Matrix Games Forums

The fight for Armageddon begins! The Matrix Holiday sales are starting today! Warhammer - Weapons of WarFlashpoint Campaigns: Red Storm gets huge update and a Steam release!Battle Academy 2 opens up a new front!Flashpoint Campaigns Featured on weekly Streaming SessionFrontline: The Longest Day - New Screenshots!Deal of the Week: Hannibal Rome and CarthageFlashpoint Campaigns: Red Storm gets Players Edition!To End All Wars gets its first major patch!
Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

anti-tank defence versus armor

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Operation Barbarossa: The Struggle for Russia >> The War Room >> anti-tank defence versus armor Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
anti-tank defence versus armor - 12/29/2009 5:58:36 PM   
Elwood

 

Posts: 8
Joined: 12/22/2009
Status: offline
Hi,
I am playing since few days (I am currently in the second campaign), and I experienced some strange behaviour about anti-tank defence capability versus armor.
In many games like this one, the anti-tank unit are very effective against armor both for attack or defence.
I noticed in OB that whe an unit attacks an anti-tank unit, the odds are the same fot an infantry unit and an armored unit : I expected a better efficiency of the infantry against anti-tank unit (compared to armored unit).
for example, , with equivalent strength, there is no damage inflicted to the armor unit, when attacking anti-tank. I expected at least 1 damage due to the anti-tank capability to hit and damage tanks.
I experienced such a (strange) behavior with a Pz III J or Pz IV C unit and a Russian anti-tank Pak (3.5 / 4.5).
Is there any foreseen adjustment to the combat rules for anti-tank units against armored units ?
BR
Mathieu Leprince


< Message edited by Elwood -- 1/11/2010 10:36:34 PM >
Post #: 1
RE: anti-tank defence versus armor - 1/11/2010 10:39:04 PM   
Elwood

 

Posts: 8
Joined: 12/22/2009
Status: offline
Mmmmh,
well no answer to my post.
No one else experienced poor defence of anti-tank units against armored unit ?
Mathieu

(in reply to Elwood)
Post #: 2
RE: anti-tank defence versus armor - 1/30/2010 8:58:43 AM   
Obsolete


Posts: 1493
Joined: 9/4/2007
Status: offline
Well, since no one stepped up to answere, I guess I'll give my two cents.  Not that they are worth much at this point.  The problem is I didn't value anti-tank units high in this game at all.  I'm not saying they are coded bad, it's just that you're probably getting bigger bang for the buck by going tanks.  The worst anti-tanks of all are the ones that aren't even tracked.  I'd upgrade those just to make a more mobile unit, but even still they were not really up to my fancy. 


_____________________________



King-Tigers don't let Tiger-I's get over-run.

(in reply to Elwood)
Post #: 3
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Operation Barbarossa: The Struggle for Russia >> The War Room >> anti-tank defence versus armor Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.079