Matrix Games Forums

Buzz Aldrins Space Program Manager is now available!Space Program Manager gets mini-site and Twitch SessionBuzz Aldrin: Ask Me Anything (AMA) on redditDeal of the week Fantasy Kommander: Eukarion WarsSpace Program Manager Launch Contest Announced!Battle Academy 2 is out now on iPad!A closer look at rockets in Space Program ManagerDeal of the Week - Pride of NationsA new update for Piercing Fortress EuropaNew screenshots for War in the West!
Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Vision

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> The War Room >> RE: Vision Page: <<   < prev  15 16 [17] 18 19   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Vision - 5/3/2011 6:56:38 AM   
Kapitanma

 

Posts: 13
Joined: 1/24/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

-Yasukuni. IJN version of Ki-67. "Yasukuni" might actually be the name of the naval unit, that employed these bombers in RL, but I can't find any other designation for them.



Long time lurker here, I just figured I'd chime in about this designation. I took a quick look, and naval attack variant of the Ki-67I was indeed referred to as Yasukuni(靖国) after the Yasukuni Shrine. The interceptor version (Ki-109) was also referred to as Yasukuni.

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 481
RE: 800kg - 5/5/2011 2:44:44 PM   
bigred


Posts: 2902
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bigred

I really wanted that 800 kg payload.  Is the d4y4 is worth the R/D?
Ummm.

Now I see the d5y1 myojo w/ the 800kg payload.....it sure does look good. In the tree w/ the d3a2val.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 5/5/2011 2:53:49 PM >

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 482
RE: IJ production mistakes - 5/5/2011 10:09:52 PM   
findmeifyoucan

 

Posts: 579
Joined: 10/14/2009
Status: offline
What A/C aircraft uses the HA 34 engine? Is there an easy way to find out what aircraft and what future aircraft uses what engine?

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 483
RE: IJ production mistakes - 5/11/2011 3:55:03 AM   
bigred


Posts: 2902
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
Off top of my head only 2 planes use the ha34.
Ki44 and the ki49.

select the engine tab in air production, then select ha34.

(in reply to findmeifyoucan)
Post #: 484
RE: IJ production mistakes - 5/11/2011 4:00:59 AM   
findmeifyoucan

 

Posts: 579
Joined: 10/14/2009
Status: offline
So is it even worth making the HA 34 or should I just switch to something more useful like Ha 31,32,33 or 35 for early 1942?

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 485
RE: IJ production mistakes - 5/11/2011 5:12:17 AM   
PaxMondo


Posts: 5925
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline
Well, most IJ players like the Helen and Tojo.  And they tend to build a LOT of them.  Like everything else in the IJ economy, you need to plan it and then make your moves slow and easy.  Fragile economies don't react nicely to heavy handed techniques.

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to findmeifyoucan)
Post #: 486
RE: IJ production mistakes - 5/11/2011 10:19:54 AM   
findmeifyoucan

 

Posts: 579
Joined: 10/14/2009
Status: offline
Maybe so but the HA34 only is for the Helen's and the Tojo is HA 35's. So at this point I don't think it is necessary to have two factories making HA34's and I think I will switch one of those factories for HA35's. I believe that the Japanese can never have enough of the HA35's. lol :-)

(in reply to PaxMondo)
Post #: 487
RE: IJ production mistakes - 5/11/2011 10:22:48 AM   
Puhis

 

Posts: 1700
Joined: 11/30/2008
From: Finland
Status: offline
Tojo is nowadays using (historical) Ha-34. One of the patches changed it.

(in reply to findmeifyoucan)
Post #: 488
RE: IJ production mistakes - 5/11/2011 5:46:08 PM   
findmeifyoucan

 

Posts: 579
Joined: 10/14/2009
Status: offline
Oh really? I thought I had the latest patch? Or does the game just not tell you and it is just a surprise when they use a different engine than otherwise indicated? Are there anymore surprises to expect that the game is also not telling me about? lol

(in reply to Puhis)
Post #: 489
RE: IJ production mistakes - 5/11/2011 6:36:07 PM   
Puhis

 

Posts: 1700
Joined: 11/30/2008
From: Finland
Status: offline
It was 5th patch, 1.01.06i

5.14. [768] Ki-44 Tojo: Engine changed to Nakajima Ha-34.
5.15. [769] Ki-44-IIa Tojo: Engine changed to Nakajima Ha-34.
5.16. [770] Ki-44-IIb Tojo: Engine changed to Nakajima Ha-34.
5.17. [771] Ki-44-IIc Tojo: Engine changed to Nakajima Ha-34.


