Standardized Artwork Set

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
User avatar
Don Bowen
Posts: 5177
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Georgetown, Texas, USA

Standardized Artwork Set

Post by Don Bowen »


A few days ago, in a thread on mods, Mike Wood posted that the main problem with mods was the lack of a consistent artwork set. His post actually concerned CHS but is probably valid for just about any mod.

He's right! I feel this way myself and I've heard this opinion stated many times, but never so succinctly or by a person of such universal esteem. It is indeed unpleasant to see a combat resolution screen with widely different styles of ship artwork.

So, I’d like to propose a Standardized Artwork Project to all the artists on the forum. These guys have provided us with tons of excellent artwork but, alas, of different styles and scales. Now I’d like to ask them to come together and help build a single, complete set of ship artwork that is compatible with the original “stock” artwork.

1. Same general style as stock.
2. Same approximate scale (4 feet per pixel) – some increase for smaller ships but only a little. A smaller ship should look smaller.

Also a consistent set of backgrounds but also a “blank” for each ship side so players can use other backgrounds. The goal is to have a homogeneous artwork set that will contain images for the major mods and “look good together”.

If you’d like to participate, please post in this thread or PM me.

Oh, and the rules:
1. This is a project of the forum members, not of Matrix Games.
2. I am doing this in the role of a WITP player only.
3. All artwork become “community property” and may be freely shared by all players.
4. Pure democracy (of team members) will be used to determine which artwork is included.




User avatar
KDonovan
Posts: 1157
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 12:52 am
Location: New Jersey

RE: Standardized Artwork Set

Post by KDonovan »

cool!!! any plans to standardize the plane tops and sides also??
Image
Akos Gergely
Posts: 733
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2004 1:22 pm
Location: Hungary, Bp.
Contact:

RE: Standardized Artwork Set

Post by Akos Gergely »

I'm second to this and it is a very good idea Don! But please please at least for the ship art provide us with some larger ship side art panels to work with!

It'd be so much easier if we have some larger area to work with, just as it was posted by Cobra aus in an older thread. It is easily possible.

Also a second suggestion is to include separate art for upgraded ships as well, because for example USS Tennessee looked very much differently in her 1941 state compared to the 1944 one...and I'm not even talking about her 1942 with reduced main mast.

Please consider these and yes, I'm willing to participate in this!

Cheers,

Akos
User avatar
Dixie
Posts: 10303
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 3:14 pm
Location: UK

RE: Standardized Artwork Set

Post by Dixie »

I'm willing to participate.  Would the project have the sides and the shil files scaled, or just the shils for the combat screens?
[center]Image

Bigger boys stole my sig
User avatar
JWE
Posts: 5039
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 5:02 pm

RE: Standardized Artwork Set

Post by JWE »

I too would be very happy to contribute.

My efforts have been directed towards the "other" vessels; AK, AP, AR, AE, AV, AGP, AVD, AS, PC, PG, ML, etc... My scaling has been at a standard 4 feet per pixel for those vessels large enough to give detail at that scale, but at about 350' and below, I use a dynamic sliding scale factor that allows detail but maintains relative proportionality. I can put this into a scale factor graph and post it for others to use if they wish.

I suggest those of us who want to put this together PM each other liberally. IMHO, we should begin with a stock art set replacement. From that beginning, we can then provide as many enhancements or add-ons as desired. I get the sense that the vast majority of players don't go in too much for the many and various mods, but use stock; they would just appreciate some tastier eye candy. So if we can do a standard art set first, it would provide a substantial basis for the modders.

Thoughts?

JWE
Big B
Posts: 4633
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 5:41 pm
Location: Cali
Contact:

RE: Standardized Artwork Set

Post by Big B »

Yo,

I'm in.
User avatar
BigJ62
Posts: 1132
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2002 9:53 am
Location: Alpharetta, Georgia
Contact:

RE: Standardized Artwork Set

Post by BigJ62 »

Plane sides and plane tops that match.

Slightly larger ship backgrounds for small ships, leave shils alone. Sub, pt, pc, pg, msw or whatever anything really small.

