Matrix Games Forums

New Update for World in Flames!Buzz Aldrin's Space Program Manager LP VideosPandora: First Contact Review on Space SectorWorld in Flames: Tutorial Videos Playlist #3Order of Battle: Pacific First Screens!Panzer Corps gets a GreenlightThe Slitherine Group Strikes Stratego License DealWeb Server Maintenance Unity of Command and Operation Barbarossa!World in Flames gets Updated!		 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Suggestions for future patches

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Gary Grigsby's Eagle Day to Bombing the Reich >> RE: Suggestions for future patches Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 5 [6]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Suggestions for future patches - 7/5/2011 2:12:01 PM   
john_txic

 

Posts: 67
Joined: 12/21/2007
Status: offline 		iv. Bomber Command to be able to carry out daylight raids (at least in the post D-Day phases)

(in reply to john_txic)
Post #: 151
RE: Suggestions for future patches - 7/17/2011 6:51:07 PM   
john_txic

 

Posts: 67
Joined: 12/21/2007
Status: offline 		v. The ability to be able to plan more than 200 missions

(in reply to john_txic)
Post #: 152
RE: Suggestions for future patches - 7/24/2011 6:36:35 PM   
john_txic

 

Posts: 67
Joined: 12/21/2007
Status: offline 		vi. Fighter Command to be able to plan fighter sweeps or bombing raids as a Wing - say one squadron as Top Cover and two at lower level etc.
vii. Bomber Command being able to plan a Group raid against a target, rather than having to nominate each participating squadron

(in reply to john_txic)
Post #: 153
RE: Suggestions for future patches - 9/2/2011 8:20:13 AM   
jamesm

 

Posts: 748
Joined: 8/28/2000
From: Cairns, Australia
Status: offline 		I am not sure if this has been mentioned before. In the assign additional bomber screen could you please place a column to show HQ?  This would be particularly used for night bombing missions to make it easy to avoid placing pathfinder squadrons in the general bomber stream.

(in reply to john_txic)
Post #: 154
RE: Suggestions for future patches - 11/7/2011 9:16:11 AM   
PizzaDeOveja


Posts: 50
Joined: 10/20/2011
Status: offline 		Wouldn't it be great to mod the game to do either the first or the second gulf war?? With a few tweaks here and there it could be done using the same core as this game. I mean that got to be second best only to command SAC and nuke Moscow..oh! a man can dream...

_____________________________


The Rules of War? I'll give you a lesson, sir, about the Rules of War...

(in reply to Golden Bear)
Post #: 155
RE: Suggestions for future patches - 11/9/2011 3:45:00 PM   
Turner


Posts: 254
Joined: 9/14/2010
From: Sweden (not Switzerland)
Status: offline 		I've not had the patience to read the whole of this thread so apologize if this has been brought up before. But is there not a possibility to hide intercepting fighters from the attacker until they are sighted by the raid(s)? It kindof sucks to have your bases in use given away to the attacker without him having to spend recon assets and time on searching for them.


_____________________________

"There are no desperate situations, only desperate people." - Heinz Guderian

Trippin' with Jagdgeschwader 11

(in reply to PizzaDeOveja)
Post #: 156
RE: Suggestions for future patches - 11/10/2011 2:41:02 PM   
otisabuser2


Posts: 1097
Joined: 8/13/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Turner

I've not had the patience to read the whole of this thread so apologize if this has been brought up before. But is there not a possibility to hide intercepting fighters from the attacker until they are sighted by the raid(s)? It kindof sucks to have your bases in use given away to the attacker without him having to spend recon assets and time on searching for them.



I am liking this one very much. One easy step going part way towards this would be to remove the message that notifys you that enemy aircraft taking off. Not only draws your attention to every base, so you miss none of them, but also tells you exactly what is taking off.

(in reply to Turner)
Post #: 157
RE: Suggestions for future patches - 11/10/2011 4:25:14 PM   
lastdingo

 

Posts: 110
Joined: 7/31/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: john_txic

vi. Fighter Command to be able to plan fighter sweeps or bombing raids as a Wing - say one squadron as Top Cover and two at lower level etc.
vii. Bomber Command being able to plan a Group raid against a target, rather than having to nominate each participating squadron


???

Just assign escorts to your sweep.

