Some of the obvious one make sense. Hannibal is 12, Africanus rises up to 10. However, I regularly see such Roman stars as Fabius (well deserved 7, maybe should be 8 fully promoted), Marcellus (7+) and Nero (7+, but I'd start him and Marcellus off with 8 though) outshined by such relative nobodies as Cethegus (9 in my recent game) and Tuditanus (7 at times). Check their records, really nothing to speak of. I hardly remember them from reading Polybius and Dodge. Mago, on the other hand, is 4, when he should be easily a 6. After all, he did defeat (or greatly aided) in killing Scipio brothers in Spain, helped pull off many Hannibal's victories and held out for 3 years in Liguria against superior Roman armies.
James, I know there are balance issues to consider, but would it be possible to reshuffle some values to give credit where credit is due and vice versa? One way to balance the change would be to keep an overall rating number the same, raising some general's rating while simultaneously lowering the other's.
< Message edited by nalivayko -- 2/16/2011 10:17:14 PM >