Get rid of plain blue background and replace with something a little more interesting.
Witp-AE
AeAi…AeAi …AeAi…Long live AeAi.
User avatar
argaur
Posts: 277
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 9:41 am
Location: Spain

RE: Standardized Artwork Set

Post by argaur »

For plane sides/tops could also be done, with 2 scales, one for fighters and other for bombers, transports....?
Image
"... tell the Emperor that I am facing Russians.
If they had been Prussians, I'd have taken the
position long ago."
- Marshal Ney, 1813
User avatar
Don Bowen
Posts: 5177
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Georgetown, Texas, USA

RE: Standardized Artwork Set

Post by Don Bowen »

Happy to see such interest. Some quick answers

The original intent was ship sides but adding aircraft is an excellent idea.

I'm afraid the size of the ship backgroups and therefore overall size of the ships are fixed. I'm not familar with Peter's work on changing sizes but I think it would be a big problem for screen sizes and layouts.

We already have the ability to create different ship side images for different refits - as long as each refit is defined as a class in the class table. Some limitations, as there are 2000 classes and only 1000 ship sides. I don't think anyone has hit this limit yet, but it is out there.

It is most important to have the shils scaled as these are the ones that appear together on the combat reports. My personal preference would be to scale the sides also, but that would be up to the team.

JWE, Big B, glad to have you aboard.

csatahajos, Dixie, BigJ62, (and Beren, who posted while I was typing) I hope you decide to join.

P.S. I'm going to pin this thread to the top.

User avatar
TheElf
Posts: 2792
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 1:46 am
Location: Pax River, MD

RE: Standardized Artwork Set

Post by TheElf »

ORIGINAL: Beren

For plane sides/tops could also be done, with 2 scales, one for fighters and other for bombers, transports....?

This is not possible in under the current code and from what I understand even re-coding it would not be worth the effort. Scale will have to be handled by the individual artist.
IN PERPETUUM SINGULARIS SEDES

Image
User avatar
TheElf
Posts: 2792
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 1:46 am
Location: Pax River, MD

RE: Standardized Artwork Set

Post by TheElf »

ORIGINAL: BigJ62

Plane sides and plane tops that match.

Slightly larger ship backgrounds for small ships, leave shils alone. Sub, pt, pc, pg, msw or whatever anything really small.

Get rid of plain blue background and replace with something a little more interesting.

Matching planesides and tops, while nice to have, requires a lot of coordination and for one person is a big job.

The easiest thing to do would be to match the sides to the tops.
IN PERPETUUM SINGULARIS SEDES

Image
User avatar
argaur
Posts: 277
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 9:41 am
Location: Spain

RE: Standardized Artwork Set

Post by argaur »

the sides i think could be done, like the ships, for example X meters lenght in reality = x pixels....
Image
"... tell the Emperor that I am facing Russians.
If they had been Prussians, I'd have taken the
position long ago."
- Marshal Ney, 1813
User avatar
Don Bowen
Posts: 5177
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Georgetown, Texas, USA

RE: Standardized Artwork Set

Post by Don Bowen »


So, Beren, are you going to step forward and take the King's Shilling from the drumhead??
User avatar
argaur
Posts: 277
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 9:41 am
Location: Spain

RE: Standardized Artwork Set

Post by argaur »

i´m studying now for exams at the university, i have no time, but in a motnh i can start doing things. Now i can only do some sides....

But i´m sure that more people can start sides with me....
Image
"... tell the Emperor that I am facing Russians.
If they had been Prussians, I'd have taken the
position long ago."
- Marshal Ney, 1813
User avatar
Don Bowen
Posts: 5177
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Georgetown, Texas, USA

And Aircraft Too!

Post by Don Bowen »


There's interest in extending the project to aircraft as well. A wonderful idea.

Ian has stepped forward and agreed to lead an air art team. We all know his excellent artwork and it's great to have him aboard.

Between stock and the various mods there are a large number of aircraft artwork sets out there. More, unfortunately, than can be put into a single panel of 248. Perhaps the best thing would be to create a basic library - all same scale and general style - that can be used as required. Then build panels for stock and the mods. Speaking purely as a player, the most important thing seems to be scaling. Remember stock and it's giant P-26s that were as big as a B-17?

So come on guys - I know there are a number of guys doing great aircraft art. Join up!

User avatar
JWE
Posts: 5039
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 5:02 pm

RE: Standardized Artwork Set

Post by JWE »

Beren, and anyone else who is interested,

We have two conflicting imperatives for the ship graphics; these follow from the box rule of a 200 ‘dot’ graphic picture width. One is to have the pictures ‘generally’ in proportion with one another, the other is to have sufficient detail for the dinkies (80 foot PTs etc). If we follow a strictly linear rule, this may, on the one hand, leave the PTs as a small gray blur on the background. On the other hand, if the scale were to give detail to the PTs, it would put a Porter in the same size (pixel) class as a New Orleans CA.

