Matrix Games Forums

War in the West Manual previewThe fight for Armageddon begins! The Matrix Holiday sales are starting today! Warhammer - Weapons of WarFlashpoint Campaigns: Red Storm gets huge update and a Steam release!Battle Academy 2 opens up a new front!Flashpoint Campaigns Featured on weekly Streaming SessionFrontline: The Longest Day - New Screenshots!Deal of the Week: Hannibal Rome and CarthageFlashpoint Campaigns: Red Storm gets Players Edition!
Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Dec 8 Mod questions

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Scenario Design and Modding >> RE: Dec 8 Mod questions Page: <<   < prev  4 5 6 7 [8]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Dec 8 Mod questions - 2/3/2011 7:23:22 AM   
Commander Cody


Posts: 878
Joined: 7/4/2003
From: Seoul, Korea
Status: offline
That's a feature, not a bug. I like having all those Corsairs on board. Seriously, squadron sizes on carriers seems a bit buggy in general in Downfall as I ended up with 18 in VF, 18 in VBF, 15 in VB and 15 in VT on most of my CVs.

Cheers,
CC

_____________________________

Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.

(in reply to NAVMAN)
Post #: 211
RE: Dec 8 Mod questions - 2/4/2011 9:47:28 PM   
JeffK


Posts: 5217
Joined: 1/26/2005
From: Back in the Office, Can I get my tin hut back!
Status: offline
Ditto

The Carrier airgroups are the hardest thing to manage in Downfall.

Re Midway, it takes so long to get the unit up to full strength as you can only draw 12 aircraft and then wait for a few days. A way around this is to change the aircraft type which thenfills out the squadron.

Other option is to land the squadron and put some of the land base VF on board.


_____________________________

Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

(in reply to Commander Cody)
Post #: 212
RE: Dec 8 Mod questions - 2/19/2011 1:21:51 PM   
Panzerjaeger Hortlund


Posts: 2700
Joined: 10/13/2000
Status: offline
There are loads of allied ships who have not done all their upgrades in Downfall. Some have not even done their 42 upgrades

_____________________________

The era of procrastination, of half-measures, of soothing and baffling expedients, of delays, is coming to a close.
In its place we are entering a period of consequences..

(in reply to Commander Cody)
Post #: 213
RE: Dec 8 Mod questions - 2/23/2011 12:53:28 AM   
Andy Mac

 

Posts: 13800
Joined: 5/12/2004
From: Alexandria, Scotland
Status: offline
There is an update around somewhere to correct that I was sure i posted it I will see if I can find it again

(in reply to Panzerjaeger Hortlund)
Post #: 214
RE: Dec 8 Mod questions - 2/23/2011 3:36:42 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 8704
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: online

quote:

ORIGINAL: Andy Mac

There is an update around somewhere to correct that I was sure i posted it I will see if I can find it again


Andy, do you recall if the Downfall which was included as a scenario in that official patch (last one I think, before the OOB/data official patch) includes the changes? IOW, the verison you just bumped in the other thread? In which case we can play the version in the patch safely?

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to Andy Mac)
Post #: 215
RE: Dec 8 Mod questions - 2/23/2011 9:59:56 PM   
mikkey


Posts: 822
Joined: 2/10/2008
From: Slovakia
Status: offline
IIRC "WITP Admiral's Edition v1.01.06i Official Update" contains Downfall scenario v1.0 (without some ship upgrade, fuel...) and this thread Official Downfall Scenario Erratta contains Downfall scenario v2.0.

_____________________________


(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 216
RE: Downfall, Buccaneer and Marianas and Ironman Allied - 3/5/2011 5:27:20 PM   
gradenko_2000

 

Posts: 857
Joined: 12/27/2010
Status: offline
Sorry if this has already been answered elsewhere, but the original post doesn't really say anything: Does "Ironman Allied" mean a game where the Allies are boosted to ahistorically stronger levels? As a counterpoint to the latest patch's scenario 010, which is a game where the Japanese are boosted to ahistorically stronger levels.

If yes, are the attachments in post 4 and 5 of this thread still the latest version? I find the idea intriguing.

(in reply to sprior)
Post #: 217
RE: Downfall, Buccaneer and Marianas and Ironman Allied - 3/19/2011 11:38:29 PM   
Andy Mac

 

Posts: 13800
Joined: 5/12/2004
From: Alexandria, Scotland
Status: offline
Yes it does no I dont think those are the latest versions I will try to dig them out later

(in reply to gradenko_2000)
Post #: 218
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 6 7 [8]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Scenario Design and Modding >> RE: Dec 8 Mod questions Page: <<   < prev  4 5 6 7 [8]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

3.512