No problems with ongoing games, unless you accepted DB changes. I did once, and run out of Ha-34s.

Apparently this mod have same changes.

< Message edited by Puhis -- 5/11/2011 6:37:06 PM >

(in reply to findmeifyoucan)
Post #: 490
RE: IJ production mistakes - 5/11/2011 6:48:07 PM   
findmeifyoucan

 

Posts: 579
Joined: 10/14/2009
Status: offline
I just checked and I have 1.04.1106i . Isn't that the latest patch and if so why doesn't the game tell me?

Hmmmm, I did accept data base changes but it is very early in the game for me when I did that like first two weeks of the war so probably doesn't matter.

(in reply to Puhis)
Post #: 491
RE: IJ production mistakes - 5/11/2011 9:40:21 PM   
DivePac88


Posts: 3123
Joined: 10/9/2008
From: Somewhere in the South Pacific.
Status: offline
1.04.1106i was the last official data patch build, but public beta1108m3 is the current exe patch build.

_____________________________


When you see the Southern Cross, For the first time
You understand now, Why you came this way

(in reply to findmeifyoucan)
Post #: 492
RE: IJ production mistakes - 5/12/2011 3:32:02 AM   
John 3rd


Posts: 11267
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Puhis

It was 5th patch, 1.01.06i

5.14. [768] Ki-44 Tojo: Engine changed to Nakajima Ha-34.
5.15. [769] Ki-44-IIa Tojo: Engine changed to Nakajima Ha-34.
5.16. [770] Ki-44-IIb Tojo: Engine changed to Nakajima Ha-34.
5.17. [771] Ki-44-IIc Tojo: Engine changed to Nakajima Ha-34.


No problems with ongoing games, unless you accepted DB changes. I did once, and run out of Ha-34s.

Apparently this mod have same changes.


I'll make sure Stanislav knows this with RA 3.0 about to come out. THANKS!

EDIT: Just checked with Tracker and RA already has Tojo with Ha-34.



< Message edited by John 3rd -- 5/12/2011 3:48:48 AM >


_____________________________



Member: Reluctant Admiral and Perfect War Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/


(in reply to Puhis)
Post #: 493
RE: Vision - 5/20/2011 5:25:44 PM   
Cannonfodder


Posts: 1974
Joined: 10/22/2008
From: the Netherlands
Status: offline
Tip for Japanese aircraft production - specialise specialise specialise! Find the planes you want for major roles and plan accordingly!!!

_____________________________


"It happened, therefore it can happen again: this is the core of what we have to say. It can happen, and it can happen everywhere.”
¯ Primo Levi, writer, holocaust survivor


(in reply to Kapitanma)
Post #: 494
42nov report - 5/25/2011 4:05:05 AM   
bigred


Posts: 2902
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
November 42 has arrived in my game w/ Dirty Harry.  I have had a problem w/ loading tracker so I restarted tracker around 42oct.  I tried to use the nomad v4 defined regions but could not get a good reading.

highlights from the industry chart are:
1.. -1100 oil per day. this was around -4000 so aI have put a dent in the loss. But still need to look for a better path.
2. Supply continues to produce +27000 per day in Tokyo.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 5/25/2011 4:08:39 AM >

(in reply to Cannonfodder)
Post #: 495
RE: 42nov report - 5/25/2011 4:08:44 AM   
bigred


Posts: 2902
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
Report 2 shows




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 5/25/2011 4:12:19 AM >

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 496
RE: 42nov report - 5/25/2011 4:11:57 AM   
bigred


Posts: 2902
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
Report 3 shows engine production. I was alarmed at the ha-60 for the d4y1 judy. then saw I have a pool. Seems the judy just started production.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 5/25/2011 4:15:50 AM >

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 497
RE: 42nov report - 5/25/2011 4:15:49 AM   
bigred


Posts: 2902
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
report 4 shows frame production.  I noted the judy has started.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 5/25/2011 4:17:00 AM >

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 498
RE: 42nov report - 5/25/2011 4:16:38 AM   
bigred


Posts: 2902
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
report 5. I needed t share what I am not building also to allow reader comment on possible errors.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 5/25/2011 4:18:32 AM >

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 499
RE: 42nov report - 5/25/2011 4:18:07 AM   
bigred


Posts: 2902
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
report 6: Im my other game w/ FatR he has the ki61 deployed into burma jan43. Note the research on the a6m5b. I plan to skip production and go straight research into the m8 w/ 3 factories at30 research points each per month.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 5/25/2011 4:44:05 AM >

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 500
RE: 42nov report - 5/25/2011 4:20:25 AM   
bigred


Posts: 2902
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
Report 7:  The other (lower) half of R/D. I have been critizied for not converting some of these factories. My lack of experieced selection of frames for future ops causes me to pause.

