Hasty AAR

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Hasty AAR

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Unity of Command Series >> After Action Reports >> Hasty AAR

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Hasty AAR - 11/16/2011 7:49:20 AM

redmarkus4

Posts: 4124
Joined: 12/1/2007
From: 0.00
Status: offline

After playing a few scenarios and starting (and losing) two campaigns, here are my main observations:

1. The AI is tricky and exploits gaps very well, cuts off units and generally gives you a tough time.

2. However, the game centers on supply sources and routes - the AI goes after those at all cost, so that even cut off enemy units will keep advancing deeper into enemy territory to capture that bridge or take that supply hex.

3. AI coding should be adjusted for realism so that cut off units attempt to break out to their own lines, not head deeper into enemy terrain.

4. Map and graphics are great.

5. Building and blowing bridges is a very neat feature - please add to WiTE Gary!!!

6. Maps are too small and too crowded, limiting tactical options.

7. Lack of stacking makes the game very unrealistic and exploitation is sometimes difficult after a successful attack.

In summary, a fun 'beer and pretzels' war game at the moment, with good potential once enhanced by the devs and modded by the community. OK value for money and I'll probably play it when not playing WiTE etc.

_____________________________

Cyberpower tower PC
Intel Core i7-3930k CPU, 3.20GHz processor
32 GB RAM
2TB HD
2xNVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 graphics cards, each with 4095 MB
Realtek sound card
Dell 3007WFP (running at 2560x1600) 32 bit monitor
Windows 7 Professional 64-bit O

Post #: 1

RE: Hasty AAR - 11/16/2011 11:15:22 AM

ComradeP

Posts: 7185
Joined: 9/17/2009
Status: offline

We noticed point 2/3 during testing as well, but it doesn't happen every time. I guess in a future update it would indeed be nice if the AI would try to maintain its supply lines (however, this could result in more conservative AI play and thus a bit worse AI play).

I'd disagree that the maps are too small, it's scaled in a certain way and that scale can only result in maps of this size so you could argue that the scale would need to be adjusted, but in this case I'd be against that as large parts of many scenarios would consist of no mans land that nobody cares about. Fall Blau is one of the operations that can be fairly accurately represented at this scale, due to the distances involved and the relative lack of participating combat units compared to offensive operations elsewhere.

Whether stacking is needed is a matter of preference, I'd say. I don't mind that you can't stack and it does mean that you have to do more planning for an attack than simply move a killer stack into position like you would in WitE.

I stand by my earlier statement that it's not a typical beer and pretzel game, but more of a mix of basic wargames with more serious ones, but you are naturally entitled to your own opinion.

_____________________________

SSG tester
WitE Alpha tester
Panzer Corps Beta tester
Unity of Command scenario designer

(in reply to redmarkus4)

Post #: 2

RE: Hasty AAR - 11/16/2011 2:22:51 PM

luer

Posts: 123
Joined: 2/9/2004
From: north & left
Status: offline

my first impressions after two hours of play.

The AI is challenging as described before. Especially in the beginning it knows much better than you how to efficiently form wedges into enemy territory.

I think the graphics are OK as they are. The busts are ugly but they are easily recognisable and do their job.

One of my main thoughts: is there an undo movement button ? If not, it is badly required. With no save option and the drag required to move the map I have made plenty of stupid moves. Maybe there is one.

Given the limited scope of the scenarios I think it would have been positive if experience (as well as losses) were passed on in the campaign. As I understand it now you can waste units away without negative impact.

In general, I think a bit more variety in the units would have been nice, but maybe this is not so important as you do not pass on stuff.

So far I like the game I think it is more than pure beer and pretzels. However, what makes me replay games a lot is if I form my BattleGroup from scenario to scenario so let's see. But anyway given I paid 42 SGD, the game gets a positive rating from me.

And, mz\y last post in the MatrixForum must have been in a private dev forum something like 6 years ago. If I never come back, well, it is not personal :).

< Message edited by luer -- 11/16/2011 2:24:40 PM >

(in reply to ComradeP)

Post #: 3

RE: Hasty AAR - 11/16/2011 3:53:57 PM

jjdenver

Posts: 1234
Joined: 11/2/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: redmarkus4
6. Maps are too small and too crowded, limiting tactical options.

This is a huge drawback imo - scenarios feel like you're playing in a shoebox. I like the game overall though.

I'm still not sure how ZOCs work really though - sometimes the AI shoots past all of my units and cuts me off - not sure how they can ignore the ZOCs nor really when I can ignore them either. I'm always surprised by how far I can or can't move my units past enemy units.

_____________________________

AARS:
CEAW-BJR Mod 2009:
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2101447
AT-WW1:
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=1705427
AT-GPW:
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=1735661

(in reply to redmarkus4)

Post #: 4

RE: Hasty AAR - 11/16/2011 5:36:50 PM

Flaviusx

Posts: 6415
Joined: 9/9/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline

I like this game a lot, it's a nice and relaxing change of pace after WitE.

Any plans to expand the game engine to cover the whole front?

_____________________________

WitE Alpha Tester

(in reply to jjdenver)

Post #: 5

RE: Hasty AAR - 11/16/2011 8:43:56 PM

redmarkus4

Posts: 4124
Joined: 12/1/2007
From: 0.00
Status: offline

I saw the zooming through my ZOC as well. I believe that unit strength affects ZOC strength, if I read that correctly...

