Matrix Games Forums

Paypal System UpdateDistant Worlds: Shadows Final Teaser!Distant Worlds: Legends gets Updated!Recruiting Testers for Commander: the Great War on Mac!Armageddon invasion starts in 2014Command Rommels Panzers in Battle Academy!Servers UpdateThe Deal goes Fourth!Command Ops gets a Massive Update!Lost Battles AAR: Smolensk 41
Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Historiker(A) vs. El Cid (J) RHS-EBO NO SID!

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> After Action Reports >> Historiker(A) vs. El Cid (J) RHS-EBO NO SID! Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Historiker(A) vs. El Cid (J) RHS-EBO NO SID! - 4/11/2008 12:53:46 AM   
Historiker


Posts: 4714
Joined: 7/4/2007
From: Deutschland
Status: offline
I'm going to tell what I plan to do, so don't keep on reading, Sid!
I'm doing my turn atm, so the first reports come later.

< Message edited by Historiker -- 4/15/2008 7:05:41 PM >


_____________________________

Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson
Post #: 1
RE: Historiker(Allies) vs. El Cid (Jap) RHS-EBO NO SID! - 4/11/2008 10:13:08 AM   
Elladan

 

Posts: 298
Joined: 8/18/2005
From: Swindon, UK
Status: online
I bet you don't have to fear Sid lurking here Torsten, his problem is rather opposite on times  Could you let us know the main differences between this scenario and CVO & EOS? I assume no house rules has been drawn?

(in reply to Historiker)
Post #: 2
RE: Historiker(Allies) vs. El Cid (Jap) RHS-EBO NO SID! - 4/11/2008 1:47:02 PM   
Historiker


Posts: 4714
Joined: 7/4/2007
From: Deutschland
Status: offline
Indeed, there are no House Rules. I asked for some as the use of HRs is quite common, but Sid insisted that RHS is designed to require no HRs.
Moreover, many HRs are there to make it easier for the Japanese player (like the 10.000 feet rule) and as I play the Allied side, there's no need if my opponent doesn't want them!

To EBO
EBO is - if I understood correctly - a scenario that assumes that only the Washington Naval Treaty was signed. So both sides start with considerable more Battleships and Cruisers, as the building programs for both were started with pre-war doctrines.


One significant thing in the first turn was, that I was not restricted in any way. Why this seems to be great for an allied player, I started thinking that it might be preferable to have a "don't leave the ports" rule while perparing my first turn. You can't imagine how difficult it is to decide what to do. The enemy may show up everywhere, he may attack every port, he may have carriers near every allied starting position.
So what to do? Leave the ports to avoid a port attack? But if you let your ships head for the wrong direction, they may be caught at sea, which is even worse!


My overal doctrine for the first month of this game is inspired by the poet Samuel Butler, wo wrote (my translation as I didn't find the original): "Who flees may win later, a dead man has fallen forever"...
So I will retreat whereever I don't expect a benefit for the total war. Every unit I avoid to be destroyed totally will be very usefull from mid 42 on. I have an intended frontline I where I want to stop him, but I'm not sure whether this is achievable in RHS (and EBO), so later more...
But not every unit will be used in this way - as I said "whereever I expect a benefit". So there'll be an intensive use of naval units in the first weeks, as this is - IMO - the only moment in the war, where surface units on their own may still show a significant impact.
The Japanese player can't have carriers everywhere, he hasn't established airfields, yet. Moreover, most Japanese player will be more aggressive than what's good for them. That means, most landings will only have an ill protection, as the Japs only have a handfull of BBs and CAs.
When I take the initiative in this moment, I can achieve great victories!
Moreover, in this stage of war, the Allied player has a lot of ships that are quite useless in my eyes. Gunboats without significant firepower and without DCs (and no DCs in further uprades). This ships will be used to divert attention and to delay the enemy.
If an unprotected landing has "retreat allowed", the TF will retreat even after the attack of a small gunboat with only 2 4in guns. Every single sysdamage I inflict may slow down the enemy ship, so later invasions take more time.
Moreover, this small ships can use up enemy ammunition and provide me with accurate intel.


So my intentions in particular:

China:
It seems that I have overwhelming forces there - I just have to use them. For the chinese troops, it will be the most important to have sufficiant supplies - which is nearly impossible to assure.
So the main goal for the first years can't be to throw out the Japs, it must be to get a stable front and to inflict damage to him. To achieve this, a shortening of the front is essential.
I intend to get a shorter front by immediate attacks on some positions while I'm willed to give up others. Allied airpower from china will be strengthend permanently, to inflict as much damage as possible to his supplies.

Western Front
I intend to stop the Japanese in Burma, but I'm prepared if he should try to invade India by sea.

Central Pacific
He can take as much as he wants! I will only try to stop him if I have sufficiant troops and supplies to be sure that I actually CAN stop him! It doesn't help me anything if I ship 3 US Divisions to the Fijis when I don't have enough Carriers and LBA to threten the KB that might show up to blockade the island. If this happens, he may ship in 6 Divisions that he keeps supplied well while mine starve to death and I'll finally have to take out at least some fragments for not loosing the whole units.
So If I decide to hold an Island, there'll be enough garrison that he will be without any serious chance.

Australia
Building airbases here and prepareing for a possible invasion.


First turn:
To avoid unnecassary losses, I've done sveral things like evacuationg Clark Field. It was totaly clear to me that he'll bomb it, so why letting him destroy a hundred planes there as my 40 fighters will never be able to stop them.
I've retreated the ships from PH but he managed to sink 2 BBs and 1 CL. I expect several additional losses the next round, as I've assigned a number of TFs that'll attack his landing forces.
More information will be provided as soon as I've talked with sid and I'm back at hime.

_____________________________

Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson

(in reply to Elladan)
Post #: 3
RE: Historiker(Allies) vs. El Cid (Jap) RHS-EBO NO SID! - 4/11/2008 5:52:07 PM   
Elladan

 

Posts: 298
Joined: 8/18/2005
From: Swindon, UK
Status: online
Interesting plans, could you share more details regarding Burma? What do you want to send there as reinforcements?
As for the Pacific islands I have to agree, not much to be gained from keeping them at all cost, later you will easily pick those needed and leave others as PoW camps for their garrisons.

(in reply to Historiker)
Post #: 4
RE: Historiker(Allies) vs. El Cid (Jap) RHS-EBO NO SID! - 4/11/2008 6:15:48 PM   
Historiker


Posts: 4714
Joined: 7/4/2007
From: Deutschland
Status: offline
I will do the same ugly thing again, that proved to be very succesfull in another PBEM that is in 12/42 now...
I will retreat to Mandalay to have the advantage of being behind a river. Mandalay will be reinforced by some Indian and Chinese units and usually will already have fortress 6-7 when the Japs arrives. If he sends in more, I can easily reinforce Mandalay from Calcutta with Transport planes or by land route if there's enough time.
The rest will stand ready for "Operation Cannae"...


