Matrix Games Forums

Deal of the Week Battle Academy Battle Academy 2 Out now!Legions of Steel ready for betaBattle Academy 2 gets trailers and Steam page!Deal of the Week Germany at WarSlitherine Group acquires Shenandoah StudioNew information and screenshots for Pike & ShotDeal of the Week Pride of NationsTo End All Wars Releasing on Steam! Slitherine is recruiting: Programmers required
Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 January 2012 (2nd part)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Tech Support >> RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 January 2012 (2nd part) Page: <<   < prev  54 55 56 57 [58]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 Ja... - 6/27/2012 2:01:17 AM   
bigred


Posts: 2892
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: seille


quote:

ORIGINAL: cohimbra

quote:

ORIGINAL: cohimbra

quote:

ORIGINAL: jcjordan
Ok I'm having a problem for something that was supposedly fixed but it looks like there's another case that needs to be solved. I have an ambhib TF that is to unload at Iba & for some reason 2 HQ become fragments during the turn execution w/ the main part due in 40+ days even thought the entire unit was in the tf before it unloaded.


I have the same problem; after unload my AirHQ is divided in 2 fragments;
the fragment whit 'torpedo ordnance' has a delay of 52 days...my Betty needs torpedo!



Hi, I report this problem once again, assuming that someone is interested



I would like to know when we finally get a fix for that bug. It is VERY annoying and can ruin a game especially in the start. Why can´t we get a hotfix for this, Michael ?
It happened now 4 (FOUR) times to me in my running game. I don´t want to use multiple taskforces because of the buggy torpedo support. I would like to get a fix for this
especially since you said it is already fixed for a future release. PLEASE.

I had this happen to me recently also. But I thought this might be WAD because I dropped the amphib corp HQ w/ the troops into the battle w/out an amphib force HQ present. So I considered the effect a penalty against the allies for not conducting a perfect coordinated amphib assault.

_____________________________

---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2597400

(in reply to seille)
Post #: 1711
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 Ja... - 6/27/2012 5:19:41 AM   
seille

 

Posts: 2123
Joined: 6/19/2007
From: Germany
Status: offline
MichaelM already confirmed this is a bug which will be fixed with next patch. The question is when this will be.
I already screwed 4 HQ´s this way, so i would like to get a fix for this as fast as possible.

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 1712
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 Ja... - 7/12/2012 2:46:00 AM   
Saros

 

Posts: 250
Joined: 12/18/2010
Status: offline
It only happens when the AIRHQ is part of an amphibious assault right? I was under that impression from another thread that you can workaround by dropping the HQ off after the base is taken.

(in reply to seille)
Post #: 1713
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 Ja... - 7/12/2012 6:19:41 AM   
seille

 

Posts: 2123
Joined: 6/19/2007
From: Germany
Status: offline
Yes, that seem to be the case.

(in reply to Saros)
Post #: 1714
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 Ja... - 7/14/2012 3:20:23 AM   
bigred


Posts: 2892
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Saros

It only happens when the AIRHQ is part of an amphibious assault right? I was under that impression from another thread that you can workaround by dropping the HQ off after the base is taken.

Warning, do not drop a corp hq in an amphib, a fragment will occur.

I apologize at the bluntness of my statement. I understand a fix is on the next beta.

< Message edited by bigred -- 7/18/2012 6:29:24 AM >


_____________________________

---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2597400

(in reply to Saros)
Post #: 1715
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 Ja... - 7/19/2012 3:15:36 AM   
CyrusSpitama


Posts: 190
Joined: 2/21/2011
From: Naw'lins, Luzianna
Status: offline
Had this occur on my 14th Army HQ as I was trying to take over the Philippines. I was not in combat at the time but, I did have the fleet as ampihbious. A sub attacked my fleet and even though the sub did not sink the leader fragment, the HQ was fragmented upon landing. 60 days I think it took to replace the Army HQ leader? I thought it a bit extreme considering it was such a small fragment of the entire army landed.

_____________________________

"I'm sure the universe is full of intelligent life. It's just been too intelligent to come here." - Arthur C. Clarke

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 1716
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 Ja... - 7/30/2012 3:30:06 PM   
hades1001

 

Posts: 974
Joined: 12/17/2007
Status: offline
Hi Michael,

I'm just curious, is there any new patch for AE coming in the near future?

(in reply to seille)
Post #: 1717
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 Ja... - 7/31/2012 12:56:31 AM   
kevin_hx


Posts: 135
Joined: 1/20/2008
From: China
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: hades1001

Hi Michael,

I'm just curious, is there any new patch for AE coming in the near future?


Me too

_____________________________

Welcome to visit my Naval blog

(in reply to hades1001)
Post #: 1718
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 Ja... - 7/31/2012 1:11:40 AM   
galex

 

Posts: 19
Joined: 8/26/2008
Status: offline
me too!


(in reply to hades1001)
Post #: 1719
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108p3 updated 10 Ju... - 8/1/2012 8:41:19 PM   
el cid again

 

Posts: 15008
Joined: 10/10/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: sanch

quote:

ORIGINAL: ecwgcx
I LOVE the "Load Tenders" option on the ships screen. Absolutely awesome!


