Matrix Games Forums

New Screenshots for Pike & ShotDeal of the Week Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations WOTYCommand: Modern Air/Naval Operations WOTY is now available!Frontline : The Longest Day Announced and in Beta!Command gets Wargame of the Year EditionDeal of the Week: Pandora SeriesPandora: Eclipse of Nashira is now availableDistant Worlds Gets another updateHell is Approaching Deal of the Week Battle Academy
Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: On the same day..

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> RE: On the same day.. Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: On the same day.. - 12/12/2012 12:08:23 PM   
rrbill

 

Posts: 588
Joined: 10/5/2009
Status: offline
Think VPs are OK and useful for scorekeeping; different win conditions in the alt41 campaign are just another issue that can be dealt with, so...

Are the VPs for a city wired into the combat resolution algorithms? If either side fights "harder" for high VP sites, then the VPs mean a lot more than "score keeping." I think VPs have no affect on combat. Of course, player invests forts, garrisons, and line-of-supply protections where wanted; this is real.

(in reply to Bletchley_Geek)
Post #: 31
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> RE: On the same day.. Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.063