< Message edited by Historiker -- 4/11/2008 6:16:55 PM >


_____________________________

Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson

(in reply to Elladan)
Post #: 5
RE: Historiker(Allies) vs. El Cid (Jap) RHS-EBO NO SID! - 4/11/2008 6:21:22 PM   
Historiker


Posts: 4714
Joined: 7/4/2007
From: Deutschland
Status: offline

quote:


As for the Pacific islands I have to agree, not much to be gained from keeping them at all cost, later you will easily pick those needed and leave others as PoW camps for their garrisons.

Yes, that's it!
If he wants Hawaii and reinforces it heavily - he may have it! There are dozends of other possibilitys to threaten the Home Islands without having to reconquer the islands. Let him conquer this islands, build up every airport and harbour to its maximum, expand the repair shipyards. If he wants, he may send 500 bombers and 500 fighters there together with 10 Divisions, so that reconquering would be extremely bloods...
If he wants, he can do so! Then he'll still have 10 Divisions and 1000 planes on Hawaii when Stars and Stripes fly over the Imperial Palace in Tokyo .
There are only 4 things that I won't let him conquer:
1. Whole India
2. Australia
3. The West Coast
4. Siberia
(5. China, but he won't be able to do so!)
He may try to get the rest...

_____________________________

Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson

(in reply to Elladan)
Post #: 6
RE: Historiker(Allies) vs. El Cid (Jap) RHS-EBO NO SID! - 4/14/2008 3:15:40 AM   
Historiker


Posts: 4714
Joined: 7/4/2007
From: Deutschland
Status: offline
12/8/41
Everything goes like expected!

PI
One of my "expandable" ships met an enemy... - and did it's job well!

Day Time Surface Combat at 44,48

Japanese Ships
ML Tsubame, Shell hits 5, and is sunk

Allied Ships
PG Moth





To slow the enemy down, some units were ordered northwards on Luzon - and the enemy didn't notice them to arrive:
Ground combat at San Fernando [PH]

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 9481 troops, 228 guns, 40 vehicles, Assault Value = 458

Defending force 15092 troops, 210 guns, 41 vehicles, Assault Value = 605

Japanese max assault: 376 - adjusted assault: 116

Allied max defense: 654 - adjusted defense: 179

Japanese assault odds: 0 to 1 (fort level 0)


Japanese ground losses:
766 casualties reported
Guns lost 27
Vehicles lost 4

Allied ground losses:
55 casualties reported
Guns lost 2

It prooved to be the right descision to evacuate Clark Field as the enemy tried to destroy our air power:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Angeles/Clark [PH] , at 43,51

Japanese aircraft
A6M2/Ki-65 Zeke x 92
G3M2/Ki-42 Nell x 53
G4M1/Ki-50 Betty x 79
Ki-48-I Lily x 30
Ki-21-II Sally x 17

No Japanese losses


Allied ground losses:
117 casualties reported
Guns lost 2
Vehicles lost 2

Airbase hits 3
Airbase supply hits 2
Runway hits 73


China
Chinese fighters engaged enemy planes - and performed quite good!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Changsha [S China] , at 45,37

Japanese aircraft
Ki-27/A5N2 Nate x 8
Ki-48-I Lily x 12
Ki-32/30 Mary/Ann x 10
Ki-46-II/C7M2 Dinah x 3

Allied aircraft
P-43A Lancer x 12

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-27/A5N2 Nate: 1 destroyed
Ki-32/30 Mary/Ann: 2 destroyed



Allied ground losses:
95 casualties reported
Guns lost 2

Airbase hits 1
Runway hits 11

Malaya
The RAF attacked an enemy TF off near Singapoore:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF at 24,49


Allied aircraft
Blenheim IV/Bolngbrk x 13
Brewster 339D/F2A x 5
Buffalo/F2A x 22
Vildebeest/Vincent x 20
Wirraway CA-1 x 6


Allied aircraft losses
Blenheim IV/Bolngbrk: 1 damaged
Vildebeest/Vincent: 1 destroyed, 1 damaged

Japanese Ships
ML Ayatosan Maru
ML Mogamigawa Maru, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage
ML Kasuga Maru
DM Hatsutaka

An enemy attack on the airfield of Singapore was intercepted by RAF and Dutch fighters, which managed to break through the fighter cover:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Singapore [UK] , at 22,51

Japanese aircraft
A6M2/Ki-65 Zeke x 7
G3M2/Ki-42 Nell x 49
G4M1/Ki-50 Betty x 2

Allied aircraft
Brewster 339D/F2A x 6
Buffalo/F2A x 20

Japanese aircraft losses
G3M2/Ki-42 Nell: 5 destroyed, 10 damaged

Allied aircraft losses
Brewster 339D/F2A: 2 destroyed
Buffalo/F2A: 1 destroyed

Runway hits 9


< Message edited by Historiker -- 4/14/2008 3:30:13 AM >


_____________________________

Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson

(in reply to Historiker)
Post #: 7
RE: Historiker(Allies) vs. El Cid (Jap) RHS-EBO NO SID! - 4/14/2008 3:18:48 AM   
Historiker


Posts: 4714
Joined: 7/4/2007
From: Deutschland
Status: offline
12/8/41
New Guinea + South Pacific
The Adelaide was ordered to attack - as this is a totally useless ship IMO - and it proved to be useless:
Day Time Surface Combat, near Lae [New Guinea] at 56,90

Japanese Ships
PC Ch 21 & Ch 22, Shell hits 4, on fire
AP Bangkok Maru, Shell hits 5, on fire
AP Saigon Maru, Shell hits 5, on fire

Allied Ships
CL Adelaide, Shell hits 2


Instead, the Pensacola which was detached to head for the enemy met some enemy ships landing troops on Tarawa:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Time Surface Combat, near Tarawa [Gilberts] at 84,95

Japanese Ships
DD Akatsuki, Shell hits 28, and is sunk
DD Hibiki, Shell hits 22, and is sunk
AV Kamoi, Shell hits 11, on fire, heavy damage
DM Tsugaru
AK Maebasi Maru
AK Mansei Maru
AK Matue Maru, Shell hits 3, on fire
AK Mito Maru
AK Tuyama Maru, Shell hits 1
AK Tyoko Maru
AK Yuri Maru

Allied Ships
CA Pensacola, Shell hits 9

Hawaii Area
I assigned several surface action TFs to attack enemy ships at the beaches where they are unloading troops. Each TF was assigned with 1CL and 4DD, the ships where choosen by their number of torpedoes. While I expect the enemy to be better in night battles, I hoped for some luck to surprise the enemy - and around 50 Torpedoes per TF might be enough even for BBs!