(in reply to john_txic)
Post #: 158
RE: Suggestions for future patches - 11/10/2011 7:20:12 PM   
john_txic

 

Posts: 67
Joined: 12/21/2007
Status: offline 		Doh! You're right, Dingo.


However, vii. still stands......


John

_____________________________

The Nazis entered this war under the rather childish delusion that they were going to bomb everyone else, and nobody was going to bomb them. They sowed the wind, and now they are going to reap the whirlwind.

(in reply to lastdingo)
Post #: 159
RE: Suggestions for future patches - 11/10/2011 8:11:48 PM   
lastdingo

 

Posts: 110
Joined: 7/31/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: john_txic

Doh! You're right, Dingo.


However, vii. still stands......


John


vii is quite close to the auto mission planning function, though. You can tell the AI to plan an attack on a target for you and it will allocate aircraft. Works nicely at night.

(in reply to john_txic)
Post #: 160
RE: Suggestions for future patches - 11/11/2011 7:25:21 AM   
john_txic

 

Posts: 67
Joined: 12/21/2007
Status: offline 		I've never tried that, Dingo; I'll have a go tonight.

I do use auto-planning for Recce, though, on occasions. Apart from having Mosquitos dicing at 500ft, it's OK...

_____________________________

The Nazis entered this war under the rather childish delusion that they were going to bomb everyone else, and nobody was going to bomb them. They sowed the wind, and now they are going to reap the whirlwind.

(in reply to lastdingo)
Post #: 161
RE: Suggestions for future patches - 11/18/2011 8:09:39 AM   
lastdingo

 

Posts: 110
Joined: 7/31/2006
Status: offline 		One more proposal: Make Luftwaffe pilot quality variable in a smart way.
A player who doesn't need many replacements should get better replacements.
The player should also be able to set a minimum skill for pilots (ranging from exp 25 to 75), and the marginal rate of training effectiveness should decline.
~150 flying hours for a exp 30 pilot
~200 flying hours for a exp 55 pilot
~250 flying hours for a exp 65 pilot
~300 flying hours for a exp 70 pilot
~400 flying hours for a exp 75 pilot

The training could run in the background (one flying hour per day and student) and create a pool of replacement pilots.
Everytime a pilot finishes training a new student replaces him. On top of that, quantity of training slots could vary over time.

Now if you need 50 replacements on a day and have set minimum skill to 65, you'd end up getting the best 50 students (may be better than if training requirement was set higher earlier). You'd get less than 50 if there were less than 50 at exp 65. Finally, a random +5/-0 exp  bonus when pilots graduate could keep this mechanic somewhat less unbelievable (not all at exactly the same skill).

(in reply to john_txic)
Post #: 162
RE: Suggestions for future patches - 1/11/2012 1:53:05 AM   
Arkham

 

Posts: 26
Joined: 9/7/2006
Status: offline 		this may have been mentioned before, but how about being able to move the waypoints via the mouse? 

(in reply to john_txic)
Post #: 163
RE: Suggestions for future patches - 1/11/2012 11:33:19 AM   
otisabuser2


Posts: 1097
Joined: 8/13/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arkham

this may have been mentioned before, but how about being able to move the waypoints via the mouse? 


I think you right click on them and drag them around ?

(in reply to Arkham)
Post #: 164
RE: Suggestions for future patches - 3/11/2012 7:36:48 AM   
john_txic

 

Posts: 67
Joined: 12/21/2007
Status: offline 		VIII. With the quality of aerial reconnaissance available, it should be possible for enemy airfields to be reported as having single-engined or twin-engined fighters based there, even if not exact types - not just a total no. of fighters as at present.

_____________________________

The Nazis entered this war under the rather childish delusion that they were going to bomb everyone else, and nobody was going to bomb them. They sowed the wind, and now they are going to reap the whirlwind.

(in reply to otisabuser2)
Post #: 165
RE: Suggestions for future patches - 5/28/2012 9:49:11 PM   
davidpballmh

 

Posts: 8
Joined: 5/28/2012
Status: offline 		I would like unit auto upgrades to be turned off so I can have total control of when they upgrade.

(in reply to john_txic)
Post #: 166
RE: Suggestions for future patches - 5/29/2012 9:25:09 AM   
john_txic

 

Posts: 67
Joined: 12/21/2007
Status: offline 		ix. In the "Move Units" command, perhaps each Group/Division etc. could be in a separate colour? Aids finding the airfield you want to select.

