DicedT
Posts: 151
Joined: 11/2/2006 Status: offline
|
What's more historical? The Germans conducting the perfect blitzkrieg because they know the starting location of every Soviet unit? Or taking Leningrad because they know exactly how many the Soviets can deploy? And why can't the Soviets just hold the border with ZOCs, so that 8 divisions can hold the line instead of 16, without the Finns oozing across the border and putting them out of supply? Still waiting to hear an answer to the biggest question: wasn't the defense of Leningrad hard enough? Hasn't the city been routinely captured? Those 7th Independent Army divisions are now delaying the Finns when they could be saving Leningrad from the ahistorical German assault. quote:
ORIGINAL: Q-Ball I don't understand why it's a problem. After all what's more historical: 14 NKVD regiments totalling 15,000 men holding the Entire Finnish front, or the equivalent of 12 divisions? IRL, the Soviets knew the Finns probably wouldn't attack over those lines for political reasons, but they couldn't be 100% sure. They could have a screen of units, but they had to be real units, not border guards. This is now exactly what the game is now
|