They performed as expected, but when the day came, some unliky ships were attacked and sunk by enemy airpower:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASW attack near Lahaina [Maui] at 115,73

Japanese Ships
SS I-5, hits 1, on fire

Allied Ships
DD Ralph Talbot
DD Mugford
DD Helm
DD Blue



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Time Surface Combat, near Lahaina [Maui] at 115,73

Japanese Ships
BB Fuso, Shell hits 4
BB Yamashiro, Shell hits 1
CL Jintsu, Shell hits 3
DD Uzuki, Shell hits 1
DD Kikuzuki, Shell hits 1
DD Yuzuki
DE Ootori
DE Kasasagi
DE Hiyodori
DE Hayabusa, Shell hits 1
DE Hato
DE Sagi, Shell hits 3, on fire, heavy damage
DE Kari
DE Kiji, Shell hits 2
BB Hyuga
BB Ise, Shell hits 2

Allied Ships
CL Helena, Shell hits 29, on fire, heavy damage
DD Blue, Shell hits 2
DD Helm, Shell hits 14, on fire, heavy damage
DD Mugford, Shell hits 1
DD Ralph Talbot, Shell hits 2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Time Surface Combat, near Lahaina [Maui] at 115,73

Japanese Ships
BB Fuso, Shell hits 6
BB Yamashiro, Shell hits 3
CL Jintsu, Shell hits 4, on fire, heavy damage
DD Uzuki, Shell hits 2
DD Kikuzuki
DD Yuzuki
DE Ootori
DE Kasasagi
DE Hiyodori, Shell hits 9, on fire, heavy damage
DE Hayabusa
DE Hato
DE Sagi, Shell hits 5, on fire, heavy damage
DE Kari
DE Kiji, on fire
BB Hyuga, Shell hits 3
BB Ise

Allied Ships
CL St. Louis, Shell hits 4
DD Case, Shell hits 2
DD Conyngham, Shell hits 6, Torpedo hits 2, and is sunk
DD Reid
DD Ward

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Time Surface Combat, near Lahaina [Maui] at 115,73

Japanese Ships
BB Fuso
BB Yamashiro, Shell hits 1
CL Jintsu, Shell hits 6, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
DD Uzuki, Shell hits 1
DD Kikuzuki
DD Yuzuki
DE Ootori
DE Kasasagi
DE Hiyodori, on fire, heavy damage
DE Hayabusa
DE Hato
DE Sagi, on fire, heavy damage
DE Kari
DE Kiji, on fire
BB Hyuga, Shell hits 1
BB Ise

Allied Ships
CL Honolulu, Shell hits 58, on fire, heavy damage
DD Tucker, Shell hits 27, and is sunk
DD Aylwin, Shell hits 2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Time Surface Combat, near Lahaina [Maui] at 115,73

Japanese Ships
BB Fuso
BB Yamashiro
CL Jintsu, on fire, heavy damage
DD Uzuki
DD Kikuzuki
DD Yuzuki
DE Ootori
DE Kasasagi
DE Hiyodori, on fire, heavy damage
DE Hayabusa
DE Hato
DE Sagi, on fire, heavy damage
DE Kari
DE Kiji, on fire
BB Hyuga
BB Ise

Allied Ships
DD Litchfield, Shell hits 35, and is sunk

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Time Surface Combat, near Lahaina [Maui] at 115,73

Japanese Ships
BB Fuso
BB Yamashiro
CL Jintsu, on fire, heavy damage
DD Uzuki
DD Kikuzuki
DD Yuzuki
DE Ootori
DE Kasasagi
DE Hiyodori, on fire, heavy damage
DE Hayabusa
DE Hato
DE Sagi, on fire, heavy damage
DE Kari
DE Kiji, on fire
BB Hyuga
BB Ise

Allied Ships
DD Chew, Shell hits 19, and is sunk

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Time Surface Combat, near Lahaina [Maui] at 115,73

Japanese Ships
BB Fuso
BB Yamashiro
CL Jintsu, on fire, heavy damage
DD Uzuki
DD Kikuzuki
DD Yuzuki
DE Ootori
DE Kasasagi
DE Hiyodori, and is sunk
DE Hayabusa
DE Hato
DE Sagi, on fire, heavy damage
DE Kari
DE Kiji, on fire
BB Hyuga
BB Ise

Allied Ships
DD Bagley, Shell hits 31, and is sunk


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF at 112,80

Japanese aircraft
B5M/B5N/Ki-47 Kate x 43

Japanese aircraft losses
B5M/B5N/Ki-47 Kate: 4 destroyed, 2 damaged

Allied Ships
DD Downes, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
CL Raleigh, Torpedo hits 3, on fire, heavy damage
DD Cassin, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage
DD Dewey


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF at 120,72

Japanese aircraft
A6M2/Ki-65 Zeke x 35
D3A2 Val x 47

Japanese aircraft losses
D3A2 Val: 3 destroyed, 3 damaged

Allied Ships
DD Reid
DD Ward, Bomb hits 3, on fire
CL St. Louis, Bomb hits 19, on fire, heavy damage


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF at 120,72

Japanese aircraft
A6M2/Ki-65 Zeke x 13
B5M/B5N/Ki-47 Kate x 22

Japanese aircraft losses
B5M/B5N/Ki-47 Kate: 4 destroyed, 1 damaged

Allied Ships
CL St. Louis, Torpedo hits 3, on fire, heavy damage
DD Case

< Message edited by Historiker -- 4/14/2008 3:34:10 AM >


_____________________________

Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson

(in reply to Historiker)
Post #: 8
RE: Historiker(Allies) vs. El Cid (Jap) RHS-EBO NO SID! - 4/14/2008 3:25:56 AM   
Historiker


Posts: 4714
Joined: 7/4/2007
From: Deutschland
Status: offline
Midway
After the Allied landings at Canton Island and in the Hawaiian Island, I expected that an enemy landing on Midway is eminent.
To respond on this, CAs from the CV-TF nearby were detached to patrol the sea around Midway while the Carrier itself was ordered in a position NE of Midway. As expected, the enemy tried to land - and only tried!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Time Surface Combat, near Midway Island [USA] at 97,63

Japanese aircraft
no flights

Japanese aircraft losses
E7K2 Alf: 1 destroyed

Japanese Ships
CL Sendai, Shell hits 47, and is sunk
DD Oite, Shell hits 4, on fire, heavy damage
DD Hayate, Shell hits 7, on fire
MSW W.11 & W.12
AP Yamatsuki Maru
AP Kiturin Maru
AP Nekka Maru
AP Kashiwara Maru
AP Kirishima Maru
AP Kumakawa Maru
AP Nichiryo Maru
AP Nissen Maru #2
AP Taiyo Maru
AP Terukuni Maru
AP Yamura Maru
AK Ryujin Maru
AK Takaosan Maru
AK Taki Maru
AK Tatuno Maru
AK Tenposan Maru
AK Terukawa Maru
AK Toyooka Maru
AK Udo Maru
AK Usa Maru
AK Yamamiya Maru

