Matrix Games Forums

Armageddon invasion starts in 2014Command Rommels Panzers in Battle Academy!Servers UpdateThe Deal goes Fourth!Command Ops gets a Massive Update!Lost Battles AAR: Smolensk 41War in the East: Lost Battles is here!Conflict of Heroes: Awakening the Bear! Let's Play videoLost Battles Scenario Manual excerpts available!A sneak peek from Allied Corps!		 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: The Truth about Pearl Harbor

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> The War Room >> RE: The Truth about Pearl Harbor Page: <<   < prev  6 7 8 9 [10]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The Truth about Pearl Harbor - 8/5/2010 2:02:51 PM   
AW1Steve


Posts: 12007
Joined: 3/10/2007
From: ME-FL-NE ? "Cloud Coo-coo land"
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: USS America


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phanatik

Gee, I express a different opinion, so now I have a "behavior."

Maybe I'll just start another cockup by stating that a lot of individual facts from the Da Vinci Code were correct. Tying them all together is ify.

Ciao


Not because you express a different opinion. If there are 5000 users on this forum, there are 5000 different opinions. The "behavior" is being unable to let it go and let other people have an opinion that is different from yours. It can be seen as "trolling" because it only becomes inflammatory.

The "behavior" looks like this (apologies to Steve ):








AND WELL YOU SHOULD!!!

As my CC in booot camp used to say (company commander...Navyees for drill instructor) "Opinions are like A$$h@les, everbody has at least one, and everbody's stinks but yours!". Earthy, but wise (I almost said true!)

_____________________________

"Don't hold yourself up as an example of what community members should aspire to. You have a long history of rude behavior, and you overract to the slightest provocation."
Amoral


(in reply to USS America)
Post #: 271
RE: The Truth about Pearl Harbor - 8/5/2010 5:09:04 PM   
Kwik E Mart


Posts: 2401
Joined: 7/22/2004
Status: offline 		my innner thetan is disturbed by all this...

_____________________________

Kirk Lazarus: I know who I am. I'm the dude playin' the dude, disguised as another dude!
Ron Swanson: Clear alcohols are for rich women on diets.


(in reply to AW1Steve)
Post #: 272
THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE! - 8/5/2010 7:59:28 PM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25218
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline 		ack! wrong thread....i meant the OTHER overlong thread....only more fun!

< Message edited by Nikademus -- 8/5/2010 8:03:29 PM >

(in reply to Kwik E Mart)
Post #: 273
RE: THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE! - 8/5/2010 8:07:28 PM   
ChickenOfTheSea


Posts: 579
Joined: 6/7/2008
From: Virginia
Status: offline 		There is also this.





Attachment (1)

_____________________________

In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice, but in practice, there is. - Manfred Eigen

(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 274
I love that movie.... I live that movie... - 8/5/2010 8:09:17 PM   
USS America


Posts: 15076
Joined: 10/28/2002
From: Raleigh, NC, USA
Status: online 		Where's the printer?  

_____________________________

Mike

"Good times will set you free" - Jimmy Buffett

"They need more rum punch" - Me


Artwork by The Amazing Dixie

(in reply to ChickenOfTheSea)
Post #: 275
RE: THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE! - 8/6/2010 6:34:33 PM   
Kwik E Mart


Posts: 2401
Joined: 7/22/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ChickenOfTheSea

There is also this.






for my own peace of mind, i'm going to assume this horse died of natural causes...

_____________________________

Kirk Lazarus: I know who I am. I'm the dude playin' the dude, disguised as another dude!
Ron Swanson: Clear alcohols are for rich women on diets.


(in reply to ChickenOfTheSea)
Post #: 276
RE: THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE! - 8/6/2010 7:10:54 PM   
ChickenOfTheSea


Posts: 579
Joined: 6/7/2008
From: Virginia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kwik E Mart


quote:

ORIGINAL: ChickenOfTheSea

There is also this.






for my own peace of mind, i'm going to assume this horse died of natural causes...