There is a side benefit from "Load Tenders" that might be considered gamey by some ...

1. Take an AGP (PT-boat tender) and some PT boats, and park them in some dinky port that happens to have some supplies.
2. Use "Load Tenders"; the AGP load some supplies.
3. Next turn, form the PT TF, and your PT boats are at 100% torpedo strength. Nice! (or maybe gamey).


Sounds right to me, in logistic terms. The tender carried torpedoes to the location. I would prefer torpedoes were tracked as
a kind of supply, by model number - but they are not. This is a reasonable approximation.

(in reply to sanch)
Post #: 1720
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108p3 updated 10 Ju... - 8/4/2012 3:36:43 AM   
jcjordan

 

Posts: 1751
Joined: 6/27/2001
Status: offline
A request, not sure if it's been asked for or not, but how about on either the HQ unit screen or from the base listing screen a way to sort/show the command that the base is attached to that way you could see all the bases under that command allowing you a quick way to find a base you might want to consider changing it's hq of???

(in reply to el cid again)
Post #: 1721
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108p3 updated 10 Ju... - 8/4/2012 9:37:12 AM   
michaelm


Posts: 9142
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Sydney, Australia
Status: offline
Doesn't this already allow you to see all bases under the command?




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to jcjordan)
Post #: 1722
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108p3 updated 10 Ju... - 8/5/2012 9:31:43 PM   
jcjordan

 

Posts: 1751
Joined: 6/27/2001
Status: offline
Oops missed that

(in reply to michaelm)
Post #: 1723
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108p3 updated 10 Ju... - 8/25/2012 5:27:52 AM   
bigred


Posts: 2892
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
I suspect this is already talked about. I have just received my fragmented Pac ocean HQ as a reinforement at San fran. On arrival it is hard coded to west coast. the Pac ocean frag at Tab is changed to restricted but has re assumed the parent position. Ignore the screenie of the 3rd marine div for this post. All units of the pac ocean are now restricted in place on the map.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 8/25/2012 5:45:25 AM >


_____________________________

---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2597400

(in reply to jcjordan)
Post #: 1724
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108p3 updated 10 Ju... - 9/5/2012 1:24:04 PM   
FatR

 

Posts: 2516
Joined: 10/23/2009
From: St.Petersburg, Russia
Status: offline
I have a couple of problems in my game, and wonder whether they are bugs or I'm doing something wrong:

1)Fighters and fighter-bombers set to naval strike/kamikaze missions are sortying without bombs for two turns in a row. I've tried setting them at 1000 and 2000 feet, but the result remains the same, no bombs.

2)Most of my transport planes set to carry troops to Sinabang repeatedly switch to hauling supplies for no clear reason.

Take a look at the attached turn, please.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

The Reluctant Admiral mod team.

Take a look at the latest released version of the Reluctant Admiral mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 1725
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108p3 updated 10 Ju... - 9/8/2012 1:55:31 AM   
michaelm


Posts: 9142
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Sydney, Australia
Status: offline
1) The Drop Tank XT is cancelling the Bomb XT.
If you turn off 'using drop tanks', the external bombs will appear.
Or the aircraft data for the scenario should have the 'DT ordnance' check box ticked to allow both to be used at same time.

_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to FatR)
Post #: 1726
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108p3 updated 10 Ju... - 9/8/2012 2:09:08 AM   
michaelm


Posts: 9142
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Sydney, Australia
Status: offline
2) The devices being air-transported may be too big. Troop transport reverts to Supply if it can't move anything.
Non-squad, non-engineer devices with load cost >9 can't be transported to a base (and cost >7 can't be dropped).


_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to michaelm)
Post #: 1727
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108p3 updated 10 Ju... - 9/8/2012 11:14:56 AM   
FatR

 

Posts: 2516
Joined: 10/23/2009
From: St.Petersburg, Russia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelm

1) The Drop Tank XT is cancelling the Bomb XT.
If you turn off 'using drop tanks', the external bombs will appear.
Or the aircraft data for the scenario should have the 'DT ordnance' check box ticked to allow both to be used at same time.

Thanks, can I ask to clarify if I understand this rule correctly, using examples?

SBD-5 Dauntless (a bomb in the "External" slot) will not carry any bombload if drop tanks are selected.

SBD-6 Dauntless (a bomb in the "Centre-line" slot) will carry its bombload if drop tanks are selected.

SB2C Helldiver will carry its 1000-lb bomb in the "Internal" slot, but not 2x250-lb bombs in the "External" slots, if drop tanks are selected.

Is that right?


< Message edited by FatR -- 9/8/2012 11:15:15 AM >


_____________________________

The Reluctant Admiral mod team.

Take a look at the latest released version of the Reluctant Admiral mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to michaelm)
Post #: 1728
Page:   <<   < prev  54 55 56 57 [58]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Tech Support >> RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 January 2012 (2nd part) Page: <<   < prev  54 55 56 57 [58]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.137