Allied Ships
CA Chicago, Shell hits 13, on fire
CA Astoria, Shell hits 8
DD Mahan, Shell hits 1
DD Drayton, Shell hits 5


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF at 98,62


Allied aircraft
F4F-3 Wildcat x 7
SB2U-2 Vindicator x 14
SBD-3/4 Dauntless x 33
TBD Devastator x 12


Allied aircraft losses
SB2U-2 Vindicator: 1 destroyed

Japanese Ships
AP Yamatsuki Maru, Bomb hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
AK Takaosan Maru, Bomb hits 2, on fire
AP Taiyo Maru
AK Udo Maru, Torpedo hits 2, on fire
AK Tenposan Maru
AK Taki Maru, Bomb hits 2, on fire, heavy damage
AK Toyooka Maru
AP Kashiwara Maru, Bomb hits 4, on fire, heavy damage
DD Hayate, Bomb hits 2, on fire, heavy damage
DD Oite, Bomb hits 5, on fire, heavy damage
AK Terukawa Maru, Bomb hits 1, on fire
AP Nissen Maru #2, Torpedo hits 1, on fire

Japanese ground losses:
372 casualties reported

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF at 98,62


Allied aircraft
F4F-3 Wildcat x 7
SB2U-2 Vindicator x 12
SBD-3/4 Dauntless x 32
TBD Devastator x 12


Allied aircraft losses
SBD-3/4 Dauntless: 1 damaged
TBD Devastator: 1 damaged

Japanese Ships
DD Hayate, Bomb hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
MSW W.11 & W.12, Bomb hits 3, on fire, heavy damage
AP Kashiwara Maru, on fire, heavy damage
AP Nissen Maru #2, Torpedo hits 1, on fire
AK Takaosan Maru, Bomb hits 3, on fire, heavy damage
AP Yamura Maru
AK Udo Maru, Bomb hits 2, on fire, heavy damage
AK Ryujin Maru, Bomb hits 1, on fire
AP Kirishima Maru, Bomb hits 2, on fire
AK Toyooka Maru, Bomb hits 2, on fire
AP Nekka Maru, Torpedo hits 1, on fire
AP Kiturin Maru, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage

Japanese ground losses:
351 casualties reported
Guns lost 2


After that defeat, the enemy fleet runs away and there's still no Japanese soldier on Midway!


_____________________________

Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson

(in reply to Historiker)
Post #: 9
RE: Historiker(Allies) vs. El Cid (Jap) RHS-EBO NO SID! - 4/15/2008 4:33:02 PM   
Historiker


Posts: 4714
Joined: 7/4/2007
From: Deutschland
Status: offline
Doctrines:

Gaining and keeping the Initiative
This is indeed my primary objective. Not the strength of the forces but the initiative is the key to victory. Japans army was by several numbers stronger than the US Army in 1945 - but the US had won the war.
Germanys navy was neglible by its size in WW2 - nevertheless, it was able to force the Britons in keeping most of their ships for years in Europe. Germany had the initiative in naval warfare as it was always Germanys descicion where to strike and the Britons had to react.
If you take the shere numbers, it seems to be impossible i.e. that the Hood was sunk and the PoW was badly damaged by the Bismarck. How can Germanys Navy with only 2 light BBs and one heavy BB (in this time) cause this damage?
Quite simple: The Britons had to react and so where unable to commit all their strength at once. Moreover, they had to split their forces as it was always unsknown where the enemy will be the next time.
So in the case of the Kriegsmarine vs. RN, only a few ships were able to tie much more enemy ships down.

Or take the central pacific. Japan has to decide: Put 5 Divisions on each of a few important islands or divert the troops? Whatever it does, it's lost as long as it hasn't the initiative. If he has fortified some islands too much, I will bypass them, if he had garrisoned all, he'll only delay me.
But if he had the initiative, he might strike my ships and avoid me gaining any more land; he can cut off my forward bases and do the same with me.

I hope this examples shows how important the initiative is. Having the initiative allows me to mass my ships up to a local superiority even if I'm inferior in total. Everytime I bombard a base, he'll have to think "Is he prepareing an invasion?"; "How can I permit him to do this again?"; "What can I do against his forces?"

Land warfare
Unfortunately, I'm not good in land warfare in witp, so I have to do the best I can while I can't expect wonders. In general - as already told - I prefer having the men surviving rather then letting them wiped out.
My doctrine is mobile warfare - as far as this is possible in witp and in the PTO - rather than a static defence doctrine. That means, I'm always willed to cede territory. To win the war, I don't intend to occupy territory. To win the war, I intend to destroy the enemy forces. Regarding this, you can expect me withdraw while it's not necessary(, yet). I work with war tactics and strategys - especially german warfare - for 17 years now, so I hope I've learned a little bit To achieve this goals, I will i.e. present him weak flanks to invite him to break through while I have strong forces in reserve to cut off the attackers - like Feldmarschall Erich von Manstein did in southern Russia in early 43.
So here again, I try to keep the initiative as much as possible...

Air warfare
I have the advantege to get my planes for free - with the big disadvantage that I don't have any control over the question what I get.
Moreover, I hate to give away still working planes, so I intend to use up as many pools as possible. But if I let I-153 fly against his A6M there's only one result: His pilots get trained. So if I let him face my obsolete planes, they will be used in ground attack or airfield attack role - or I intend to mass them so much, that the shere number is decicive.
Meanwhile, I intend to avoid totally unnecassry losses. As a result of that, I've evacuated Clark Field. Defending it is helpless and every plane there would be destroyed now - while after evacuating it, I had no losses. Sids comment was:
quote:

Brilliant - imaginitive - unique - no one ever does that - effective - heaps of praise for such a decision.

Hearing this from the always critical sid is something I like

Avoiding useless casualtys doesn't mean I'll do Sir Robin with all air groups and everywhere. The last day, Singapore was attacked by a huge number of bombers where I managed to shoot down 5 of them with only one own fighter lost to enemy escorts (the other two were destroyed on the airfield). Defending Singapore makes much more sense, as he can only fight my planes with Zeroes, which reduces the nomber I might face. Moreover, every damaged plane has to mage a very long run home, so the enemy will face significant higher ops losses than on attacks from Formosa on Clark!

As I'm going to recieve huge numbers of bombers which in most cases are never used (at least the experience from other gamges), I intend to react on that. That means, the "cheap" bombers will be used extensively - mainly to attack enemy industry and airfields. While I get my planes for free, he has to produce every one. So if I bomb some of his planes with my "cheap bombers", it's a success, even if I have significant losses. 5 useless planes lost in return of one usefull on is a success - at least if this 5 planes aren't shot down by fighters which recieve +20xp for every kill.

