Matrix Games Forums

To End All Wars: Artillery Battle Academy 2: Eastern Front - End of Early Access Space Program Manager unveils its multiplayer modes Another update for Commander: The Great War!Distant Worlds: Universe gets a new updateDeal of the Week: Eagle Day to Bombing the Reich Advanced Tactics Gold is coming to SteamMatrix Games now speaks German!A little bit of history with To End All WarsBattle Academy 2 gets a release date!
Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Whats next?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Unity of Command Series >> Whats next? Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Whats next? - 12/2/2011 3:26:35 PM   
paulus103

 

Posts: 3
Joined: 12/2/2011
Status: offline
Hi Folks,

Really enjoyed playing your game - finished the German campaigns and scenarios.
Just wondered if you have any plans to extend the game or do a different campaign?

I'd love a Kursk campaign game or expansion :)

Only comment I've got to improve the game would an undo feature

Cheers and thanks
Paul
Post #: 1
RE: Whats next? - 12/5/2011 8:38:52 PM   
2xTom


Posts: 109
Joined: 10/31/2011
Status: offline
Hi Paulus,

right now it looks like there will be more campaigns, probably in the form of DLCs.

Before making the first DLC available, there will be at least one update with the undo, probably some new MP features, and other (small) improvements.

Regarding the exact campaign we're going to pick for the DLC... would members of this forum object to one further Eastern Front campaign?

< Message edited by 2xTom -- 12/5/2011 8:39:28 PM >


_____________________________

Tomislav Uzelac
Unity of Command Lead Developer

(in reply to paulus103)
Post #: 2
RE: Whats next? - 12/5/2011 8:47:16 PM   
TomBombadil711


Posts: 149
Joined: 10/25/2005
From: Germany
Status: offline
I will not object, but West Front would be nice too.

(in reply to 2xTom)
Post #: 3
RE: Whats next? - 12/6/2011 12:45:41 AM   
sabre1


Posts: 1928
Joined: 8/15/2001
From: CA
Status: offline
Eastern Front works for me.

Of course you are obligated to do the entire European Theartre followed by the Pacific.

(in reply to TomBombadil711)
Post #: 4
RE: Whats next? - 12/6/2011 12:49:07 AM   
RandomAttack


Posts: 151
Joined: 7/23/2009
From: Arizona
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: sabre1

Eastern Front works for me.

Of course you are obligated to do the entire European Theartre followed by the Pacific.



Agreed! And then WWI, the American Civil War, and then...

(in reply to sabre1)
Post #: 5
RE: Whats next? - 12/7/2011 1:03:58 PM   
hafer


Posts: 257
Joined: 8/28/2010
Status: offline
We need at least one grand campaing on one big map.

I feel sorry about the fact that the game has a very good engine but just a few tiny scenarios.

Developer, in your own interest and for getting more customers, please get more stuff into this game!

(in reply to RandomAttack)
Post #: 6
RE: Whats next? - 12/7/2011 4:39:20 PM   
2xTom


Posts: 109
Joined: 10/31/2011
Status: offline
Hey hey, we're on it, ok?

What could really help from the community, is posting some playthroughs and AARs created now, before you become very good at playing the game. This really helps us with understanding how you learn and approach the game, so the more of that we see, the better.

It would be a shame if the DLC was just some new vehicles and uniforms. Sure, we will add "undo" and major stuff like that, but to get the finer details right, we need lots of feedback. I have 10-20 minor game tweaks on the "maybe" list already, and basically if we get to see more playthroughs, we can get more of that into the game.

Re: big maps, we will be working to make the game system more robust so it can have bigger maps with still decent scenario balance. It may take more than one update to get there though.

Thanks!


_____________________________

Tomislav Uzelac
Unity of Command Lead Developer

(in reply to hafer)
Post #: 7
RE: Whats next? - 12/7/2011 7:19:37 PM   
Ramses


Posts: 199
Joined: 2/11/2011
From: the Netherlands
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: hafer

We need at least one grand campaing on one big map.

I feel sorry about the fact that the game has a very good engine but just a few tiny scenarios.

Developer, in your own interest and for getting more customers, please get more stuff into this game!