Kwik E Mart

In order to make you feel better, I believe the horse was photoshopped into the pic.


_____________________________

In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice, but in practice, there is. - Manfred Eigen

(in reply to Kwik E Mart)
Post #: 277
RE: THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE! - 8/6/2010 7:12:45 PM   
Kwik E Mart


Posts: 2401
Joined: 7/22/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ChickenOfTheSea


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kwik E Mart


quote:

ORIGINAL: ChickenOfTheSea

There is also this.






for my own peace of mind, i'm going to assume this horse died of natural causes...


Kwik E Mart

In order to make you feel better, I believe the horse was photoshopped into the pic.



yeah, it's one of my favorite movies...
"Looks like you tend to miss a lot of work here."
"Well, I wouldn't exactly say that I MISS work..."


< Message edited by Kwik E Mart -- 8/6/2010 7:13:18 PM >

_____________________________

Kirk Lazarus: I know who I am. I'm the dude playin' the dude, disguised as another dude!
Ron Swanson: Clear alcohols are for rich women on diets.


(in reply to ChickenOfTheSea)
Post #: 278
RE: THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE! - 8/7/2010 7:13:39 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 6166
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kwik E Mart

yeah, it's one of my favorite movies...
"Looks like you tend to miss a lot of work here."
"Well, I wouldn't exactly say that I MISS work..."



"I'm going to show her my 'O-face'"

"I'm going to federal pound-you-up-the-a** prison!!"

I got a million of them. The best movie ever made for anyone who's worked for a corporation. Or owned a stapler.

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to Kwik E Mart)
Post #: 279
RE: How to judge Japan's attack without the benefit of ... - 8/9/2010 8:55:32 AM   
Schatten

 

Posts: 35
Joined: 10/3/2009
Status: offline 		it was stupid for beginning to not attack Russia (even since they had some Oil Fields and other ressources in Asia, next to Japan too).

Anyway...IF you want SRA so there was anyway no need to attack the US....stupid planning.
Why Pearl and attacking Philippines? there was absolutly no need, Japan dont need them as long there was Peace with US.
Attacking them has only given Rosevelt the excuse to go into War he desperatly look for 3 years as he was not able to go into War without the Pearl Harbour Propaganda.

Except this there were so *easy* way to do it....simply ask Germany to tell the Dutch Puppet Administration to sell the needed Oil and Ressources to Japan for a *low* Price, this would compare the US Embargo nearly full.
Of course the local Durch Gouverment would by most possible denied to fullfill the Order but than the puppet Administration would be simply *ask* Japan to do a police action agains Rebels and it were than help and not War.

Clearly everyone would know the truth and the fact´s but at the peaper it would still look good and would not give US and *legal* reason to open the War, there were no treaties with Dutch (if they were US would clearly go in the War against Germany asap).
Mayby it were even possible to attack Singapore and Britain (as Ally of Germany that was in War with them) and still avoid a War with USA (there were no Treaties of Help betwen the 2 too).

It all would make it at the Paper look more good...good enough so the Peace Movement in the USA would not be crushed as it was after Pearl.

So stupidity and overconfidence at same time and place....anyway its now past.

(in reply to m10bob)
Post #: 280
RE: How to judge Japan's attack without the benefit of ... - 8/9/2010 11:12:13 AM   
LoBaron


Posts: 3843
Joined: 1/26/2003
From: Vienna, Austria
Status: offline 		The US granted a plan to increase the 5-3-3 ratio in major combatants to 10-5-3 (US-UK-IJN) in 1944 a couple of months
before the war started. (could be that I´m wrong on the latter numbers, I´m at work now so cannot take a look).

Restrictions were already put on Japanese economy as early as 1939, which at that time already relied heavily on imports (IIRC they had to import about
80% of tungsten, rubber and oil from areas such as the DEI´s and the US - at least before the trade embargo was in effect because of
their China adventure).
The US condition for reentering a trade agreement with Japan was retreat to their pre-1937 borders which was deemed unacceptable.
The close distance to the Phillippines which had the potential of growing into a US military bastion soon was a threat to any southern expansion.