So here again, I intend to gain and keep the initiative - as my bombardement of singkawangs airfield on day two witch 50 bombers showed. He now is forces to send additional fighters to keep the inteded number of fighters free for LR-CAP or sweeps, as he is forced to defend his airfields!

Naval Warfare
Initiative is the key here, too! It's only of secondary importance how much ships you have, if you are willed to use the ships you DO have! To fight is the mission of every warship in war, so my ships will get that chance. I will not wait until he does something, my attack against his ships at Midway and Tarawa were examples for this, further attacks will follow in the next days.
Everytime I attack, I'll force him to react. This delays his own plans, this diverts his attention, this avoids offensive actions by him. So have the initiative at sea is even more important than at land or in the air.

Still, he has the huge advantege to sit in the middle of all fronts. While it takes me 3-6 month (including necassary repairs after long seatravels) to send carriers from the US West coast to India, he can move the KB from Pearl to the Street of Malacca within some weeks.

But you can expect to see me conducting several intruding missions, several shore bombardements, etc.

So while I am going to play an aggressive naval warfare, you mustn't expect me to be too greedy. For instance, I will retreat my carrier from Midway now instead of hunting down the enemy landing force.
Why? Well, if I were him, I would send my carriers in to get the Carrier. ATM, it's a huge victory, but if I loose the CV in 2 or 3 days, it will turn into a huge defeat. As the war will continue, I expect to get some more chances for every single ship to sink it. So: Don't be greedy if you've already achieved a huge victory.

< Message edited by Historiker -- 4/15/2008 4:41:16 PM >


_____________________________

Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson

(in reply to Historiker)
Post #: 10
Victory ad Midway - Enemy fleet runs away! - 4/15/2008 7:10:09 PM   
Historiker


Posts: 4714
Joined: 7/4/2007
From: Deutschland
Status: offline
The situation in china:
The green line including Nangchang shows the frontline I will agree to fall back if he forces me to. Nanchang is already under attack and I hope that I will take the city within the next week.
The blue line shows the citys that will get attacked after the Nanchang is conquered.
The orange line is the frontline I hope to achieve until late 42/mid 43
the red line shows Canton. My experience from CHS showed that its impossible to take the city, but as long as my troops are there, he can't attack from it northwards and the industry stands still - so its fine just to stay in there doing nothing




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Historiker -- 4/15/2008 7:11:07 PM >


_____________________________

Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson

(in reply to Historiker)
Post #: 11
RE: Victory ad Midway - Enemy fleet runs away! - 4/15/2008 7:17:55 PM   
Historiker


Posts: 4714
Joined: 7/4/2007
From: Deutschland
Status: offline
One example for my intend to keep the initiative - and a nasty surprise for Sid, I hope:






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Historiker -- 4/15/2008 7:19:59 PM >


_____________________________

Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson

(in reply to Historiker)
Post #: 12
RE: Victory ad Midway - Enemy fleet runs away! - 4/15/2008 7:20:59 PM   
Historiker


Posts: 4714
Joined: 7/4/2007
From: Deutschland
Status: offline
HMAS Adelaide also in offensive:





Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson

(in reply to Historiker)
Post #: 13
RE: Victory ad Midway - Enemy fleet runs away! - 4/15/2008 7:44:48 PM   
Historiker


Posts: 4714
Joined: 7/4/2007
From: Deutschland
Status: offline
Actual operations:

Burma:
I'm moving my troops to Mandalay to build up the city. ATM only the fortress gets built.

Malaya
No enemy landings here, but the enemy has put at least 9 units were put ashore in Singora. Despite having no troops on the peninsula, yet, I'm retreating my forces to Singapore. This is done to assure that the fortess gets built up ASAP. Moreover, it combines as much AAA as possible.
Later, I intend to evacuate all troops from the peninsula! Why? Well, if I leave them there, I will loose 1000 AV or more - just to buy half a month or a month of time. This troops will prove their worth much more elsewhere!

DEI
I started mining everything and the tankers start shipping oil to Perth and fuel to Darwin.
I started to combine my ships to form a powerful SAG against his surface forces. the last days, three BBs were bombarding Cagayan, so there'll be sufficiant targets and only the CVE-CG. The Kates on them only carry 250kg AP bombs, so no real threat to the BBs while the bombs are of course enough to endange Cruisers and destroyers. As Caga has fallen, I'm afraid there'll also be Bettys there, soon.

New Guinea
The enemy has landed on Biak, Hollandia, Kavieng, Lae, Buna and Rabaul. Enemy Paras were dropped at Kokoda and Sorong.
The HMAS Westralia, an AMC, is assigned to attack enemy shipping at Biak, the HMAS Adelaide already attacked the enemy at Lae and is now underway to Kavieng.
Two more CA, three CL and one DD will arrive in the Solomons in about 4 days. I hope Rabaul holds out long enough that he hasn't H6K there, yet. If it is so, I will attack his ships at Rabaul with the Cruiser TF.

Midway
The Lexingon leaves Midway while the cruisers will stay at the island for one to three more days. The Island itself will not be reinforced, as it's alone and with one strike the airfield will be closed. As I only have three CVs there atm, there's no chance to break throug an enemy blockade of the island if the KB shows up - so no wasting of ressources there.

Mawaii
Lanai. Lahaina and Kona have fallen to the enemy. The airfield wasn't closed, so there are 27 fighters ready to fight again. As the airfield is still very damaged, no bombers have started, yet - but as soon as they do, I'll start to close the enemy airfields where no enemy planes are on, yet. If I should achieve this, I'll think about trying to hold PH - otherwhise I'll think about evacuation the most important parts off the island.



ATTU
IMO one of the most nasty islands on the map for the japs! There's already a chain of possible airfields to the island, so even if he had taken it, it's possible to retake it under the cover of landbased planes. If attu is built up, even Honshu lies in the range of 4e-Bombers! So as soon as Umnak Island has an airfield and Dutch Harbour is fortified, I'll start building Attu up.
Having the island I have the perfect possibility to divert his attention by landing in the Kuriles. If he lets me do so, the Jap HI will be even more in danger, if not, he needs to have a strong garrison there which can't be elsewhere...

Again: trying to take the initiative there!

_____________________________

Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson

(in reply to Historiker)
Post #: 14
RE: Victory ad Midway - Enemy fleet runs away! - 4/15/2008 8:31:44 PM   
Historiker


Posts: 4714
Joined: 7/4/2007
From: Deutschland
Status: offline
I'm still wondering about how to make this AAR.

