Matrix Games Forums

To End All Wars: Video, AAR and Interview!Ageod's To End All Wars: Video, AAR and Interview!To End All Wars: Artillery Battle Academy 2: Eastern Front - End of Early Access Space Program Manager unveils its multiplayer modes Another update for Commander: The Great War!Distant Worlds: Universe gets a new updateDeal of the Week: Eagle Day to Bombing the Reich Advanced Tactics Gold is coming to SteamMatrix Games now speaks German!
Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Device issues, general notice

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Scenario Design and Modding >> Device issues, general notice Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Device issues, general notice - 12/5/2011 11:20:46 PM   
elcid

 

Posts: 226
Joined: 11/20/2002
From: Lakewood Washington
Status: offline
A test game revealed rather more unpredictability than I expected in AE, so I began to explore possible causes by looking at the device list.
Here I found general inconsistency. Identical and similar devices often have very different values.

Once I get this fully resolved, I am going to post a number of threads on each sub type. I am trying to work out standards. I have been
asked to post these matters outside the small RHS community.

The worst case seems to be in re land units. Worst in two senses - land combat seems more unpredictable than other kinds -
and the data supporting it really is radically inconsistent. In some cases, simplifying assumptions appear to have been used:
an armored car is, for example, 10 tons in weight, with 10 mm of armor, and perhaps a .30 MMG as armament. But most
armored cars weigh only 2-4 tons - a few weigh 5 or 6; have a range of armor (mostly 5 to 15 mm), and a range of armament -
including Boys AT rifles, HMG, 20 mm guns, sometimes 37 or 45 mm guns or other weapons. A true tank, on the other hand,
usually is defined at 2/3 of its actual weight - but it has on that too easy to lift foundation too much armor! [Did you know a Sherman
has four inches of armor? And that is one of the lesser cases of overstating. A close support Sherman, on the other hand, had
12 EXTRA inches in front of its 3 inches of normal armor - and that is vastly understated.] So what we have is not a bias that is
consistent - but simply data all over the place. Modders should review land devices as a whole, to insure they are consistent,
and related to the actual vehicle or weapon described. To which add that squads may be far too powerful in re anti-tank values.
It appears the assumption is that every squad gets a PIAT or bazooka - when the BEST case is one in three could get one.
Here the solution appears to be to break out the AT devices as separate weapons. Still - it warrants a thread of its own.
So it will get one - once I have it sorted out and at least one solution working.
Post #: 1
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Scenario Design and Modding >> Device issues, general notice Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.066