I have noticed that the great majority of interesting vessels fall in the 350’ to 780’ range. Thus, I propose a dynamic scale. 4 feet per pixel seems to work down to the destroyer classes, but begins to unravel for Clemsons, Wickes, Otoris, DEs, and especially PGs, PCs, MLs, and the like. I have also noticed that the odd ducks seem to cluster at about 80 to 90 pixels, relative. This is also (80 to 90) a reasonable scale for detail.

What I propose is a sliding scale; one scale for vessels between 80’ to 300’; a second scale for 300’ to 400’; a standard scale (4’ per pixel) for 400’ to about 760-780’, and a final by-guess-and-by-golly scale for the monsters. This method tends to compress the PC, PG, DE, and smaller DDs into the 86 to 90 pixel range.

The math goes like this, where “y” is the length of the ship in pixels (bit map blocks):

Y = (ship LOA)/8 + 44, for all ships up to about 350’
Y = (ship LOA)/6 + 32, for ships between 350’ and 400’
Y = (ship LOA)/4, for ships between 400’ and 760’ (std 4’ per pixel)
Y = (ship LOA)/6 + 64, for ships over 760’ (to a max of 820’)

This will give an 80’ PT at 54 pixels (not too bad) and a Yorktown with ‘some’ space fore and aft. I haven’t paid much attention to the top end, since my concern has been models of those ships in the 300’ to 500’ range, but I can refine the graph very easily. I can’t upload the graph (wrong format), but I can modify with the appropriate math input. I would appreciate comments. We should finalize this and cast it in stone for our project. Fewmets and rotten vegetables accepted.

JWE
User avatar
TheElf
Posts: 2792
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 1:46 am
Location: Pax River, MD

RE: And Aircraft Too!

Post by TheElf »

Right,
I would not suggest a gnat's ass scale approach to the planesides. The tops are nearly impossible to get to a representative scale given the limited space we have, but I found an eyeball cal was possible.

It think it is more important to have an image that is a blending of some appropriate scale and the highest level of detail. More to the point is we are sticklers for scale then assuming our largest subject is the B-29 (which should fill the canvas), then our smallest subject, the P-26 will only be about 10 pixels long!

If scale for the sides is absolutely necessary: We just want to give the impression of scale. My suggestion for the sides would be to use the space available to you. That is don't worry so much about the pixel to foot ratio and focus on getting the Bombers in scale with bomber and fighters in scale with fighters. They will never appear on the screen together, so this compromise his few downsides.

Let's start with Identifying the largest A/C of each type, Heavy bomber, Medium Bomber, and Fighter. Then create the side for each. From that first bomber you can use that as a reference when scaling the rest of them
IN PERPETUUM SINGULARIS SEDES

Image
User avatar
argaur
Posts: 277
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 9:41 am
Location: Spain

RE: And Aircraft Too!

Post by argaur »

Yes, as i said before in plane sides for me the best option is to divide in 2 scales :

1.-fighters/dive bombers/ torpedo bombers/ float planes... (one engine, or 2 enginees pro p38 and so...)
2.-bombers/transports/float planes.... (2 or more engines...)

Image
"... tell the Emperor that I am facing Russians.
If they had been Prussians, I'd have taken the
position long ago."
- Marshal Ney, 1813
User avatar
JWE
Posts: 5039
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 5:02 pm

RE: And Aircraft Too!

Post by JWE »

Sounds like Beren and brother Elf have the planes under control.

I'll volunteer to work on the ship art. I'm back-channeling with BigB; we may be relatively close with what we have currently. Just need to check on what's missing from our current combination.

JWE
Akos Gergely
Posts: 733
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2004 1:22 pm
Location: Hungary, Bp.
Contact:

RE: And Aircraft Too!

Post by Akos Gergely »

Air guys, please do not forget that there is already a fairly uniform set from [size="-1"]Cathartes [/size]and they are absolutely nice, not to mention that he did already two versions, an early war and a mid war one, and hopefully he will give us a late war one.

So as for the sides I think it would me wasted work to duplicate that.

You can check it here: http://mathubert.free.fr/witp_files/All ... 0.zip 
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”