in the future. Threads that go way out of bounds will be deleted. If Jason feels that a particular forum member is violating our forum policies, they'll get a warning and be referred to the general forum moderators as usual.

If anyone has any questions or comments, please e-mail me at erikr@matrixgames.com.

Regards,

- Erik


_____________________________

Erik Rutins
Director of Product Development


For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.

(in reply to barker)
Post #: 84
RE: New Forum Policy for JTCS-is this approved by Matrix - 12/13/2011 7:27:02 PM   
barker


Posts: 1210
Joined: 7/6/2008
Status: offline
Thanks for the clarification, This is a great HELP!

_____________________________

games:
1. AGEOD Blue and Gray
2. John Tiller's Battleground Series
3. Combat Mission: Beyond Overlord
4. Combat Mission: Barbarossa to Berlin
5. V for Victory Games
6. Silent Hunter III
7. Silent Hunter IV
8. Rise and Fall of the Third Re

(in reply to Erik Rutins)
Post #: 85
RE: New Forum Policy for JTCS-is this approved by Matrix - 12/13/2011 9:12:10 PM   
Deputy


Posts: 446
Joined: 9/24/2005
From: Silver City, NM USA
Status: offline
Thanks Eric. Exactly what we wanted to know.

_____________________________

Squad Battles
John Tiller's Campaign Series: Abandonware and no longer supported. Whata shame.

(in reply to barker)
Post #: 86
RE: New Forum Policy for JTCS-is this approved by Matrix - 12/15/2011 12:32:33 PM   
undercovergeek

 

Posts: 1476
Joined: 11/21/2006
From: UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Deputy

quote:

ORIGINAL: undercovergeek


quote:

ORIGINAL: Deputy


quote:

ORIGINAL: undercovergeek


quote:

ORIGINAL: Deputy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arctic Blast

Seeing how well this is going, I can't imagine why Jason would possibly not want to deal with this sort of thing in the sub forum...


He did. That is the whole problem. There seems to be a conflict within Matrix rules and regulations. One rule says the thread gets locked down and another rule says posts are deleted. That was the point of the OP. We'd like to know WHICH rule is in effect.


i dont want to rain on your parade, or indeed your arguement that youve managed to carry across 3 different forums now it would seem, but..........

no
one
cares

except the original people embroiled in the arguement. All youre doing is bitching and moaning in public. Imagine three little girls all whirling their hands in each others face and shouting at the same time - thats you that is.



First off I am not the OP. I was simply describing what he wanted to know. Secondly, the OP left the JTCS forum to find out from others who MIGHT KNOW what the policy might be at this location. Thirdly, NOBODY is forcing you to read the thread. If you don't have an answer to the original question put forward, you are just blowing smoke and padding your post count.


you, the OP and all the other little girls dont want an answer.

If Erik came on here now and said Yes or No, one of you would find a contrary arguement to blast the others with and THEN it would be locked - so leave it be now.

A google search soon brings up places where you can go argue with each other - netmummys looks like a popular one

JD - they were the best ever when i was at school


So you ASS U ME that is the case. Why not let Erik post the answer and THEN make your judgement?


can i make it now?

(in reply to Deputy)
Post #: 87
RE: New Forum Policy for JTCS-is this approved by Matrix - 12/15/2011 2:47:01 PM   
Deputy


Posts: 446
Joined: 9/24/2005
From: Silver City, NM USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: undercovergeek

can i make it now?





_____________________________

Squad Battles
John Tiller's Campaign Series: Abandonware and no longer supported. Whata shame.

(in reply to undercovergeek)
Post #: 88
RE: New Forum Policy for JTCS-is this approved by Matrix - 12/15/2011 4:33:11 PM   
undercovergeek

 

Posts: 1476
Joined: 11/21/2006
From: UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Deputy


quote:

ORIGINAL: undercovergeek

can i make it now?






lmao - let me see now..................

quote:

ORIGINAL: undercovergeek

If Erik came on here now and said Yes or No, one of you would find a contrary arguement to blast the others with and THEN it would be locked - so leave it be now.



if that isnt EXACTLY what happened

so yes U are an ASS and ME? i was right all along

(in reply to Deputy)
Post #: 89
RE: New Forum Policy for JTCS-is this approved by Matrix - 12/15/2011 5:24:05 PM   
Deputy


Posts: 446
Joined: 9/24/2005
From: Silver City, NM USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: undercovergeek

If Erik came on here now and said Yes or No, one of you would find a contrary arguement to blast the others with and THEN it would be locked - so leave it be now.



if that isnt EXACTLY what happened

so yes U are an ASS and ME? i was right all along



You have an amazing imagination or you can't read for squat.

"Thanks Eric. Exactly what we wanted to know".

looks like you are the donkey in this forum.

_____________________________

Squad Battles
John Tiller's Campaign Series: Abandonware and no longer supported. Whata shame.

(in reply to undercovergeek)
Post #: 90
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion >> RE: New Forum Policy for JTCS-is this approved by Matrix Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.109