|
unclean -> RE: Weapon Damage and Armor comparison (2/10/2013 12:00:43 AM)
|
Finally got around to adding the Legends weapons! Only images right now, I'll upload the rest later.
Weapon DPS per size vs shields:
[image]http://i.imgur.com/ypByN00.jpg[/image]
Weapon DPS per size vs reactive armor (second best):
[image]http://i.imgur.com/SaLlQra.jpg[/image]
I zoomed in a little to get a beter picture, the autocannons go to 5.5 or something.
Individual weapon comparisons of the same here: 1 2
About this:
-Just treat this as a baseline. Range is arguably more important than sheer damage in practice, and some things aren't modeled here, like energy use and accuracy.
-Range is roughly modeled and gets rounded to the nearest hundred, so range differences are more dramatic here than they are in game.
-Modifiers vs armor that railguns, missiles and phasers get are all applied here.
-Damage Control components only reduce damage that gets past the reactive rating of armor, so it isn't modeled here.
Anyways there's some interesting stuff here - I didn't realize rail guns got shut down so hard by high tech armor. Also the top tier rail gun looks horrible, does anyone actually use it? I'm a fan of rail guns but I always stop at Heavy Rails personally.
Also I'm going to try missiles and phasers instead of switching to torpedoes early on, looks fun.
|
|
|
|