- For a Cuttlefish-design AAR, my english is way too bad and I lack the creativity. Moreover, I hate to copy... - especially when the copy is much worse than the original...
- For an AAR like Feinder oder Cap Mandrake write, I lake the knowledge in gfx-apps...
- A simple combat.txt is to primitive for me

So what to do?
- I might explain my tactics and strategy here like I already did.
- I might make a "propaganda-AAR", which exagerates and lies in a propably funny way. But for an AAR of that style, it would be better play the Japanese...

So if anyone is reading here and interested in an AAR by me: Suggestions?


_____________________________

Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson

(in reply to Historiker)
Post #: 15
RE: Victory ad Midway - Enemy fleet runs away! - 4/16/2008 11:28:30 AM   
Mistmatz

 

Posts: 1393
Joined: 10/16/2005
Status: offline
So far I'm happy with the style you started with.
No extensive combat reports, some pics along with situation analysis and discussion of plans is the way to go.

(in reply to Historiker)
Post #: 16
RE: Victory ad Midway - Enemy fleet runs away! - 4/16/2008 12:37:30 PM   
Monter_Trismegistos


Posts: 1358
Joined: 2/1/2005
From: Gdansk
Status: offline
Hi.

More details please. Where are you moving your units, and which ones.

_____________________________

Nec Temere Nec Timide
Bez strachu ale z rozwagą

(in reply to Mistmatz)
Post #: 17
RE: Victory ad Midway - Enemy fleet runs away! - 4/16/2008 1:10:35 PM   
Elladan

 

Posts: 298
Joined: 8/18/2005
From: Swindon, UK
Status: online
Combat records should be avoided methinks, give us an overview of actions, situation and plans for each area. Those doesn't have to be done on daily basis, weekly would be fine unless there is a lot happening there.

(in reply to Monter_Trismegistos)
Post #: 18
RE: Victory ad Midway - Enemy fleet runs away! - 4/16/2008 2:13:38 PM   
Historiker


Posts: 4714
Joined: 7/4/2007
From: Deutschland
Status: offline
Ok, at least someone's reading here

So I will explain the general ideas - as already done in wide parts. But Radoslaw, this will make it very difficult for us to play against each other, when you know so much about what I think of naval warfare
I will keep on showing the shortened combat reports of big battles, as "a huge battle happend" might not be as interesting as the actual results.
More accurate informations about the forces involved will be provided.

So more informations:

TF1 "DEI" (get's assigned atm)
BB Prince of Wales (on the way to meeting point)
BC de Zeven Provincien
BC Repulse (otw)
CA Houston
CA Exeter (otw)
CL Kijkduin
CL Boise
CL Danae (otw)
CL De Ruyter
CL Tromp
CL Eendracht (otw)
CL Dragon (otw)
CL Durban (otw)
around 30 Destryers

Additional forces on the way but with an eta of +5 days:
CA Cornwall
CL Glasgow
CL Ceres
CL Colombo
CL Capetown
CL Dauntless

So 1BB, 2BC, 3CA and 13CL in total!
These forces will engage enemy ships - the 3 BBs in the area prefered - in the Celebs or Sulu sea


TF2 "ANZNF" not formed yet, but ships under way
CA Louisville
CA Pensacola (under way from Tarawa)
CA Canberra
CL Perth
CL Leander
CL Achilles
DD Le Triomphant

This TF will operate against enemy shipping at Rabaul and in the Solomon Sea


CA Portland will hit Wake Island this night. ATM, there are still enemy forces, but I don't know wheter the enemy warships are still there (my primary target as the APs and AKs will already have unloaded most of their freight.


Other surface elements are on their way to the Aleutians, to protect the area against possible enemy invasions. I've already written how important I consider Attu Island to be.

< Message edited by Historiker -- 4/16/2008 2:16:52 PM >


_____________________________

Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson

(in reply to Elladan)
Post #: 19
RE: Victory ad Midway - Enemy fleet runs away! - 4/16/2008 8:39:56 PM   
Historiker


Posts: 4714
Joined: 7/4/2007
From: Deutschland
Status: offline
Turn 3

PG Moth, one of my "useless ships", was used to attack the enemy fleet at San Fernando. After sinking an enemy ML, I took her for recon not expecting she would survive the night.
This gave me the accurate information that there are 4 CA and eight DDs

AVD Childs was at Jolo on an ASW mission to attack the sub that was detected there two days ago. At night, the enemy fleet from Cagayan went in to bombard Jolo and sank the ship. So while ths ship is lost, he brings his BB closer and closer to TF1

The CA Indianapolis with 5 DMS attacked an enemy ML at Canton Island and sank it

As expected, the CA Portland surprised him totally and sank an enemy AV and DE at Wake. If I manage to do some more missions like this, it will make him very uncertain where my ships may appear.

At Hawaii, he sank some survivors of the previous battles which were already nearly sinking. Also, only CLs and DDs which were already written off, so nothing to concern about!

The AMCs Manoora and Kanimbla bombarded Sinkawang. Strange, because I was absolutley sure that I ordered the Kanimbla to head for Brunai. Strange...

Several enemy TFs unloaded troops at Midway. This is VERY disappointing, as I left the two CAs and two DDs to intercept such an attempt. I don't know why they didn't attack, perhaps they were docked? Anyway, over 130 enemy AV now on the Island, so it'll be lost in some days.

The enemy attacked several airfields - as expected - and met neither opposition NORE planes! I do what every soldier knows: If you have revealed your position to the enemy: change it!

The enemy attacked both Rangoon and Singapore. Unfortunately, even the AVG showed no good performance despite my planes were even higher in numbers! At Singapore, he swept in and shot down a huge nomber while loosing only a few. Not so good, I guess I'll retreat both or reinforce them.

_____________________________

Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson

(in reply to Historiker)
Post #: 20
RE: Victory ad Midway - Enemy fleet runs away! - 4/17/2008 10:20:45 AM   
Historiker


Posts: 4714
Joined: 7/4/2007
From: Deutschland
Status: offline
Diplomatic message from the Japanese Foreign Minister arrived in Moskow:
quote:

We have a problem.

There are multiple sightings of ANT-3 patrol planes in the Bohei Gulf/Yellow Sea area.

This must mean these aircraft are overflying Korea, or possibly Manchukuo - a violation
of sovereignty.

Given the nature of patrol missions (in code anyway) it also means that there WILL be hits
on ships and submarines - acts of war.

While recon flights are tolerated - if limited in number - patrol flights (which are much less limited
in number) - are not tolerated. Doubly so when they must overfly territory.

Japanese patrol planes do not overfly Soviet territory. Further - they do not attempt to search
the Sea of Othosk north of the Japanese/Soviet border on Sakhalin Island.

In addition to this, Japanese patrols are carefully range limited so that a submarine may pass undetected and unmolested between Vladivostok and Suchan, or between ports in the Northern part of the Sea of Othosk. OTHER voyages - between Suchan and Sakhalin - or any point in the main Soviet Far East and Petropavlovsk - would be facilitated upon notice - that is NO submarine patrols would fly on the dates requested - provided this did not become abusive in frequency or as a door for US operations.