I second that; very nice game and very (re)playable but a broader choice of scenario's/units would be welcomed. Maybe the sales of this game could give you the resources needed for such an undertaking. (no offense intended, just a well-meant advice)

(in reply to hafer)
Post #: 8
RE: Whats next? - 12/7/2011 8:44:31 PM   
hafer


Posts: 257
Joined: 8/28/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: 2xTom

Hey hey, we're on it, ok?

What could really help from the community, is posting some playthroughs and AARs created now, before you become very good at playing the game. This really helps us with understanding how you learn and approach the game, so the more of that we see, the better.

It would be a shame if the DLC was just some new vehicles and uniforms. Sure, we will add "undo" and major stuff like that, but to get the finer details right, we need lots of feedback. I have 10-20 minor game tweaks on the "maybe" list already, and basically if we get to see more playthroughs, we can get more of that into the game.

Re: big maps, we will be working to make the game system more robust so it can have bigger maps with still decent scenario balance. It may take more than one update to get there though.

Thanks!




Glad to hear that!

Your AI, the UI and mechanics are top class (believe an old grognard who played almost every wargame out there). The "only" critic is the amount of scenarios & campaigns. And this could be a showstopper for most of the gamers. Sorry for being repetitive, i think my message is clear

(in reply to 2xTom)
Post #: 9
RE: Whats next? - 12/8/2011 1:19:43 PM   
pzgndr

 

Posts: 1641
Joined: 3/18/2004
Status: offline
quote:

This really helps us with understanding how you learn and approach the game, so the more of that we see, the better.


I think the only rules section I had to go back and reread after playing a bit was the part about reinforcements and reorganizing. I tried reorganizing a unit to see what happened and expected to see it come back at some point but obviously that's not what it does. Other than that the rest is pretty intuitive.

One suggestion I have is to maybe improve the visuals for supply? The supply view shows the current logistical situation well enough, but doesn't provide good planning information for moving deeper into enemy controlled territory. So my suggestion would be to show something like the maximum normal and extended supply network from a selected supply source, and give players a better idea of how far they could go and stay supplied. Of course weather and enemy ZOCs would affect supply on the next turn, but having another simple planning tool would be helpful.

Another wish-list request would be to play the scenarios against the computer for either side. Sometimes being the underdog defender is worth playing out also.

(in reply to hafer)
Post #: 10
RE: Whats next? - 12/8/2011 3:46:20 PM   
AZ Gung Ho


Posts: 335
Joined: 6/7/2006
Status: offline
I love being the underdog defender, going down to defeat but selling my life dearly!! Gotta love that stuff, but then I'm a little different!!

_____________________________

"In Arduis Fidelis"
Louie Marsh

Books:
Once A Raider… http://tinyurl.com/89mfnnk
Getting Real - http://tinyurl.com/7zhcjlq
Websites:
www.marshianchronicles.com
www.usmcraiders.com

(in reply to pzgndr)
Post #: 11
RE: Whats next? - 12/9/2011 12:29:00 AM   
alejes02

 

Posts: 24
Joined: 6/11/2007
Status: offline
Most interesting game I've played on the PC in quite a while. Do what you must to turn this into a mass market product.

(in reply to AZ Gung Ho)
Post #: 12
RE: Whats next? - 12/9/2011 12:46:39 AM   
tommict

 

Posts: 28
Joined: 11/27/2010
Status: offline
I really like this game. Simple to learn, was playing as soon as it was installed. Now I'm reading the manual to learn a bit more. I have many Matrix Games, but never can seem to get past beginner. I think this one may teach me enough about the genre to tackle some of the other games on my HD. I think we're going to need more content soon!

(in reply to alejes02)
Post #: 13
RE: Whats next? - 12/9/2011 2:51:07 AM   
SeaMonkey

 

Posts: 754
Joined: 2/15/2004
Status: offline

Alright, you guys(2X2) said some more east front, I know exactly where this needs to go. Opening phase of Barbarossa, AGC, PanzerGruppe Guderian, all the way to Smolensk. Let us see if we can get to Moscow before winter, no sideshow into Kiev, a great "what if" with the historical limitations. Can we the players do what Hitler couldn't?

(in reply to tommict)
Post #: 14
RE: Whats next? - 12/9/2011 3:26:31 AM   
AZ Gung Ho


Posts: 335
Joined: 6/7/2006
Status: offline
Great idea SeaMonkey!