This chart reminds me AI have an opportunity to bring in the myoko maybe a year early if I get to work on it.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 5/25/2011 4:47:01 AM >

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 501
RE: 42nov report - 5/25/2011 4:22:17 AM   
bigred


Posts: 2902
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
report 8: I note a loss of 347 naval build points per turn. It is suggested I have too many naval points. Seems You use it or lose it.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 6/9/2011 6:09:22 AM >

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 502
RE: 42nov report - 5/25/2011 4:24:58 AM   
bigred


Posts: 2902
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
report 9: Not much left on the cruiser list.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 5/25/2011 4:26:35 AM >

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 503
RE: 42nov report - 5/25/2011 4:26:14 AM   
bigred


Posts: 2902
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
report 10:




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 5/25/2011 4:27:22 AM >

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 504
RE: 42nov report - 5/25/2011 4:27:01 AM   
bigred


Posts: 2902
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
report 11: oops, repeat.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 5/25/2011 4:29:13 AM >

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 505
RE: 42nov report - 5/29/2011 3:57:13 AM   
bigred


Posts: 2902
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
I needed to make some changes to air production.
1.  turned on ha35 production.





Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 5/29/2011 3:58:28 AM >

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 506
RE: 42nov report - 5/29/2011 4:05:35 AM   
bigred


Posts: 2902
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
2.  Converted one 30frame ki44IIa to ki44IIb.  This will give me 90 r/d per month.
3.  converted active ki48IIa to ki48IIb r/d.   Wanted to get the DB into the field.
4.  Used all the kubota engines so turned of the ki27 production.
5.  Converted ki67a peggy r/d to ki61a r/d.  This gives me 4 factories for the ki61a.  One will produce current model,  others will continue r/d on the ki61b..

7nov42.


< Message edited by bigred -- 5/29/2011 4:06:29 AM >

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 507
RE: 42nov report - 6/8/2011 3:48:35 AM   
bigred


Posts: 2902
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
I am scrounging around looking for 1/2 r/d factories to change r/d to d5y1myoko.   This is the grandson of the d3a1 val w/ an 800kg bomb.
Nominations for r/d discontinued are:
g8n1 Rita, --I really like 16 250kg payload, but will it be able to penetrate in 45?
ki95 recon---I am happy w/ the ki46, why pay extra.
ki83 2 eng ftr for 44, will the cannons really make a difference?
ki119 fb--come on---- 2 range?
p1y1 frances---do I really need another torp delivery system?  It does have armor in late 43.
ki74--lb---a 1945 2e level bomber--can I get by w/ the ki49 till end game?


AGAIN THIS IS ANOTHER MISTAKE...I SHOULD HAVE MADE THESE DECISIONS ON 1ST WEEK OF GAME FOR MAX EARLY ENTRY OF THESE WEAPONS.
Side note--I converted d5y1 myoko R/D to d3a2 val w/ current build of 1.  Then after fix at 1000 points I will inlarge factory to 30(cost 3000 supply) and convert back to d5y1 myoko r/d(at no cost).

I have been thinking about converting the sally factory to something else(size23) but to do so would cost 23000supply.  W/ this RA70 senario I suspect I will need the supply to fort up the centpac.  So If I cant get a conversion cheap then for me it is a no go!!!


(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 508
RE: 42nov report - 6/8/2011 2:58:33 PM   
bigred


Posts: 2902
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
I could put the sally factory into R/D something which IIRC would spread the cost out over a period of time.

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 509
RE: factory repair - 6/16/2011 8:50:43 PM   
bigred


Posts: 2902
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
I was looking thru tracker mid nov42 and found a few factories that need to be "repair off".  If not then cost is 1000supply points per repaired factory.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 6/16/2011 8:51:40 PM >

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 510
Page:   <<   < prev  15 16 [17] 18 19   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> The War Room >> RE: Vision Page: <<   < prev  15 16 [17] 18 19   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.119