We expect the USSR to honor its non-aggression pact with Japan. [IRL it did - and it gave formal notice the agreement would not be renewed on schedule in 1945 a few months before it expired - as required by the treaty]

Direct the Soviet Naval Air Forces to cease such operations immediately. Further violations - even one more violation on one more day - will be interpreted as a technical state of war requiring some sort of response. [Presumably the ANT-3 unit will have to be killed at a minimum] We do not wish to see hostilities in this area - but violation of territorial integrity are in fact hostilities.

Your call.

The Japanese Foreign Minister (Togo)


The Soviet answer:

quote:

To Minister Togo,

After your unprovoced acts of war against the United States, the Soviet Union is concerend a lot about your aims.
Japan has not only signed the Anitkominternpakt in 1935, your country also formed an official alliance with Germany and Italy, the Tripacte. Both nations started their unprovoced aggression against our country and German troops are only a few kilometers from our capital.
Now, Japan also started an unprovoked war against the United States without even declaring war - as well as Germany did in June against our country.
Japan has showed its ambitions to take Soviet and Mongolian territory at Changkufeng in 1938 and in 1939 at Chalchin Gol. We have informations that your generals speak open about their ambitions to create a northern empire in Siberia.
Concerning this as well as your attacks on the members of the komintern, the Soviet Republic of China puts our forces in high altert.
Our recon flights are simply for selfprotections as you've showed your aggressive ambition against the peacful workers- and peasents state.
Be advised:
Any aggression against us or our allies will result in an immediate response in full retaliation with our armed forces. Japan must never expect the Soviet Union to be weakend, just because the Fashist Germany has taken a little of our territory. We are ready to respond on every single act of aggression!

Wjatscheslaw Michailowitsch Molotow,
People's Commisar for Foreign Affairs


_____________________________

Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson

(in reply to Historiker)
Post #: 21
RE: Victory ad Midway - Enemy fleet runs away! - 4/17/2008 2:24:23 PM   
Elladan

 

Posts: 298
Joined: 8/18/2005
From: Swindon, UK
Status: online
Well, in my opinion you should limit your patrols, unless provoking a Russo-Japanese war is your intention.

(in reply to Historiker)
Post #: 22
RE: Victory ad Midway - Enemy fleet runs away! - 4/17/2008 2:33:22 PM   
Historiker


Posts: 4714
Joined: 7/4/2007
From: Deutschland
Status: offline
It will be limited, but I can't deny that I would like to provoce a war!
However, this would be against Sid's intentions of the mod. I should keep it realistic and have already done some things he doesn't like. To provoce a war with Japan when Germany is 30km away from Moscow isn't what can be called realistic!
Maybe in late 43 or mid 44, but defentily not now - this is far beyond everything what's possible...


_____________________________

Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson

(in reply to Elladan)
Post #: 23
RE: Victory ad Midway - Enemy fleet runs away! - 4/17/2008 3:06:19 PM   
Monter_Trismegistos


Posts: 1358
Joined: 2/1/2005
From: Gdansk
Status: offline
What is the size of Vladivostok? When it reaches size 10 don't forget to start lying defensive minefields using your L-class submarines. Also you should have few Shch-class submarines patroling hexes adjanced to your bases. And run regular cruises between Soviet and US ports for supply, using Soviet AK and TK - as it was done historically.



< Message edited by Monter_Trismegistos -- 4/17/2008 3:08:34 PM >


_____________________________

Nec Temere Nec Timide
Bez strachu ale z rozwagą

(in reply to Historiker)
Post #: 24
RE: Victory ad Midway - Enemy fleet runs away! - 4/17/2008 3:21:35 PM   
Historiker


Posts: 4714
Joined: 7/4/2007
From: Deutschland
Status: offline
I'm not sure how big the size is, but It was about 8, I guess.
I mined the base south of Vladivostok last turn with the DMs and sent all fighters on LR-CAP over them. I already planned to supply SIberia from the US and if he should attack such a convoy or one of the mining operations, I will retaliate against the airfield - which should be realistic if it was a serious attack (so not 5 bombers scoring no hits).
In this case, it's up to him how he reacts

About the sub-patrols... I'm not sure. I can't order "just selfdefense" (which I hope to see in AE or at least witp 2 somewhen), so it might happen that my subs attack one of his ships first - and then? They may have been at sea, but would they be allowed to attack Japanese shipping? Never! So maybe I declare a zone of souvereignty 1 hex from my coast, but I can't do more.

I would like to have Russia at war to be able to fight with the russian fighters too - which I haven't done yet.

Anyway, I really intend to honor Sid's rules to keep it realistic. So it will not be the Soviet union that provoces war in the next two years...


_____________________________

Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson

(in reply to Monter_Trismegistos)
Post #: 25
RE: Victory ad Midway - Enemy fleet runs away! - 4/17/2008 6:13:09 PM   
Monter_Trismegistos


Posts: 1358
Joined: 2/1/2005
From: Gdansk
Status: offline
Thats what I was talking about - claim territorial waters and eradicate all intruders. Even if this is still peacetime you must be prepared to suprising landings on your coast. Also you can send supply from US - using Soviet vessels - this was done historically. Soviets had guaranteed by Japan "channels" to move their ships unattacked.

_____________________________

Nec Temere Nec Timide
Bez strachu ale z rozwagą

(in reply to Historiker)
Post #: 26
RE: Victory ad Midway - Enemy fleet runs away! - 4/17/2008 6:49:28 PM   
Historiker


Posts: 4714
Joined: 7/4/2007
From: Deutschland
Status: offline
I'm at home again...
Vladivostok is at 8/8/3 and I expand all three atm (1/1/11% after two days, so expanding quite fast). Sid wants a realistic game, so it's quite unlikely that he'll attack me unless most of continental Asia is already in his hands - and I'm pretty sure I'll be able to permit this. Nevertheless, I'm going to prepare myself, that can't be wrong!


_____________________________

Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson

(in reply to Monter_Trismegistos)
Post #: 27
RE: Victory ad Midway - Enemy fleet runs away! - 4/18/2008 10:21:53 AM   
Historiker


Posts: 4714
Joined: 7/4/2007
From: Deutschland
Status: offline
Ok, I finally have the turn...

I now ask myself, whether or how much it can be agreed with Sids rules to evacuate the Malaya Peninsula? I know the Japs are stronger - so my Generals know that, too. But giving up or weakening the defense of the "Gibraltar of the East"? If I play "like they would have done", I would have had to let the Force Z attack, too - and I would have to reinforce Singapore instead of preparations to evacuate it!