_____________________________

"In Arduis Fidelis"
Louie Marsh

Books:
Once A Raider… http://tinyurl.com/89mfnnk
Getting Real - http://tinyurl.com/7zhcjlq
Websites:
www.marshianchronicles.com
www.usmcraiders.com

(in reply to SeaMonkey)
Post #: 15
RE: Whats next? - 12/9/2011 11:14:36 AM   
Keke


Posts: 3515
Joined: 3/12/2002
From: Finland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SeaMonkey


Alright, you guys(2X2) said some more east front, I know exactly where this needs to go. Opening phase of Barbarossa, AGC, PanzerGruppe Guderian, all the way to Smolensk. Let us see if we can get to Moscow before winter, no sideshow into Kiev, a great "what if" with the historical limitations. Can we the players do what Hitler couldn't?


Considering the fact that logistical restraints would have made earlier strike to Moscow impossible, and German objective was to destroy as much of the Red Army as possible (-> Kiev), that doesn't sound historically plausible.

_____________________________

Jyri

The eternal privilege of those who never act themselves: to interrogate, be dissatisfied, find fault.

- A. Solzhenitsyn


(in reply to SeaMonkey)
Post #: 16
RE: Whats next? - 12/9/2011 7:47:16 PM   
SeaMonkey

 

Posts: 754
Joined: 2/15/2004
Status: offline

Yeah!! No doubt those idiots Hoth, Bock and Guderian had any idea of how to maneuver mobile forces, in late August of 41 after taking Smolensk, to get to Moscow before Winter, else why would they even try in late September and almost succeed. Hitler brilliantly rebuked their lobbying to continue the drive and divert to Kiev, good thing he didn't listen to such fantasies, or else they might have lost the war.

Thanks for the clarity Keke, 2X2 ignore that lame request, could never happen, my sanity has returned!

(in reply to Keke)
Post #: 17
RE: Whats next? - 12/9/2011 8:06:56 PM   
Keke


Posts: 3515
Joined: 3/12/2002
From: Finland
Status: offline
Well, one can choose to believe in the post-war propaganda of German generals, or educate oneself about the realities of Eastern Front. Your choice.

< Message edited by Keke -- 12/9/2011 8:07:15 PM >


_____________________________

Jyri

The eternal privilege of those who never act themselves: to interrogate, be dissatisfied, find fault.

- A. Solzhenitsyn


(in reply to SeaMonkey)
Post #: 18
RE: Whats next? - 12/9/2011 9:02:54 PM   
ComradeP

 

Posts: 7166
Joined: 9/17/2009
Status: offline
In terms of distance covered, the move towards Kiev would cost AGC's mobile units more fuel than a move to Moscow, starting from Smolensk, it's an extra 100 miles or so. August would probably not have been possible, but Typhoon starting early in September, but with stronger Soviet forces in the south would probably have been possible. The chance of success wouldn't be great, but it's an interesting "what if".

Scenarios where the Germans head for Moscow directly after the battles around Smolensk would be nonsense from a historical perspective, but an earlier Typhoon and a "no Kiev pocket" or "smaller Kiev pocket" would be possible.

< Message edited by ComradeP -- 12/9/2011 9:05:51 PM >


_____________________________

SSG tester
WitE Alpha tester
Panzer Corps Beta tester
Unity of Command scenario designer

(in reply to Keke)
Post #: 19
RE: Whats next? - 12/10/2011 12:10:39 AM   
SeaMonkey

 

Posts: 754
Joined: 2/15/2004
Status: offline

Lord knows that games like these don't represent a deflection of reality! Like the red and blue pill of propaganda, you either take it or leave it.

(in reply to ComradeP)
Post #: 20
RE: Whats next? - 12/10/2011 8:00:07 PM   
paulus103

 

Posts: 3
Joined: 12/2/2011
Status: offline
Personally I'd like the Kursk campaign :)
Follows on from the recapture of Kharkov in one of the scenorios so it seems a logical step

Lots of different units - attack vrs defense for both sides

My two cents anyway

(in reply to SeaMonkey)
Post #: 21
RE: Whats next? - 12/10/2011 11:01:41 PM   
SeaMonkey

 

Posts: 754
Joined: 2/15/2004
Status: offline

Actually paulus that may be the way to go. Exploring how this game engine handles fortifications, defense in depth, and a battering ram thesis of attack could help round out any idiosyncrasies that would arise for further additions. There are plenty of "set piece" battles in the annals of WW2 history that will need to be addressed as this new genre evolves.

