Matrix Games Forums

Pandora: Eclipse of Nashira is now availableDistant Worlds Gets another updateHell is Approaching Deal of the Week Battle Academy Battle Academy 2 Out now!Legions of Steel ready for betaBattle Academy 2 gets trailers and Steam page!Deal of the Week Germany at WarSlitherine Group acquires Shenandoah StudioNew information and screenshots for Pike & Shot
Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Supply Question #2

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Advanced Tactics Series >> Advanced Tactics Support >> Supply Question #2 Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Supply Question #2 - 11/22/2011 11:25:33 PM   
sjadow

 

Posts: 53
Joined: 11/4/2004
Status: offline
I have 3 HQ's.. Supreme, 1HQ and 2HQ. Normally, 1HQ and 2HQ are subordinate to Supreme.

I read where it could be organized such that 2HQ reports to 1HQ, who in turn reports to Supreme. What would be the advantage in doing this (rather than having both report directly to Supreme).

I am ending up with some very strange supply situations and I'm trying to sort it out ....

Thanks ...
Post #: 1
RE: Supply Question #2 - 11/22/2011 11:39:28 PM   
ernieschwitz

 

Posts: 1563
Joined: 9/15/2009
From: Denmark
Status: offline
Well... there is one obvious advantage.

Each HQ has a supply range. So adding a middle HQ in effect extends that supply range. :)

(in reply to sjadow)
Post #: 2
RE: Supply Question #2 - 11/23/2011 3:36:16 AM   
Jeffrey H.


Posts: 2881
Joined: 4/13/2007
From: San Diego, Ca.
Status: offline
If you had them both subordinated to the Supreme HQ, you could then use them as combat HQ's up close, (within like 3 hexes) of the fighting units. Then all your supply and new production could go directly to the supreme HQ.


_____________________________

History began July 4th, 1776. Anything before that was a mistake.

Ron Swanson

(in reply to ernieschwitz)
Post #: 3
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Advanced Tactics Series >> Advanced Tactics Support >> Supply Question #2 Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.063