_____________________________

Cyberpower tower PC
Intel Core i7-3930k CPU, 3.20GHz processor
32 GB RAM
2TB HD
2xNVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 graphics cards, each with 4095 MB
Realtek sound card
Dell 3007WFP (running at 2560x1600) 32 bit monitor
Windows 7 Professional 64-bit O

(in reply to Flaviusx)

Post #: 6

RE: Hasty AAR - 11/16/2011 8:45:31 PM

redmarkus4

Posts: 4124
Joined: 12/1/2007
From: 0.00
Status: offline

Well, I choose to drink beer and eat pretzels while playing Unity of Command :-)

WiTE, on the other hand, requires a good steak dinner and a big glass of red wine!

_____________________________

Cyberpower tower PC
Intel Core i7-3930k CPU, 3.20GHz processor
32 GB RAM
2TB HD
2xNVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 graphics cards, each with 4095 MB
Realtek sound card
Dell 3007WFP (running at 2560x1600) 32 bit monitor
Windows 7 Professional 64-bit O

(in reply to ComradeP)

Post #: 7

RE: Hasty AAR - 11/16/2011 9:07:02 PM

nenad

Posts: 36
Joined: 11/3/2011
Status: offline

Re ZOC: Unlike some other games, in UoC enemy ZOC is not exerted over the frontline into the friendly territory. Consequently, when your unit enters a ZOC hex, the hex ownership will change discarding the ZOC. This, in turn, might make a room for other units to occupy previously unreachable ZOCs that lie behind.

This can be used to exploit weaknesses in enemy defense lines, penetrating through ZOCs deeper into the enemy territory. Unfortunately, AI knows how to do that too

Also, units that are marked "weak" (less than 3 active steps) do not exert ZOC at all.

P.S. Dev team officially encourages consuming beer and pretzels while playing UoC.
Cheers!

< Message edited by nenad -- 11/16/2011 9:13:54 PM >

_____________________________

Unity of Command
16x16

(in reply to redmarkus4)

Post #: 8

RE: Hasty AAR - 11/18/2011 2:15:27 PM

redmarkus4

Posts: 4124
Joined: 12/1/2007
From: 0.00
Status: offline

This is the kind of AI 'exploit' I am concerned about. Because of a 1 hex gap in my line, the AI drives a lone unit to the map edge in a sort of kamikaze drive. The small map size means that this single unit 'cuts off' all of the Soviet units to the south, even though they are not actually cut off. Silly.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by redmarkus4 -- 11/18/2011 2:16:49 PM >

_____________________________

Cyberpower tower PC
Intel Core i7-3930k CPU, 3.20GHz processor
32 GB RAM
2TB HD
2xNVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 graphics cards, each with 4095 MB
Realtek sound card
Dell 3007WFP (running at 2560x1600) 32 bit monitor
Windows 7 Professional 64-bit O

(in reply to redmarkus4)

Post #: 9

RE: Hasty AAR - 11/21/2011 12:26:01 PM

Noakesy

Posts: 191
Joined: 5/26/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: redmarkus4

This is the kind of AI 'exploit' I am concerned about. Because of a 1 hex gap in my line, the AI drives a lone unit to the map edge in a sort of kamikaze drive. The small map size means that this single unit 'cuts off' all of the Soviet units to the south, even though they are not actually cut off. Silly.

This has happened to me with the AI a couple of times, which is quite frustrating I agree. Would a human opponent do the same thing is the question I think (i.e. it's a glitch with the system maybe more than the AI)?

(in reply to redmarkus4)

Post #: 10

RE: Hasty AAR - 11/21/2011 1:54:36 PM

Treale

Posts: 1281
Joined: 8/10/2003
From: Central Florida
Status: offline

I've found this also. You spend a lot of your resources defending your supply points???

_____________________________

Tony

(in reply to Noakesy)

Post #: 11

RE: Hasty AAR - 11/21/2011 4:50:55 PM

cpdeyoung

Posts: 3381
Joined: 7/17/2007
From: South Carolina, USA
Status: offline

I like this aspect of the game. It took me awhile to learn how vicious the AI was going to be about this aggressive behavior.

I guess the best way to think of it is that by 1942 the Red Army had promoted more aggressive commanders. The bad effects of the purges were being worked out. The German successes of 1941 had made the rapid penetration technique hard to ignore. In this game both sides will exploit to cut supply lines. I actually think that a lot of the war was about defending your own access to fuel and ammo, and conversely disrupting the enemy access to those supplies. The book "War Without Garlands" by Robert Kershaw helped me see the priority these factors had in the war.

I believe turns are four days in this game, and the model reflects the anxiety that a unit will feel when supply is threatened in that time frame. I find myself losing interest in offensive maneuvers and looking to my rear. I imagine commanders in the East felt the same way. This is not a game for "fast and loose". You have to be aggressive to meet the deadlines, but one cannot do without the careful staff work that keeps your units potent.

I am liking the feel, lots of tension, and quick reversals.

Chuck

Edit : a typo.

< Message edited by cpdeyoung -- 11/21/2011 10:10:21 PM >

(in reply to Treale)

Post #: 12

RE: Hasty AAR - 11/30/2011 7:29:55 AM

sshenzhuzhu

Posts: 3
Joined: 11/30/2011
Status: offline

I guess the best way to think of it is that by 1942 the Red Army had promoted more aggressive commanders.tea length wedding gowns The bad effects of the purges were being worked out.casual wedding gowns The German successes of 1941 had made the rapid penetration technique hard to ignore. In this game both sides will exploit to cut supply lines.couture wedding gowns I actually think that a lot of the war was about defending your own access to fuel and ammo,discount wedding gowns and conversely disrupting the enemy access to those supplies. The book "War Without Garlands" by Robert Kershaw helped me see the priority these factors had in the war.

(in reply to cpdeyoung)

Post #: 13