_____________________________

The Nazis entered this war under the rather childish delusion that they were going to bomb everyone else, and nobody was going to bomb them. They sowed the wind, and now they are going to reap the whirlwind.

(in reply to davidpballmh)
Post #: 167
RE: Suggestions for future patches - 6/2/2012 7:57:53 AM   
harley


Posts: 1662
Joined: 10/13/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: lastdingo

The training could run in the background (one flying hour per day and student) and create a pool of replacement pilots.
Everytime a pilot finishes training a new student replaces him. On top of that, quantity of training slots could vary over time.

Now if you need 50 replacements on a day and have set minimum skill to 65, you'd end up getting the best 50 students (may be better than if training requirement was set higher earlier). You'd get less than 50 if there were less than 50 at exp 65. Finally, a random +5/-0 exp  bonus when pilots graduate could keep this mechanic somewhat less unbelievable (not all at exactly the same skill).



there *is* a pilot pool, but it's very limited. It doesn't work the way you describe, but if you limit losses you will get slightly better pilots. It doesn't work the way you've described, but it does also allow for a mini-flood of pilots if you have a bad day.

_____________________________

gigiddy gigiddy gig-i-ddy

(in reply to lastdingo)
Post #: 168
RE: Suggestions for future patches - 11/12/2012 7:07:33 AM   
john_txic

 

Posts: 67
Joined: 12/21/2007
Status: offline 		x. 83 and 97 Sqn were transferred to 5 Group in April 1944; 627 Sqn followed. I'm in December '44 in my 700-Turn game, and they're still with 8 Group

_____________________________

The Nazis entered this war under the rather childish delusion that they were going to bomb everyone else, and nobody was going to bomb them. They sowed the wind, and now they are going to reap the whirlwind.

(in reply to harley)
Post #: 169
RE: Suggestions for future patches - 11/12/2012 7:08:54 AM   
john_txic

 

Posts: 67
Joined: 12/21/2007
Status: offline
xi. Where's the Lancaster BII? We have every little Luftwaffe sub-type, so why not allied bombers too?

_____________________________

The Nazis entered this war under the rather childish delusion that they were going to bomb everyone else, and nobody was going to bomb them. They sowed the wind, and now they are going to reap the whirlwind.

(in reply to john_txic)
Post #: 170
RE: Suggestions for future patches - 2/20/2013 7:21:41 AM   
npsergio

 

Posts: 101
Joined: 1/23/2010
Status: offline 		Not sure if it's possible with the game code...

For the next patch:
Not to control the pilots, but to control the unit leader.
I.E. A button in the unit screen let you "retire" the current commander.
Then, it's open a screen with the eligible pilots.
You select the one you want and it's assigned as a new commander.

Eligible pilots:
- same nationality
- not other commanders, only pilots from the units
- same or higher rank. Minimum rank major (maybe)

Cost:
- removed leaders are lost, showing them as "Ret" (retired). Not eligible for anything (posted in administrative jobs?)
- movement points (50 - 100)
- morale points penalty to the new commander unit (like in unit movement)

An easier way:

A button in the unit screen let you "retire" the current commander.
If you click it, the game ask for a confirmation.
If you confirm, then the commander is removed (Ret), and the next pilot in the same unit, given an order of preference is assigned new commander.

Order of preference:
- Higher or same rank
- Better experience
- More missions
- More kills
- Alphabetical order / random

Cost:
- removed leaders are lost, showing them as "Ret" (retired). Not eligible for anything (posted in administrative jobs?)
- movement points (50 - 100)
- morale points penalty to the unit (like in unit movement)
- you can´t control the commander. You don´t know if the new commander will be better or worse than the retired commander.


< Message edited by npsergio -- 2/21/2013 2:44:40 PM >

(in reply to Fallschirmjager)
Post #: 171
RE: Suggestions for future patches - 4/15/2013 2:06:24 PM   
warshipbuilder


Posts: 72
Joined: 2/23/2013
From: C-eh-n-eh-d-eh
Status: offline 		Since there is already a "what if" Jet 44 campaign, can we not have Meteors, P-80's and B-29's incorporated?

_____________________________

Any ship can be a minesweeper, once.

(in reply to npsergio)
Post #: 172
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 4 5 [6]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Gary Grigsby's Eagle Day to Bombing the Reich >> RE: Suggestions for future patches Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 5 [6]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.096