_____________________________

Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson

(in reply to Historiker)
Post #: 28
Soviet Union declares zone of permittet access! - 4/18/2008 3:23:15 PM   
Historiker


Posts: 4714
Joined: 7/4/2007
From: Deutschland
Status: offline
quote:

To Minister Shigenori Tōgō,

as the situation in Asia is heating up, our peacful nation has to prepare itself against any unprovoced aggression. We have to protect our peaceloving citizens against any surprise attack and so have to permit every foreign espionage or unopposed apprioaching to our coasts. To secure our shores, the Soviet Union declares a zone of permitted access. Within this zone of 120 miles [=2 hex] off our coast, any foreign ship is forbidden to enter. This does even count for Fishing Boats and Aircraft. This zone will be established with the 15th of Dezember 1941.
Both Red Fleet and Red Air Force will control this zone and attack any suspects found in it.

Yours respectfully,

Wjatscheslaw Michailowitsch Molotow,
People's Commisar for Foreign Affairs

With the 15th, I will start mining the shores, assign the PT-boats, form Sub patrols... Shikuka on Sakhalin is entered from the east, so this should be no problem.

I'm really curious how the Empire of Japan reacts on this.



Other news:
I reinforced Singapore with every Dutch fighter available and hope that they perform better, if he attacks again.
A group of B-17 was ordered to Palembang and will attack the aircraft engine production at Saigon.
Most Bombers in the DEI are on ASW duty, but still no hit
Two PGs in the PI were ordered to attack unprotected (at least if the intel is correct) landing fleets. Let's see what their two 6in guns can do.

More interesting:
TF 1001, a SAG is ordered from Belikpapan to Tarakn. It consists of:
BB Prince of Wales
BC Repulse
BC de Zeven Provencien
CA Houston
CA Exeter
CL Eendracht
CL Kjkduin
CL De Ruyter
CL Tromp
CL Danae
CL Dragon
CL Durban
CL Marblehead
CL Boise
and 11 Destroyers
This force has a Gun Value of 9.153, an AAA of 3851, 206 Torps and 48 ASW. It will stand read to attack the enemy SAG/Bombardement fleet which seems to head for Davao on Mindanao to bombard the 101st Phillipine Division. This force is reported to be formed of 3BB 5CA and 2 CL. If it turns to Jolo or Borneo again, we'll try to intercept them! :)


_____________________________

Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson

(in reply to Historiker)
Post #: 29
RE: Historiker(A) vs. El Cid (J) RHS-EBO NO SID! - 4/21/2008 9:53:16 AM   
Historiker


Posts: 4714
Joined: 7/4/2007
From: Deutschland
Status: offline
Solomons:
The CL Adelaide was ordered for Kavieng and met 2 CA, 2CL and 6DD. As it was even surprised, it sank after 4 Torpedo hits and 12 shell hits. Doesn't mind, this ship was quite useless anyway: slow, weak armement, neglible AAA and no furture upgrades...
But even as it's lost, It did a good job: It showed that the force there is just at the right size for the Cruisers I'm sending there. If he leaves them there longer, I may be able to engage him.

Pearl Harbour
My PTs attacked an enemy SAG with 4 BBs, 2CL and some DDs. In the first attempt, one (group of 3 PTs) was sunk, in the second, DD Akbono was hit by a Torpedo and is heavy damaged. In a third attack, one more PT was sunk while one was heavy damaged.
Two air attacks on the airfield of Laihana met 36 A6M and 23 Me109. He lost none while I lost 2B-17, 11 Bolos, 3 Dauntless and 3 P-40B. BAD! I guess I'll order them for Naval attack from now on, as I can't break his CAP withour open the skies over PH, my vital Airbase.
How important the CAP over PH is showed an attack by him, wehn 46 Zeros and 6 Vals attacked (I guess the airfield). They were intercepted by 1F4F, 1P-36 and 10 P-40B.
I lost 3 P-40B, he 4 Vals with no hits scored.
To free P-40B I upgraded a P-40B unit at Pearl to P-400. Despite its loudicrous max alt, it seems to be a fine fighter. If he attacks unter 14500 ft, the P-400s will be able to engage him.

DEI/PI
His subs put a huge number of torpedoes into several ships - but all only AKs, so I don't care too much.
Two attacks on two enemy APs at Omoc by PG Asheville which prooved to be ineffective despite one "Japanese naval force is surprised". Only one on fire, non heavy damaged. But anyway, the sysdamage will make them slower, so the PG did it's job.
His heavy SAG seems to head for Palau to refuel and to load new ammo but he still has a serious SAG at Cagayan with several CAs and perhaps one BB (but this might also be the CVE-group as the recon says 1 CV)
I'm afraid he already has Bettys at Cagayan, so I can't go there directly with my big SAG.

Indochina/Malaya
6 of my B-17 hit Saigon facing no opposition. The Ha-101 engine factory is hit once. This isn't anything to mention about, as the damage is not more than 1000 supplies, but I guess he'll keep some of his fighters for CAP now. So the Goals taking initiative and divert his attention was fully achieved.
Over Singapore, 16 British Brewsters, 16 Dutch Buffalos, 3 CV-21B and 3 DEI Hawk 75 engaged 30 attacking A6M2 and 21 Ki-21 II. The battle was a disaster:
for 3 A6M2 and 3 Ki-21, 17 fighters and 2 TBs were destroyed in air and on ground. This forces me to retreat my planes.
At Singapore, my tactics are inspired by this: http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=FbiJEy3JH74

Midway
He managed to land several more troops on the Island - and again, my SAG did NOTHING! I don't understand why, but I will consequently retreat it, now. It's a wonder that no enemy CV as already appeared, so he wont get the chance if he decides to send one, now.
The new troops made a shock attack and showed that he has 146AV against my 40 - so the island is lost. The attack failed, but that won't change anything.

China
My force in Canton was attacked by him. with 492 he attacked my 520 AV and he got 154 assault against 1501. The city hex works for mee, too He lost 1800 men and 28 guns, while I lost only 70/3.
An attack on some of his forces near Shanghai failed, he lost 288/3, I lost 2900/97!
At Nanchang, this happened:
Ground combat at Nanchang [C China]

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 39385 troops, 415 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 1505

Defending force 43209 troops, 343 guns, 64 vehicles, Assault Value = 739

Allied max assault: 1296 - adjusted assault: 431

Japanese max defense: 453 - adjusted defense: 452

Allied assault odds: 0 to 1 (fort level 3)


Japanese ground losses:
337 casualties reported
Guns lost 9

Allied ground losses:
1016 casualties reported
Guns lost 50
Additional forces are on their way, I hope I'll be able to conquer the city.

Alaska/Aleutians
I begin shipping engineers to the Aleutians to fortify this important area

The situation in china:



Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Historiker -- 4/21/2008 10:39:54 AM >


_____________________________

Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson

(in reply to Historiker)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> After Action Reports >> Historiker(A) vs. El Cid (J) RHS-EBO NO SID! Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.171