It is plausable that they decided to strike now, not later, and to eliminate the US Pac Fleet as a militarey threat even though there were always doubts that
a sustained war could be won. The outlook to try something similar later would have looked even bleaker.

All in all Japan was a country just recently emerging as an industrialized nation but acting like a major power, with many social and economical elements still not far away
from a middle age rural society. Their economy could not sutain their population.
Happened often enough in history that such factors combined ended in war.

< Message edited by LoBaron -- 8/9/2010 11:14:16 AM >

_____________________________

S**t happens in war.

All hail the superior ones!

(in reply to Schatten)
Post #: 281
RE: How to judge Japan's attack without the benefit of ... - 8/9/2010 12:22:49 PM   
LoBaron


Posts: 3843
Joined: 1/26/2003
From: Vienna, Austria
Status: offline 		Btw Schatten, they DID attack Russia. And all they got was a bloody nose.

_____________________________

S**t happens in war.

All hail the superior ones!

(in reply to LoBaron)
Post #: 282
RE: How to judge Japan's attack without the benefit of ... - 8/9/2010 10:29:38 PM   
Schatten

 

Posts: 35
Joined: 10/3/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LoBaron

Btw Schatten, they DID attack Russia. And all they got was a bloody nose.



yep, years bevore and alone so Russia was able to throw everything at them.
nothing to compare with 1941 as Russia was at the end (Russia´s counterattack early 1942 was performed mainly by the forces they have took from far east after the Japanese attack as they have known now they safe from this side...their west army was at this point nearly completly destroyed).

and Philpines were of course a threat but as long there was no War not more....there was no need for this attack it, the whole plan was a epic failure.
If they have tried it with negotations and the tactic against the dutch colonies as i have wrote above they would gain nearly all they have want without big fight if any.

anyway as said its past now...but in germany we say too *if you have such allies as we have had you need no enemy*...this both for WWI and II^^

(in reply to LoBaron)
Post #: 283
RE: How to judge Japan's attack without the benefit of ... - 8/9/2010 11:13:03 PM   
mike scholl 1

 

Posts: 1173
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Schatten


quote:

ORIGINAL: LoBaron

Btw Schatten, they DID attack Russia. And all they got was a bloody nose.



yep, years before and alone so Russia was able to throw everything at them.




Yet both times the Japanese "tried" the Russians before WW II, it was the local Soviet Garrison forces that kicked their teeth in. If the Japs could have somehow arranged to fight the Russians in the Jungles of SE Asia they might have had a chance. On the barren hills and plains of Manchuria the Soviet armor and artillery superiority made the IJA so much "dogmeat"...




(in reply to Schatten)
Post #: 284
RE: How to judge Japan's attack without the benefit of ... - 8/10/2010 3:24:38 PM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25218
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LoBaron

Btw Schatten, they DID attack Russia. And all they got was a bloody nose.


In terms of Operational objective yes. They however gave as good as they got in terms of casualties despite the material advantage of Russian armor and arty. However even the Japanese themselves had to conceed that they lost the battle based on the fact that the Russians held the contested ground at the close of hostilities.


(in reply to LoBaron)
Post #: 285
RE: How to judge Japan's attack without the benefit of ... - 8/10/2010 6:21:42 PM   
Alfred

 

Posts: 3263
Joined: 9/28/2006
Status: offline 		Let us not downplay too much the Soviet performance. By the tine of the second confrontation in 1939, the Soviet purge had arrived in the Far East.

Alfred

(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 286
RE: How to judge Japan's attack without the benefit of ... - 8/10/2010 6:31:29 PM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25218
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline 		I wasn't.



< Message edited by Nikademus -- 8/10/2010 6:33:05 PM >

(in reply to Alfred)
Post #: 287
Page:   <<   < prev  6 7 8 9 [10]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> The War Room >> RE: The Truth about Pearl Harbor Page: <<   < prev  6 7 8 9 [10]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.570