(in reply to paulus103)
Post #: 22
RE: Whats next? - 12/10/2011 11:15:39 PM   
SeaMonkey

 

Posts: 754
Joined: 2/15/2004
Status: offline

How about a more extensive command and control feature with the use of army HQs. Already I've seen some posts about specialist attachments and possibly a little more flexibility of the supply structure could be coordinated by a command doctrine. This way a pre OOB could be set up before entering into the scenario with the appropriate attachments made by the players. Obviously there is room to enhance attack and defense parameters as well as unit attributes(morale, effectiveness) through such a system, not to mention an unknown factor for units suddenly becoming "out of communications" a kind of FoW feature.

(in reply to SeaMonkey)
Post #: 23
RE: Whats next? - 12/11/2011 12:17:53 AM   
Treale


Posts: 1256
Joined: 8/10/2003
From: Central Florida
Status: offline
A lot of these suggestions sound great, but don't make it into a complicated Grigsby game!!!

_____________________________

Tony

(in reply to SeaMonkey)
Post #: 24
RE: Whats next? - 12/11/2011 9:00:05 AM   
Kipper


Posts: 272
Joined: 3/5/2005
Status: offline
+1

The glory of this design is what's left out. It focuses on operational art, to the exclusion of everything else.

The one thing I admire most about the designers of this game is their clear vision of their design concept and the self-discipline to leave out what doesn't contribute to it.

Much easier to decide to add things to the pot than take them out!

(in reply to Treale)
Post #: 25
RE: Whats next? - 12/11/2011 10:33:01 AM   
Alan Sharif

 

Posts: 417
Joined: 8/1/2001
From: UK.
Status: offline
Excellent well made point Kipper.

_____________________________

A Sharif

(in reply to Kipper)
Post #: 26
RE: Whats next? - 12/11/2011 10:52:50 AM   
SeaMonkey

 

Posts: 754
Joined: 2/15/2004
Status: offline

No doubt the immersion level needs to carefully balanced, over complication IMO is a needless disadvantage to the AI for one, not to mention the hindrance to gameplay. I've watched SC slowly integrate more player involvement to the point where any additions could very well be detrimental. I agree, we already have enough designs out there for indulging micro-managing commanders. What I like to see are features that don't require a lot of player interaction, things that run in the background and are accessible to the player at his option so that the degree of complication is managed by the player's discretion, yet a game that takes advantage of the enormous computing power of today's processors.

(in reply to Alan Sharif)
Post #: 27
RE: Whats next? - 12/11/2011 1:44:58 PM   
cherryfunk

 

Posts: 93
Joined: 8/18/2011
Status: offline
I just figured out what's bugging me about this game -- too much unit shuffling with no penalty.  Since only one unit at a time can attack (unless I'm missing something) you're forced to constantly shuffle units around to get multiple attacks on a specific part of the line.  You can't combine several units' attacks, so you have to hit with one, pull him back, push another in, attack, pull him back, push another in etc.  It results, for me, in less of a war game feel and more of a checkers or Go feel.

I love how War in the East handles this: a single unit can launch a 'hasty' attack, but to bring in adjacent units you need a more costly 'deliberate' attack, so you have to carefully plan your positioning and maneuver for advantage.  Unity seems to be missing that feel of positional warfare and combined offensives...


(in reply to SeaMonkey)
Post #: 28
RE: Whats next? - 12/11/2011 1:49:27 PM   
paulus103

 

Posts: 3
Joined: 12/2/2011
Status: offline
Mr Kipper

Great point. You've Put your finger on it -- that is what I like about this game

If i'm honest didn't have that much expectations from the game but its actually a very polished game
Doesn't over complicate and is fun to play

(in reply to SeaMonkey)
Post #: 29
RE: Whats next? - 12/11/2011 5:05:19 PM   
stormbringer3

 

Posts: 523
Joined: 7/26/2007
From: Staunton, Va.
Status: offline
Keke,
What game is your signature icon from?
Thanks.

(in reply to paulus103)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Unity of Command Series >> Whats next? Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.109