Matrix Games Forums

Players compare Ageods Civil War to Civil War IIDeal of the week - An updated War in the East goes half Price!Sign up for the Qvadriga beta for iPad and Android!Come and say hi at Pax and SaluteLegends of War goes on sale!Piercing Fortress Europa Gets UpdatedBattle Academy Mega Pack is now availableClose Combat: Gateway to Caen Teaser TrailerDeal of the Week Alea Jacta EstDeal of the Week Alea Jacta Est
Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Proposal for CHS - Remove the Zero bonus. Any opinions?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> RE: Proposal for CHS - Remove the Zero bonus. Any opinions? Page: <<   < prev  21 22 23 24 [25]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Proposal for CHS - Remove the Zero bonus. Any opini... - 12/27/2005 11:42:14 PM   
Big B


Posts: 4065
Joined: 6/1/2005
From: Not there! - There!
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Redd

I bought my copy about 5 or 6 months ago and it came with 1.5 installed. Haven't bothered to upgrade to 1.6 yet. I don't like patching either. I always end up with a corrupted file or something . Although I did just get DSL so maybe I should try it out now......




1.5 installed!!!???

Hmmmm I better check my basic version

(in reply to Redd)
Post #: 721
RE: Proposal for CHS - Remove the Zero bonus. Any opini... - 5/16/2012 1:20:47 PM   
Lanconic

 

Posts: 260
Joined: 7/1/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bradley7735

This response isn't directed to Honda in particular, but all of you who think Mdiehl is nuts.

He's the only one who is producing actual facts to back up his opinion. I haven't seen anyone who thinks the Zero bonus is valid produce some actual facts on the matter. It's just things like "allied pilots thought Japanese pilots wore glasses and looked like monkeys". or "Japan needs all the help they can get". (neither of which are valid responses to a statistical analysis) In fact, Mdiehl is the only one to produce one fact that the zero bonus is valid, although only vs British Hurricane pilots. Vs other planes, the zero's characteristics and pilot experience are already enough to get 20-1 odds (buffaloes, etc). And, vs good allied planes (P-40, F4F, etc) the zero should fare at about 1-1 odds. (but starting exp will give zero's the advantage)

Can anyone produce a historical fact that back's up the game's Zero bonus? (sorry if I've missed a post that does actually support the zero bonus. I haven't read all 9 pages)


Actually, Mdiehl is VERY selective in the stats he produces. He is even more selective in whom he offers as a supporting opinion. He ignores anyone who doesnt support his positions. That is hardly being objective. In fact it is the definition of bias.

When Mdiehl makes ANY comment about WitP, you need to recall that he does NOT own the game, nor has he ever played it. He also does NOT own Bombing of the Reich or BoB. He has NEVER actually played any of them as a GAME.
He is simply angry with the developers for ignoring his suggestions.

As for the Zero Bonus, they Japs DID manage to overun the SRA rather easily. Something that should matter.

(in reply to Bradley7735)
Post #: 722
Page:   <<   < prev  21 22 23 24 [25]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> RE: Proposal for CHS - Remove the Zero bonus. Any opinions? Page: <<   < prev  21 22 23 24 [25]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.064